 |

|
 |
| | | | |  | Metatags 12/12/2008 3:51:59 PM EST Gold on Designer Skin, LLC v. S & L Vitamins, Inc., 560 F. Supp. 2d 811 (D. Az. 2008)
S & L Vitamins, an internet reseller, used the trademarks of Designer Skin, a manufacturer, in the metatags of its website and as search engine keywords. S & L also displayed thumbnail images of Designer Skin’s products on its websites. Consequently, Designer Skin filed a trademark action against S & L. In this Commentary, Andrew Gold analyzes Designer Skin, LLC v. S & L Vitamins, Inc., 560 F. SuppBy Andrew M. Gold Create an account or login to post comments. Continue reading >> |
| | |  | Geographically Descriptive Marks 7/18/2008 7:21:05 AM EST Gold on the Limited Protection Afforded Geographically Descriptive Marks in Vail Associates, Inc. v. Vend-Tel-Co, Ltd, 516 F.3d 853 (10th Cir. 2008)
Can the owner of a registered, geographically descriptive service mark prevent others from using the descriptive mark in connection with related, but not directly competitive services? In addressing this question, Andrew M. Gold, a partner in the Oakland firm of Bogatin, Corman & Gold, analyzes the case of Vail Associates, Inc. v. Vend-Tel-Co, Ltd, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2782 (10th Cir. 2008). In VailBy Andrew M. Gold Create an account or login to post comments. Continue reading >> |
| | |  | Trademark Infringement 4/16/2008 4:48:36 PM EST Andrew Gold on Sponsored Linking and the Scope of Injunctive Relief
A plaintiff obtains an injunction to prohibit a business competitor from using a trademark confusingly similar to plaintiff’s mark. In response, defendant changes its mark, but continues to purchase "sponsored links" on Google.com such that a "Google" search of plaintiff's mark yields an advertisement for defendant's competitive services. Although finding that the sponsored link was a "use" By Andrew M. Gold Create an account or login to post comments. Continue reading >> |
| |  | Trademark Infringement 3/25/2008 11:45:45 AM EST Andy Gold on Optimum Technologies, Inc. v. Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc.
Imagine that a product distributor surreptitiously manufactures a product that directly competes with a product it has been distributing. Imagine that the "new" product looks like the "old" product, bears the same UPC Code as the "old" product, and is placed by retailers on shelves bearing the tags of the "old" product. Imagine too that the website of the distributor contains descriptionBy Andrew M. Gold Create an account or login to post comments. Continue reading >> |
|
|
|
 |
 |













Our Communities Other Links 
Message has been sent.
|
|