Go to Home Page Legal
  
UCC, Commercial Contracts and Business Law Center
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
UCC, Commercial Contracts and Business Law Center
RSS Email Alert




Trademark Law - Personal Names
NEW! 10/12/2009 3:23:58 PM EST
LaLonde on Use of Personal Name After Selling Related Trademark Rights

The fashion industry is replete with valuable personal name trademarks. After selling his rights to the registered trademark consisting of his name, one fashion designer waited out his non-compete agreement and began a new company. He wanted to use his name in advertising his new designs. The company that had purchased rights to his name objected. In this Analysis, Anne Gilson LaLonde discusses By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Domain Names
9/29/2009 2:13:04 PM EST
LaLonde: What Trademark Owners Must Know About the Impending Flood of gTLDs

In 2010, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will drastically expand the number of generic top level domains (gTLDs) available online, adding to .com, .net and others. This move will trigger new opportunities for cybersquatters and will require trademark owners to make decisions about where to commit their scarce resources. In this Analysis, Anne LaLonde discuss
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Law Events
8/10/2009 11:40:54 AM EST
September 16: LexisNexis presents Anne Gilson LaLonde on The Zombie Trademark: Windfall And Pitfall - New York, NY

By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Litigation Center - Trademark Law
7/22/2009 11:29:08 AM EST
The Rescuecom v. Google Trademark Law Ruling And The Meaning Of ‘Use In Commerce’

In Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc. (562 F.3d 123 [2d Cir. N.Y. 2009]), the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that Google had used Rescuecom’s trademark in commerce when it recommended and sold the mark as a keyword to Rescuecom’s compet

By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Registration
6/15/2009 10:10:55 AM EST
Gilson LaLonde: A Call to Action About the Upcoming Surge of gTLDs

Addressing concerns about the trademark implications of the roll-out of new top-level domains in 2010, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) created the Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) to make recommendations for trademark protection. The IRT’s final report makes several proposals intended to protect mark owners from the possibility of large expenditures and abusive registrations expect
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
5/26/2009 9:41:17 AM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on Rescuecom v. Google and the Meaning of "Use in Commerce"

Trademark Infringement
5/4/2009 7:51:45 AM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on Handling Trademark Problems Posed by Fan-Created Content

In the internet age, a tension has arisen between products and fans who express their product enthusiasm in various forms to the population as a whole. Such enthusiasm begs the question: Does fan fidelity boost the popularity of a trademark or does it threaten trademark rights? In this Commentary, Anne Gilson LaLonde discusses fandom and trademark rights and examines the handling of trademark problems posed by fan-created cont
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Domain Names
4/13/2009 1:43:33 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on the Dramatic Expansion of Generic Top Level Domains

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will soon drastically expand the number of generic top level domains (gTLDs) available online. This move will trigger a new round of opportunities for cybersquatters and requires trademark owners to make several decisions about where to commit their scarce resources. Mark owners may choose to operate one or more gTLD registries of their own or to increase their po
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Counterfeiting
12/12/2008 3:36:55 PM EST
FREE DOWNLOAD: Gilson LaLonde on Tiffany Ultimately Responsible for Protecting its Marks, So No Contributory Infringement by eBay for Sale of Conterfeit Goods: Tiffany, Inc. v. eBay, Inc.

Enormous online marketplace eBay is not liable for contributory trademark infringement, though listings on its site offer counterfeit silver Tiffany jewelry for sale, according to a judge in the Southern District of New York. eBay had refused to preemptively remove certain listings of silver Tiffany jewelry before the listings were available to the public, though it did immediately remove listings when Tiffany notified it tha
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act
10/20/2008 9:58:50 AM EST
How the PRO IP Act of 2008 Changes Trademark Anti-Counterfeiting Law

            The PRO IP Act of 2008, officially the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act, increases penalties for civil and criminal counterfeiting and creates a new intellectual property enforcement coordinator at the federal level. While the law’s primary focus is counterfeiting of copyrightedBy Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
9/29/2008 11:10:37 AM EST
Gilson LaLonde on Tiffany Ultimately Responsible for Protecting Its Marks

In Tiffany, Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53359 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), the court held that eBay was not liable for contributory trademark infringement, though listings on its site offered counterfeit silver Tiffany jewelry for sale. In analyzing Tiffany, Anne Gilson LaLonde, the author of Gilson on Trademarks, examines eBay’s anti-counterfeiting procedures and Tiffany’s efforts to stop counterfe
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Foreign Trademarks
7/9/2008 2:49:45 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde: Don't I Know You From Somewhere: Protection in the United States Of Foreign Trademarks That Are Well Known But Not Used There

In certain jurisdictions and under narrowly-defined circumstances, a trademark can be enforced in the United States when it has never been used there. Under the "well-known marks doctrine" (sometimes called the "famous marks doctrine"), the owners of well-known foreign marks can sometimes protect them from infringement in the United States even without using them in commerce or registering them there. No ma
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Fraud
6/23/2008 1:23:53 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde: Thinking Ahead to Avoid a "Fraud" Charge: False Claims of Use to Procure or Maintain a Trademark Registration at the USPTO

Historically, allegations of fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) were rarely successful, but Medinol v. Neuro Vasx, Inc., 67 U.S.P.Q.2d 1205 (T.T.A.B. 2003) changed the landscape to one in which the stakes for the applicant and registrant are much higher. In Medinol, the Board clearly stated that, in certain circumstances, an applicant or registrant could commit unintentional fraud on t
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
6/2/2008 3:59:18 PM EST
LaLonde: Defendant Preclusion, Not Claim Preclusion, Bars Party from Seeking Relief from Default Judgment: Nasalok Coating Corp. v. Nylok Corp., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8376 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Nylok sued Nasalok for trademark infringement, and when Nasalok defaulted, the district court enjoined it from infringing the mark. Thereafter, Nasalok petitioned the TTAB (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board) to cancel the mark, but the Federal Circuit deemed this an impermissible collateral attack on the district court's order. Anne Gilson LaLonde, the author of Gilson on Trademarks, analyzes the defendant’s attempt to av
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
5/14/2008 5:57:14 PM EST
Gilson LaLonde: The Latest from the TTAB on the Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents

Do any of your clients use a foreign language trademark? If so, you need to understand the doctrine of foreign equivalents. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has published a number of precedential opinions developing the doctrine, under which foreign terms are translated into English before infringement or descriptiveness analysis. Anne Gilson LaLonde, author of Gilson on Trademarks, clarifies this confusing doctrine
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
5/12/2008 1:31:58 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on the Doctrine of Inevitable Confusion and Forgivable Misstatements to the USPTO: Angel Flight of Georgia, Inc. v. Angel Flight America, Inc.

Things are not always as they seem in trademark law. A party can acquiesce to another's use of a similar trademark, yet be granted an injunction. And a party can make a misstatement in a trademark application, yet be spared from a finding of fraud. The Eleventh Circuit made both of these findings in Georgia, Inc. v. Angel Flight America, Inc. In examining this case, Anne Gilson LaLonde, the author of Gilson on Trademark
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
4/16/2008 4:49:38 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on Trade Dress Infringement by Store Brands

In McNeil Nutritionals v. Heartland Sweeteners, the Third Circuit ruled that store brand copies of national brands can have packaging that comes closer to that of the national brands than a competing national brand could, provided the store brand packaging displays the well-known store brand and does not copy the national brand’s packaging. Explaining the case, Anne Gilson LaLonde writes: By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
4/15/2008 11:55:36 AM EST
Electing Statutory Damages in a Counterfeiting Case May Bar an Award of Attorneys Fees in the Ninth Circuit

The Ninth Circuit’s recent interpretation of the Lanham Act’s damages provisions surely surprised many trademark practitioners.  It held that, when a plaintiff chooses to receive statutory damages in a counterfeiting case instead of opting for actual damages, it may also be barred from recovering its attorneys’ fees.  K&N Engineering, Inc. v. Bulat, (9th Cir. 2007).
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
3/25/2008 12:22:30 PM EST
Gilson LaLonde on Rhoades v. Avon Products, Inc., 504 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2007)

In the trademark infringement case, Rhoades v. Avon Products, Inc., 504 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2007), the Ninth Circuit discusses what constitutes a real and reasonable apprehension of suit sufficient to create a justiciable case or controversy for declaratory judgment purposes. It also decides that threats of litigation are admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 408 to show a real and reasonable apprehension of suit. F
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
3/25/2008 12:19:21 PM EST
Opting for Statutory Damages in a Counterfeiting Case May Prevent Your Client From Receiving Attorneys' Fees

After successful prosecution of a counterfeiting case, a plaintiff may choose between trebled actual damages and statutory damages. The Ninth Circuit has interpreted the Lanham Act damages provision (15 U.S.C. § 1117) to preclude an award of attorneys' fees under Section 1117(b) when the plaintiff chooses to pursue statutory damages in a counterfeiting case. In this commentary, Anne Gilson LaLonde discusse
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Registration
3/25/2008 12:16:05 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on the TTAB Accelerated Case Resolution Procedure (ACR)

Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) is the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's new method for resolving cases expeditiously. It's a voluntary procedure in which the Board promises to decide the case in fifty days based on summary judgment-like submissions from the parties. In fact, the Board is requiring parties to discuss this streamlining option in their discovery/settlement conference. In this commentary, Anne Gilson LaLonde w
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Infringement
3/25/2008 12:11:30 PM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on the "Famous Marks Doctrine": Foreign Trademark Renown as the Basis for Protection in the United States

Your international client does not use its mark in the United States, though it is quite well known here. A company copies that mark and uses it on its own goods in the . Legal? Yes, in the Second Circuit. No, in the Ninth Circuit. Compare ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc., 482 F.3d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 288 (2007) with Grupo Gigante S.A. de C.V. v. Dallo & Co., 391 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2004). In explaining the
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Registration
3/25/2008 11:50:52 AM EST
Gilson on Trademarks: A New Era in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Inter Partes Litigation

Welcome to a new era in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board inter partes litigation. The new Board rules impose on litigants a complex series of requirements that substantially increase their work, add to the cost of litigation, and probably discourage the filing of some oppositions and cancellation proceedings. Parties must file initial disclosures without being asked, participate in pretrial discovery, pursue discovery and sett
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Trademark Registration
3/25/2008 10:59:09 AM EST
Anne Gilson LaLonde on the Role of Trademark Similarity in the Likelihood of Confusion Determination

 

The trademark similarity factor plays a crucial role in likelihood of confusion analysis, though the appellate courts are split over whether courts may look at that factor alone in determining trademark infringement. In this commentary, Anne Gilson LaLonde explains where Jada Toys, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc., 496 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2007), falls in the appellate spectru
By Anne Gilson LaLonde

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>

Which health care reform tax proposal is least desirable?

Dems: Surtax AGI filers over ½MM single/1MM joint
Dems: Excise tax on the noncompliant uninsured
GOP: No tax incentives to buy individual coverage
Submit
















Your Resources

Your Toolbox

Our Communities

Other Links