Go to Home Page Legal
  
Insurance Law Center
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
Insurance Law Center
Monthly Issues Focus: Current Topics are Duty to Defend, Reinsurance and Environmental Coverage Issues
RSS Email Alert




Insurance Issues
NEW! 9/17/2008 4:43:31 PM EST
Clifford on the California Supreme Court's Discussion of the Genuine Dispute Doctrine and an Insurer's Duty to Fully Investigate in Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co., 2007 Cal. LEXIS 13314 (Cal. 2007)

Robert C. Clifford discusses the issues raised by the California Supreme Court's decision in Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co., 2007 Cal. LEXIS 13314 (Cal. 2007) in this commentary. Although this case involved an insured's claim for underinsurance benefits, the implications of the holding go beyond underinsurance coverage and must be cons

By Robert C. Clifford

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Insurance Issues
3/17/2008 9:27:47 PM EST
Clifford on Storek v. Fidelity Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., 504 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Cal. 2007): Analyzing an Insurer's Duty to Defend Under California Law

Robert C. Clifford discusses the issues raised by the U.S. District Court in Storek v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., 504 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Cal. 2007) and the duty of an insurer to provi

By Robert C. Clifford

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims
3/17/2008 7:59:19 PM EST
Clifford on California's Unfair Competition Law, the Federal Cigarette Labeling Act, and the California Supreme Court's Decision in In re Tobacco Cases II, 41 Cal. 4th 1257 (Cal. 2007)

In re Tobacco Cases II, 41 Cal. 4th 1257 (Cal. 2007) considered the issue of whether the Federal Cigarette Labeling Act (15 USCS § 1331 et seq.) preempted plaintiffs' Cal Bus & Prof Code § 17200 unfair competition lawsuit against certain cigarette manufacturers. Overruling Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds By Robert C. Clifford

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>
Insurance Issues
1/7/2008 10:54:47 AM EST
Clifford on Insurance Coverage Implications of the United States Supreme Court's Decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 127 S. Ct. 1438 (U.S. 2007)

In Massachusetts v. EPA, 127 S. Ct. 1438 (U.S. 2007), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Clean Air Act authorized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles—despite the EPA's contrary claim—and that Massachusetts had standing to challenge the EPA's denial of a

By Robert C. Clifford

Create an account or login to post comments.

Continue reading >>

A bartender works in a restaurant located in a high crime area. He's struck in the back by a stray bullet that was fired from a gang shooting outside the restaurant. Is his injury compensable?

Yes, increased risk existed at restaurant
No, risk was the same as for general public
Submit


















Your Resources

Your Toolbox

Our Communities

Other Links