<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Lexis(R) Hub: Building your skills: </title><link /><description /><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Employee Inventions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Fundamentals-of-Intellectual-Property-Law/Employee-Inventions</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;Typically, ownership of an idea or invention is determined by whom and in what context the creation took place. For example, an individual who invents something entirely on his own retains complete ownership. On the other hand, an individual hired by a company for the purpose of creating new products or ideas relinquishes those rights to his employer as one of the conditions of his employment. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MAR</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:42:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Fundamentals of Trade Secret Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Fundamentals-of-Intellectual-Property-Law/The-Fundamentals-of-Trade-Secret-Law</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;Trade secrets can be any type of information, process, idea or &amp;quot;know how&amp;quot; that is not generally known and gives the possessor an advantage in the marketplace. Trade secrets, therefore, include a wide range of confidential business information known as proprietary information, such as chemical formulas, industrial processes, business plans, and customer lists. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;b&gt;How </description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:27:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The First Amendment, Non-Commercial Use, and Fair Use</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Fundamentals-of-Intellectual-Property-Law/The-First-Amendment-Non-Commercial-Use-and-Fair-Use</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: navy"&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;Fair use is a legislatively codified equitable doctrine designed to carve out certain exceptions to the copyright monopoly for the benefit of the public. 17 U.S.C. &amp;sect;107; see &lt;i&gt;Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,&lt;/i&gt; 510 U.S. 569 (1994). Fair use has traditionally been defined as a privilege in others than the owner of the copyright to use the copyrighted material in a &lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR:</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:48:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Licenses Between Patent Holders and Licensees Are Likely to Change Because of the Supreme Court's Decision in Medlmmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Emerging-Trends-in-IP/Licenses-Between-Patent-Holders-and-Licensees-Are-Likely-to-Change-Because-of-the-Supreme-Court's-Decision-in-Medlmmune-Inc-v-Genentech-Inc</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: navy"&gt;In &lt;i&gt;MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., &lt;/i&gt;127 S. Ct. 764 (2007), the United States Supreme Court held that a court has jurisdiction over a &amp;ldquo;nonrepudiating licensee&amp;rdquo; declaratory suit, at least in instances in which the patent owner has threatened, implicitly or explicitly, to enforce the patent upon nonpayment of royalties on the licensee&amp;rsquo;s products and the threat would cause major harm to the licensee&amp;rsquo;s busine</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:58:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Supreme Court's Interpretation of Obviousness and Combination Inventions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Emerging-Trends-in-IP/Supreme-Court's-Interpretation-of-Obviousness-and-Combination-Inventions</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: navy"&gt;In &lt;i&gt;KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., &lt;/i&gt;127 S. Ct. 1727, 2007 U.S. LEXIS 4745 (April 30, 2007), the Supreme Court held that common sense governs when assessing the patentability of inventions that combine prior art elements. It affirmed its prior decisions, which urged caution in granting patents on combinations. It rejected rigid applications of the Federal Circuit&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;TSM&amp;rdquo; (teaching, suggestion, motivation) t</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:57:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Anti-Counterfeiting</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Emerging-Trends-in-IP/Anti-Counterfeiting</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: navy"&gt;It has been estimated that the sales of counterfeit goods reach a staggering $500 billion each year and counterfeiting has usurped 750,000 American jobs and costs the United States approximately $200 billion dollars each year. These startling figures beg the questions: what is counterfeiting, where does a counterfeit mark fit into the overall scheme of counterfeiting, and what is being done both criminally and civilly to protect both con</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:56:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Trade Dress Infringement by Store Brands</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/IP-Expert-Commentary/Trade-Dress-Infringement-by-Store-Brands</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;In &lt;i&gt;McNeil Nutritionals v. Heartland Sweeteners&lt;/i&gt;, the Third Circuit ruled that store brand copies of national brands can have packaging that comes closer to that of the national brands than a competing national brand could, provided the store brand packaging displays the well-known store brand and does not copy the national brand&amp;rsquo;s packaging. Explaining the case, Anne Gilson LaLonde writes: &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div st</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:22:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Willful Infringement, Objective Recklessness and the Trial Attorney-Client Privilege</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/IP-Expert-Commentary/Willful-Infringement-Objective-Recklessness-and-the-Trial-Attorney-Client-Privilege</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;The Patent Act empowers a court to treble actual damages awarded to a patent owner for patent infringement. 35 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 284. Section 284 does not provide a standard for enhancing damages, but courts historically have linked damage enhancement, as well as the authorization to award a patent owner attorney fees in &amp;quot;exceptional&amp;quot; cases under 35 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 285, to a finding that an infringer's conduct was &amp;quot;willf</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:17:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Defining Patent Claim Terms-Decisions on the Patentee as Lexicographer</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/IP-Expert-Commentary/Defining-Patent-Claim-Terms-Decisions-on-the-Patentee-as-Lexicographer</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;A venerable patent law axiom-&amp;quot;a patentee may be its own lexicographer&amp;quot;-- allows a drafter to define, explicitly or even implicitly, in a patent specification an ambiguous word or phrase in a patent claim or even give an unconventional meaning to a word or phrase that has an otherwise clear ordinary meaning in a technical field. In this expert commentary, Donald S. Chisum discusses six Federal Circuit cases since 2005, which illustrate that it is not so </description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:36:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Intellectual Property Law Basics</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Intellectual-Property-Overview/Intellectual-Property-Law-Basics</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Patent Law&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Patent law covers the legal conditions under which an invention may be patented. In the U.S., patent law requires that the invention be of patentable subject matter, and have utility, novelty, and non-obviousness. A patent examiner judges patentability during an official examination of a patent application. If the patent is granted, the invention is presumed to have been patentable. However, if an error occurs during the grantin</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:57:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Types of Firms Practicing Intellectual Property Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Intellectual-Property-Overview/Types-of-Firms-Practicing-Intellectual-Property-Law</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: navy"&gt;Small Law Perspective: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: navy"&gt;Sophisticated intellectual property practices are often found in small boutique law firms that specialize in a single practice area.&amp;nbsp;Firms in this category will often take on matters that are more typically seen in a large law firm and will produce average revenues per attorney that rival those seen in large law.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:29:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Copyright Workflow</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Intellectual-Property-Overview/Copyright-Workflow</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"&gt;1)&lt;span style="FONT: 7pt 'Verdana'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"&gt;Research Copyright Registrations&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"&gt;a.&lt;span style="FONT: 7pt 'Verdana'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nb</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:36:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obtain Authoritative IP Treatises and Expert Legal Analysis at the LexisNexis Bookstore</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Intellectual-Property-Law-Solutions-from-LexisNexis/Obtain-Authoritative-IP-Treatises-and-Expert-Legal-Analysis-at-the-LexisNexis-Bookstore</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;The LexisNexis Bookstore provides the most comprehensive collection of legal research products available on the web, with the full LexisNexis Publishing&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt"&gt;TM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; line of Matthew Bender&amp;reg;, Michie&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt"&gt;TM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;Shepard's&lt;/i&gt;&amp;reg; products available to assist with your research. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;Top IP title</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:17:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Patent Overhaul Even Congress Would Approve</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Intellectual-Property-Law-Solutions-from-LexisNexis/The-Patent-Overhaul-Even-Congress-Would-Approve</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;Protect IP and leave nothing to chance by relying on the world&amp;rsquo;s largest collection of searchable full-text and bibliographic patent databases, including images, citations, legal status and patent family collections. &lt;i&gt;TotalPatent&lt;/i&gt;&amp;trade; is an online, patent research and retrieval application thatoffers users access to a single, new platform that combines comprehensive first-level data coverage, a user friendly design, and powerful search functionality</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:55:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>So, Your Client's Big Idea Is Being Bootlegged in Singapore?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Building-your-skills/Intellectual-Property-Law-Solutions-from-LexisNexis/So-Your-Clients-Big-Idea-Is-Being-Bootlegged-in-Singapore</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;i&gt;PatentOptimizer &lt;/i&gt;is a first-to-market service that facilitates the patent professional&amp;rsquo;s analysis of patent applications and granted patents by enabling them to identify key issues in the patent prosecution and litigation processes. &lt;i&gt;PatentOptimizer &lt;/i&gt;helps streamline the patent analysis process and serves as a critical quality-control check. It also helps patent practitioners develop internally consistent, concise and well-tailored patent applica</description><author>Lisa C. Coppolo</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>