<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Lexis(R) Hub: Discussion Board: </title><link /><description /><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Celebrity Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Discussion-Board/News-for-New-Attorneys-DS/Celebrity-Cases</link><category /><guid /><description>Cases involving celebrities tend to get the most press, but raise the least interesting of legal questions while making attorneys seem useless at best. What gives?!?</description><author>doc</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:25:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Associates Making Partner (Salary)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/newattorney/Discussion-Board/News-for-New-Attorneys-DS/Associates-Making-Partner-Salary</link><category /><guid /><description>&lt;p&gt;I read a blurb in the Legal Times (Jan 30) about&amp;nbsp;senior&amp;nbsp;associates actually making as much, if not more than junior partners, which is another reason to rethink the whole climb to partnership.&amp;nbsp; The reason is that partners often pay extra expenses (in addition to the capital contribution) that are covered for senior associates.&amp;nbsp; From a working hours perspective, people say that making partner is like winning a pie-eating contest in which the prize is more pie; now, it doesn</description><author /><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:15:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>