<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareasWorkers-Compensation</link><description>Workers' Compensation Law Center: Build professional network, contribute content, view news, content by Lex Larson, the Workers' Compensation Law Blog, and other content on Workers' Compensation Law.</description><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: McDonald v. Community Memorial Hospital (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (AWW; EDD records)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-McDonald-v-Community-Memorial-Hospital-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-AWW-EDD-records</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8FPms5naECo%3d</guid><description>  Linda McDonald v. Community Memorial Hospital  
 Average Weekly Wage Determination&amp;mdash;Earnings&amp;mdash;Evidence&amp;mdash;WCAB held that, in determining average weekly wage and temporary disability indemnity rate of applicant/Medicare billing coordinator with cumulative injuries to neck, low back, a</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:57:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Penalber v. Costco Wholesale (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (spinal surgery)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Penalber-v-Costco-Wholesale-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-spinal-surgery</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">94mwuU2EBPM%3d</guid><description>  Eddie Penalber v. Costco Wholesale  
 Medical Treatment&amp;mdash;Spinal Surgery&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that two-level artificial disk replacement surgery recommended by applicant/produce stocker's treating physician was not reasonable or necessary to cure or relieve from effects of applican</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Rodriguez v. St. John's Health Center (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (interim order; Almaraz-Guzman II)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Rodriguez-v-St-Johns-Health-Center-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-interim-order-Almaraz-Guzman-II</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uBZ5DJgzRRI%3d</guid><description>  Rosa Rodriguez v. St. John's Health Center  
 Petitions for Reconsideration&amp;mdash;Removal&amp;mdash;WCAB dismissed Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because not taken from final order and granted removal in order to avoid unnecessary prejudice and harm to parties, when WCAB found that WCJ's Or</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:02:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Cervantes v. El Aguila Food Products (Calif. WCAB En Banc)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Cervantes-v-El-Aguila-Food-Products-Calif-WCAB-En-Banc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6fyasTohfds%3d</guid><description>  Jesus Cervantes   v.    El Aguila Food Products, Inc., Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois, Superior National Insurance Co., In Liquidation, California Insurance Guarantee Association, and Broadspire (Servicing Facility)  
 ADJ3675309 (SAL 0081669)  ADJ2967795 (SAL 0101259)  ADJ3517865 (SAL 0077391)</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:46:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Lait v. County of Cook (Industrial Commission of Illinois) (injury; toilet paper)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Lait-v-County-of-Cook-Industrial-Commission-of-Illinois-injury-toilet-paper</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0hWmlG20%2fbM%3d</guid><description> MARY LAIT, PETITIONER, v.
 
 COUNTY 
OF
 COOK 
 
, RESPONDENT.  
 No. 97 WC 56215  
 INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF  ILLINOIS  STATE OF  ILLINOIS ,
 COUNTY 
OF
 COOK 
 
  2000  
 Ill. 
  Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 311;  00 IIC 0045  
 January 20, 2000  
 The Commission, after considering the issue</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:00:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Zuniga v. Radio Shack (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (attorney's fee; VRMA)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Zuniga-v-Radio-Shack-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-attorneys-fee-VRMA</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oswPv2eOUXc%3d</guid><description>  Raquel Zuniga v. Radio Shack  
 Attorney's Fees&amp;mdash;Vocational Rehabilitation&amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that attorney for applicant/saleswoman with 11/25/2001 right shoulder injury was not entitled to attorney's fee for services provided in connection with applicant's claim for vocatio</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:29:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Seiuli v. Save-A-Lot (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (duty to develop record; waiver)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Seiuli-v-Save-A-Lot-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-duty-to-develop-record-waiver</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OPsAPzG0axA%3d</guid><description>  Faleula Seiuli v. Save-A-Lot/Supervalu, Inc.  
 Evidence&amp;mdash;Duty to Develop Record&amp;mdash;WCAB granted defendant's request for removal from WCJ's decision ordering further development of record regarding compensability of applicant/shipping clerk's  6/29/2008 injury to psyche and in form o</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:27:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Avila-Gonzalez v. Barrett Business Services (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (1997 vs. 2005 Schedule)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Avila-Gonzalez-v-Barrett-Business-Services-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-1997-vs-2005-Schedule</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dpFF6Pppy4c%3d</guid><description>  Armando Avila-Gonzalez v. Barrett Business Services  
 Petitions to Reopen&amp;mdash;Good Cause&amp;mdash;Change of Law&amp;mdash;WCAB, reversing WCJ's finding, held that applicant/roofer did not show good cause to reopen WCJ's decision in which WCJ originally relied upon interpretation of Labor Code  &amp;</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:25:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 50 State Survey Drug-Free Workplace Programs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-50-State-Survey-Drug-Free-Workplace-Programs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OEdr%2be23LxU%3d</guid><description> Logon to your free web center account to download a 50 state survey of Drug-Free Workplace Programs. This chart was compiled using information from the Dept. of Labor website. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:53:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Milpitas Unified School District’s Petition for Writ of Review of Almaraz-Guzman II En Banc Decision</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Milpitas-Unified-School-Districts-Petition-for-Writ-of-Review-of-Almaraz-Guzman-II-En-Banc-Decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">quD8hiJlIP0%3d</guid><description>Milpitas Unified School District filed a petition for writ of review of the  Almaraz-Guzman II  en banc decision on 10/16/2009 with the California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District.
 
Due to the large size of the file, we have separated it into three parts.
 
Logon to your free</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:01:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: SCIF's Petition for Writ of Review of Almaraz-Guzman II En Banc Decision</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-SCIFs-Petition-for-Writ-of-Review-of-Almaraz-Guzman-II-En-Banc-Decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CrhHHQUGgkE%3d</guid><description> The State Compensation Insurance Fund filed a petition for writ of review of the  Almaraz-Guzman II  en banc decision on 10/19/2009 with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District.  
 Logon to your free web center account to download the petition. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:39:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Liddell v. State of Calif., Dept. of Trans. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (PD; apportionment)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Liddell-v-State-of-Calif-Dept-of-Trans-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-PD-apportionment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qi0ZpUNw7ss%3d</guid><description>  Paul Liddell v. State of California, Department of Transportation  
 Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Apportionment&amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that applicant/special program person suffered 7/21/2001 industrial injury to his cervical spine and right shoulder causing 71 percent permanent disabil</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:07:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Palengat v. Town of Hillsborough (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (sanctions; false statements)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Palengat-v-Town-of-Hillsborough-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-sanctions-false-statements</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NrFdVIe1xUk%3d</guid><description>  Pierre Palengat v. The Town of Hillsborough, PSI  
 Sanctions&amp;mdash;False Statements&amp;mdash;WCAB, on its own motion, removed case to itself to issue Notice of Intention to impose a $750.00 sanction on defense counsel under Labor Code &amp;sect; 5813 and 8 Cal. Code Reg. &amp;sect; 10561 for making false s</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:05:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Foss v. County of Mendocino (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (credit for overpayment of TD)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Foss-v-County-of-Mendocino-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-credit-for-overpayment-of-TD</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KbOHSuJVHB0%3d</guid><description>  Greg Foss v. County of Mendocino, PSI  
 Credit&amp;mdash;Overpayment of Temporary Disability Indemnity&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that defendant was not entitled to credit for full amount of claimed temporary disability indemnity overpayment to applicant/animal control director with industrial </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:03:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Nat'l Assoc. of Waterfront Employees v. Hilda Solis (identifying parties for longshore and black lung cases)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Natl-Assoc-of-Waterfront-Employees-v-Hilda-Solis-identifying-parties-for-longshore-and-black-lung-cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Ykifm84Y5DE%3d</guid><description> A Federal District Court has enjoined the Office of Administrative Law Judges from using only initials on black lung and longshore decisions. The decision does not specifically apply to the Benefits Review Board. Nonetheless, the Benefits Review Board has determined that it will be going back </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:19:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Social Security Administration - ALJ Decision Outline Form</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Social-Security-Administration---ALJ-Decision-Outline-Form</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CI5cvxg%2f6Ig%3d</guid><description> A community member from the Eight Circuit sent this form to us. We're not sure if other circuits are using this form for Social Security disability cases. In any event, it's a useful checklist to help you outline the ALJ's decision in your SSD case. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:58:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Marchese v. Home Depot (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (compromise &amp; release)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Marchese-v-Home-Depot-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-compromise--release</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9dHfoN1APHI%3d</guid><description>  William Marchese v. The Home Depot, PSI  
 Settlements&amp;mdash;Compromise and Release Agreements&amp;mdash;Setting Aside&amp;mdash;WCAB affirmed WCJ's finding that there was good cause to set aside order approving compromise and release agreement purporting to settle applicant/stock clerk's claim for 10/28</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:21:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ramirez v. Quiznos (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (interpreter lien)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ramirez-v-Quiznos-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-interpreter-lien</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">02cuCWU7T2Y%3d</guid><description>  Maria Isabel Ramirez v. Quiznos  
 Liens&amp;mdash;Interpreting Services&amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded  WCJ's order allowing interpreter's $1,570.00 lien for interpreting services provided to  applicant/fast food worker at medical treatment appointments in connection with 9/30/2006 industrial injuri</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:59:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Eccleston v. State of Calif. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (death benefits; dependent of public employee)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Eccleston-v-State-of-Calif-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-death-benefits-dependent-of-public-employee</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">npAkIA97TgU%3d</guid><description>  Lee Eccleston (Deceased), Barbara Eccleston, Joseph Eccleston, Sarah Eccleston v. State of California, Department of Corrections  
 Death Benefits&amp;mdash;Special Death Benefits for Dependents of Public Employees&amp;mdash;WCAB, rescinding WCJ's findings and award, held that partially dependent childre</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:24:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ogilvie II (Calif. WCAB en banc issued 9/3/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ogilvie-II-Calif-WCAB-en-banc-issued-932009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FFsGG%2ftL57s%3d</guid><description>   Summary of decision below. Logon to your free account to download the case.   
   Wanda Ogilvie v.  City and County of San Francisco, Permissibly Self-Insured   
  ADJ1177048 (SFO 0487779)  
  This decision was filed and served on September 3, 2009.  
  The holding involves the applicati</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:15:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Snead v. HBH Construction (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (AWW; intermittent workers)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Snead-v-HBH-Construction-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-AWW-intermittent-workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zTQlFb0kxt8%3d</guid><description>  Eric Snead v. HBH Construction  
 Average Weekly Wage Determination&amp;mdash;Intermittent Workers&amp;mdash;WCAB affirmed WCJ's determination that applicant who worked intermittently as a finish carpenter had average weekly earnings of $720.00 per week at time of his 10/10/2007 left shoulder injury, pro</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:51:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Sandoval v. Dollar Cleaners (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (discovery; depositions; liens)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Sandoval-v-Dollar-Cleaners-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-discovery-depositions-liens</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Vxa6lOk9%2fjE%3d</guid><description>  Maria Sandoval v. Dollar Cleaners  
 Discovery&amp;mdash;Depositions&amp;mdash;Removal to WCAB&amp;mdash;WCAB denied defendant's request for removal from WCJ's ruling issued during deposition of doctor/owner of lien claimant surgery center involved in consolidated lien proceedings, in which WCJ, acting as a </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:49:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Binger v. Integrated Office Systems (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (UR; time to issue denial)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Binger-v-Integrated-Office-Systems-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-UR-time-to-issue-denial</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">376xm7BFojM%3d</guid><description>  Helen Binger v. Integrated Office Systems  
 Medical Treatment&amp;mdash;Utilization Review&amp;mdash;Time to Issue Denial&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that, for purposes of determining whether defendant timely served utilization review denial of treating physician's treatment recommendations pertaini</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:47:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Black v. A.F.B. Contractors (VA Workers' Comp Commission) ("Sweeny's Revenge")</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Black-v-AFB-Contractors-VA-Workers-Comp-Commission-Sweenys-Revenge</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rR6yqiU5epA%3d</guid><description> To download a free copy of this decision, please logon to your web center account. Register for free at our site. 
  Read a blog about the   Unilateral Suspension of Benefits by Employers Attacked in   
  
Virginia , by Peter M .Sweeny.  </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:44:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Degarcia v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation (VA Workers' Comp Commission) ("Sweeny's Revenge")</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Degarcia-v-Pilgrims-Pride-Corporation-VA-Workers-Comp-Commission-Sweenys-Revenge</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MlVCZZHeDAA%3d</guid><description> To download a free copy of this decision, please logon to your web center account. Register for free at our site. 
  Read a blog about the   Unilateral Suspension of Benefits by Employers Attacked in   
  
Virginia , by Peter M .Sweeny.  </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:47:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Goss v. State of Calif. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (expert witness fees; Costa v. Hardy Diagnostic)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Goss-v-State-of-Calif-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-expert-witness-fees-Costa-v-Hardy-Diagnostic</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HrK1mugxL1g%3d</guid><description>  Randall Goss v. State of California, Department of Corrections  
 Costs&amp;mdash;Vocational Expert Witness Fees&amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that defendant was liable for lien of vocational rehabilitation expert retained by applicant/correctional officer with admitted industrial injuries to fe</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:27:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Williams v. Dept. of Corrections (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (apportionment/presumption of compensability)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Williams-v-Dept-of-Corrections-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-apportionmentpresumption-of-compensability</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nBD5Ra7JdmM%3d</guid><description>  Charles Williams v. Department of Corrections  
 Presumption of Compensability&amp;mdash;Heart Trouble&amp;mdash;Correctional Officers&amp;mdash;Apportionment&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that Labor Code &amp;sect; 4663(e) precluded apportionment of permanent disability stemming from applicant/correctional of</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:24:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Medrano v. Aquabrew (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (Weiner-related decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Medrano-v-Aquabrew-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-Weiner-related-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LW525Nk2hW4%3d</guid><description>  Carlos Medrano v. Aquabrew, Inc.  
 Vocational Rehabilitation&amp;mdash;Vocational Rehabilitation Maintenance Allowance&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant/machine operator with 5/2/2002 industrial injuries to back, left knee and psyche was entitled to further vocational rehabilitation mai</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:21:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ragland v. Metropolitan Provisions (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (Weiner-related decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ragland-v-Metropolitan-Provisions-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-Weiner-related-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">sjzB7cVLHmk%3d</guid><description>  Arnie Ragland v. Metropolitan Provisions  
 Vocational Rehabilitation&amp;mdash;Vocational Rehabilitation Maintenance Allowance&amp;mdash;WCAB denied removal from WCJ's order rejecting applicant's  6/24/2009 Declaration of Readiness to proceed (DOR) in which applicant sought an expedited hearing on </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:16:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Large v. Klein Plastering (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (AMA Guides Rebutted)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Large-v-Klein-Plastering-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-AMA-Guides-Rebutted</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KSq2gIPOU80%3d</guid><description>  Dana Large v. Klein Plastering  
 Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Rating&amp;mdash;AMA  Guides &amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that applicant/plasterer suffered 18 percent permanent disability  as a result of an industrial right knee injury on 6/9/2005 and  during cumulative period ending&amp;nb</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:10:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Proposals of Interim Committee Studying Pinnacol Assurance (9/18/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Proposals-of-Interim-Committee-Studying-Pinnacol-Assurance-9182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5xEmJE7p5IQ%3d</guid><description> DENVER, CO - The Interim Committee to Study Issues Related to Pinnacol Assurance has proposed legislation that would help injured workers and provide controls over Pinnacol and the workers' comp insurance industry as a whole. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Casarez v. Davita, Inc. (Calif. WCAB Panel Decision) (Special Mission Exception)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Casarez-v-Davita-Inc-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision-Special-Mission-Exception</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">a%2f9XdOoJUmQ%3d</guid><description>  Yvette Casarez v. Davita, Inc.  
 Injury AOE/COE&amp;mdash;Special Missions&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant/scheduler met burden of proving that she sustained injury AOE/COE on 12/18/2007 while traveling to a shopping center to purchase food and gifts for a holiday potluck party for co</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:13:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Gomez v. Trugreen Landcare (Calif. WCAB Panel Decision) (Psychiatric Injury)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Gomez-v-Trugreen-Landcare-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision-Psychiatric-Injury</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">x1tJ9ATyo1A%3d</guid><description>  Carlos Gomez v. Trugreen Landcare  
 Psychiatric Injury&amp;mdash;WCAB, denying defendant's petition for reconsideration, held that applicant's injury to psyche was compensable because, as required by Labor Code &amp;sect; 3208.3(b)(1), actual events of employment were predominant as to all causes combin</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:10:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Salcedo v. Aluminum Roofing (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (Panel QME; Waiver of Objection)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Salcedo-v-Aluminum-Roofing-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-Panel-QME-Waiver-of-Objection</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">t2%2f7D0J5S9s%3d</guid><description>  Roque Salcedo v. Aluminum Roofing Specialists  
 Medical-Legal Procedure&amp;mdash;Panel Qualified Medical Evaluators&amp;mdash;Conflicts of Interest&amp;mdash;WCAB affirmed WCJ's decision denying applicant's request that 11/5/2008 report of panel qualified medical evaluator be stricken and a replacement pan</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:08:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Black v. Granite Construction (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (delay in offer of modified work)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Black-v-Granite-Construction-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-delay-in-offer-of-modified-work</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Kw37x2GzDoE%3d</guid><description>  John Black v. Granite Construction  
  Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Offer of Regular, Modified or Alternative Work &amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant with cumulative injury during period ending 1/18/2008 was entitled to a 15 percent increase in permanent disability indemnity pursuant t</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:26:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Paredes v. Andromeda Entertainment (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (QME Ex Parte Communication)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Paredes-v-Andromeda-Entertainment-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-QME-Ex-Parte-Communication</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DNlbdEEMhFo%3d</guid><description>  Maria Ana Paredes v. Andromeda Entertainment dba Gallaxy Ballroom  
 Medical-Legal Procedure&amp;mdash;Qualified Medical Evaluators&amp;mdash;Ex Parte Communications&amp;mdash;WCAB, affirming WCJ's finding in death benefits case stemming from employee's 9/21/2005 brain injury/cerebral hemorrhage, held that t</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:02:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Jamison v. Dee Fairbanks Enterprises (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (UR process)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Jamison-v-Dee-Fairbanks-Enterprises-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-UR-process</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">V%2b8r%2b6ORLuw%3d</guid><description>  Mathew Jamison v. Dee Fairbanks Enterprises  
 Medical Treatment&amp;mdash;Utilization Review&amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's order disallowing lien claimant's lien for durable medical equipment, including a muscle stimulator (RS4M), prescribed by applicant's treating physician to treat applicant's 4/27/2</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:58:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: The State of the Unions in 2009 (Los Angeles, California, and the Nation) (UCLA study)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-The-State-of-the-Unions-in-2009-Los-Angeles-California-and-the-Nation-UCLA-study</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GF%2bvhn%2fSW5k%3d</guid><description> The UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment has released its study on &amp;quot;The State of the Unions in 2009: A Profile of Union Membership in Los Angeles, California and the Nation&amp;quot;. The reports states that for several decades, the nation&amp;rsquo;s unionization rate &amp;ndash; the perce</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:01:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Martinez v. Yamato Restaurant (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (six-month employment rule)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Martinez-v-Yamato-Restaurant-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-six-month-employment-rule</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Z4SE7gxYm%2bg%3d</guid><description>  Hernan Martinez v. Yamato Restaurant  
 Psychiatric Injuries&amp;mdash;Six-Month Employment Rule&amp;mdash;WCAB granted defendant's request for removal and reversed WCJ's ruling that defendant could not raise application of six month employment requirement in Labor Code &amp;sect; 3208.3(d) as a defense to a</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:01:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Monroy v. Tempstar Services (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (CIGA contribution; applicant's claim dismissed)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Monroy-v-Tempstar-Services-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-CIGA-contribution-applicants-claim-dismissed</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fzP1InSewoE%3d</guid><description>  Emilia Monroy v.Tempstar Services, Inc.  
 California Insurance Guarantee Association&amp;mdash;Contribution and Reimbursement&amp;mdash;Dismissal of Applicant's Case&amp;mdash;WCAB found that California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), on behalf of defendant's insolvent carrier, was entitled to pursu</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:04:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Mogensen v. Santa Ynez River Water Dist. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (orthopedic mattress; ACOEM Guidelines)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Mogensen-v-Santa-Ynez-River-Water-Dist-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-orthopedic-mattress-ACOEM-Guideslines</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DAzYpVa4k7I%3d</guid><description>  Dawayne Mogensen v. Santa Ynez River Water District  
 Medical Treatment&amp;mdash;ACOEM Guidelines&amp;mdash;Orthopedic Mattresses&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant/operation technician who suffered injuries to back and neck on 8/8/2001 and during period 1991 to 8/8/2001, was not entitled t</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:57:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Metcalf v. Hines Horticulture (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (good samaritan)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Metcalf-v-Hines-Horticulture-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-good-samaritan</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MDCE%2btRLF%2bI%3d</guid><description>  Johnnie Metcalf v. Hines Horticulture  
 Injury AOE/COE&amp;mdash;Employee's Response to Emergency&amp;mdash;WCAB affirmed WCJ's finding that applicant/merchandiser sustained a compensable injury on 6/29/2008 when he was hit by a car while standing on shoulder of  freeway after stopping to render as</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:59:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Hawkins v. Sutter Health (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (Panel QME new rules)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Hawkins-v-Sutter-Health-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-Panel-QME-new-rules</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s9VMXeCuUV0%3d</guid><description>  Cathy Hawkins v. Sutter Health Corporation (dba) Sutter Tracy Community Hospital  
 Medical-Legal Procedure&amp;mdash;Panel Qualified Medical Evaluators&amp;mdash;Replacement Panels&amp;mdash;WCAB, designating defendant's premature petition for reconsideration as a petition for removal, granted removal from </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:53:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Premier Medical Management Lien Dispute Documents</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Premier-Medical-Management-Lien-Dispute-Documents</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KGx9ZxAMvkY%3d</guid><description> As part an agreement to resolve criminal charges, Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. of  &lt;/city&gt;
  
 
 Los Angeles 
&lt;/city&gt; has requested California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Appeals Board Chief Judge Mark Kahn to issue a consent order dismissing an estimated $70 million of medical bill</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:44:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ewert v. City of National City (Calif. WCAB panel decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ewert-v-City-of-National-City-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">a9EliL6ThT4%3d</guid><description>  Rating of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence; Life pension and commutation of attorney&amp;rsquo;s fees.  A Calif. WCAB panel provides insight into (1) how the Disability Evaluation Unit rated erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence under the 2005 rating schedule in this case, and (2)</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:16:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Valdez v. Ameron International (Calif. WCAB panel decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Valdez-v-Ameron-International-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">L4%2bYHd%2bzkqU%3d</guid><description>  Dismissal of lien.  Calif. WCAB panel affirmed the workers' compensation judge's analysis of rules regarding dismissal of liens, dismissal of the lien, and award of attorney's fees under Labor Code Sec. 5813 against the lien claimant. The workers' compensation judge's report recommended </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:12:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Campos v. Expert Tree Service (Calif. WCAB panel decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Campos-v-Expert-Tree-Service-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vWUJia1T66w%3d</guid><description>  Sudden and extraordinary employment condition.  A majority of a Calif. WCAB panel reversed the decision of a workers' compensation judge, holding instead that applicant tree cutter&amp;rsquo;s claim of injury to psyche was barred in that it was not caused by a sudden  and extraordinary  empl</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:08:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Monti-Alexander v. SCIF (Calif. WCAB panel decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Monti-Alexander-v-SCIF-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">U0zMxmwt8qs%3d</guid><description> Average Weekly Wage Determination&amp;mdash;Life Pensions&amp;mdash;State Average Weekly Wage Increases&amp;mdash;Calif. WCAB panel held that applicant who suffered 100 percent permanent disability from psychiatric injury through 1/7/2004, was entitled to state average weekly wage (SAWW) increases under Labor </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:53:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Jose Hernandez v. Warner Bros. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (post-termination claim)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Jose-Hernandez-v-Warner-Bros-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-post-termination-claim</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GsgrtL%2f3WlI%3d</guid><description>  Injury AOE/COE&amp;mdash;Post-Termination Claims &amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant/janitor's claims for injuries to back and lower extremities during cumulative period through 1/9/2004 and to psyche and respiratory system during cumulative period through 1/21/2004, were not barred by Lab</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:08:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Borlie Wong v. PDS Technical Services (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (special mission exception)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Borlie-Wong-v-PDS-Technical-Services-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-special-mission-exception</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CpR2mQv0oQ0%3d</guid><description>  Employment&amp;mdash;Injury AOE/COE&amp;mdash;Special Mission Exception to Going and Coming Rule &amp;mdash;WCAB, denying defendant's petition for reconsideration, held that applicant was injured AOE/COE, since contract of employment existed at time of applicant's injury and applicant was injured while engage</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:06:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: State-by-State Use of AMA Guides (Revised 7/1/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-State-by-State-Use-of-AMA-Guides</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uQ14dpwD53U%3d</guid><description> This chart, which was prepared for an upcoming release of  Occupational Injuries and Illnesses , is a work in progress. A few corrections were made for this version dated 7/1/2009. 
 It lists each state and whether it uses the AMA Guides (and, if so, which edition) or whether is has</description><author>AMA Guides Resource Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:04:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ray Lobato v. Crystal Cream &amp; Butter Co. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (closure of discovery)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ray-Lobato-v-Crystal-Cream--Butter-Co-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-closure-of-discovery</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Q07Cz9nwQ68%3d</guid><description> Discovery&amp;mdash;Closure of Discovery&amp;mdash;WCAB denied defendant's request for removal from WCJ's order setting trial of applicant's 7/29/2006 industrial injury claim and closing discovery pursuant to Labor Code &amp;sect; 5502(e)(3) over defendant's objection, when defendant had objected to DOR and re</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:46:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Emily Clausen v. Inamed Corp. (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (100 Percent Fibromyalgia)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Emily-Clausen-v-Inamed-Corp-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-100-Percent-Fibromyalgia</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rIZy%2fEq98Ac%3d</guid><description> Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Apportionment&amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's findings that applicant/inspector's cumulative injuries to neck, bilateral knees and shoulders, left foot and ankle, and in form of fibromyalgia during period 10/17/98 to 1/4/2000, and from 7/1/2001 to 7/2/2002, caused 100 percent per</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:43:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Almaraz II (WCAB en banc issued 9/3/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Almaraz-II-WCAB-en-banc-issued-932009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">d5Pjfa%2bDr4w%3d</guid><description>   Summary of decision below. Logon to your free account to access the case.   
   Mario Almaraz v. Environmental Recovery Services (aka Enviroserve); State Compensation Insurance Fund   
   Joyce Guzman v. Milpitas Unified School District, Permissibly Self-Insured; Keenan &amp;amp; Associates   
  A</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:13:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Kenneth Moore v. State of Calif. (Calif. WCAB Panel Decision) (AMA Guides Rating of Hernia)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Kenneth-Moore-v-State-of-Calif-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision-AMA-Guides-Rating-of-Hernia</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3%2bZg5NW9Dzo%3d</guid><description> Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Rating&amp;mdash;AMA  Guides &amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant/correction officer's 10/24/2006 industrially related hernia resulted in 20 percent permanent disability, after adjustment for age and apportionment, based upon agreed medical evaluator's determinatio</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:01:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Juan Zamano v. Diverse Staffing (Calif. WCAB panel decision) - Spinal Surgery</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Juan-Zamano-v-Diverse-Staffing-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision---Spinal-Surgery</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TOumb9nD3GE%3d</guid><description> Spinal Surgery&amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that applicant with back and neck (cervical and lumbar) injuries was entitled to neck surgery recommended by treating physician and second opinion spinal surgeon, and returned matter to trial level for WCJ to determine whether defendant engaged in u</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:58:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Denise Roberts v. State of Calif., Dept. of Transportation - Calif. WCAB Panel Decision</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Denise-Roberts-v-State-of-Calif-Dept-of-Transportation---Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hdH6dWwp3pM%3d</guid><description>  Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Apportionment&amp;mdash; Wilkinson  Rule &amp;mdash;WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that applicant/landscape lead worker's 6/10/98 low back injury and 4/21/2003 injuries to low back and neck combined to cause 61 percent permanent disability, and held that, pursuant to  Benson v. Th</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:31:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Arellano v. Telacu - Calif. WCAB Panel Decision - Liens; Outpatient Surgery Centers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Arellano-v-Telacu---Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision---Liens-Outpatient-Surgery-Centers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FSGS6vg7pqs%3d</guid><description>
  Liens&amp;mdash;Outpatient Surgery Centers&amp;mdash;Burden of Proving Reasonableness of Fee &amp;mdash;WCAB affirmed WCJ's finding that, under   Kunz v. Patterson Floor Covering, Inc.  (2002) 67 Cal. Comp. Cases 1588 (Appeals Board en banc opinion) and  Tapia v. Skill Master Staffing  (2008) 73 Cal. C</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:06:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. WCAB En Banc Decision 8/17/2009 in Weiner v. Ralphs Company</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-WCAB-En-Banc-Decision-8172009-in-Weiner-v-Ralphs-Company</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9bdIYybHGXU%3d</guid><description> The California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Appeals Board has issued an en banc decision &amp;ndash; Opinion and Order Denying Reconsideration in: 
 Weiner v Ralphs Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. (MON 0305426) 
 This decision was filed and served on August 17, 2009.  
 The Appe</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:57:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: How to Research Workers' Comp Law: Free and Low Cost Online Resources</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-How-to-Research-Workers-Comp-Law-Free-and-Low-Cost-Online-Resources</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VLSI5G9tlYI%3d</guid><description> In this paper on  Researching Workers' Compensation Law in the Great State of Texas: How to Achieve Old-Fashioned Results in a New Fangled Way , you can find a list of online resources that may help you conduct  legal research regardless of the state in which you live or work.   
 This p</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:13:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Hadden v. U.S. (uncertainties of medicare reimbursement amount; roadblock to settlement)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Hadden-v-US-uncertainties-of-medicare-reimbursement-amount-roadblock-to-settlement</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7E93AxjNmog%3d</guid><description> In this decision by the U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky, the claimant settled a personal injury claim and was responsible for the Medicare Reimbursement Amount, but that amount was substantial and consumed most, if not all, of the claimant&amp;rsquo;s proceeds. The District Court made</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:53:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Terrones v. Garfield Beach (Calif. WCAB Panel Decision - EAMS and Late Filings)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Terrones-v-Garfield-Beach-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision---EAMS-and-Late-Filings</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oLwW8Nxz%2b54%3d</guid><description> In this recent panel decision, the WCJ's Report illustrates how some judges are addressing late filings related to EAMS. 
</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:03:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. WCAB Panel Decision on Utilization Review: Vasquez v. Colton Unified School District</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decisison-on-Utilization-Review-Vasquez-v-Colton-Unified-School-District</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cbMwJAtEWTg%3d</guid><description>  Utilization Review:  Does the defendant waive all objections to the recommended treatment if it does not use
  
 &lt;/city&gt;UR? Read the Calif. WCAB's panel decision in  Argelia Vasquez v. Colton Unified School District .  
 *   *   * 
 Download a free copy of the decision</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:10:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Study on Psychosocial Aspects of Disabling Musculoskeletal Pain (English and Spanish Versions)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Study-on-Psychosocial-Aspects-of-Disabling-Musculoskeletal-Pain-English-and-Spanish-Versions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LLk2rKuOlZg%3d</guid><description> A new article published in the Journal of Bone &amp;amp; Joint Surgery says that psychosocial factors are important determinants of pain intensity and disability in patients with disabling musculoskeletal pain. These psychosocial aspects include beliefs, expectations, coping style, depression, pai</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:21:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Slide Presentation on AMA Guides Sixth Edition (Robert Rondinelli, MD, PhD, Medical Editor)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Slide-Presentation-on-AMA-Guides-Sixth-Edition-Robert-Rondinelli-MD-PhD-Medical-Editor</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DuHyg5GY5kg%3d</guid><description> Dr. Robert Rondinelli, a medical editor, provides background and explanation of the AMA Guides as well as a survey of criticism of the AMA Guides Sixth Edition. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:35:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Louisiana PPO Case: Troquille v. Pineville Partnership; Harr v. McDonald's</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Louisiana-PPO-Case-Troquille-v-Pineville-Partnership-Harr-v-McDonalds</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4R0AI4uBB4M%3d</guid><description> A healthcare facility,
  
  
Central
  
Louisiana
  
Ambulatory
  
Surgical
  
Center , claimed that the Louisiana Restaurant Association Self-Insurance Fund underpaid the facilities for services provided in the treatment of injured workers. It contended that the payments were paid pursu</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:06:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Recovery Resources, Inc. v. WCAB/Gordon (writ denied) - PPO Contract Issues in California</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Recovery-Resources-Inc-v-WCABGordon-writ-denied---PPO-Contract-Issues-in-California</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fl1V4a614gM%3d</guid><description> A recent California WCAB decision judicial review by the California Court of Appeal . . . 
 Recovery Resources, Inc., Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Calistoga Spa, State Compensation Insurance Fund, (Cynthia Gordon), Respondents  
 Civil No. A124695--Court of Appeal, First App</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:39:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Shamieh v. Great West Casualty Company - Health Care Provider Awarded PPO Discounted Underpayment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Shamieh-v-Great-West-Casualty-Company---Health-Care-Provider-Awarded-PPO-Discounted-Underpayment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eba4mjA1ofY%3d</guid><description> Shamieh v. Great West Casualty Company. This is a recent decision in which a Louisiana trial court, after a trial on the merits, ruled in favor of the plaintiff health care provider and against the employer and its workers&amp;rsquo; compensation insurer, and awarded the PPO discounted underpayment, as</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:49:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: SSA's Occupational Information System - OIDAP Content Model</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-SSAs-Occupational-Information-System---OIDAP-Content-Model</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UZ5XH0QOGqw%3d</guid><description> The Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced that they're developing a new Occupational Information System (OIS) to replace the information currently obtained from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT), including the Selected Characteristics of Occupations (SCO) and Revised Handbook</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:56:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. Permanent Disability, Life Pensions, Cost of Living Adjustments - SIBTF v. WCAB/SYZZS SJO2</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-Permanent-Disability-Life-Pensions-Cost-of-Living-Adjustments---SIBTF-v-WCABSYZZS-SJO2</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bboJDz4JakM%3d</guid><description> The Calif. Director of Industrial Relations as Administrator of the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund filed a Petition for Writ of Review in XYZZX SJO2 v. SIBTF (WCAB panel decision). To download the Petition, please logon to your Workers' Comp Law Center account. Registration at our sit</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:47:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: XYZZX SJO2 v. SIBTF (Permanent Disability COLA, Life Pension) (WCAB panel decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-XYZZX-SJO2-v-SIBTF-Permanent-Disability-COLA-Life-Pension-WCAB-panel-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CD0YL8VTUyU%3d</guid><description> The Calif. Director of Industrial Relations as Administrator of the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund filed a Petition for Writ of Review in XYZZX SJO2 v. SIBTF (WCAB panel decision).  To download the Petition, click here . The California Court of Appeal granted writ of review on Ju</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:08:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Boganim v. Beverly Hills Hilton (Calif. WCAB panel decision - vocational rehabilitation)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Boganim-v-Beverly-Hills-Hilton-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision---vocational-rehabilitation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fMaVcbnjkSE%3d</guid><description> Samson Boganim, Applicant v. Beverly Hills Hilton, Hilton Hotels Corporation, PSI, Defendants. 
 W.C.A.B. Nos. ADJ 1898212 (LAO 0671427), ADJ 957820 (LAO 0688269)&amp;mdash;WCJ Roger A. Tolman, Jr. (LAO); WCAB Panel: Commissioners Cuneo, Lowe, Chairman Miller 
 Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Pa</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:59:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Proposed Legislation for Sale of Calif. State Compensation Insurance Fund</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Proposed-Legislation-for-Sale-of-Calif-State-Compensation-Insurance-Fund</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rn34NKARock%3d</guid><description>Governor Schwarzenegger has released the proposed legislative language for the State Fund asset sale.</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:32:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Weiner v. Ralphs Grocery (En Banc Decision June 11, 2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Weiner-v-Ralphs-Grocery-En-Banc-Decision-June-11-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jzmGavmuJFc%3d</guid><description> Lawrence Weiner v. Ralphs Company, et al., WCAB Case No. ADJ347040 (MON 0305426)  
 The decision was filed and served on June 11, 2009. 
 On April 14, 2009 the Appeals Board granted reconsideration and issued a notice allowing interested persons and entities to file amicus curiae briefs on the is</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:26:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Cell Phone Bill Case - Penalty of $24,900 for Delay in Payment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Cell-Phone-Bill-Case---Penalty-of-24900-for-Delay-in-Payment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">m2%2bJWX%2btKV4%3d</guid><description> A   
  
Colorado court affirmed the imposition of 83 penalties of $300 each, totaling $24,900, against an employer for a three-month delay in paying a $107.79 cellular telephone bill where the injured worker had been awarded cell phone services necessary to make emergency calls. The injured </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:14:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Collazo v. Roldan Construction (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (case file lost during EAMS conversion)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Collazo-v-Roldan-Construction-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-case-file-lost-during-EAMS-conversion</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XQcl5TPH6eU%3d</guid><description> Calif. WCAB unable to review the record on reconsideration, when during EAMS conversion, the case file was lost and not scanned into the new electronic system. All pertinent documents were lost. WCAB, therefore, granted reconsideration, resinded the WCJ's Findings and Award, and returned the matter</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:13:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Aguirre v. Pioneer Packing (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (SCIF liable for anesthesiologist's lien)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Aguirre-v-Pioneer-Packing-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-SCIF-liable-for-anesthesiologists-lien</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NvvSr1sDgQA%3d</guid><description> Lien claimant performed anesthesiology for the treating physician who operated on the injured worker's back. The lien claimant argued SCIF was liable to him because it never denied the treating physician's treatment. The WCAB found that the settlements between SCIF and the treating physician did no</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:09:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Anderson v. Target (Calif. WCAB panel decision) (Post-Smith/Amar Case)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Anderson-v-Target-Calif-WCAB-panel-decision-Post-SmithAmar-Case</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KVyu1UxC4c8%3d</guid><description> The WCAB found that the recent California Supreme Court's holding in Smith v .WCAB/Amar v. WCAB was directly applicable to the facts of this case. Here, the defendant did not seek to terminate the applicant's award of further medical treatment. Instead, defendant challenged a specific modality of t</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:04:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ramirez v. Home Ready - Calif. WCAB Panel Split on Applicability of 1997 Rating Schedule</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ramirez-v-Home-Ready---Calif-WCAB-Panel-Split-on-Applicability-of-1997-Rating-Schedule</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gxcGSBNRWz8%3d</guid><description> In  Ramirez v. Home Ready , the majority of the WCAB panel reversed the WCJ's application of the 1997 Rating Schedule, stating that no medical reports pre-dating January 1, 2005 were admitted into evidence. The dissenting Commissioner, citing  Cugini , stated that the &amp;quot;entire record&amp;quot; here</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:23:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Case Documents for Piketon, Ohio, Cold War Widows' Claims for Death Benefits</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Case-Documents-for-Piketon-Ohio-Cold-War-Widows-Claims-for-Death-Benefits</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hBc0kv2vq2g%3d</guid><description> Represented by  &lt;/city&gt;Columbus,   Ohio, attorney Philip J. Fulton, author of  Fulton's Ohio Workers' Compensation Law  (LexisNexis), the widows of 38 former employees of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in  &lt;/city&gt;Piketon,   Ohio, are trying to win death benefits from the   
  
Ohio worker</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:37:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Oregon Workers' Compensation Medical Payment Trends 2000-2007</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Oregon-Workers-Compensation-Medical-Payment-Trends-2000-2007</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QYWi1fAU%2byo%3d</guid><description> The Oregon Dept. of Consumer and Business Services released a report in May 2009 covering Oregon Workers' Compensation Medical Trends for the years 2000 through 2007. The report examines the trends in medical payments from 2000 through 2007 and their distribution by insurer category, provider type,</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:25:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. WCAB Panel Decision Molina v. Mercer Staffing (General/Special Employer; CIGA Liability)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision-Molina-v-Mercer-Staffing-GeneralSpecial-Employer-CIGA-Liability</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">o%2f5r5g2ZbCA%3d</guid><description> In  Molina v.   Mercer Staffing , a Calif. WCAB panel held that applicant/truck driver/loader/unloader who suffered industrial injuries to his left shoulder, low back and neck on 10/26/2004 while employed by the temporary placement agency Mercer Staffing (Mercer) and working, through an agency, for</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:05:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 2009 Supplement to Workers' Comp Laws of Calif. - New and Amended Regulations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-2009-Supplement-to-Workers-Comp-Laws-of-Calif---New-and-Amended-Regulations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ABeRcYDeRXs%3d</guid><description> All subscribers to Workers' Comp Laws of California will receive a free 2009 supplement covering the latest regulatory changes.  
 To view the Table of Amendments listing all the regulatory changes, click   here  . 
 To review the text of the regulations covered in the 2009 supplement: 
 
</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:36:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. WCAB Panel Decision: Morgan v. Redwood Credit Union (Post-Almaraz With Dissent)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision-Morgan-v-Redwood-Credit-Union-Post-Almaraz-With-Dissent</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">G72r2KNTNgw%3d</guid><description> In  Morgan v. Redwood Credit Union , a majority of a WCAB panel has granted Applicant's petition for reconsideration and returned the matter to the trial level for further development of the medical record in accordance with the WCAB's recent en banc decision in  Almaraz/Guzman . The majority </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:44:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Louisiana PPO Class Action Documents: Gunderson v. F.A. Richard &amp; Associates</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Louisiana-PPO-Class-Action-Documents-Gunderson-v-FA-Richard--Associates</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Z%2fDyz%2fPoNno%3d</guid><description> Summary Judgment was rendered by Judge Wyatt in the class action suit (over $261 million) of Clark A. Gunderson, M.D., et al. v. F.A. Richard &amp;amp; Associates, et al. With legal interest the actual award is almost $400 million. To read the blog by Denis Paul Juge,   click here  . 
  To access</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:45:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Conceptualizing Brain Injury as a Chronic Disease (Brain Injury Association of America Position Paper)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Conceptualizing-Brain-Injury-as-a-Chronic-Disease-Brain-Injury-Association-of-America-Position-Paper</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nYPIZXFczVY%3d</guid><description> The Brain Injury Association of America released a position paper in March 2009, the purpose of which is to encourage the classification of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) not as an event, not as the final outcome, but rather as the beginning of a disease process. The paper presents the scienti</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:03:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Glossary of Legal Terms for People With Brain Injury (Brain Injury Association of America)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Glossary-of-Legal-Terms-for-People-With-Brain-Injury-Brain-Injury-Association-of-America</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oV5q75gO6Gs%3d</guid><description> The Brain Injury Association of America has prepared this glossary, which gives the basic meaning of some of the laws and legal terms that may be used in resources for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This glossary should not replace advice from a lawyer. The terms are written simply </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:23:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>PANDEMIC RESOURCE CENTER: Larson's on Coverage of Traveling Employees - Free Download</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/PANDEMIC-RESOURCE-CENTER-Larsons-on-Coverage-of-Traveling-Employees---Free-Download</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">37Dk3NbLyXc%3d</guid><description> Professor Arthur Larson says that an employee whose work entails travel away from the employer's premises is generally considered to be within the course of his or her employment continuously during the trip, except when there is a distinct departure on a personal errand. Thus, injuries flowing fro</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:19:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>PANDEMIC RESOURCE CENTER: Larson's on Traveling Employees and Employer's Conveyance - Free Download</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/PANDEMIC-RESOURCE-CENTER-Larsons-on-Traveling-Employees-and-Employers-Conveyance---Free-Download</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">98j7Nx5Grck%3d</guid><description> Traveling employees are often at a higher risk of contracting communicable diseases. Professor Arthur Larson states that when the journey to or from work is made in the employer's conveyance, the journey is in the course of employment, the reason being that the risks of the employment continue thro</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:58:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>PANDEMIC RESOURCE CENTER: Larson's on Accidental Infectious Disease - Free Download</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/PANDEMIC-RESOURCE-CENTER-Larsons-on-Accidental-Infectious-Disease---Free-Download</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SwKo7zHZFY8%3d</guid><description>
 According to Professor Arthur Larson, the contraction of disease is deemed an injury by accident in most states if due to some unexpected or unusual event or exposure. Thus, infectious disease may be held accidental if the germs gain entrance through a scratch or through unexpected or abnormal ex</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:54:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. WCAB Panel Decision - Cortez v. Supercuts (Issued 4/17/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision---Cortez-v-Supercuts-Issued-4172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tHtMymUN%2fPA%3d</guid><description> The California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued a panel decision on April 17, 2009, in the case of  Cortez v. Supercuts , a post- Almaraz/Guzman  case. The WCAB stated that in light of its April 6, 2009 decision granting reconsideration in  Almaraz/Guzman , the WCJ in  Cortez v. Supercuts</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:54:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: "Costa IV" – A Recent Noteworthy Panel Decision Issued by Calif. WCAB (Dated March 13, 2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Costa-IV---A-Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decision-Issued-by-Calif-WCAB-Dated-March-13-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">miQbXzhFg8Y%3d</guid><description> Costa I &amp;amp; II were Calif. WCAB en banc decisions dealing with costs awarded to experts in association with a permanent disability rating under the 2005 PDRS. Following the en banc decision in Costa II the trial judge refused to follow the WCAB' s direction and again denied the cost for the </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:48:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ferras v. United Airlines, a Post-Almaraz/Guzman Panel Decision Issued 3/2/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ferras-v-United-Airlines-a-Post-AlmarazGuzman-Panel-Decision-Issued-322009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cJz97cq4uvk%3d</guid><description>  Anthony Ferras v. United Airlines   
 Permanent Disability&amp;mdash;Rating&amp;mdash;AMA  Guides &amp;mdash;WCAB upheld WCJ's finding that applicant/aircraft mechanic's 1/10/2002 right abductor tendon injury resulted in 24 percent permanent disability, as rated under Chapter 6 (hernia-related injuries) of A</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:32:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Hand-Arm Vibration Injuries (chapter excerpt from Occupational Injuries and Illnesses treatise)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Hand-Arm-Vibration-Injuries-chapter-excerpt-from-Occupational-Injuries-and-Illnesses-treatise</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mTpcpod7lAY%3d</guid><description> Raynaud's syndrome is a characteristic pattern of cold-induced vasospasm marked by blanching of the fingers and hands. When it occurs in workers who use vibrating tools for prolonged periods, it is known as Raynaud's phenomenon of occupational origin and is associated with sensory impairment, pain </description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:35:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. WCAB's Order Allowing Amicus Briefs in Voc Rehab Jurisdiction Case: Weiner v. Ralphs Company</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-WCABs-Order-Allowing-Amicus-Briefs-in-Voc-Rehab-Jurisdiction-Case-Weiner-v-Ralphs-Company</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RxlJA1ymOFc%3d</guid><description>  Weiner v. Ralphs Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.  
 (MON 0305426) 
 This decision was filed and served on April 14, 2009. 
 The Appeals Board designated this case, which had already been granted for study as a panel decision, as an en banc case, and issued a decision allow</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:08:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Weiner v. Ralphs Grocery - Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration (2/9/2009) and Applicant's Answer (2/17/2009) - Calif. Workers' Comp. Appeals Board</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Weiner-v-Ralphs-Grocery---Defendants-Petition-for-Reconsideration-292009-and-Applicants-Answer-2172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">X3f6Q%2bue5Ps%3d</guid><description> To read the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration,    click here   . 
 To read the Applicant's Answer,    click here   . 
 To read the WCAB's order,    click here   . </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:32:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 50 States Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking (Oregon Study)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-50-States-Workers-Compensation-Premium-Rate-Ranking-Oregon-Study</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">flZFhREv1wk%3d</guid><description> Oregon's Department of Consumer and Business Services has released its 2008 survey of 50 states workers' compensation premium rate ranking.  
  IMPORTANT NOTE: A FINAL VERSION OF THIS REPORT WAS ISSUED IN MARCH 2009. TO VIEW THE FINAL VERSION,      CLICK HERE   .  </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:06:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 50 States Premium Rate Ranking (Oregon 2008 Study) (Revised March 2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-50-States-Premium-Rate-Ranking-Oregon-2008-Study-Revised-March-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">iVpvQY8W01o%3d</guid><description> Thsi is the final version (March 2009) of the Oregon Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking for Calendar Year 2008. Some changes were made from the draft  report issued in October 2008 with respect to New Hampshire's ranking.  </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:32:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: State Firefighter Cancer Presumption Laws and Current Firefighter Cancer Research</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-State-Firefighter-Cancer-Presumption-Laws-and-Current-Firefighter-Cancer-Research</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2cY8pr0G0R4%3d</guid><description> The National League of Cities has released an April 2009 report indicating that there is inadequate scientific research to determine a link between working as a firefighter and an elevated risk of contracting cancer.   
</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:17:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: CMS Memo 4/3/2009: Methodology of Pricing Future Prescription Drug Treatment Costs/Expenses in Workers’ Comp Medicare Set-Aside Arrangement Proposals</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-CMS-Memo-432009-Methodology-of-Pricing-Future-Prescription-Drug-Treatment-CostsExpenses-in-Workers'-Comp-Medicare-Set-Aside-Arrangement-Proposals</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wmrnhPLt3Sw%3d</guid><description> CMS came out with a new memo that some say will be the end of C&amp;amp;Rs when an MSA is required.  The memo states that  starting 6/1/09  Average Wholesale Price (AWP) will be the only calculation method accepted and no other calculation or discounts will be allowed.  Up to now, the prescri</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:49:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Calif. DWC's Order Denying Rehabilitation Consolidation and Stay and Cancelling Hearing 4/15/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Calif-DWCs-Order-Denying-Rehabilitation-Consolidation-and-Stay-and-Cancelling-Hearing-4152009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jo7Gke9nbMg%3d</guid><description> The Calif. DWC has issued an order on 4/15/2009 denying rehabilitation consolidation and stay and cancelling hearing in light of the WCAB's en banc order in Weiner. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:50:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Milpitas Unified School Dist. v. WCAB (Guzman) Petition for Writ of Review</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Milpitas-Unified-School-Dist-v-WCAB-Guzman-Petition-for-Writ-of-Review</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8%2f8Kn0Mc7Ks%3d</guid><description> To download the Petition for Writ of Review in the recent Calif. WCAB en banc decision in  Guzman , please logon to your Workers' Comp Law Center account. If you don't have an account, you can register  for free  by   clicking here  . 
 This download does not include the exhibits. If you want</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:30:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Ogilvie v. City &amp; County of San Francisco, Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of En Banc Decision</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Ogilvie-v-City--County-of-San-Francisco-Defendants-Petition-for-Reconsideration-of-En-Banc-Decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TxRWySvs5HE%3d</guid><description> Defendant City and County of San Francisco has filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the WCAB's en banc decision in   Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco  .  
 Logon to your account to download the petition. If you haven't registered at our site yet, click   here  . Registration is FREE.</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:39:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Newsletter (Dec. 2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-LexisNexis-Workers-Compensation-Law-Center-Newsletter-Dec-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Pu95KpQ8CvI%3d</guid><description> Read our first newsletter for the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center. It explains what Web 2.0 is all about and how LexisNexis is being responsive in real time to developments on the ground by providing you with the most current information available.  
 In this free 50-page newslett</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:52:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Understanding Employment Liability Insurance - Excerpt From New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Understanding-Employment-Liability-Insurance---Excerpt-From-New-Appleman-Insurance-Law-Practice-Guide</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FGlDi%2fF60eE%3d</guid><description> Sections 41.11 and 41.12 of the 2008 Edition of New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide are part of a new chapter, &amp;ldquo;Understanding Employment Liability Insurance&amp;rdquo; by L.D. Simmons and Lowndes Christopher Quinlan of McGuire Woods LLP. This excerpt from the chapter explores one of the mos</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:48:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD Liberty Mutual 2008 Workplace Safety Index</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Liberty-Mutual-2008-Workplace-Safety-Index</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CvqNCRz2P1Q%3d</guid><description> The Liberty Mutual 2008 Workplace Safety Index sets forth the most disabling workplace injuries that cost the industry an estimated $48.6 billion. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:01:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 2008 State New Economy Index - 50 State Surveys Benchmarking Economic Transformation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-2008-State-New-Economy-Index---50-State-Surveys-Benchmarking-Economic-Transformation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Wr1SDy82cZM%3d</guid><description> The 2008 State New Economy Index compiled by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation ranks the economic structure of each state. It asks: &amp;quot;To what degree does the structure of state economies match the ideal structure of the New Econom</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:00:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 13th Annual Small Business Survival Index - 50 State Rankings</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-13th-Annual-Small-Business-Survival-Index---50-State-Rankings</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">l9nyHlR0Tto%3d</guid><description> The Small Business &amp;amp; Entrepreneurial Council's 13th Annual Small Business Survival Index 2008 ranks the 50 states and D.C. according to some of the major government-imposed or government-related costs affecting investment, entrepreneurship, and business, including workers compensation benefits </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:42:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of 2008 Industry Week Workers' Compensation State Ranking</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-2008-Industry-Week-Workers-Compensation-State-Ranking</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3LFDTOi7rZY%3d</guid><description> The 2008 Industry Week Workers' Compensation State Ranking is now available in excel format. This useful tool shows senior manufacturing executives how their state stacks up compared to other states in terms of workers' compensation benefits, costs and awards. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:14:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: Practice Points on 2009 Proposed Revisions to Calif. Qualified Medical Examiner Regulations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Practice-Points-on-2009-Proposed-Revisions-to-Calif-Qualified-Medical-Examiner-Regulations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hsmebSTWINw%3d</guid><description> Senate Bill 228 (Alarc&amp;oacute;n, ch. 639, Stats. 2003) and Senate Bill 899 (Poochigian, ch. 34, Stats. 2004), among others, changed the workers' compensation laws in California with respect to the roles of treating physicians, Agreed Medical Examiners (AMEs) and Qualified Medical Evaluators (QMEs).</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:21:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of National Premium Rate Rankings Compiled by Florida Office of Insurance Regulation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-National-Premium-Rate-Rankings-Compiled-by-Florida-Office-of-Insurance-Regulation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">pG9f8ujOA08%3d</guid><description> The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation has issued its version of 2007 Workers' Compensation Premium to Worker Ratios. In stark contrast to the   study published in Oregon  , the Florida report shows West Virginia at the top of the state rankings with Alaska placing second and Delaware</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:51:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: "Costa III" – A Recent Noteworthy Panel Decision Issued by Calif. WCAB</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-Costa-III---A-Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decision-Issued-by-Calif-WCAB</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VcNAJ464Dts%3d</guid><description> Costa I &amp;amp; II were Calif. WCAB en banc decisions dealing with costs awarded to experts in association with a permanent disability rating under the 2005 PDRS. Following the en banc decision in Costa II the trial judge refused to follow the WCAB' s direction and again denied the cost for the </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:08:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Attorneys' Textbook of Medicine Ch. 93 Sequelae of Head Injuries (excerpt)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Attorneys-Textbook-of-Medicine-Ch-93-Sequelae-of-Head-Injuries-excerpt</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SJXlwTo%2bPII%3d</guid><description> This chapter on head injuries is excerpted from the  Attorneys' Textbook of Medicine  (Matthew Bender).  
</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:46:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD: 2008 National Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Rankings</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-2008-National-Workers-Compensation-Premium-Rate-Rankings</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">o0hqS1uGBA8%3d</guid><description> The Oregon Department of Consumer &amp;amp; Business Services has released its  2008 Oregon Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking Summary , a national survey of states with the highest and lowest premium rates. To download the summary for free, please logon. If you haven't already registered at th</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:13:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Attorneys' Textbook of Medicine Ch. 177 Treatment of Pain (excerpt)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Attorneys-Textbook-of-Medicine-Ch-177-Treatment-of-Pain-excerpt</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">D%2bz6%2bNUcvU4%3d</guid><description> This chapter on treatment of pain is excerpted from the  Attorneys' Textbook of Medicine  (Matthew Bender).  
</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:38:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Defense Base Act Coverage by Joshua T. Gillelan II</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Defense-Base-Act-Coverage-by-Joshua-T-Gillelan-II</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2dHE%2fa6%2fqfI%3d</guid><description> This chapter on &amp;quot;Coverage: Categories of Work Within Defense Base Act&amp;quot; was written by Joshua T. Gillelan II of the Longshore Claimants' National Law Center. It is excerpted from the new    Defense Base Act and War Hazards Compensation Act Handbook.     
 Attendees of the upcoming Loyola/</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:58:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Merle C. Rabine on Sanctions, Underground Regulations and Temporary Disability Cap</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Merle-C-Rabine-on-Sanctions-Underground-Regulations-and-Temporary-Disability-Cap</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hVDbp8LV97A%3d</guid><description> This commentary examines four recent panel decisions: two involving sanctions on reconsideration [see  Deza v. The Home Depot , 2008 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 228;  Nuno v. Carniceria Le Mejor,  2008 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 253]; one involving second QME panels and underground regulations </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:21:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Roger A. Levy's Expert Commentary on the Challenges of Using the Defense Base Act to Civilian Employees Injured Overseas</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Roger-A-Levys-Expert-Commentary-on-the-Challenges-of-Using-the-Defense-Base-Act-to-Civilian-Employees-Injured-Overseas</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">c1OyCrbGkg0%3d</guid><description></description><author>Roger A Levy</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:43:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Merle C. Rabine's Expert Commentary on Benson v. Permanente Medical Group (CA - WCAB en banc)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Merle-C-Rabines-Expert-Commentary-on-Benson-v-Permanente-Medical-Group-CA---WCAB-en-banc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VjptsGLUrwk%3d</guid><description>    

                                               &amp;nbsp</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:56:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of National Insurance Act of 2007: Emerging Issues Commentary</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-National-Insurance-Act-of-2007-Emerging-Issues-Commentary</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2brjr49Vlv4M%3d</guid><description> If the National Insurance Act of 2007 becomes law it may well lead to a revolution in the insurance industry. At present, insurance is regulated state by state. This bill would allow insurance companies to be chartered by the federal government and to be governed by one set of regulations instead o</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:55:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of Melissa C. Brown's Expert Commentary on Discrimination Due to Apportionment to Age and Gender-Related Conditions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-Melissa-C-Browns-Expert-Commentary-on-Vaira-v-WCAB</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XcEpTD3%2bR0Y%3d</guid><description> The following expert commentary by Melissa C. Brown can be downloaded for free once you've registered at this site. If you're already registered, simply logon to access the free download. If you have any problems, contact the site coordinator, Robin Kobayashi, at   Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis</description><author>Melissa C. Brown</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:54:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE DOWNLOAD of David Bryan Leonard's Expert Commentary on Silent PPOs and California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-DOWNLOAD-of-David-Bryan-Leonards-Expert-Commentary-on-Silent-PPOs-and-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wElBbqZUi%2fY%3d</guid><description>        
    

    
                                               &amp;nbs</description><author>David Bryan Leonard</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:43:57 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>