|
|
11/16/2009 3:50:49 PM EST Posted by Charles GholzPartner, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt
In this Analysis, Charles Gholz discusses opinions relating to interferences published in volumes 69-72 of the United States Patents Quarterly (Second), with the exception of Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
11/16/2009 2:58:36 PM EST Posted by Charles GholzPartner, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt
A party to an interference who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences can either appeal to the Federal Circuit under Continue reading >>Comments (0)
|
11/10/2009 11:30:27 AM EST Posted by Lawrence M. Sung, Ph.D.Partner, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP; Professor & Intellectual Property Law Program Director, University of Maryland School of Law
Patent infringement damages have come under increasing public scrutiny. Much of the criticism has centered on the inaccuracy of relying upon abstract notions of causation to assess act ... Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
11/10/2009 11:09:29 AM EST Posted by Lawrence M. Sung, Ph.D.Partner, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP; Professor & Intellectual Property Law Program Director, University of Maryland School of Law
A patent provides a right of exclusivity to the claimed invention. So what does a licensee get when it non-exclusively licenses patented technology in the absence of special provisions ... Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
11/3/2009 11:41:31 AM EST Posted by Lawrence M. Sung, Ph.D.Partner, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP; Professor & Intellectual Property Law Program Director, University of Maryland School of Law
A key distinction of U.S. patent law from its international counterparts is the grant of exclusivity only to actual inventors. However, a third party may sue in the U.S. district court ... Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
11/3/2009 11:36:20 AM EST Posted by Charles GholzPartner, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt
In this Analysis, Charles Gholz argues that even though requests for rehearing or reconsideration are seldom successful, the Federal Circuit’s strange opinion in Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
11/3/2009 11:33:28 AM EST Posted by Eric E BensenCo-author of Milgrim on Licensing and Milgrim on Trade Secrets and a Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Hofstra University School of Law Comments (0)
|
11/3/2009 11:38:18 AM EST Posted by Charles GholzPartner, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt
It has been generally assumed that the "derivation proceedings" that would be created by both the House and Senate versions of the Patent Reform Act of 2009 would simply be d ... Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
10/20/2009 8:08:26 AM EST Posted by Eric E BensenCo-author of Milgrim on Licensing and Milgrim on Trade Secrets and a Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Hofstra University School of Law
Although not offering bright-line holdings, the Federal Circuit’s much anticipated decision in Continue reading >>Comments (0)
|
10/12/2009 3:33:50 PM EST
For years, there was a Federal Circuit split regarding product-by-process limitations. One panel had declared that the process is not a limitation for infringement. Another panel disag ... Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
|
|
9/16/2009 9:28:47 AM EST
Due to the constantly increasing number of EU member states, the European Patent System has become relatively inert, and its ability to reform itself is quite restricted. Nonetheless, ... Create an account or login to post comments. | Comments (0)
|
|