Go to Home Page Legal
  
Workers Compensation
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
Workers' Compensation Law Center Powered by Larson's
RSS Email Alert




Longshore Act & Defense Base Act
12/16/2007 9:25:51 PM EST
Peter M. Sweeny
Peter M. Sweeny on Wainwright v. Newport News
Posted by Peter M. Sweeny
Attorney

Virginia’s one major seaport is in its Tidewater Region.  Industry and commerce center around Hampton Roads, which is home to one of the largest naval bases in the world as well as major civilian shipping industries.  Workers’ compensation practitioners in the Tidewater who represent injured workers are often faced with dual jurisdiction: the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act [Va. Code § 65.2-1 et seq.], and the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) [33 U.S.C.S. § 901 et seq.] Frequently, benefits are better under the LHWCA but to preserve their client’s state rights practitioners will file a claim with the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission and advise the Commission that the injured worker is currently receiving benefits under the LHWCA. In this expert commentary, Peter M. Sweeny discusses how this common practice was challenged in Robert B. Wainwright v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., 50 Va. App. 421, 650 S.E.2d 566 (2007). Mr. Sweeny concludes that Virginia practitioners on both sides of claims will have to carefully review the claims being made and the issues being submitted for decision by the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission.  The defense will now have a harder time making a case that a claimant abandoned a part of his or her claim.  Claimants will have to be wary of language being included in defenses or decisions that have a broader reach than the facts and circumstances merit.

Access the complete commentary on lexis.com

 

Readers may also access the author's martindale.com law directory listing here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Create an account or login to post comments.

Your Resources

Your Toolbox