<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareasWorkers-Compensation</link><description>Workers' Compensation Law Center: Build professional network, contribute content, view news, content by Lex Larson, the Workers' Compensation Law Blog, and other content on Workers' Compensation Law.</description><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on 2009 State-by-State Survey of Key Workers' Compensation Legislative Changes (January -- November 1, 2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-2009-State-by--tate-Survey-of-Key-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Changes-January-November-1-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fNnqzfkjYBM%3d</guid><description>This Emerging Issues Analysis by Thomas A. Robinson contains a state-by-state survey of key workers compensation legislative changes during the period from January through November 2009.
 
&amp;ldquo;Overall, it has been quite an active year,&amp;rdquo; Robinson writes. &amp;ldquo;Legislatures in Califor</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:18:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Implanted Lens as "Corrective Lens" for Purposes of Determining Loss of Use: Johnson v. Beauty Unlimited Landscape Co.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Implanted-Lens-as-Corrective-Lens-for-Purposes-of-Determining-Loss-of-Use-Johnson</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YOHE0RvAB84%3d</guid><description>Thomas A. Robinson tells us in this article that when determining the extent to which an injured worker has lost his or her vision, the dominant rule is that one&amp;rsquo;s loss of vision should be based on reading or other appropriate visual activity without the use of corrective lenses (with regard t</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:35:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Danyelle Wright on Genetic Information Discrimination Act of 2008 (GINA)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Danyelle-Wright-on-Genetic-Information-Discrimination-Act-of-2008-GINA</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oY%2fm%2bpNAqmg%3d</guid><description>&amp;ldquo;Widely hailed as civil rights legislation for the genetic age, the   Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008   (GINA) protects Americans against discrimination based on their genetic information when it comes to health insurance and employment,&amp;rdquo; writes Danyelle Wright. &amp;ldquo;</description><author>Danyelle S.T. Wright</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:35:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Topical Index of LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis on Workers’ Compensation Related Issues (Updated 11/12/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Topical-Index-of-LexisNexis-Emerging-Issues-Analysis-on-Workers-Compensation-Related-Issues</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kII6WYgqDpc%3d</guid><description> Topical Index of    LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis  
 Workers' Compensation Related Issues 
 [Current through  November  2009]    
 Lexis.com subscribers can access articles for a fee. To become a lexis.com subscriber, contact your LexisNexis Account Manager or   Customer Service  . &amp;n</description><author>Workers' Compensation Experts</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:27:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bruce S. Harrison on Discipline or Discharge for Drug or Alcohol-Related Conduct</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Bruce-S-Harrison-on-Discipline-or-Discharge-for-Drug-or-Alcohol-Related-Conduct</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">PlD5tM%2bpc8c%3d</guid><description>Most corporations have long been aware of the economic costs of employee alcoholism. No company, large or small, is immune from this problem. A large number of corporations have developed programs to identify, rehabilitate and, if necessary, discipline and discharge employees who have used or abused</description><author>Bruce S. Harrison</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:42:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Harry Asatrian and Ainsley Harrell on To E-Verify or not to E-Verify</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Harry-Asatrian-and-Ainsley-Harrell-on-To-E-Verify-or-not-to-E-Verify</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">49V8gVZPDlE%3d</guid><description>As federal, state, and local governments push more and more U.S. employers to deny hiring unauthorized workers, the question of whether to use the E-Verify system comes up more often. In this Analysis, Harry Asatrian and Ainsley Harrell, of Strasser Asatrian LLC, go over the pros and cons of E-Verif</description><author>Harry Asatrian and Ainsley Harrell</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:41:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sana Swe and Rishi Sharma on Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications (off-duty marijuana use &amp; job performance)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Sana-Swe-and-Rishi-Sharma-on-Ross-v-RagingWire-Telecommunications</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">H7yoEx4uzyE%3d</guid><description>In  Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc. , a five-justice majority of the California Supreme Court rejected a plaintiffs assertions that his discharge, based on off-duty, off-premises marijuana use that allegedly did not impact his job duties or performance, (i) was protected by the Compassio</description><author>Sana Swe and Rishi N. Sharma</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:01:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Steven D. Feinberg, MD on Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy &amp; Causalgia</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Steven-D-Feinberg-MD-on-Complex-Regional-Pain-Syndrome-Reflex-Sympathetic-Dystrophy--Causalgia</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QJ4YwQIhXO8%3d</guid><description> Complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS) type I and type II formally known as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) and Causalgia respectively, are the most complicated chronic neuropathic pain syndromes involving sensory, motor and autonomic changes. 
 Short of a diagnosis of an incurable terminal dis</description><author>Steven D. Feinberg, M.D.</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:56:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tennessee Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Sixth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Tennessee-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">A%2f5yD%2bOhgkM%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Tennessee that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially sets forth the relevant sections of the Tennessee Code.
 
&amp;ldquo;Tenn. Code Ann. &amp;sect; 50-6-204(d) provide</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:53:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Louisiana Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Sixth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Louisiana-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EGtWrkguVhA%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Louisiana that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially sets forth the relevant statutory authority:
 
La. R.S. 23:1221(4)(q) provides as follows: No benefits shal</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:13:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vernon Sumwalt on "Last Clear Chance" Doctrine under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-10.2(e): Outlaw v. APAC-Atlantic, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vernon-Sumwalt-on-Last-Clear-Chance-Doctrine-under</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">v03mGq16jWM%3d</guid><description>In a case of first impression, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in  Outlaw v. APAC-Atlantic, Inc., 660 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008) , that a negligent employer cannot recover its workers' compensation lien even though a negligent third party had the last clear chance of avoiding an injury</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:02:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Andrew Gold on Personal Jurisdiction in the Internet Age: What Does a Website Have to Do to Constitute Minimum Contacts Sufficient to Establish Jurisdiction?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Andrew-Gold-on-Personal-Jurisdiction-in-the-Internet-Age-What-Does-a-Website</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RYk5zMhgL3k%3d</guid><description>In  Andys Music, Inc. v. Andys Music, Inc. , an Alabama plaintiff argued that the mere fact that the defendant had a website accessible via the internet in Alabama was sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction against it. A court disagreed. So, what does constitute minimum contacts in the age of</description><author>Andrew M. Gold</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:08:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>John K. Rabiej on Discovery of Employee Privileged Communications Sent or Stored Using Employer's Computer System</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/John-K-Rabiej-on-Discovery-of-Employee-Privileged-Communications-Sent-or-Stored</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ogn9nzkwUjQ%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, John K. Rabiej, Chief of the Rules Committee Support Office of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, reports that courts have developed an analytical framework to determine whether an employee&amp;rsquo;s expectation of privacy in workplace e-mails is r</description><author>John K. Rabiej</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:19:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Kentucky Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Fifth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Kentucky-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nuxlaCxvJFY%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Kentucky that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially explains that &amp;quot;Kentucky currently utilizes the AMA Guides, Fifth Edition. Various statutory provisions ordinar</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:08:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Fifth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VIRe2HWst0g%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Iowa that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially explains that &amp;ldquo;Iowa Admin. Code r. 876-2.4 has been amended to read: The Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Im</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:03:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Colorado Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Third Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Colorado-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wmE7QPHOZL4%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Colorado that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially explains that &amp;ldquo;Some workers never fully recover from their work-related injuries. In such cases, when a worke</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:57:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Arkansas Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Fourth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Arkansas-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SjfRxggg4wA%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Arkansas that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially explains that &amp;quot;pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. &amp;sect; 11-9-522(g)(1)(A), the Workers' Compensation Commission is ch</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:13:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Premises Owners Immunity From Tort Actions Filed by Injured Employees of Subcontractors: Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Premises-Owners-Immunity-From-Tort-Actions-Filed-by-Injured-Employees-of-Subcontractors-Entergy-Gulf-States-Inc-v-Summers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u9QbtizvkWE%3d</guid><description> Thomas A. Robinson notes that virtually all states have &amp;ldquo;statutory employer&amp;rdquo; (sometimes referred to as &amp;ldquo;contractor-under&amp;rdquo;) statutes that make general contractors liable for workers&amp;rsquo; compensation benefits for the employees of subcontractors, usually conditioned upon the</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:51:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Logging on Farm as Not "Agricultural" Activity Exempt From Workers' Compensation Coverage: Commonwealth v. Gussler</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Logging-on-Farm-as-Not-Agricultural-Activity-Exempt-From-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">awA%2fi5mSKfY%3d</guid><description>Particularly in its early years, workers' compensation law was an industrial phenomenon. It sprang from factory conditions in the first few decades of the Twentieth Century, and for many years, a majority of states exempted farm labor from the protective coverage of their workers' compensation acts.</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:38:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jesse N. Rosen on AMA Guides, Spinal Impairment, and First Reported Calif. Workers' Compensation Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jesse-N-Rosen-on-AMA-Guides-Spinal-Impairment-and-First-Reported-Calif-Workers-Compensation-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VlQzWouIVds%3d</guid><description>Ch. 15 of the AMA  Guides , 5th Edition, details the methods of assessing Whole Person Impairment (WPI) for spinal injury. It sets forth detailed instructions and methods of determining spinal WPI. Two methods of evaluating spinal WPI are provided: DRE (Diagnosis Related Estimate) and ROM (Range of </description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:14:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California's 2009 E-Discovery Laws: Text and Analysis</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Californias-2009-E-Discovery-Laws-Text-and-Analysis-----</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">A9sfzL91IGk%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Paul R. Kiesel and Steve Williams report that California's new Electronic Discovery Act, effective June 29, 2009, makes comprehensive changes in California law relating to e-discovery. This commentary includes an analysis by these two authors who helped write the Ac</description><author>Paul R. Kiesel &amp; Steven N. Williams</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:21:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Arizona Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment – Sixth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Arizona-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fqDH8vHivUI%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from Arizona that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Robinson initially explains that the Arizona &amp;ldquo;Workers' Compensation Act divides permanent disabilities into two broad categories:</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:49:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Carrier Payment for Gastric Bypass Surgery "Associated" With Treatment for Knee Injury: Sprague v. SAIF Corp.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Carrier-Payment-for-Gastric-Bypass-Surgery-Associated-With-Treatment-for-Knee-Injury</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Ryj8t1txjDc%3d</guid><description>On April 23, 2007, Duke University published a study of its own employees, which found that gaining too much weight is not only bad for an employee's waistline; when it comes to the employer or carrier's workers' compensation expenses, it is bad for the employer's bottom line. The Duke University Me</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:22:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ann Allott on Grassley Amendment Allowing E-Verify for Existing Employees</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ann-Allott-on-Grassley-Amendment-Allowing-E-Verify-for-Existing-Employees-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yY5bnEJpoS4%3d</guid><description>E-Verify, an Internet-based system operated by the Department of Homeland Services in cooperation with the Social Security Administration, allows an employer to electronically verify employment eligibility of new hires, thus deterring the employment of unauthorized workers. This free screening </description><author>Ann Allott</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:21:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Employee Misconduct and Workers' Compensation: Brackett v. Focus Hope, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Employee-Misconduct-and-Workers-Compensation-Brackett-v-Focus-Hope-Inc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Pb3fSKMYkzE%3d</guid><description>Thomas A. Robinson notes that cases involving statutory misconduct are relatively rare. One reason is that only about one-third of American jurisdictions have such disqualifying statutes. Even within those jurisdictions, because Commissions and courts are reluctant to order a disqualification for a </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:15:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Noteworthy Cases Interpreting the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment - Fifth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Noteworthy-Cases-Interpreting-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FKRoDkv5b2w%3d</guid><description>In this Emerging Issues Analysis, Thomas A. Robinson analyzes noteworthy cases from California that interpret the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition. Robinson initially explains that California adopted the AMA Guides as follows: &amp;ldquo;Cal. Lab. Code &amp;sect; 4660(b)(1</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:24:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>David Bryan Leonard on Calif. Doctrine of Fair Procedure and Admission to Medical Networks in Workers' Comp Context: Palm Medical Group v. SCIF</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/David-Bryan-Leonard-on-Calif-Doctrine-of-Fair-Procedure-and-Admission-to-Medical-Networks-in-Workers-Comp-Context-Palm-Medical-Group-v-SCIF</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u6sq6x22Sn8%3d</guid><description>This article analyzes  Palm Medical Group, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 161 Cal. App. 4th 206 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 2008) , in which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District ruled that the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) owed a plaintiff a duty of fair pr</description><author>David Bryan Leonard</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:57:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Richard C. Kissiah on 2008 Significant Changes in Georgia Workers' Compensation Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Richard-C-Kissiah-on-2008-Significant-Changes-in-Georgia-Workers-Compensation-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gH96JG4wr%2f0%3d</guid><description>A number of changes have recently been made in Georgia workers' compensation law. Some of the changes were effectuated by changes in the Georgia Workers' Compensation Act by the General Assembly that were signed into law by the Governor. Other changes were effectuated by the State Board of Workers' </description><author>Richard C Kissiah</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:53:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Ability of Claimant to Assign Disability Benefits to Third Party: Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Ability-of-Claimant-to-Assign-Disability-Benefits-to-Third-Party-Cross-v-Capital</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">pFsj%2fo%2f%2f0Xs%3d</guid><description>Thomas A. Robinson says that we have all seen the television ads: &amp;quot;You need your money and you need it now&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;It's your money, use it now!&amp;quot; The ads target persons who receive periodic payments through an annuity, structured settlement agreement, or the like, and offer the oppor</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:29:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Denis Paul Juge on Tribal Workers' Compensation Law: Case Study of Coushatta Indian Tribe of Louisiana</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Denis-Paul-Juge-on-Tribal-Workers-Compensation-Law-Case-Study-of-Coushatta-Indian-Tribe-of-Louisiana</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wcXXXI3%2fWSE%3d</guid><description> This commentary discusses the unique nature of Indian sovereignty and how the status of sovereign nations has enabled them to establish workers' compensation laws outside of the laws in the states where the tribes are located. The drafting of a workers' compensation law for the Coushatta Tribe of  </description><author>Denis Paul Juge</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:03:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Robert G. Rassp on Five of the Most Controversial Issues in AMA Guides and California Workers' Compensation Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Robert-G-Rassp-on-Five-of-the-Most-Controversial-Issues-in-AMA-Guides-and-California-Workers-Compensation-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lHa3ft2Ye3E%3d</guid><description>In order to get an accurate permanent disability rating for an injured worker in the California workers' compensation system, counsel needs to develop the record in all AMA  Guides  cases by reading the instructions in the AMA  Guides  and making sure physicians applied the descriptions and measurem</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:45:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Philip J. Fulton on Permanent and Total Disability Benefits in Ohio: State ex rel. Spohn v. Indus. Comm.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Philip-J-Fulton-on-Permanent-and-Total-Disability-Benefits-in-Ohio-State-ex-rel-Spohn-v-Indus-Comm</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">C0gPLn125e8%3d</guid><description> Philip J. Fulton examines the case of  State ex rel. Spohn v. Indus. Comm.,     115 Ohio St. 3d 329, 2007 Ohio 5027   , in which the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the Industrial Commission&amp;rsquo;s termination of a claimant&amp;rsquo;s permanent and total disability award because of medical improvement</description><author>Phil Fulton</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:19:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on 2008 Year-End State-by-State Survey of Key Workers' Compensation Legislative Changes (June - November 2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-2008-Year-End-State-by-State-Survey-of-Key-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Changes-June---November-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fsXFoMrrlFM%3d</guid><description> This commentary provides a state-by-state survey of key workers' compensation legislation from June to December 2008. 
 Virtually all state legislatures have closed up shop for the year, their members venturing home for holiday breaks. Its an appropriate time, therefore, to highlight some of the k</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:24:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Teddy Snyder on Settling a Workers' Compensation Case: Why, When, and How</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Teddy-Snyder-on-Settling-a-Workers-Compensation-Case-Why-When-and-How</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">i5lOC1a%2fxs8%3d</guid><description> Unlike liability cases that have to end eventually, a workers' compensation case may continue for as long as the worker lives. After the indemnity value of the case is paid--even if the worker is not treating--if the case has not concluded, the file must remain open for possible additional medical </description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:14:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Teddy Snyder on Preserving Public Benefits: A Settlement Primer</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Teddy-Snyder-on-Preserving-Public-Benefits-A-Settlement-Primer</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">h4IxUzoL0%2bo%3d</guid><description> This commentary provides basic information to highlight issues critical to the settlement process. 
 A workers' compensation case typically consists of two components: income replacement, sometimes called indemnity, and medical expense coverage. A disabled worker may also be receiving income </description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:30:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bourque, Callier, and Lovitch on Issues and Trends in the Regulation of Genetic Testing</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Bourque-Callier-and-Lovitch-on-Issues-and-Trends-in-the-Regulation-of-Genetic-Testing</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LNGopvV20t0%3d</guid><description> 
Genetic tests are available for an estimated 1300 genes, and many more tests are currently in development. Legislators and regulatory agencies, however, have begun to take action to improve industry oversight and to ensure proper safeguards are in place to protect patients. This article exam</description><author>Dianne Bourque, Shawneequa Callier, Karen Lovitch</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:07:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge David M. Gersten on Right of Workers' Compensation Claimants to Leave Florida and Obtain Treatment From Foreign Physician</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Judge-David-M-Gersten-on-Right-of-Workers-Compensation-Claimants-to-Leave-Florida-and-Obtain-Treatment-From-Foreign-Physician</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yBOLrFI8jEM%3d</guid><description> Judge David M. Gersten discusses AMS Staff Leasing, Inc. v. Arreola,   976 So. 2d 612   (  Fla. 1st DCA 2008), and the right of workers' compensation claimants to leave   
  
Florida and obtain treatment from a foreign physician. In  AMS Staff Leasing , the First District Court of Appeal determin</description><author>Judge David M. Gersten</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:00:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter Lareau on Employment Law Backgrounder: Financial Crisis and Employment Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Peter-Lareau-on-Employment-Law-Backgrounder-Financial-Crisis-and-Employment-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">v%2fKdoXf%2fyOk%3d</guid><description>
 The United States is facing an enormous financial crisis. This devastating decline in the nation's economy, and the election of Barack Obama and the strong gains made, generally, by the Democratic Party in national elections foreshadows changes in labor and employment law and a surge in employmen</description><author>Peter Lareau</author><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:40:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Darrell VanDeusen and Kelly Hoelzer on The DOL's Final FMLA Regulations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Darrell-VanDeusen-and-Kelly-Hoelzer-on-The-DOLs-Final-FMLA-Regulations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dnEXjzG36Lw%3d</guid><description> On November 17, 2008, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) issued highly anticipated revisions to the 1995 regulations interpreting the 15-year-old Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 2601  et seq . The new regulations also clarify the first-ever amendments to the FMLA</description><author>Darrell Van Deusen &amp; Kelly Hoelzer</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:47:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Company Doctor Exception to Exclusivity</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Company-Doctor-Exception-to-Exclusivity</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rU8B4VUJvIQ%3d</guid><description> The company doctor is the health care professional employed at the factory infirmary, or on call to provide professional first aid, routine medical examinations, immunizations, health screening, and the like. Although the practice has begun to disappear in many locations, historically some employer</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:05:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Reed Smith LLP on the Potential for Federal Regulation of Insurance in Light of AIG, Inc.'s Financial Collapse</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Reed-Smith-LLP-on-the-Potential-for-Federal-Regulation-of-Insurance-in-Light-of-AIG-Incs-Financial-Collapse-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ih9%2bNoevdTk%3d</guid><description> The financial collapse of AIG, Inc., one of the world's largest groups of insurance companies, has had and will continue to have significant impacts on the financial services industry, including the regulation of insurance. AIG's difficulties highlight the extent to which insurance has become inter</description><author>Paul Walker-Bright</author><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:52:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Generalized Anxiety Disorder as Occupational Disease</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder-as-Occupational-Disease</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VB4qhVUpqkg%3d</guid><description> Determining the compensability of so-called &amp;quot;mental-mental&amp;quot; cases&amp;mdash;those instances in which a mental (as distinguished from a physical) impact or stimulus results in a mental injury or occupational disease&amp;mdash;is among the most challenging issues within the workers' compensation ar</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:09:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Francis P. Alvarez &amp; Joseph J. Lazzarotti on Workplace Wellness Programs Standards</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Francis-P-Alvarez--Joseph-J-Lazzarotti-on-Workplace-Wellness-Programs-Standards</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ga4W%2fmdV0UI%3d</guid><description> Francis P. Alvarez and Joseph J. Lazzarotti of Jacson and Lewis, LLP, highlight three areas under the HIPAA nondiscrimnation regulations that are particularly important to the design and administration of covered wellness programs and provide practical insight to employers about how to comply with </description><author>Francis P. Alvarez &amp; Joseph J. Lazzarotti</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:40:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>N. Pete Lareau on Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/N-Pete-Lareau-on-Lilly-Ledbetter-Fair-Pay-Act-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">pVlWf7pb6wk%3d</guid><description> On January 22, 2009, President Obama signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. This commentary, written by N. Pete Lareau, after summarizing the facts and holding of the Supreme Court's Ledbetter decision, examines the new law, what it is intended to accomplish, and some practical ramificatio</description><author>Peter Lareau</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:22:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dudley C. Rochelle on Religious Discrimination and Religious Accommodations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Dudley-C-Rochelle-on-Religious-Discrimination-and-Religious-Accommodations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OOLaPiN6lx4%3d</guid><description> In 2007, we are beginning to see the results of cases brought by and for these alleged victims of the backlash 9-11.  Along with these plaintiffs, other religious believers are filing claims related to religious dress code issues.  
 As the results come in, it appears that the attitude of cou</description><author>Dudley C. Rochelle</author><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:15:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ann Allott on Immigration and Customs Enforcement Raids and Employer Sanctions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ann-Allott-on-Immigration-and-Customs-Enforcement-Raids-and-Employer-Sanctions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u5VgzVw%2f8l8%3d</guid><description> Ann Allott on Immigration and Customs Enforcement Raids and Employer Sanctions: In a time of increasing worksite raids to catch employers hiring unauthorized alien workers or not properly verifying employment authorization under the Immigration Reform and Control Act, Ann Allott offers guidance. Ms</description><author>Ann Allott</author><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:13:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dorinda D. DeScherer on the Rights and Obligations of Returning Service Members</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Dorinda-D-DeScherer-on-the-Rights-and-Obligations-of-Returning-Service-Members</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xA2tJU%2b0v1Q%3d</guid><description> Federal law guarantees reemployment as well as the restoration of certain tax-favored benefits, such as health care coverage and retirement plan contributions to returning service members. 
 When Johnny comes marching home again from military service, he may be marching straight to his former empl</description><author>Dorinda D. DeScherer</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:27:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jonathan R. Mook on ADA and Hearing Impaired Workers: Bates v. United Parcel Services, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jonathan-R-Mook-on-ADA-and-Hearing-Impaired-Workers-Bates-v-United-Parcel-Services-Inc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6FiQraxGmJg%3d</guid><description> Jonathan R. Mook examines the 9th Circuit decision in Bates v. United Parcel Services, Inc. , a major decision reversing a ruling of the courts panel that UPS had violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by excluding hearing-impaired individuals from package-car driver positions. 
 In it</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:04:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>David N. Nissenberg on Loading Dock Safety: Legal Issues Involving Forklifts and Loading and Unloading of Tractor-Trailers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/David-N-Nissenberg-on-Loading-Dock-Safety-Legal-Issues-Involving-Forklifts-and-Loading-and-Unloading-of-Tractor-Trailers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">F2prflmkR1s%3d</guid><description> Loading dock activity can be frenetic, and as a result, workplace accidents involving big rigs often occur during the loading and unloading process. OSHA reports that there are close to 70,000 forklift accidents each year. On average, 100 workers are killed and 20,000 are injured every year in fork</description><author>David N. Nissenberg</author><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:59:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Workers' Compensation and the Telecommuter: Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Workers-Compensation-and-the-Telecommuter-Wait-v-Travelers-Indemnity-Co</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">IVcdUhx7e%2bs%3d</guid><description> In 2006, approximately 34 million American workers telecommuted to some degree.  In a recent Wall Street Journal article, it was reported that at Safeco, a Seattle-based insurer, some 1,500 of its 7,000 employees now work away from corporate offices.  Large numbers of employees at IBM, Un</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:27:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Robert C. Leventhal on NCCI, Inc. v. AIG, Inc.: The Discovery Obligations of Reinsurance Pool Participants</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Robert-C-Leventhal-on-NCCI-Inc-v-AIG-Inc-The-Discovery-Obligations-of-Reinsurance-Pool-Participants</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">a7Zepj0ZJvs%3d</guid><description> Robert C. Leventhal, a litigation partner in Foley &amp;amp; Lardner, LLP, where he represents both cedants and reinsurers in reinsurance disputes, discusses a recent federal trial court decision that required a reinsurance pool and its attorney in fact to produce documents that were in the possession </description><author>Robert C. (Bob) Leventhal</author><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:05:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jonathan R. Mook on Reassignment as an ADA Reasonable Accommodation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jonathan-R-Mook-on-Reassignment-as-an-ADA-Reasonable-Accommodation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">w7P1gxAJtLY%3d</guid><description> Jonathan R. Mook, attorney, founding partner with DiMuroGinsberg, P.C., and author of  Americans with Disabilities   Act: Employee Rights and Employer Obligations  and  Americans with Disabilities   Act: Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities , examines the Eighth Circuit case of    Huber </description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:22:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Workers' Compensation and Horseplay: Hilton v. Martin</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Workers-Compensation-and-Horseplay-Hilton-v-Martin</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7QDpHmXacdc%3d</guid><description> For good or ill, horseplay is a part of the American workplace.  Acknowledging that a worker is not always as focused as the machine he or she may manage, that levity has its place on the job, and that human beings are social creatures who release tension, show affection, or bid away idle time</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:42:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi on Taking the Fear Out of Subrogation (Part Two)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-on-Taking-the-Fear-Out-of-Subrogation-Part-Two</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bX8TD2Q1GVU%3d</guid><description> Part one of this two-part Expert Commentary discussed conquering &amp;ldquo;subrophobia&amp;rdquo; by addressing the &amp;ldquo;basics&amp;rdquo; of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation subrogation: (1) explaining subrogation terminology, (2) providing guidance on identifying subrogation opportunities, and (3) recommending</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:03:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Professor Seth J. Chandler on Title I of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Professor-Seth-J-Chandler-on-Title-I-of-the-Genetic-Information-Nondiscrimination-Act-of-2008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CrdMFLHgNE4%3d</guid><description> Many have hailed the newly enacted Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) as the first major piece of civil rights legislation of the 21st Century that will foster medical treatment based on genetics by prohibiting &amp;ldquo;genetic discrimination&amp;rdquo; on the part of insurers and e</description><author>Seth Chandler</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:16:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Douglas Richmond on When It Comes to Insurance Regulation, Is Uncle Sam the New Sheriff in Town?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Douglas-Richmond-on-When-It-Comes-to-Insurance-Regulation-Is-Uncle-Sam-the-New-Sheriff-in-Town-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UF7u9DMiJv4%3d</guid><description> Insurance regulation has historically been left to the states. There has long been occasional noise about replacing state regulation with a federal system.   Now, the noise over possible federal regulation of insurance is building to a crescendo as a result of H.R. 5840, the Insuranc</description><author>Douglas R. Richmond</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:24:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hilary Haycock and Peter Harbage on National Health Insurance Reform Proposals: Comparison of John McCain's and Barack Obama's Plans</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Hilary-Haycock-and-Peter-Harbage-on-National-Health-Insurance-Reform-Proposals-Comparison-of-John-McCains-and-Barack-Obamas-Plans-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TbB2OoKK724%3d</guid><description> With 45.7 million Americans without health insurance or access to care, and with health care costs spiraling ever higher for individuals, employers and governments, health care reform has been a major issue throughout the 2008 presidential campaign. Both major parties&amp;rsquo; nominees ─ Senator John</description><author>Peter Harbage and Hilary Haycock</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:14:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Kerri N. Harper on California Supreme Court's Decision on Disability Discrimination: Green v. State of California</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Kerri-N-Harper-on-California-Supreme-Courts-Decision-on-Disability-Discrimination-Green-v-State-of-California</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qfpQpC1CINA%3d</guid><description> Before the   California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District decided  Green v. State of   
  
California (Green I),  the law had been well-settled that plaintiffs carry the burden of proof on the essential elements of claims they assert in litigation. The  Green I  court decided othe</description><author>Kerri N. Harper</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:27:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Workers' Compensation Dual Person Exception to Exclusivity: Peterson v. Industrial Door Co.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Workers-Compensation-Dual-Person-Exception-to-Exclusivity-Peterson-v-Industrial-Door-Co</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NSBz9T7btBw%3d</guid><description> At its core, workers compensation differs significantly from tort litigation. As Arthur Larson has written, tort litigation is an adversary contest to right a wrong between the contestants; workers compensation is a system, not a contest, to supply security to injured workers and distribute the cos</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:11:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi on Taking the Fear Out of Subrogation (Part One)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-on-Taking-the-Fear-Out-of-Subrogation-Part-One</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LCX0wHLFEMs%3d</guid><description> One of the more mysterious and confusing concepts in the handling of workers compensation claims is subrogation. Each time subrogation rears its head, the claims examiner must venture beyond the relatively familiar territory of workers compensation into the unknown realm of third party fault and da</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:18:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dan D. Kohane on Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Dan-D-Kohane-on-Liberty-Mutual-Insurance-Company-v-The-Insurance-Company-of-the-State-of-Pennsylvania-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HFLQNX12YaA%3d</guid><description> What will be the order of insurance coverage in a construction accident lawsuit where there are primary, co-primary and excess policies? For the practitioner, understanding the order of coverage among primary and excess policies is critically important. In  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Liberty Mutual Ins</description><author>Dan D. Kohane</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:44:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sonnenschein Nath &amp; Rosenthal, LLP on Bad Faith &amp; Summary Judgment in Iowa</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Sonnenschein-Nath--Rosenthal-LLP-on-Bad-Faith--Summary-Judgment-in-Iowa-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Co29qzl%2bRHI%3d</guid><description>Under the bad faith law in most jurisdictions, it is often possible to show that a bad faith claim fails as a matter of law. Even though some facts may be in dispute, the disputed facts are often immaterial to whether the insurer&amp;rsquo;s conduct met the requirements of the law or, if that condu</description><author>William T. Barker and Robert C. Johnson</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:35:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jonathan Mook on Individual Liability Under Disability Discrimination Laws</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jonathan-Mook-on-Individual-Liability-Under-Disability-Discrimination-Laws</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bX9z%2bUMITHM%3d</guid><description> Jonathan R. Mook, attorney, founding partner with DiMuroGinsberg, P.C., and author of Americans with Disabilities Act: Employee Rights and Employer Obligations and Americans with Disabilities Act: Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities, explains that individuals may not be liable for ADA d</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:55:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jonathan Mook on How to Evaluate ADA Claims: ADA Checklist</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jonathan-Mook-on-How-to-Evaluate-ADA-Claims-ADA-Checklist</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WRQ2BaAOh%2bQ%3d</guid><description> Determining whether the  &lt;/city&gt;
  
ADA applies to a particular client's situation requires a number of complicated factual and legal analyses. Jonathan Mook, author of two legal treatises on the  Americans with Disabilities Act: ADA: Employee Rights and Employer Obligations  and  ADA: Public Acc</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:33:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter Harbage, Hilary Haycock and Michael Odeh on California Healthcare Reform: Legislation in 2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Peter-Harbage-Hilary-Haycock-and-Michael-Odeh-on-California-Healthcare-Reform-Legislation-in-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hKvuA3RTD%2f8%3d</guid><description> With comprehensive healthcare reform failing a key legislative vote in January 2008,   
  
California policymakers are now energized to achieve specific healthcare reform goals in 2008, despite also struggling with a significant state budget deficit. In this commentary, Peter Harbage, Hilary Hayc</description><author>Peter Harbage and Hilary Haycock</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:17:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Workers' Compensation Bunkhouse Rule: Vaught v. State of Calif.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Workers-Compensation-Bunkhouse-Rule-Vaught-v-State-of-Calif</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">scaIoSs4SWQ%3d</guid><description> The bunkhouse rule--the doctrine that broadens the ordinary course and scope of ones employment so as to include injuries occurring when the employee may be off-the-clock, but living in employer-provided housing--is sometimes dismissed as a throwback to an early era of isolated logging and mining c</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:37:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ann Allott on Arizona and Illinois Laws (and Lawsuits) on Undocumented Workers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ann-Allott-on-Arizona-and-Illinois-Laws-and-Lawsuits-on-Undocumented-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OnnOFDXTYEM%3d</guid><description> On July 2, 2007, Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano (D) signed the Legal Arizona Workers Act, which prohibits employers from knowingly or intentionally hiring undocumented workers and attaches criminal penalties. It requires all employers to use what used to be called the Basic Pilot Program -- now </description><author>Ann Allott</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:56:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi, LLP, on Protecting Privileged Information in the Claims File</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-LLP-on-Protecting-Privileged-Information-in-the-Claims-File</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">I4T%2fJyxXyEU%3d</guid><description> This Expert Commentary, authored by Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp;amp; Moresi LLP, one of the largest firms in the country specializing in California Workers' Compensation Defense, examines the tool most often used by attorneys to obtain claims information -- the deposition subpoena -- and ways to re</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:47:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge David M. Gersten on Asserting Intentional Tort Claims Against an Employer in Florida: Jones v. Martin Electronics</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Judge-David-M-Gersten-on-Asserting-Intentional-Tort-Claims-Against-an-Employer-in-Florida-Jones-v-Martin-Electronics</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xKo%2fXLhh8Ng%3d</guid><description> The workers&amp;rsquo; compensation system provides employees with limited medical and wage loss benefits, without regard to fault, for losses resulting from workplace injuries. In turn, section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes, gives the employer immunity from liability for their negligent conduct that cau</description><author>Judge David M. Gersten</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:28:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>McDonnell on Illinois Supreme Court Ruling on Employer Waiver of Lien in Third Party Recovery: Gallagher v. Lenart</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/McDonnell-on-Illinois-Supreme-Court-Ruling-on-Employer-Waiver-of-Lien-in-Third-Party-Recovery-Gallagher-v-Lenart</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jDAbuIJSF3g%3d</guid><description> The Illinois Supreme Court resorted to elementary principles of contract law in determining whether an employer, who had obtained from its employee a release &amp;ldquo;in full and final settlement of all claims under the Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Act,&amp;rdquo; had waived its statutory lien by failing </description><author>Joseph B. McDonnell</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:17:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>James M. Stone and Nicole M. Monachino on Ohio Supreme Court Decision to Limit Workers' Compensation Retaliation Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/James-M-Stone-and-Nicole-M-Monachino-on-Ohio-Supreme-Courts-Decision-to-Limit-Workers-Compensation-Retaliation-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2%2fxIL86mI5k%3d</guid><description> In a major victory for employers, the Supreme Court of Ohio narrowed the number of claims and potential recovery for employees who are terminated while receiving workers compensation benefits. Mr. Stone and Ms. Monachino explain that in  Bickers v. W. &amp;amp; S. Life Ins. Co ., 116 Ohio St. 3d 351, 2</description><author>James M. Stone and Nicole M. Monachino</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:11:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi, LLP, on Returning Injured Employees to Work Under California Labor Code Sections 4658 and 4658.6: Incentive or Trap?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-LLP-on-Returning-Injured-Employees-to-Work-Under-California-Labor-Code-Sections-4658-and-46586-Incentive-or-Trap</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7vGjsAbRIOE%3d</guid><description> Winston Churchill once said, &amp;ldquo;However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.&amp;rdquo; While it may still be too early to tell for sure, it does seem unfortunate that Mr. Churchill did not have the opportunity to impart this sagacious tidbit to the authors of Califo</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:05:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Death Benefits for Partners in Civil Union: Langan v. State Farm</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Death-Benefits-for-Partners-in-Civil-Union-Langan-v-State-Farm</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UEJH2EOPiDk%3d</guid><description> In a recent case of first impression,  Matter of Langan v. State Farm Fire &amp;amp; Casualty, 2007 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13242 (December 27, 2007), a New York a state appellate court was faced with a highly charged issue: does the surviving member or partner of a state sanctioned civil union have stand</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:56:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jeffrey E. Thomas on Emerging Issues for Terrorism Insurance</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jeffrey-E-Thomas-on-Emerging-Issues-for-Terrorism-Insurance-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ULX0hDv%2bayE%3d</guid><description> 
The federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 became law on December 26, 2007. It extended the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (&amp;ldquo;TRIA&amp;rdquo;) through the end of 2014 and made other changes to the Act. In this commentary, Associate Dean Jeffrey E. Thomas of the U</description><author>Jeffrey E Thomas</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:24:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Professor Kent Sinclair on Civil Actions for Assault or Wrongful Death in Virginia: Hilton v. Martin</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Professor-Kent-Sinclair-on-Civil-Actions-for-Assault-or-Wrongful-Death-in-Virginia-Hilton-v-Martin</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">c%2ffhxOFnTyQ%3d</guid><description> In its recent decision in  Hilton v. Martin , 275 Va. 176, 654 S.E.2d 571 (2008), the Supreme Court of Virginia revisited one of the classic issues in civil tort litigation in Virginia -- the question whether the &amp;quot;exclusive remedy&amp;quot; provision of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act precl</description><author>Kent Sinclair</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:12:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>David Kizer on California Workers' Compensation Apportionment After SB 899</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/David-Kizer-on-California-Workers-Compensation-Apportionment-After-SB-899</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Ob3JoZKhxOg%3d</guid><description> Apportionment is defined for purposes of workers' compensation as &amp;quot;the separating out of the part or parts of a disability or condition that are the result of an industrial injury fromthe part or parts of the disability or condition that are the result of other industrial or non-industrial inj</description><author>David Allen Kizer</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:46:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Illegal Aliens &amp; Workers' Compensation: Curiel v. Environmental Mgmt Svcs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Illegal-Aliens--Workers-Compensation-Curiel-v-Environmental-Mgmt-Svcs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">sgvIeMeThmU%3d</guid><description> Few issues these days have the power to monopolize/polarize the political discussion like that of illegal immigration.  Should millions, if not billions, of dollars be allocated to build a wall to separate &amp;ldquo;us&amp;rdquo; from &amp;ldquo;them?&amp;rdquo;  Should driver&amp;rsquo;s licenses be availa</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:57:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi, LLP, on California Subrogation Strategies</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-LLP-on-California-Subrogation-Strategies</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mPZSHZGYbUY%3d</guid><description> The rising value of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation benefits received by injured employees, coupled with the increasing reluctance of civil juries to award significant damages in personal injury actions, has resulted in a growing number of situations in which the injured employee either declines to pur</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:51:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Joseph B. McDonnell on Sale of Lien Rights in Illinois Workers' Compensation: Evans v. Doherty Construction</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Joseph-B-McDonnell-on-Sale-of-Lien-Rights-in-Illinois-Workers-Compensation-Evans-v-Doherty-Construction</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fodCXC0ehpE%3d</guid><description> An employee who is injured in a work-related accident has the right under Sec. 5(b) of the Illinois Workers' Compensation Act to sue a third party who may be legally liable for damages. If a recovery is made against that third party, either by suit or settlement, the employee is required to re</description><author>Joseph B. McDonnell</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:18:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jonathan R. Mook on Telecommuting as an ADA Reasonable Accommodation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jonathan-R-Mook-on-Telecommuting-as-an-ADA-Reasonable-Accommodation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">laEspLQcF10%3d</guid><description> Must an employer permit disabled employees to work from home or telecommute? In the past, Mr. Mook explains, the courts generally have not viewed telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation required by either the Americans with Disabilities Act   or the 1973 Rehabilitation Act.   However, the tide </description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:03:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi on Reasonable Accommodation Under AB 2222: California's Version of the ADA</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-on-Reasonable-Accommodation-Under-AB-2222-Californias-Version-of-the-ADA</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ptjKVlHo4rU%3d</guid><description> California employers need to be warned about the dangers presented by AB 2222 &amp;ndash;    California's version of the Americans with Disabilities Act (&amp;quot; &lt;/city&gt;
  
ADA &amp;quot;). The vast majority of disability discrimination lawsuits filed in   
  
California allege failure by employers</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:37:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Recent Workers' Compensation Case Involving First Responders: Gambardella v. Browning</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Recent-Workers-Compensation-Case-Involving-First-Responders-Gambardella-v-Browning</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ceqLkJIvu1w%3d</guid><description> In the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks and the anthrax scares that followed soon thereafter, Congress and a number of state legislatures enacted legislation granting special status, benefits, and financing in favor of many so-called &amp;ldquo;first responders&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;those police </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:47:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jesse N. Rosen on Time to Raise or Risk Waiver of Issues in California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jesse-N-Rosen-on-Time-to-Raise-or-Risk-Waiver-of-Issues-in-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">enPOtCm9QDQ%3d</guid><description> When are issues finalized for trial in a   
  
California workers' compensation case?  Does a party to a workers' compensation proceeding waive an issue if it is not raised at the MSC?  Or, as long as an issue is raised by the start of trial, is waiver avoided?  Parties frequently </description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:42:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on Recent California WCAB Panel Decisions: Stipulations, Commutation, and Commercial Traveler</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-Recent-California-WCAB-Panel-Decisions-Stipulations-Commutation-and-Commercial-Traveler</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">IGzZBeNqZ04%3d</guid><description> This expert commentary examines four recent panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board involving parties bound by trial stipulations despite later claims that the stipulations were not accurate, a commutation of a 100% award to allow applicant to purchase a rental </description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:53:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter Harbage and Hilary Haycock on California Healthcare Reform: How State Politics and Ideology Derailed California Healthcare Reform</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Peter-Harbage-and-Hilary-Haycock-on-California-Healthcare-Reform-How-State-Politics-and-Ideology-Derailed-California-Healthcare-Reform</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Jd4dvOX1WR0%3d</guid><description> This extensive commentary explains the substance and history of   
  
California &amp;rsquo;s ambitious but now stalled attempts at comprehensive health reform legislation. The legislation started with great promise but ended in ideological and political stalemate in the State Senate. Although  </description><author>Peter Harbage and Hilary Haycock</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:45:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vernon R. Sumwalt on North Carolina Misrepresentation in Contract of Employment: Freeman v. Rothrock</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vernon-R-Sumwalt-on-North-Carolina-Misrepresentation-in-Contract-of-Employment-Freeman-v-Rothrock</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gBbPcZq%2bsiM%3d</guid><description> In  Freeman v. Rothrock,  657 S.E.2d 389 (2008), 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 430, a majority of the North Carolina Court of Appeals announced that an employee&amp;rsquo;s misrepresentations in an application for employment rendered the subsequent employment contract&amp;mdash;and also the employer-employee relati</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:05:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on 2008 Mid-Year State-by-State Survey of Key Workers' Compensation Legislative Changes</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-2008-Mid-Year-State-by-State-Survey-of-Key-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Changes</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LomUcpt38WM%3d</guid><description> Thomas A. Robinson reviews some of the key legislative changes affecting workers' compensation law that have occurred between January and May 2008.  
 Probably the hottest topic relates to abuses and perceived abuses in the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:59:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>David Kizer on Cumulative Trauma in California Workers' Compensation Cases: What Is It and How to Address It</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/David-Kizer-on-Cumulative-Trauma-in-California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-What-Is-It-and-How-to-Address-It</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cb8z1B9vP1Q%3d</guid><description> Cumulative injury is one of the most difficult concepts for physicians in the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation field. This expert commentary, written by
  
David Kizer, discusses how physicians must often address the long term harmful effects of work exposure to the psyche, the back and internal organ</description><author>David Allen Kizer</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:49:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on Spinal Treatment Modalities: Calif. WCAB Panel Decisions in Sepeda and Barrera</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-Spinal-Treatment-Modalities-California-WCAB-Panel-Decisions-in-Sepeda-and-Barrera</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Bt%2fjfADXUao%3d</guid><description> A recent piece in  The New York Times  reports a study in the  Journal of the American Medical Association  that found an increase in spending on spinal treatments to $86 billion in 2005, 65% higher than it was in 1997, with no evidence of improvement in health status.  It quotes one of t</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:31:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi, LLP, on a Mean Lien Fighting Machine and California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Laughlin-Falbo-Levy--Moresi-LLP-on-a-Mean-Lien-Fighting-Machine-and-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YIpxWJy0%2bK8%3d</guid><description> Liens are usually the last issues addressed in a workers' compensation case.  Liens, however, are not and should not be treated as an afterthought.  With proper preparation, the defense can do far better than the run-of-the-mill settlement for a large portion of the lien value.  Thou</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:15:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Melissa C. Brown on Discrimination Due to Apportionment to Age and Gender-Related Conditions: Vaira v. WCAB</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Melissa-C-Brown-on-Discrimination-Due-to-Apportionment-to-Age-and-Gender-Related-Conditions-Vaira-v-WCAB</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9lndHQdlcvw%3d</guid><description> This expert commentary by Melissa C. Brown analyzes the unpublished California Court of Appeal decision in     Vaira v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.  (2007) 72   
  
Cal. Comp. Cas. 1586   , which held that any apportionment of a workers&amp;rsquo; compensation award to age or gender,  per se , is a viola</description><author>Melissa C. Brown</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:40:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vernon R. Sumwalt on Enforceability of NC Deputy Commissioner Opinions and Awards During Appeal to Full Commission: Roberts v. Dixie News, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vernon-R-Sumwalt-on-Enforceability-of-NC-Deputy-Commissioner-Opinions-and-Awards-During-Appeal-to-Full-Commission-Roberts-v-Dixie-News-Inc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9MDwdHu8YSE%3d</guid><description> Vernon R. Sumwalt has written an expert commentary article on     Roberts v. Dixie News, Inc. , 658 S.E.2d 684 (2008),    2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 654, in which the North Carolina Court of Appeals held that a decision by a deputy commissioner is enforceable during an appeal, even though it is appealed </description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:29:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jerome Schreibstein on FEHA and California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jerome-Schreibstein-on-FEHA-and-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lazTTmvxeCs%3d</guid><description> Jerome Schreibstein has written an expert commentary discussing the importance of FEHA to   
  
California workers' compensation attorneys. In the post-SB 899 environment, many   
  
California applicants&amp;rsquo; attorneys are seeking sources of compensation for their injured clients in addition</description><author>Jerome Schreibstein</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:18:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stuart D. Colburn on Texas Medical Reimbursement Policies and Guidelines: Rules 134.1, 134.2, 134.203, and 134.204</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stuart-D-Colburn-on-Texas-Medical-Reimbursement-Policies-and-Guidelines-Rules-1341-1342-134203-and-134204</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FG5%2f95CcbiE%3d</guid><description> &amp;copy;  Copyrighted 2008 by
  
Downs Stanford, PC. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.  
 Stuart D. Colburn notes that the Division has published the adoption of the aforementioned rules [Rules 134.1, 134.2, 134.203, 134.204] which required one-hundred seventy-six pages to justify.&amp;n</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:36:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on Apportionment to Factors of Disability That Were Also Factors of Causation of Surgery</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-Apportionment-to-Factors-of-Disability-That-Were-Also-Factors-of-Causation-of-Surgery</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">m6nlcEZtVD0%3d</guid><description> Merle C. Rabine's expert commentary examines two recent panel decisions -     Sanjoro v. Motion Picture and Television Fund       ,   2007 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 34   , and     Sallay  v. Macy&amp;rsquo;s West   ,      2007 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 16    -   that address the issue of apportionmen</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:02:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vernon R. Sumwalt on North Carolina Evaluation of Fringe Benefits in Employee’s Average Weekly Wage: Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vernon-R-Sumwalt-on-North-Carolina-Evaluation-of-Fringe-Benefits-in-Employees-Average-Weekly-Wage-Shaw-v-US-Airways-Inc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cim1V2XdC%2fc%3d</guid><description> Vernon R. Sumwalt asks: Which employee &amp;ldquo;earns&amp;rdquo; more at work? The one who gets $10.00 an hour?  Or the one who gets $10.00 an hour plus an additional 6% in quantifiable contributions made by the employer into a retirement account, and to which the employee is 100% vested at the</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:46:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Employee Fraud (False Statements): Obregon v. Industrial Comm’n of Ariz.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Employee-Fraud-False-Statements-Obregon-v-Industrial-Commn-of-Ariz</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Lo7UDDCZhbg%3d</guid><description> Thomas A. Robinson writes that significant attention has been given to the problem of employee fraud within the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation context.  Dishonest practices not only add to the overall cost of maintaining a workers&amp;rsquo; compensation program for employers, they increase the </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:28:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stuart Colburn on Texas Performance Based Oversight Initiatives Rule 180.19</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stuart-Colburn-on-Texas-Performance-Based-Oversight-Initiatives-Rule-18019</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ZC5ilbxiqIw%3d</guid><description> Stuart Colburn examines the Texas Depart of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation's adopted rules for Performance Based Oversight (PBO).  The Division has already issued its &amp;ldquo;Report Cards&amp;rdquo; grading insurance carriers and medical providers without the benefit, or lim</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:08:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on California WCAB Panel Decisions on Sanctions, Underground Regulations, and State Disability Benefits</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-California-WCAB-Panel-Decisions-on-Sanctions-Underground-Regulations-and-State-Disability-Benefits</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">f2jYavQ68G0%3d</guid><description> Merle C. Rabine examines four recent panel decisions of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board on the following topics:  
  Sanctions on Reconsideration :      Deza v. The Home Depot  2008 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 228   ;     Nuno v. Carniceria La Mejor  2008 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:48:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Paul B. Howell on Mississippi Supreme Court Explores Compensability of Murder Case: Total Transportation Inc. v. Shores</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Paul-B-Howell-on-Mississippi-Supreme-Court-Explores-Compensability-of-Murder-Case-Total-Transportation-Inc-v-Shores</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Zl%2fYWoPJj2I%3d</guid><description> Paul B. Howell notes that the backroads of Wyoming are an unlikely setting for one of the most significant Mississippi Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation cases to address the compensability of an injury due to the willful act of a third person.  
 It was 2:00 a.m. on a cold dark, night in
  
 &lt;/city&gt;La</description><author>Paul B. Howell</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:38:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Denis Paul Juge on Preferred Provider Organization Litigation in Louisiana Subject Matter Jurisdiction: "How to Fit a Round Peg into a Square Hole"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Denis-Paul-Juge-on-Preferred-Provider-Organization-Litigation-in-Louisiana-Subject-Matter-Jurisdiction-How-to-Fit-a-Round-Peg-into-a-Square-Hole</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gXVivZNYp88%3d</guid><description> Denis Paul Juge's previous Expert Commentary on &amp;quot;Status of PPO Litigation in   Louisiana: What&amp;rsquo;s the Problem?&amp;quot; gave a general overview of the litigation in   
  
Louisiana involving the claim of medical providers that their fees for the treatment of injured workers were improperly</description><author>Denis Paul Juge</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:29:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stuart D. Colburn on Texas Health Facility Fees: Rules 134.403 and 134.404</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stuart-D-Colburn-on-Texas-Health-Facility-Fees-Rules-134403-and-134404</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OOYF4QTPXGA%3d</guid><description> Stuart D. Colburn's Expert Commentary discusses the Texas Division of Workers' Compensation amendments to the Hospital Inpatient Fee Guidelines and creation of new Hospital Outpatient Fee Guidelines.  The two fee guidelines significantly increase reimbursement rates for hospitals; allow specif</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:55:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stephen C. Embry on Occupational Disease Law in Connecticut: Deschenes v. Transco Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stephen-C-Embry-on-Occupational-Disease-Law-in-Connecticut-Deschenes-v-Transco-Inc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">b53JaaaARJI%3d</guid><description> We are all familiar with the story of Solomon, who faced with the claims of two women for the custody of a baby ordered that the baby be split in half and a proportionate share be given to each claimant. One of the women, presumably the true mother, withdrew her claim so that the baby might be spar</description><author>Stephen C Embry</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:42:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on California WCAB Panel Decisions Regarding Apportionment, Preexisting Impairment, Third Party Settlements, QME Reports</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-California-WCAB-Panel-Decisions-Regarding-Apportionment-Preexisting-Impairment-Third-Party-Settlements-QME-Reports</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zJZtffDe3tk%3d</guid><description> Merle C. Rabine examines the recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel decisions  Odle v. Heintschel Plastering, Inc.  2007 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 226,  Anzevino v. Subsequent Injuries Fund  2008 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 2,  Lacentra v. Cal State Hayward  2008 Cal. Wrk. Comp</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:56:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Florida Guns in the Workplace Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Florida-Guns-in-the-Workplace-Act</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6l7vKcJPTXs%3d</guid><description> It is axiomatic that the number of workplace violence incidents has increased dramatically during the past few decades.  As part of their response to this escalation of violence, many employers have adopted policies that prohibit employees and others from bringing guns and other weapons onto t</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:37:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jesse N. Rosen on California Temporary Disability Limitation and Multiple Injuries: Foster v. Workers' Comp. App .Bd.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jesse-N-Rosen-on-California-Temporary-Disability-Limitation-and-Multiple-Injuries-Foster-v-Workers-Comp-App-Bd</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MBNS0WGZ2zc%3d</guid><description> When does 2 + 2 = 2? The new math of SB 899 in   
  
California might well create such a result for entitlement to temporary disability benefits when a person suffers multiple injuries.  
 In      Foster v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.      (2008) 161   Cal. App. 4th 1505, 73   
  
Cal. Comp. Cas. </description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:06:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Reid L. Steinfeld on Interpreter Fees in California Workers' Compensation Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Reid-L-Steinfeld-on-Interpreter-Fees-in-California-Workers-Compensation-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">STUE%2ba92svY%3d</guid><description>This expert commentary written by Reid L. Steinfeld discusses California statutes, regulations, and case law describing specific situations in which an interpreter may accompany an applicant and be paid, generally by the defendant's claims administrator. This commentary also discusses interpreters' </description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:01:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Misclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors and Deliberate Avoidance of Employment Relationships</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Misclassification-of-Employees-as-Independent-Contractors-and-Deliberate-Avoidance-of-Employment-Relationships</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uewxpg3cg8Q%3d</guid><description>The American capitalist economy is founded, at least in part, upon the freedom of firms and individuals to bind themselves to legal contracts without significant interference from outsiders, particularly the government. The freedom to contract does not exist within a vacuum, however. For e</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:37:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vernon R. Sumwalt on the Physician-Patient Privilege in Workers' Compensation Cases Since the Enactment of N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 97-25.6</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vernon-R-Sumwalt-on-the-Physician-Patient-Privilege-in-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Since-the-Enactment-of-NC-Gen-Stat-Sec-97-256</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UqE%2bmtbbTsU%3d</guid><description>For years, many appellate decisions in North Carolina have looked at the propriety of communications between parties and medical providers during litigation. Popularized by the medical malpractice case of Crist v. Moffatt,  326 N.C. 326 , 389 S.E.2d 41 (1990), the physician-patient privilege ha</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:29:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stephen C. Embry on Managed Care Is No Care: Connecticut's Medical Fee Schedule and the Medicare Resource Based Relative Value Scale</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stephen-C-Embry-on-Managed-Care-Is-No-Care-Connecticuts-Medical-Fee-Schedule-and-the-Medicare-Resource-Based-Relative-Value-Scale</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kOXXYlJU8NU%3d</guid><description>   
  
Connecticut recently joined a growing list of states that use Medicare Resource Based Relative Value Scales (RBRVS) for setting medical fees in workers' compensation cases. [Conn. Gen. Stat. &amp;sect; 31-280] If experience with other states is of any value in predicting the future, workers in </description><author>Stephen C Embry</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:29:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude S. Munday, Ph.D., on Issues in Apportionment in Psychiatric Cases and California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Claude-S-Munday-PhD-on-Issues-in-Apportionment-in-Psychiatric-Cases-and-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ldP9sAryL9s%3d</guid><description> California workers ' compensation professionals are dealing with the changes mandated by SB899 that have been further modified or clarified (to a degree) by the  Escobedo  decision [ Escobedo v. Marshalls, CNA Insurance Co.,  70 Cal. Comp. Cases 604, WCAB  en banc , April 19, 2005]. This exper</description><author>Claude S. Munday, Ph.D</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:54:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Recent Workers' Compensation Cases Involving Retaliatory Discharge Claims: Wrongful Demotion; Discharge As Not a "Change in Condition"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Recent-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Involving-Retaliatory-Discharge-Claims-Wrongful-Demotion-Discharge-As-Not-a-Change-in-Condition</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">G2AgcGC0GtE%3d</guid><description>Under the &amp;quot;at-will&amp;quot; employment doctrine en force within a number of states, an employer may terminate an employee for good reason, for bad reason, or for no reason at all (proponents of the rule would counter that within these jurisdictions employees may leave one place of employment for a</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:41:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dr. Jennifer Christian on ACOEM's New Work Disability Prevention Guideline</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Dr-Jennifer-Christian-on-ACOEMs-New-Work-Disability-Prevention-Guideline</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nQl%2fbc5qsuQ%3d</guid><description>
Physicians see devastating psychological, medical, social, and economic effects caused by unnecessarily prolonged work disability and loss of employability. They also see wasted human and financial resources and lost productivity. The physicians who developed the American College of Occupational &amp;</description><author>Jennifer Christian, M.D.</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:42:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Paul L. Salafia On NH Statutory Changes Re Employees v. Independent Contractor</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Paul-L-Salafia-On-NH-Statutory-Changes-Re-Employees-v-Independent-Contract0r</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7Bs5tNqTo1c%3d</guid><description> The New Hampshire Legislature has recently adopted statutory changes that will govern whether an employee is in fact an employee, or an independent contractor, for the purposes of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation benefits.  The new criteria will also be determinative in issues regarding employment,</description><author>Paul L. Salafia</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:09:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter M. Sweeny on Wainwright v. Newport News</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Peter-M-Sweeny-on-Wainwright-v-Newport-News</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">pjZDwY8hJKY%3d</guid><description> Virginia&amp;rsquo;s one major seaport is in its Tidewater Region.  Industry and commerce center around Hampton Roads, which is home to one of the largest naval bases in the world as well as major civilian shipping industries.  Workers&amp;rsquo; compensation practitioners in the Tidewater who re</description><author>Peter M. Sweeny</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:25:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on CA WCAB Panel Decisions Re Overlap, Refusal of Medical Treatment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-CA-WCAB-Panel-Decisions-Re-Overlap-Refusal-of-Medical-Treatment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">W%2fm29JoQXMA%3d</guid><description> Recent interest in California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel decisions has been fueled by continuing uncertainty of interpretation of parts of Senate Bill 899 and by discussion and debate on the Internet. This commentary, written by Merle C. Rabine, the past Chairman of the Workers&amp;rsquo</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:20:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas A. Robinson on Recent Medical Malpractice Cases Relating to Workers' Compensation Claims: Physician's Negligent Administration of Paperwork; Laboratory's Improper Release of HIV Results</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Thomas-A-Robinson-on-Recent-Medical-Malpractice-Cases-Relating-to-Workers-Compensation-Claims-Physicians-Negligent-Administration-of-Paperwork-Laboratorys-Improper-Release-of-HIV-Results</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">iJbCmJP4RrA%3d</guid><description> Anyone who thinks that workers' compensation law deals primarily with broken bones, low back injuries, and computations of average weekly wages has only to look at recent decisions from around the country to see that the issues examined within the &amp;quot;comp world&amp;quot; are as interesting and intri</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:22:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Levine on Medical Specialists in Workers' Compensation, California Implications</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Levine-on-Medical-Specialists-in-Workers-Compensation-California-Implications</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rVMtw1F2w%2bw%3d</guid><description> Medical specialists&amp;rsquo; willingness to accept workers&amp;rsquo; compensation patients has been trending downward in a number of states over the past 10 years. This is due to two major factors: increased regulatory burdens and declines in specialist fees. This commentary, written by Dr. Steven E. Le</description><author>Steven E. Levine, M.D.</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:26:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Richard C. Kissiah on Significant 2007-2008 Changes in Georgia Workers' Compensation Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Richard-C-Kissiah-on-Significant-2007-2008-Changes-in-Georgia-Workers-Compensation-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EIDaENZw%2btc%3d</guid><description> Significant changes have occurred in the Georgia workers' compensation law in 2007 through legislation passed by the Georgia General Assembly and signed into law by the Governor, through the revision by the State Board of Workers' Compensation of its Rules &amp;amp; Regulations, and through decisions b</description><author>Richard C Kissiah</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:06:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Levy on War Hazards Compensation Act for Overseas Injured Civilian Employees</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Levy-on-War-Hazards-Compensation-Act-for-Overseas-Injured-Civilian-Employees</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6ChGCfiJl%2bM%3d</guid><description>  Hostilities in Eastern Europe, Afghanistan, and most recently Iraq and other countries in the Middle East have caused many employers concern and uncertainty over workers&amp;rsquo; compensation exposures to employees working in those parts of the world. This commentary, written by Roger A. Levy, who i</description><author>Roger A Levy</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:58:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rassp on Affirming Fuentes Rule for Permanent Disability Indemnity Calculation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Rassp-on-Affirming-Fuentes-Rule-for-Permanent-Disability-Indemnity-Calculation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">khJ9VdgITQQ%3d</guid><description>   The California Supreme Court resolved in  Brodie v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd ., 40 Cal. 4 th  1313, 72 Cal. Comp. Cas 565, 2007 Cal. LEXIS 4334 (May 3, 2007), the conflict among the state appellate courts as to the correct Formula to be applied for determining the apportionment of subsequen</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:42:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Doug McCoy on the Elimination of Second Injury Funds: Protecting Our Freedom, No Protection at Home</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Doug-McCoy-on-the-Elimination-of-Second-Injury-Funds-Protecting-Our-Freedom-No-Protection-at-Home</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EfWWS0J70HY%3d</guid><description>  Second Injury Funds began in
  
in 1916 and were then modified following World War II to encourage the hiring of disabled war veterans. Beginning in 1992, however, states began to close their Second Injury Funds. This commentary by Doug McCoy of McCoy Consulting, examines the policies behind the</description><author>Doug McCoy</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:53:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Embry on Crossing the Jensen Line and Coppola v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Embry-on-Crossing-the-Jensen-Line-and-Coppola-v-Logistec-Connecticut-Inc</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">JlHmPAEAstc%3d</guid><description> In  Coppola v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc ., 283 Conn. 1, 925 A.2d 257 (2007), the Connecticut Supreme Court reversed the Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission and ruled that the state has concurrent jurisdiction with the federal government over certain claims involving injuries incurred on n</description><author>Stephen C Embry</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:18:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vernon R. Sumwalt on Proving Causation of Work-Related Medical Conditions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vernon-R-Sumwalt-on-Proving-Causation-of-Work-Related-Medical-Conditions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">AmHV9jrbLJU%3d</guid><description>   &lt;/city&gt;
  
Vernon Sumwalt on Proving Causation of Work-Related Medical Conditions  
    
  A significant percentage of
  
  North Carolina appellate decisions have addressed the issue of causation in workers&amp;rsquo; compensation cases over the past several years.    
    
    
  In L</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:18:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Denis Paul Juge on Status of the Preferred Provider Organization Litigation in Louisiana: What's The Problem?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Denis-Paul-Juge-on-Status-of-the-Preferred-Provider-Organization-Litigation-in-Louisiana-Whats-The-Problem</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GPQOTcudMUA%3d</guid><description>  Litigation has been filed in both federal and state courts in   Louisiana concerning the discounting of payments by silent PPOs to healthcare providers for medical services that are provided to patients for treatment under the   
  
Louisiana workers&amp;rsquo; compensation act. This commentary, wri</description><author>Denis Paul Juge</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:25:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Levy on Applying Defense Base Act to Civilian Employees Injured Overseas</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Levy-on-Applying-Defense-Base-Act-to-Civilian-Employees-Injured-Overseas</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VR9yGTQxgVQ%3d</guid><description> Hostilities in Eastern Europe, Afghanistan, and most recently Iraq and other countries in the Middle East have caused many employers concern and uncertainty over workers&amp;rsquo; compensation exposures to employees working in those parts of the world. This commentary, written by Roger A. Levy, who is</description><author>Roger A Levy</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:50:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Merle C. Rabine on CA WCAB Panel Decisions Re DFEC, Outpatient Surgery Centers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Merle-C-Rabine-on-CA-WCAB-Panel-Decisions-Re-DFEC-Outpatient-Surgery-Centers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OWp5Ympvrq4%3d</guid><description> Recent interest in California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel decisions has been fueled by continuing uncertainty of interpretation of parts of Senate Bill 899 and by discussion and debate on the Internet. This commentary, written by Merle C. Rabine, the past Chairman of the Workers&amp;rsquo</description><author>Merle C Rabine</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:25:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>James Ponzio on the California Supreme Court Affirming the Fuentes Rule for the Calculation of Permanent Disability Indemnity</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/James-Ponzio-on-the-California-Supreme-Court-Affirming-the-Fuentes-Rule-for-the-Calculation-of-Permanent-Disability-Indemnity</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VyXWnr138Zk%3d</guid><description> The California Supreme Court resolved in Brodie v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 40 Cal. 4th 1313 (2007), the conflict among the appellate courts as to the correct formula for calculating the permanent disability indemnity when there is apportionment to either a previous industrial disability, to non</description><author>James Ponzio</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:41:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Doug McCoy on the Closing of the Georgia Subsequent Injury Trust Fund</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Doug-McCoy-on-the-Closing-of-the-Georgia-Subsequent-Injury-Trust-Fund</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WdZEWPqkS2c%3d</guid><description> On July 1, 2006, the Georgia legislature closed the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund to new claims. Doug McCoy concludes in part that insurance carriers and third party administrators must reexamine their inactive claims, especially those in which impairment existed prior to the work-related injury, an</description><author>Doug McCoy</author><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:15:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>