Go to Home Page Legal
  
Insurance Law Center
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
Insurance Law Center
Monthly Issues Focus:
Current Topics are Financial Meltdown and 2008 Election Results
RSS Email Alert




Coverage and Exclusions
10/14/2008 12:50:32 PM EST
Randy J. Maniloff
Pennsylvania Federal Court: Emotional Injury is Not "Bodily Injury"
partner, White and Williams LLP

Create an account or login to download your free copy.

Recently the Middle District of Pennsylvania addressed coverage under a liability policy for an underlying claim against an insured for sexual assault of a co-worker. At issue was whether the underlying complaint alleged “bodily injury.”

The court held in Babalola v. Donegal Mutual Insurance that allegations of emotional and mental harm do not satisfy a liability policy’s definition of “bodily injury.” The term was defined as “bodily harm, sickness or disease, including required care, loss of services and death that results.” Most notably the court also concluded that allegations of physical manifestation of mental or emotional harm fail to qualify as “bodily injury.”

Among other things, the alleged victim asserted in her complaint that she had seen her family physician and a psychiatrist to help her cope with and manage the mental and emotional trauma suffered because of the attacks.  She also alleged that she required consultation and treatment by a cardiologist due to a heart condition that developed as a result of the attacks and has suffered other physical manifestations of the emotional trauma caused by the insured.  The alleged victim also asserted an offensive touching.

Nonetheless, the court held that there were no allegations of “bodily injury,” and, thus, liability coverage was not triggered.

While this conclusion is consistent with prior Pennsylvania decisions on the issue, not all states are in accord with Babalola when it comes to coverage for physical manifestation of mental or emotional harm.

Indeed, just last month the Montana Supreme Court reached the opposite conclusion as Babalola in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wagner-Ellsworth. In doing so, the Wagner-Ellsworth Court cited to a Washington Court of Appeals decision which stated that “many courts have held that allegations of physically-manifested emotional distress fall within ‘bodily injury’ coverage in the insurance context.” Wagner-Ellsworth, 2008 Mont. LEXIS 382, **25, quoting Trinh v. Allstate Ins. Co., 37 P.3d 1259, 1262, 2002 Wash. App. LEXIS 53 (Wash App. 2002).

[Editor’s note: Readers that register and log on to this site may obtain a FREE DOWNLOAD of Babalola v. Donegal Mutual Insurance Company by clicking on the link above. Readers are encouraged to register and log on to this site to leave questions or comments, or to contact Randy Maniloff directly at http://Maniloff@whiteandwilliams.com.]

Create an account or login to post comments.

Your Resources

Your Toolbox

Our Communities

Other Links