The treatise was updated to reflect certain case law developments. First, “doing business,” under BCL Article 13, was interpreted under two standards. A heightened standard applied to statutes raising concerns about interfering with the Commerce Clause authority reserved to Congress, and a less strict standard, in CPLR 302, applied when such concerns were not present. Since BCL § 1315 raised no Commerce Clause concerns, the less strict standard applied. Under this standard, the foreign corporation, through its wholly owned subsidiary and acting as its principal, did business in New York. The foreign corporation, a shell holding company, which functioned in New York through its sole operational subsidiary, was thus subject to § 1315’s obligation to make available its shareholder list. AirTran v. Midwest Air Group. Furthermore, the update indicates that In Miller v. Ross, the court held that section 1006 is not limited only to the conversion into a New York limited liability company, it also applies to the conversion to a Delaware (or any other foreign jurisdiction) LLC. Otherwise, the rights of limited partners could be forfeited by merely selecting a jurisdiction that did not provide for their protection and organizing the new entity there.