Go to Home Page Communities
  
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
UCC, Commercial Contracts and Business Law Center
RSS Email Alert




Commercial Law - Top Cases
4/1/2009 8:41:11 AM EST
UCC, Commercial Contracts & Business LC Staff
Golden Gate Rest. Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5191
Petition for rehearing en banc denied. Section 514(a) (29 U.S.C.S. § 1144(a)) of ERISA did not preempt the employer spending requirements of the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance. The spending requirements did not establish an ERISA plan, nor did they have an impermissible connection with employers' ERISA plans, or make an impermissible reference to such plans.
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Golden Gate Rest. Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Golden Gate Rest. Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco.

Create an account or login to post comments.

Martindale-Hubbell(R) Connected - Join Now

lexisOne Community

Community Questions







Your Resources

Your Toolbox

Our Communities

Other Links