1. Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V. (In re DDAVP Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.), Docket No. 06-5525-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22719, September 15, 2008, Argued, October 16, 2009, Decided
2. Nanodetex Corp. v. Defiant Techs., No. 08-2123, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22634, October 15, 2009, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
3. In re Roth, 2009-1223, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22499, October 14, 2009, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of In re Roth
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of In re Roth
4. Emcore Corp. v. Optium Corp., Civil Action No. 7-326, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96303, October 16, 2009, Decided, October 16, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
5. Emcore Corp. v. Optium Corp., Civil Action No. 7-326, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96305, October 16, 2009, Decided, October 16, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
6. Emcore Corp. v. Optium Corp., Civil Action No. 7-326, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96368, October 16, 2009, Decided, October 16, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
7. Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Sys., 8:06CV458, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96196, October 15, 2009, Decided, October 15, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
8. MEI, Inc. v. JCM Am. Corp., Civil No. 09-351 (RBK/JS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96266, October 15, 2009, Decided, October 15, 2009, Filed, NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
9. Horizon Hobby, Inc. v. Ripmax Ltd., Case No. 07-CV-2133, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, URBANA DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96255, October 15, 2009, Decided, October 15, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
10. Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm't, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-6510 SECTION "F", UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95518, October 14, 2009, Decided, October 14, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.