|
 |
Patent Law - Top Cases 9/28/2009 3:51:52 PM EST Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of September 20th, 2009
1. Cincom Sys. v. Novelis Corp., No. 07-4142, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 09a0346p.06;, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21172; 2009 FED App. 0346P (6th Cir.), September 8, 2008, Argued, September 25, 2009, Decided, September 25, 2009, Filed
2. Astrazeneca Pharms. Lp & Astrazeneca Uk v. Teva Pharms. United States, 2008-1480, 2008-1481, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21165, September 25, 2009, Decided
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Astrazeneca Pharms. Lp & Astrazeneca Uk v. Teva Pharms. United States
3. Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. (In re '318 Patent Infringement Litig.), 2008-1594, 2009-1070, 2009-1088, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21166, September 25, 2009, Decided Analysis, As of: Sep 28, 2009
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
4. Kara Tech. Inc. v. Stamps.com Inc., 2009-1027, -1028, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21120, September 24, 2009, Decided
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Kara Tech. Inc. v. Stamps.com Inc.
5. Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co., No. 08-4815, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21126, September 21, 2009, Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a), September 23, 2009, Opinion Filed, NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION UNDER THIRD CIRCUIT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE RULE 5.7. SUCH OPINIONS ARE NOT REGARDED AS PRECEDENTS WHICH BIND THE COURT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. Analysis, As of: Sep 28, 2009
6. In re Lister, 2009-1060, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20907, September 22, 2009, Decided
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of In re Lister
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of In re Lister
7. Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. Cook Inc., 2009-1006, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20906, September 22, 2009, Decided Analysis, As of: Sep 28, 2009
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. Cook Inc.
8. Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd., Case No. 05-40188, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87895, September 24, 2009, Decided, September 24, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
9. Travel Sentry, Inc. v. Tropp, 06-CV-6415 (ENV), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87923, September 24, 2009, Decided, September 24, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
10. Byrd v. Wal-Mart Transp., Case No. CV609-014, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, STATESBORO DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87356, September 23, 2009, Decided, September 23, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
Create an account or login to post comments.
|