Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of September 27th, 2009
1. Remote Solution Co. v. Fgh Liquidating Corp., No. 08-3662, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21787, September 8, 2009, Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a), October 2, 2009, Filed, NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION UNDER THIRD CIRCUIT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE RULE 5.7. SUCH OPINIONS ARE NOT REGARDED AS PRECEDENTS WHICH BIND THE COURT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
2. Advanced Software Design Corp. v. FRB of St. Louis, 2008-1152, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21464, September 30, 2009, Decided
3. Bd. of Trs. of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Sys., 2008-1509, 2008-1510, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21465, September 30, 2009, Decided
4. Ductcap Prods. v. J & S Fabrication, Civil No. 09-1179 ADM/FLN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92038, October 2, 2009, Decided, October 2, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
5. Cynosure, Inc. v. Cooltouch, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-10026-NMG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91331, October 1, 2009, Decided, October 1, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
6. Codonics, Inc. v. DatCard Sys., CASE NO. 1:08-CV-1885, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91624, October 1, 2009, Decided, October 1, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
7. Kirsch v. Canon USA, Inc., Case No. 00-72775, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90120, September 30, 2009, Decided, September 30, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
8. Oatey Co. v. IPS Corp., Case No. 03-CV-1231, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90201, September 30, 2009, Decided, September 30, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
9. Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. APComPower, Inc., Case No. 1:09-CV-113, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91170, September 30, 2009, Decided, September 30, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
10. SP Techs., LLC v. Garmin Int'l, Inc., No. 08 C 3248, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91183, September 30, 2009, Decided, September 30, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.