1. Lucent Techs. v. Gateway, 2008-1485, 2008-1487, 2008-1495, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20325, September 11, 2009, Decided
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Lucent Techs. v. Gateway
2. Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc., 2008-1306, 2008-1331, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20155, September 10, 2009, Decided Analysis, As of: Sep 15, 2009
3. Sanofi-Aventis United States Llc v. Sandoz, 2009-1427, -1444, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20294, September 10, 2009, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
4. Nystrom v. Trex Co., 2009-1026, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20016, September 8, 2009, Decided Analysis, As of: Sep 15, 2009
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Nystrom v. Trex Co.
5. Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Inc. v. Federal-Mogul Corp., 2009-1135, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20077, September 8, 2009, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. Analysis, As of: Sep 15, 2009
6. Arlington Indus. v. Bridgeport Fittings, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:01-CV-0485, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83028, September 11, 2009, Decided, September 11, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
7. Lapine v. Seinfeld, No. 08 Civ. 128 (LTS)(RLE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82304, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
8. Furminator, Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., Case No. 4:08CV00367 ERW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82350, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
9. Arlington Indus. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:01-CV-0485 (CONSOLIDATED), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82417, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
10. Arlington Indus. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:01-CV-0485 (CONSOLIDATED), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82423, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.