Go to Home Page Communities
  
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
Patent Law Center
RSS Email Alert




Patent Law - Top Cases
10/13/2009 11:05:31 AM EST
LexisNexis Patent Law Center Staff
Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of October 4th, 2009
1. Halpern v. Peritec Biosciences, Ltd., No. 08-4278, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 09a0673n.06;, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22297; 2009 FED App. 0673N (6th Cir.), October 6, 2009, Filed, NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION. SIXTH CIRCUIT RULE 28 LIMITS CITATION TO SPECIFIC SITUATIONS. PLEASE SEE RULE 28 BEFORE CITING IN A PROCEEDING IN A COURT IN THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. IF CITED, A COPY MUST BE SERVED ON OTHER PARTIES AND THE COURT. THIS NOTICE IS TO BE PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED IF THIS DECISION IS REPRODUCED.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Halpern v. Peritec Biosciences, Ltd
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Halpern v. Peritec Biosciences, Ltd
 
2. Colida v. Nokia, Inc., 2009-1326, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21909, October 6, 2009, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Colida v. Nokia, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Colida v. Nokia, Inc.
 
3. Funai Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 09-00374, UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, 2009 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 115; SLIP OP. 2009-107, October 6, 2009, Decided
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Funai Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
4. Media v. Google, CASE NO. 2:07-CV-279, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, MARSHALL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94340, October 9, 2009, Decided, October 9, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Media v. Google
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
5. Clark v. Walt Disney Co., Case No. 2:08-cv-982, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94506, October 9, 2009, Decided, October 9, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Clark v. Walt Disney Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
6. AddVenture Prods. v. Smoothreads, Inc., CASE NO. 07CV2025-MMA (AJB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94060, October 8, 2009, Decided, October 8, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of AddVenture Prods. v. Smoothreads, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
7. Furminator, Inc. v. Munchkin, Case No. 4:08CV00367 ERW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94385, October 8, 2009, Decided, October 8, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Furminator, Inc. v. Munchkin
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
8. World Props. v. Arlon, NO. 3:08CV1827 (MRK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94546, October 8, 2009, Decided, October 9, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of  World Props. v. Arlon
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
9. Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-221-DF-CE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, MARSHALL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93606, October 7, 2009, Decided, October 7, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
10. Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-221-DF-CE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, MARSHALL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93605, October 7, 2009, Decided, October 7, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Create an account or login to post comments.

Martindale-Hubbell(R) Connected - Join Now

lexisOne Community

Community Questions





Your Resources

Your Toolbox

Our Communities

Other Links