Go to Home Page Communities
  
Let your voice be heard by joining the community today. Sign up.
Workers' Compensation Law Center Powered by Larson's
RSS Email Alert




Return to Work & Employment Issues
9/18/2009 8:09:23 PM EST
National Drug Free Work Week 2009
National Drug-Free Work Week 2009 Resource Center

Welcome to our 2009 National Drug-Free Work Week resource center. We'll be featuring blogs and other resource materials throughout the month of October.  This site will be periodically updated so please check back often.

BLOGS ON THE FREE WEB

FREE DOWNLOAD

U.S. DEPT. OF LABOR

LEXISNEXIS EMERGING ISSUES ANALYSIS ARTICLES

  • Swe and Sharma on Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, 2008 Emerging Issues 2022. California Supreme Court rejected a plaintiff’s assertions that his discharge, based on off-duty, off-premises marijuana use that allegedly did not impact his job duties or performance, violated state statutes and the state constitution. The Court virtually abolished employee lawsuits that challenge employment actions based on an employer’s lawful knowledge of any marijuana use. Order here on the LexisNexis Store
  • Harrison on Discipline or Discharge for Drug or Alcohol-Related Conduct, 2008 Emerging Issues 1250. This article discusses how to create a properly structured drug/alcohol program that may increase employee productivity, reduce employee turnover, reduce health insurance costs, reduce accidents and poor decision making. Order here on the LexisNexis Store

LEXISNEXIS PUBLICATIONS

Lexis.com users can access publications within their subscription plan or otherwise incur an additional charge to access  publications outside their subscription plan. If you would like to become a lexis.com subscriber, please contact Customer Support.

  • Employment Law Deskbook, Ch. 20, Drugs and Alcohol Policies and Testing. The chapter explores employer drug testing programs, corporate liability for inaccurate drug testing, federal drug testing guidelines, and the practical considerations for drug testing. The chapter also provides a checklist for substance abuse testing programs and sample policy statements. (31 pages)
  • Americans With Disabilities Act: Employee rights and Employer Obligations, Ch. 6, § 6.05. The section discusses the fact that alcohol and drug abuse may constitute a disability under the ADA . It explores the requirements the employer must follow to make reasonable accommodations for alcoholics and drug addicts. (5 pages)
  • California Employers’ Guide to Employee Handbooks and Personnel Policy Manuals, Ch. 2, § 2.33 Drug-Free Workplace.  Sample policy on drugs and alcohol in the workplace that employers can modify and use in an employee handbook; includes research notes referring to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the California Labor Code, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and recent California case law, such as Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, 42 Cal. 4th 920 (2008).
  • California Employment Law, Ch. 41, § 41.53 Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Rules and Tests.  Discusses whether and under what circumstances employment discrimination practices based on drug and alcohol use and addiction are prohibited under statutes such as the ADA , the Rehabilitation Act, and Title VII.
  • California Employment Law, Ch. 50, § 50.43 Drug and Alcohol Tests. Discusses potential issues involved in drug and alcohol testing and accommodation of employees in drug or alcohol rehabilitation programs.  Included are discussions of the following: collective bargaining agreements; case law related to balancing employers’ interest in a drug-free workplace against California’s constitutional right to privacy; federal Fourth Amendment issues; issues under California ’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA); and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  • California Employment Law, Ch. 41, § 41.32[3][a] Alcoholism and Drug Abuse. Discusses issues relating to drugs and alcohol in the workplace, such as under what circumstances individuals with such addictions are protected under the FEHA, the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act and under what circumstances they can lose that protection.
  • California Employment Law, Ch. 41, § 41.42[2][f] Drug and Alcohol Use. Discusses whether employers may base hiring decisions on applicants’ drug use and alcoholism, as well as relevant provisions of the FEHA, ADA , the Rehabilitation Act and Title VII.
  • Dubreuil’s Florida Workers’ Compensation Handbook, Ch. 9, § 9.02[10]. Discusses Florida law on the Drug-Free Workplace Program, including the presumption of intoxication and drug testing procedure.
  • Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, 36, Intoxication. Voluntary intoxication which renders an employee incapable of performing work is a departure from the course of employment. Otherwise, apart from special statute, evidence of intoxication at the time of injury is ordinarily no defense, at least unless intoxication was the sole cause of injury. Under the special statutory defense of intoxication, the requisite causal connection between intoxication and the injury varies among the statutes all the way from mere existence of intoxication at time of injury to the requirement that intoxication be the sole cause.

Thank you for visiting our resource center!

Create an account or login to post comments.

Martindale-Hubbell(R) Connected - Join Now

lexisOne Community

Community Questions










Your Resources

Your Toolbox

Our Communities