<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareasWorkers-Compensation</link><description>Workers' Compensation Law Center: Build professional network, contribute content, view news, content by Lex Larson, the Workers' Compensation Law Blog, and other content on Workers' Compensation Law.</description><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Fraud Awareness Month November 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Fraud-Awareness-Month-November-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">fTV3hebXJjQ%3d</guid><description>  
 
 
 
 Welcome! We've designed this resource center to help you locate materials on Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Fraud, here on the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center, the Internet, and lexis.com. Please be sure to check back often for new updates to the resou</description><author>Fraud Awareness Month November 2009</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:57:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. WCAB En Banc Decision Confirms Mandatory Procedures for Requests for Spine Surgery</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-WCAB-En-Banc-Decision-Confirms-Mandatory-Procedures-for-Requests-for-Spine-Surgery</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">q2ecIMQcs1c%3d</guid><description> In the matter of    Jesus Cervantes v. El Aguila Food Products, Inc,    filed November 19, 2009, in an en banc decision the WCAB has held that the procedures and timelines covering requests for and objections to a treating physician's recommendation for spinal surgery must strictly conform with Lab</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:45:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Civilian Defense Worker's Suicide in Iraq Not Caused by Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Civilian-Defense-Workers-Suicide-in-Iraq-Not-Caused-by-Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XQSjj1f%2bOI4%3d</guid><description> Decedent, who worked for a defense contractor in Iraq, committed suicide.  His widow sought benefits under the Defense Base Act (42 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 1651,  et seq ., which, in turn, is an extension of the Longshore and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901,  et seq. ), c</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:42:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Division of Workers’ Compensation Quarterly Carrier Meeting 10/22/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Division-of-Workers-Compensation-Quarterly-Carrier-Meeting-10222009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yDOxdJsYu6o%3d</guid><description> On October 22, 2009, the TDI- Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation held its Quarterly Carrier Meeting at the central offices of the Division in
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Austin,   Texas. 
 Opening remarks were presented by Ron Bordelon, the Commissioner of the Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation.  </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:54:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Court Issues Another Opinion on Timeliness of Notice to Employer – Is There Any Notice Defense Left?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Court-Issues-Another-Opinion-on-Timeliness-of-Notice-to-Employer---Is-There-Any-Notice-Defense-Left</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9AhSPyi39Pg%3d</guid><description> In   Bridge v. Karr Tuckpointing  , issued March 11, 2009, the Iowa Court of Appeals reversed the Iowa Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Commissioner, and held that the employee gave his employer timely notice, even though he did not submit the notice within the 90 days required under the State stat</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:48:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Close Encounter With A Table Saw – Alternative WPI Ratings Post-Almaraz-Guzman II</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Close-Encounter-With-A-Table-Saw---Alternative-WPI-Ratings-Post-Almaraz-Guzman-II</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">J1NmufFfVfE%3d</guid><description> The following is a real-life example of how to figure out a WPI rating. 
  Strict rating:   15% WPI (see below) 
  Alternative rating method A:   Add rating for functional impairment (grip loss) with rating for anatomic loss (15% WPI from strict rating). 
  Alternative rating method B:</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:40:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Dreaded Rule 30</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Dreaded-Rule-30</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">R1MZqcqZKec%3d</guid><description> Most
  
  California workers compensation attorneys and judges are not aware of it yet. Of those who are aware, applicant attorneys love it and defense attorneys dread it. What is &amp;ldquo;it?&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rdquo; is  Title 8 California Code of Regulations, section 30 . Specifically,  sub-sectio</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:23:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis Top Blog of the Year Workers Compensation and Workplace Issues - 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/LexisNexis-Top-Blog-of-the-Year-Workers-Compensation-and-Workplace-Issues-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">n4q8X9IOP1E%3d</guid><description> The LexisNexis Workers&amp;rsquo;
  
  
Compensation
  
Law
  
Center is pleased to announce our selection for Top Blog of the Year 2009. To be sure, it was a tough decision to make, what with so many excellent blogs to consider in our  Top 25 Blogs 2009  list. We appreciate all of the feedback </description><author>Top Blog of the Year 2009 - Workers Compensation</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:52:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Interview of Dennis Jay, Executive Director of Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, on Fraud Investigation - Issues and Challenges</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Interview-of-Dennis-Jay-Executive-Director-of-Coalition-Against-Insurance-Fraud-on-Fraud-Investigation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VmlQOtdPwQs%3d</guid><description> As part of our Fraud Awareness Month campaign, we interviewed Dennis Jay, the Executive Director at the   Coalition Against Insurance Fraud  , on recent issues and challenges with respect to fraud investigation, including workers&amp;rsquo; compensation fraud. Be sure to check out Dennis Jay&amp;rsquo;s   </description><author>Fraud Awareness Month Interview</author><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:20:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CWCI Industry Scorecard Examines Job Injury Claims by Professional/Clerical Workers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CWCI-Industry-Scorecard-Examines-Job-Injury-Claims-by-ProfessionalClerical-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RBH%2bvUNHz0s%3d</guid><description> The California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Institute has issued a new &amp;ldquo;Industry Score Card,&amp;rdquo; the second in a new research series that looks at claims experience within key sectors of the   
  
California economy. The new Score Card provides detailed data derived from 361,384 work inju</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:25:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases November Advanced Postings 11/19/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-November-Advanced-Postings-11192009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TVVe%2fqNbJcM%3d</guid><description> Here's the fourth batch of advanced postings for the November 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
  City of San Diego, PSI, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Sandra Smullen, Respondents,  74 Cal. Comp. Cases ***,  2009 C</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:53:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Lawmakers Shift More Regulatory Costs onto Employers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Lawmakers-Shift-More-Regulatory-Costs-onto-Employers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dqekCeD0n2E%3d</guid><description> The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) has calculated the 2010 assessments that state law requires workers&amp;rsquo; compensation insurers collect from policyholders to cover the budget of the state Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation (DWC), as well as five related programs mandat</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:45:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Low Cost Health Care Imaging Solutions for Workers’ Compensation Insurance</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Low-Cost-Health-Care-Imaging-Solutions-for-Workers-Compensation-Insurance</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eGvGnQj68Oo%3d</guid><description> For chief executive officers of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation insurance companies, very little has been known about how radiology services management companies offer low cost health care imaging solutions for workers&amp;rsquo; compensation insurance. For one, all of the services companies are private co</description><author>Andrew J. Barile</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:33:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California W.C.A.B. Disapproves of Prior Brasher Procedure for Second Surgical Objections</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-WCAB-Disapproves-of-Prior-Brasher-Procedure-for-Second-Surgical-Objections</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5JEeOB8Ghu4%3d</guid><description> The W.C.A.B. has issued an  en banc  decision which substantially disapproves of and reverses its prior decision in  Brasher v. Nationwide Studio Fund  (2006)  71 Cal.Comp.Cases 1282  regarding objections to treating physician&amp;rsquo;s request for Spinal Surgery pursuant to  Labor Code &amp;sect; 4062 (</description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:29:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 11/20/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-11202009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9lo4zi%2bW88c%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
         
 
   Worke</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:02:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Death of Private Eye Investigating Workers’ Comp Fraud Not Found Compensable</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Death-of-Private-Eye-Investigating-Workers-Comp-Fraud-Not-Found-Compensable</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9YsiLa1ZdPw%3d</guid><description>Anderson worked for Veracity Research, investigating workers' compensation claimants who were suspected of fraud. He was killed in a one-car accident on July 19, 2003. He was survived by his wife and two minor children. His family sought workers' compensation death benefits. The Divis</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:01:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Appeals Court Requires Disparate Treatment to Support Labor Code § 132a Award</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Appeals-Court-Requires-Disparate-Treatment-to-Support-Labor-Code-Section-132a-Award</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Wi%2f1NoW2hUQ%3d</guid><description> The Second District Court of Appeals has reversed a W.C.A.B. award of benefits under  Labor Code &amp;sect; 132a  holding the W.C.A.B. did not apply the correct standard enunciated by the California Supreme Court in  Dept of Rehabilitation v W.C.A.B. (Lauher) . 
 The factual issues in  Gelson&amp;rsquo;s </description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:58:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Anthony Van Gorp on “How to Prevent Fraudulent Workers' Compensation Claims” (Podcast Transcript)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Anthony-Van-Gorp-on-How-to-Prevent-Fraudulent-Workers-Compensation-Claims-Podcast-Transcript</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9lL6s6kqRNQ%3d</guid><description>The following podcast transcript is the second in a series of four webcasts on &amp;ldquo;Risk Management Strategies in a Weak Economy&amp;rdquo;, hosted by Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services. To listen to the podcast for free, go to   http://www.workerscompkit.com/gallagher/mp3/  .
 
&amp;copy</description><author>Anthony Van Gorp</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:21:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 11/13/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-11132009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">I%2b%2fipKcy%2bms%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
           </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:05:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Working Nights Weighs-in on Health Care Reform</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Working-Nights-Weighs-in-on-Health-Care-Reform</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rirt8TMeOiY%3d</guid><description>   Circadian Age, Inc.   &amp;ndash; &amp;lsquo;  Working Nights  &amp;rsquo; &amp;ndash; a company dedicated to helping shift workers and their families adjust to their unique lifestyles, is concerned with making sure that any health care reform will benefit the 25 million Americans working shifts. These workers r</description><author>Circadian Age, Inc. dba Working Nights</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:16:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis Top 25 Blogs for Workers' Compensation and Workplace Issues - 2009 Honorees</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/LexisNexis-Top-25-Blogs-for-Workers-Compensation-and-Workplace-Issues---2009-Honorees</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KF7qMrS%2fZhE%3d</guid><description>
 The LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center has selected its  2009 honorees for the Top 25 Blogs for Workers' Compensation and Workplace Issues . Congratulations to all the honorees! 
 We thank our community members and Larson's National Workers' Compensation Advisory Boa</description><author>Top 25 Blogs 2009</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:38:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Independence Self-Evident?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Is-Independence-Self-Evident</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5yYro%2bMi1cQ%3d</guid><description> How many times, whether in the last year or over the course of your tenure as a savvy workers&amp;rsquo; compensation practitioner, have you received a Claim Petition, alleging a work-related injury occurring in the alleged course and scope of employment, against an insured, who then proceeds to tell y</description><author>Kevin L. Connors</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:43:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa: Medical Benefits Ordered for Petition Filed Nine Years After the Injury</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Medical-Benefits-Ordered-for-Petition-Filed-Nine-Years-After-the-Injury</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Mo0PtdM1Ie0%3d</guid><description> In  Robertson/Star Building v. Coohey , filed November 12, 2009, the Iowa Court of Appeals found that a Petition for medical care for a 1996 work injury was not barred by the statute of limitations. Citing  section 85.26 (2) of the Iowa Code, the Iowa Court of Appeals allowed the injured worker to </description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:26:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis Podcast of Margaret DiBianca on Implications of Social Networking, Technology and Employment Law on Workers’ Compensation (Transcript)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/LexisNexis-Podcast-of-Margaret-DiBianca-on-Implications-of-Social-Networking-Technology-and-Employment-Law-on-Workers-Compensation-Transcript</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0dk9%2blf%2b0KE%3d</guid><description>  LexisNexis Podcast of Margaret DiBianca on Implications of Social Networking, Technology and Employment Law on Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation   February 2009   Interview Conducted by Steve Berstler, Esq.   
 On this edition Margaret DiBianca of Young, Conaway, Stargatt &amp;amp; Taylor of Wilmington, De</description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:44:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>EAMS Blogs Reference Page</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/EAMS-Blogs-Reference-Page</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OBGysGSC1Go%3d</guid><description> Welcome to the EAMS Blogs Reference Page, which is designed to help you find specific topics, statutes, and regulations referenced in the blogs written by Judge Colleen Casey and Judge Robert Norton. Feedback and comments can be sent to  Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com . 
   
  Table of Contents</description><author>EAMS Blogs</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:18:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A New Twist on Going and Coming Rule: Employee Injured During Commute on Temporary Assignment Out of State</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-New-Twist-on-Going-and-Coming-Rule-Employee-Injured-During-Commute-on-Temporary-Assignment-Out-of-State</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2f7lUljrb4bM%3d</guid><description> West and three other employees at an Ohio Lukjan plant were sent to   
  
North Carolina on a one-week temporary assignment, to assist with the training of the NC Lukjan employees and to complete production runs at the NC Lukjan plant. Prior to the trip, West had been on several similar weeklong </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:02:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Big on Health, Light on Reform</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Big-on-Health-Light-on-Reform</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">U%2fxPVJUcdSU%3d</guid><description>   Paraphrasing Sen Ron Wyden   (D OR) produces the most accurate soundbite description of the House' health reform bill. 
 Is this the best we can do? 
 If the answer is yes, we're in deeper trouble than even I thought. I'm really disappointed with the  Republicans. They are supposed to be the bu</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:43:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>6.2 Million Reasons to Implement a Proactive Workers’ Compensation Return to Work Program</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/62-Million-Reasons-to-Implement-a-Proactive-Workers-Compensation-Return-to-Work-Program</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">H9Qf8DcMBzg%3d</guid><description>Employers are so focused on managing workers compensation injuries that they often forget that the injury itself is the gateway to employment litigation. Until now, employers have systematically overlooked and downplayed the link between the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and workers compensa</description><author>Margaret Spence</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:00:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Workers' Compensation: Earnings and Temporary Disability: Old Conundrums, New Complications</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Workers-Compensation-Earnings-and-Temporary-Disability-Old-Conundrums-New-Complications</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">trP7qZBETls%3d</guid><description> In 2006 the Fifth District Court of Appeal expressed the opinion that the calculation of the temporary disability benefit was &amp;ldquo;a fairly simple calculation.&amp;rdquo;  Signature Fruit v. WCAB (2006)  71 CCC 1044  . We commented shortly thereafter that &amp;ldquo;Obviously these justices never had to </description><author>Howard Stevens</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:51:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 11/6/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges, Convictions &amp; Investigations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-1162009---Recent-Arrests-Charges-Convictions--Investigations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Hmiyous2Pqs%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, convictions, and investigations.
      &amp;nbsp</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:01:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>EAMS and the QME Process</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/EAMS-and-the-QME-Process</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eqd0z6qB0so%3d</guid><description>Most people are surprised to learn that the DWC Medical Unit is not yet integrated with EAMS. Because of that, here are some special considerations practitioners need to know in order to effectively communicate with the Medical Unit. In addition, the DWC issued new QME regulations on February 17, 20</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:06:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Molly DiBianca: Risks for Employers Who Use Facebook to Investigate Employee Fraud</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Molly-DiBianca-Risks-for-Employers-Who-Use-Facebook-to-Investigate-Employee-Fraud-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dNZpvtbDCSs%3d</guid><description> In light of the recent increase in the number of   employers who use the internet to research potential job candidates  , it is only logical that more and more employers will begin to use the internet to   monitor  current  employees  , as well.  For example, an employer may suspect that </description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:29:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AMA Guides, Sixth Edition Arrive on the Scene</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AMA-Guides-Sixth-Edition-Arrive-on-the-Scene</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lfAmgFvZ%2b8A%3d</guid><description> The use of impairment and the eclipse of disability is a dangerous trend for injured workers. 
 The  current trend in the large majority of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation jurisdictions in the United States is towards adopting  The AMA Guides for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment  as the gat</description><author>Todd D. McFarren</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:30:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Employer Fraud in Workers’ Compensation – Just How Significant Is It?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Employer-Fraud-in-Workers-Compensation---Just-How-Significant-Is-It-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YJoimszJm84%3d</guid><description>  Introduction  
 If there is one topic that unifies all parties involved in workers' compensation, that topic is the desire to eliminate fraud.  Whether it is created by the employer/insurance company or the employee, there is no place for fraud in the system and legitimate efforts to elimina</description><author>Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr.</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:41:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz-Guzman II WCAB En Banc Decision: Providing a WPI That Is the Most Accurate Reflection of the Impairment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Almaraz-Guzman-II-WCAB-En-Banc-Decision-Providing-a-WPI-That-is-the-Most-Accurate-Reflection-of-the-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">V0wroh1kcCg%3d</guid><description> After receiving input from many sources, I have updated my Almaraz-Guzman II Advice to Physicians as follows: 
 Dear Colleague:  
 On September 3, 2009, the WCAB provided Almaraz-Guzman II. This article will discuss how the AME/QME/Treating physician might respond when queried about Almaraz-Guzma</description><author>Steven D. Feinberg, M.D.</author><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:48:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases November Advanced Postings 11/11/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-November-Advanced-Postings-11112009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TGDh4UVBwkg%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the third batch of advanced postings for the November 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
  Ronald Clevidence, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Petsmart, Inc., Travelers Property Casualty Company, Responden</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:42:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Real Diehl: Repairing Impairment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Real-Diehl-Repairing-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1CeSeHzaCH4%3d</guid><description> About a year ago, the Pennsylvania Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation community was turned on its head when the Commonwealth Court issued its initial opinion in   Diehl v. WCAB (IA Construction Liberty Mutual Insurance)  . That opinion shocked compensation practitioners in the course of eviscerating the i</description><author>Kevin L. Connors</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:52:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workplace Incident Data: Fact or Fiction?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workplace-Incident-Data-Fact-or-Fiction</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gnubCk2o5y0%3d</guid><description> It&amp;rsquo;s been an interesting path taking the leap from writing an occasional guest column in the local newspaper to blogging, where all of sudden there is a global audience. Yet even though readers are out there searching the web for useful content, a Blogger never knows if their writing has any </description><author>John Astad</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:30:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>When Do Misrepresentations by Injured Workers Cut Off Workers' Compensation Benefits?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/When-Do-Misrepresentations-by-Injured-Workers-Cut-Off-Workers-Compensation-Benefits</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RE24BOSFr7s%3d</guid><description>  Workers&amp;rsquo; compensation is harsher on fraud than in civil cases. Civil cases use a balancing test, i.e., how bad is the misrepresentation versus the claim, whereas in workers&amp;rsquo; compensation, it is an absolute. The following discussion of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation fraud was excerpted fro</description><author>Larson's Spotlight</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:18:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comp Cost Escalation in California; No Answer in Sight</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Comp-Cost-Escalation-in-California-No-Answer-in-Sight</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EBsuytqSEGs%3d</guid><description> There are two key takeaways from the  WCIRB report on California's work comp costs  (as reported by workcompcentral.com). 
 Medical costs are rising fast, and managed care costs are rising much faster.  
 Medical expenses climbed 7.9% last year, led by a ten percent increase in hospital expenses.</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:19:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Recovery Is Coming - What Does That Mean for Work Comp?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Recovery-Is-Coming---What-Does-That-Mean-for-Work-Comp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qfBJhJx6XIM%3d</guid><description>  Work comp is affected by several factors, but none are as significant as the economy.  After over a year of horrible news, things look to be slowly getting better. As activity picks up, we can expect the comp industry to start breathing again. 
 Last week the index of   leading economic indicator</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:38:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Administration's Drug Deal - Implications for Work Comp</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Administrations-Drug-Deal---Implications-for-Work-Comp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Zhhnkv1%2fQiY%3d</guid><description> Today's NYTimes   confirms   that the deal struck by big PHARMA and the Administration over drug costs is set in stone; the  White House confirmed that they will not go back to drug companies and ask for concessions beyond the $80 billion already promised.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D CA) has sai</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:11:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Reforming Health Care Without Busting the Budget</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Reforming-Health-Care-Without-Busting-the-Budget</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">W2WFh5IqU7k%3d</guid><description>  Comprehensive health reform will not happen in the near future.   There is no money.  There are lots of other priorities - financial stability, huge and growing deficits, energy, wars in two countries, nuclear proliferation and tax policy.  There's just no money, and not much b</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:20:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Health Reform and Workers Comp - The View From IAIABC</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Health-Reform-and-Workers-Comp---The-View-From-IAIABC</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">p0xwXx9CebA%3d</guid><description> Reform - whether it happens this year, in ten years, in one big change or a series of smaller steps - is going to have a big impact on workers comp. 
 That's the takeaway from one of the sessions yesterday morning at IAIABC's annual conference. 
 Greg Krohm, Director of IAIABC, Dr. Dan Juniga, Me</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:49:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers Comp Impairment Ratings</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Impairment-Ratings</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">L5i%2fgLtpMvc%3d</guid><description> Chris Brigham, MD, senior editor of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (the Guides), had the coveted post-lunch speaking slot at last week's NCCI meeting on Thursday. For those not conversant with this issue, the  Guides are used in workers comp to determine when, and how much</description><author>Joseph Paduda</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:36:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Unilateral Suspension of Benefits by Employers Attacked in Virginia</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Unilateral-Suspension-of-Benefits-by-Employers-Attacked-in-Virginia</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">b%2bfFxlsSnDA%3d</guid><description> The   Virginia practice whereby employers seeking to terminate ongoing benefits unilaterally suspend those benefits in advance of a hearing on the merits is being challenged in three cases currently before the Virginia Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Commission. 
  The current practice  
 There is no</description><author>Peter M. Sweeny</author><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:39:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Research Guides on Return-to-Work and Participatory Ergonomics Programs (Free of Charge)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Research-Guides-on-Return-to-Work-and-Participatory-Ergonomics-Programs-Free-of-Charge</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uov5hu3tGDo%3d</guid><description> The Institute for Work &amp;amp; Health (IWH) has produced two guides, free of charge, which you may find useful. One is a return-to-work guide, and the other offers direction on setting up participatory ergonomics programs. 
 These guides are available at  www.iwh.on.ca   Both guides are based o</description><author>Institute for Work &amp; Health</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:46:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obesity Costs in Workers’ Compensation Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Obesity-Costs-in-Workers-Compensation-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yUmqWSMX6tY%3d</guid><description> Commentators suggest rising obesity rates increase workers&amp;rsquo; compensation costs.  Obesity may now directly increase workers&amp;rsquo; compensation costs if more states require carriers to pay for weight loss surgery. 
 According to recent government statistics, 34% of all Americans are obes</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:44:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Tale of Two Med Claims: Delaware IAB Utilization Review Appeal Number #2 is now in!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Tale-of-Two-Med-Claims-Delaware-IAB-Utilization-Review-Appeal-Number-2-is-now-in</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">D1eJTJ9e9K0%3d</guid><description> Last week the IAB released the decision in    Francisco Irizarry v. Christiana Care Health Services   , IAB #  1294065 (10/14/09)   reversing   a UR decision below, in which Dr. Peter Bandera charges that were denied on UR were deemed to have been withheld wrongfully.  This case is very i</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:42:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 11/4/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-1142009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UxrDZACigxw%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 74, No. 10   October 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compensation </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:47:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Downside of Denial: A California Perspective</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Downside-of-Denial-A-California-Perspective</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">n%2f%2fU57XkTEI%3d</guid><description> There is an old joke where the schoolboy is asked to use &amp;ldquo;denial&amp;rdquo; in a sentence and he responds, &amp;ldquo;Denial is a river in Egypt.&amp;rdquo; In Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation, the denial is definitely not a river, but if not properly timed and exercised, a denial can leave the adjuster with </description><author>Howard Stevens</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:24:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The COLA Wars</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-COLA-Wars</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tzTjmuvEBK4%3d</guid><description> A great deal of confusion and litigious contention has predictably arisen over the application of the so-called COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) application to life pension cases and 100% permanent total disability cases with dates of injury after January 1, 2003. Currently, cases are making their </description><author>Howard Stevens</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:01:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz and Ogilvie II New Limits on Creative PD Determinations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Almaraz-and-Ogilvie-II-New-Limits-on-Creative-PD-Determinations-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">e09t3oaDYUI%3d</guid><description> In a rare process, the WCAB en banc has reconsidered its own holdings in   Mario Almaraz and Joyce Guzman v WCAB  , and   Wanda Ogilvie v City and County of San Francisco  , seminal cases which significantly liberalized the Permanent Disability rating process placed into effect with the passage of </description><author>Howard Stevens</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:08:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz and Ogilvie II New Limits on Creative PD Determinations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Almaraz-and-Ogilvie-II-New-Limits-on-Creative-PD-Determinations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">L0k2iNApWis%3d</guid><description> In a rare process, the WCAB en banc has reconsidered its own holdings in   Mario Almaraz and Joyce Guzman v WCAB  , and   Wanda Ogilvie v City and County of San Francisco  , seminal cases which significantly liberalized the Permanent Disability rating process placed into effect with the passage of </description><author>Howard Stevens</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:23:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases November Advanced Postings 11/5/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-November-Advanced-Postings-1152009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">b%2beZ5mXldUc%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the second batch of advanced postings for the November 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
  City of  
 Santa Ana 
&lt;/city&gt;, PSI v. W.C.A.B., Mark R. Nichols  
 74 Cal. Comp. Cases ***,  2009  
 Cal. 
  Wrk. Comp. LEXIS </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:57:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Uninsured Employer Unable to Seek Contribution/Indemnity From Third Party in Wrongful Death Action</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Uninsured-Employer-Unable-to-Seek-ContributionIndemnity-From-Third-Party-in-Wrongful-Death-Action</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">IWro4wexScc%3d</guid><description>An employer purchased a used posthole digger for use in its operations. While using the posthole digger and tractor to do fencing work, an employee became entangled in the auger blade and died as a result of his injuries. When the employee's widow sought workers' compensation benefits, it </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:14:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CWCI Launches Scorecard Series Examining California Workers’ Comp Claims Experience by Industry</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CWCI-Launches-Scorecard-Series-Examining-California-Workers-Comp-Claims-Experience-by-Industry</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gpj2s0kbYTE%3d</guid><description> The California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Institute has initiated a new series of research publications, &amp;ldquo;California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Industry Score Cards,&amp;rdquo; which use subsets of data from CWCI&amp;rsquo;s Industry Claims Information System (ICIS) database to measure various aspe</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:28:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 10/30/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-10302009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cZIWciJxKY8%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
          
 

</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:14:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Life After Andrepont: The Contentious Issue of Attoney’s Fees in Longshore Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Life-After-Andrepont-The-Contentious-Issue-of-Attoneys-Fees-in-Longshore-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oeEaQIMNtDs%3d</guid><description>One of the most contentious issues under the Longshore and Harbor Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Act (  33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901   et seq.) in the last few years concerns the denial of an employer paid attorney fee to a successful claimant&amp;rsquo;s attorney when the case fails to meet the strict guideline</description><author>Paul B. Howell</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:39:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jonathan Mook on EEOC’s Notice of Proposed Rules to Amend Current Americans with Disabilities Act Regulations (Podcast Transcript)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Jonathan-Mook-on-EEOCs-Notice-of-Proposed-Rules-to-Amend-Current-Americans-with-Disabilities-Act-Regulations-Podcast-Transcript</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">a0ezZFaItxY%3d</guid><description>  LexisNexis Podcast of Jonathan Mook on EEOC&amp;rsquo;s Notice of Proposed Rules to Amend Current Americans with Disabilities Act Regulations   Posted October 20, 2009   Interview Conducted by Steve Berstler  
 On this edition, Jonathan Mook of   DiMuro Ginsberg, PC  , in Alexandria, Virginia on the </description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:44:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases November Advanced Postings 10/29/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-November-Advanced-Postings-10292009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WT%2b5sK2xnyE%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the first batch of advanced postings for the November 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
  Louwana Knoll Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, State of California/Employment Development Department, legally unin</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:35:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Delaware Detour and Folic</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Delaware-Detour-and-Frolic</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">K21LoZAEUhU%3d</guid><description> 
   
  
 Delaware Detour and Frolic   A workers' comp law blog by Cassandra Roberts        ABOUT ME   I am a newcomer to the Larson's National Workers' Compensation Advisory Board, but a seasoned workers' compensation practitioner from &amp;quot;The First State.&amp;quot;   
  
Delaware born</description><author>Delaware Detour and Frolic Law Blog</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:07:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Version of Sixth Edition to AMA Guides Published</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Version-of-Sixth-Edition-to-AMA-Guides-Published</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zAemJh3ZCXc%3d</guid><description> Apparently realizing that its 52-page &amp;quot;Clarifications and Corrections&amp;quot; to the 6th Edition of the  Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment  was totally unworkable, the American Medical Association has finally taken the step to republish the 6th Edition.  Current owners of the</description><author>John Kawczynski</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:59:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Corporate America, Train Thy Front Line Manager Well on the Ways of Workers' Comp</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Corporate-America-Train-Thy-Front-Line-Manager-Well-on-the-Ways-of-Workers-Comp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wdnZES7tEpM%3d</guid><description> It is said that a company is only as good as its worst employee. It would stand to reason then, that how a company handles a workers' compensation claim is largely only going to be as good as the skill, knowledge and commitment of the front line manager who initially deals with the situation. A cor</description><author>workerscompensation.com</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:56:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group Publishes 2009 Workers’ Compensation Network Report</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Workers-Compensation-Research-and-Evaluation-Group-Publishes-2009-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">BDqBL0VCuQA%3d</guid><description>The Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Research and Evaluation Group (WCREG) published its 2009 workers&amp;rsquo; compensation network report card results.  Average medical costs in networks were once again higher than non-networks.  Networks tended to have higher utilization of professional service</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:44:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Wallyball Injury Found Compensable by Illinois Court</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Wallyball-Injury-Found-Compensable-by-Illinois-Court</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HAYK5o%2fgm8M%3d</guid><description>The employee worked as a fitness supervisor for a park district that was operating a fitness facility. A coworker asked the employee to participate in a wallyball game (a team sport similar to volleyball, but which is played within the confines of a racquetball court). Although the employee did not </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:55:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Can an Employer Require a Medical Exam Before They Return an Employee Back to Work Following a Work Related Injury?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Can-an-Employer-Require-a-Medical-Exam-Before-They-Return-an-Employee-Back-to-Work-Following-a-Work-Related-Injury</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">PkOQcvqna4c%3d</guid><description> 
     An often asked question by employers is whether they can require an injured worker following a work-related injury to undergo a medical exam before returning the employee to regular or modified duties.  
     The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals examined this issue in   Indergard v. Georgia P</description><author>Barry S. Pearlman</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Baseball and Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Baseball-and-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xW07L0xWS1Y%3d</guid><description> Baseball is the great American pastime and its players are often idolized by their legions of fans. But even the highest paid players are still made of flesh and bones. Professional baseball players are entitled to worker's compensation benefits in the event of an injury which may disable them temp</description><author>workerscompensation.com</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:18:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AMA Guides Resource Center</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AMA-Guides-Resource-Center-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1VrbDgkxOIs%3d</guid><description>  Welcome! We've designed this resource center to help you locate AMA Guides-related materials, here on the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center, the Internet, and lexis.com. Please be sure to check back often for new updates to the resource center.  

  TABLE OF CONTENTS    
 Fr</description><author>AMA Guides Resource Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:05:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Longshore Act Amended</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Longshore-Act-Amended</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ATmSyYxGa8w%3d</guid><description> The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (commonly known as the &amp;quot;Stimulus Package&amp;quot;)contained a provision that amends &amp;sect;2(3)(F) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers'''' Compensation Act 33 U.S.C. 902(3)(F)). 
 OLD LAW 
 Under the prior law, the following employees were exclu</description><author>John Kawczynski</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:01:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Injured Women After Reform (iWAR) Seeks to Elect New Calif. Governor, End Discrimination Against Women Injured at Work</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Injured-Women-After-Reform-iWAR-Seeks-to-Elect-New-Calif-Governor-End-Discrimination-Against-Women-Injured-at-Work</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">un%2bsvtiIC0A%3d</guid><description> On Thursday, October 8, 2009, women injured at work and women attorneys who are their advocates announced formation of Injured Women After Reform (iWAR), a new political action committee and Internet-based campaign to elect a new governor who will end discrimination against women in the workplace.&amp;</description><author>iWAR (Injured Women After Reform)</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:45:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 10/23/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-10232009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2zKXPvxbxsc%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
         
 

   Wor</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:13:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ask the Doctor? - Utilization Review in Delaware</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ask-the-Doctor---Utilization-Review-in-Delaware</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SG%2bBJFtB4bQ%3d</guid><description> Today I have the pleasure of hosting guest blogger Michael Owen, Esquire of the
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Wilmington insurance defense law firm of Chrissinger &amp;amp; Baumberger. Mike and his colleagues have been testing the waters in the wake of the newly-enacted Practice Guidelines and Utilization Review mechan</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:59:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Presence of Cannabinoids and Opiates in Worker's System is Insufficient to Support Denial of Benefits</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Presence-of-Cannabinoids-and-Opiates-in-Workers-System-is-Insufficient-to-Support-Denial-of-Benefits</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u0xxTG8Hf4M%3d</guid><description>A recent decision from North Carolina,  Moore v. Sullbark Builders, Inc .,   680 S.E.2d 732   (N.C. Ct. App. 2009) illustrates an important rule related to drug testing and workers' compensation claims: the presence of controlled substances in the injured worker's blood stream is generally insuffici</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:15:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>EAMS: Insuring the Right to Privacy</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/EAMS-Insuring-the-Right-to-Privacy</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">l8eOhgwjC10%3d</guid><description>The Fifth District Court of Appeal issued an   unpublished   opinion on July 27, 2007 in the case of  City of Turlock v. WCAB , (STK09YYZZZ) (2007)   72 CCC 931  , affirming the decision of the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation judge that the injured worker&amp;rsquo;s hepatitis C was work related. ( Californ</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:54:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Robert Rassp on Almaraz/Guzman II and Ogilvie II (podcast transcript)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Robert-Rassp-on-AlmarazGuzman-II-and-Ogilvie-II-podcast-transcript</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DLrzm9TCNkU%3d</guid><description>  On this edition attorney Robert Rassp will give us his thoughts on the recent decisions by the California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Appeals Board and    Almaraz/Guzman    and    Ogilvie    dated September 3, 2009. Robert Rassp has practiced workers' compensation and Social Security disabili</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:01:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers’ Compensation – The Risk of Transferring Risk</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation---The-Risk-of-Transferring-Risk</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">F8lYjpO%2fzeg%3d</guid><description> Depending on the source,   
  
California&amp;rsquo;s $1.727 Trillion economy falls somewhere between the 3rd and 10th largest when compared to all other nations of the world. With a population estimated at nearly 37 Million, the cost of protecting the state&amp;rsquo;s workforce against industrial accid</description><author>Michael Klizer</author><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:58:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mark Webb on Almaraz/Guzman II and Ogilvie II (Podcast Transcript)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Mark-Webb-on-AlmarazGuzman-II-and-Ogilvie-II</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qSsK3a0DoWM%3d</guid><description>  Attorney Mark Webb will give us his thoughts on the recent decisions by the California Workers Compensation Appeals Board on Almaraz/Guzman and Ogilvie dated September 3, 2009.  
  Mark Webb is Vice President for Governmental Relations at Employers Direct Insurance Company.  He interact</description><author>Mark E. Webb</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:40:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>WCAB Decisions in Almaraz/Guzman II, Ogilvie II</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/WCAB-Decisions-in-AlmarazGuzman-II-Ogilvie-II</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GqYCP57Un2Q%3d</guid><description>The WCAB recently handed down a 51-page, 4-to-3 &amp;quot;split decision&amp;quot; in   Almaraz/Guzman II  , with the majority of commissioners essentially validating what they did back in February, but with some notable restraints, limiting modifications and even a couple of outright reversals.  To ma</description><author>Corey Ingber</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:12:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NYSIF Introduces State-of-Art Medical Bill Inquiry System</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/NYSIF-Introduces-State-of-Art-Medical-Bill-Inquiry-System</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HHrq%2fcMg5qo%3d</guid><description>The New York State Insurance Fund announced yesterday a state-of-the-art online medical bill inquiry service with the expansion of its electronic Explanation of Benefits (EOB) for doctors treating workers&amp;rsquo; compensation injuries covered by NYSIF.
 
In making the announcement, NYSIF Chief</description><author>New York State Insurance Fund</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:31:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Practitioners: Don’t Forget to Exhaust All Administrative Remedies Before Appealing</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Practitioners-Dont-Forget-to-Exhaust-all-Administrative-Remedies-Before-Appealing</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s8RNDZN1TwU%3d</guid><description>  Petition for reconsideration (&amp;ldquo;Recon&amp;rdquo;):   A legal process to appeal a decision issued by a   workers' compensation judge .  Heard by the   Workers' Compensation Appeals Board   Reconsideration   Unit, a seven-member, judicial body appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. </description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:15:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Limitation on Compensability of Medical Travel Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Limitation-on-Compensability-of-Medical-Travel-Injuries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">q%2fGEE%2bEzeJM%3d</guid><description>
The 4th Appellate District (San Diego) has upheld a W.C.A.B. decision that denied benefits to an employee who sustained injury while traveling to a medical appointment where the employee&amp;rsquo;s route was much longer than the usual trip from home or work to the medical offices.
 
In    Esqu</description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:25:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Taneka’s Law Eliminates Ambiguity Over Definition of Personal Relationship as Basis for Denying Workers’ Comp Claim</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Tanekas-Law-Eliminates-Ambiguity-Over-Definition-of-Personal-Relationship-as-Basis-for-Denying-Workers-Comp-Claim</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">i3uKhZhuXuM%3d</guid><description>  Today, with the signing of AB 1093, Taneka Talley&amp;rsquo;s senseless death has a bittersweet epilogue. Justice has been served for the Talley family, and her son should know that a   
  
California law in his mother&amp;rsquo;s name will live on to protect others who might find themselves in suc</description><author>Mariko Yamada</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:33:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 10/16/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-10162009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3jJd8pJc%2bvQ%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
        
 

    Wor</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:13:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Prevent Drug Abuse in the Workplace</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Prevent-Drug-Abuse-in-the-Workplace</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">q2dWJvd0oB8%3d</guid><description> 
The use of drugs is prevalent in the country. It has penetrated homes, schools, organizations, and even workplaces. Drug abuse cuts across all industries &amp;ndash; major and minor &amp;ndash; and this causes significant problems. The repercussions in the workplace are not limited to</description><author>Safety Services Company</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:50:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Just Say No? A Retrospective of a Few Recent Occupational Disease Cases That Ended with an Epidemic of Denials</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Just-Say-No-A-Retrospective-of-a-Few-Recent-Occupational-Disease-Cases-That-Ended-with-an-Epidemic-of-Denials</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kDt5sZ2SvYg%3d</guid><description> In the claimant-friendly jurisdiction of The First State where the standard of compensability is considered decidedly low by practitioners on both sides of the vee, claims for occupational disease stand alone in terms of their complexity, the unforgiving one-year statute of limitations that might s</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:42:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Call for Suggestions: Top 25 Blogs for 2009 (COMMENT PERIOD HAS ENDED)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Call-for-Suggestions-Top-25-Blogs-for-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kkSr1SIWfko%3d</guid><description> Dear Community Members: The time has arrived for the LexisNexis Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Law Center Staff to make selections for its annual Top 25 Blogs for Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation and Workplace Issues. 
 We want to hear your recommendations. Please logon to your free web center account to </description><author>Top 25 Blogs 2009</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:29:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FREE Weekly eNewsletter Alerts - California Edition - Sign Up for Free</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FREE-Weekly-eNewsletter-Alerts---California-Edition---Sign-Up-for-Free</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vwzHYUCTTOI%3d</guid><description> FREE WEEKLY eNEWSLETTER ALERTS - CALIFORNIA EDITION 
 To sign up for free, email  Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com  to be added to the distribution list. 
 I've started these free eNewsletter alerts to help you find California-related items on the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center. 
 Y</description><author>Free eNewsletter Alerts - California Edition</author><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:36:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>National Drug-Free Work Week 2009 Resource Center</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/National-Drug-Free-Work-Week-2009-Resource-Center</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">w58g7s5nmLk%3d</guid><description>  Welcome to our 2009 National Drug-Free Work Week resource center. We'll be featuring blogs and other resource materials throughout the month of October.  This site will be periodically updated so please check back often.   
   
   BLOGS ON THE FREE WEB   
 
         What Risk Managers Nee</description><author>National Drug Free Work Week 2009</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:09:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases October Advanced Postings 10/16/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-October-Advanced-Postings-10162009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3%2bDPfgbDBQw%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the third batch of advanced postings for the October 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
  City of Los Angeles (Department of Transportation), PSI, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, John Tomkies Respondents </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:23:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: Access to EAMS</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Access-to-EAMS</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YUvQ6yCwigE%3d</guid><description> Good news for the workers&amp;rsquo; comp community. The EAMS webpage (  www.dwc.ca.gov/eams  ) has been redesigned to make the entire site more user-friendly. All instruction pods from &amp;ldquo;EAMS for beginners&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;Preparing your paper documents for submission&amp;rdquo; have been reorganized</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:37:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Employer Fraud in Workers’ Compensation – Just How Significant Is It?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Employer-Fraud-in-Workers-Compensation---Just-How-Significant-Is-It</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ksYQx5AVOqQ%3d</guid><description>  Introduction  
 If there is one topic that unifies all parties involved in workers' compensation, that topic is the desire to eliminate fraud.  Whether it is created by the employer/insurance company or the employee, there is no place for fraud in the system and legitimate efforts to elimina</description><author>Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr.</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:26:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 10/9/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges, Convictions, Investigations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-1092009---Recent-Arrests-Charges-Convictions-Investigations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eFABrlGTHow%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, convictions, and investigations.
       
 </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:15:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Court Awards Permanent Total Disability Benefits to Claimant Working 32 Hours a Week</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Court-Awards-Permanent-Total-Disability-Benefits-to-Claimant-Working-32-Hours-a-Week</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bo2BkvkdCwk%3d</guid><description> This decision is not as strange as it sounds, but the Iowa Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Commissioner did find the facts &amp;ldquo;unusual.&amp;rdquo; In   West Ridge Care Center v. Johnson  , so far unpublished, the Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Deputy Commissioner, sitting as Administ</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:09:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>You Can Run, But You Can’t Hide: CIGA’s Liability on Assigned Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/You-Can-Run-But-You-Cant-Hide-CIGAs-Liability-on-Assigned-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zFdIiCnyZdM%3d</guid><description> On September 8, 2009, we published  a blog  on the LexisNexis Workers&amp;rsquo;
  
  
Compensation
  
Law
  
Center with respect to CIGA&amp;rsquo;s liability on &amp;ldquo;assigned&amp;rdquo; claims. On 10/5/09 the California Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District, decided the case of  Catholic Health</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:09:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz/Guzman II &amp; Ogilvie II Decisions Issued</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AlmarazGuzman-II--Ogilvie-II-Decisions-Issued-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4ScLOWJQGf4%3d</guid><description> The W.C.A.B. has issued its anxiously awaited decisions in the ALMARAZ/GUZMAN and OGILVIE cases today, upholding but significantly altering significant portions of ALMARAZ/GUZMAN and essentially upholding its prior decision in Ogilvie with some additional procedural clarifications: 
  ALMARAZ/GUZM</description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:16:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Poizner’s Directive Bears Fruit</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Poizners-Directive-Bears-Fruit</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">JetG5kp%2fHd8%3d</guid><description> One large problem in   California workers' comp has been the inability of the WCIRB to accurately assess workers' comp cost trends. 
 The WCIRB (Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau) collects data from insurers and makes recommendations on rates to
  
  California 's Insurance Commission</description><author>Julius Young</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:57:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 10/13/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-10132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mBlt2EJwCpA%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES  
  Vol. 74, No. 9  
  September 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compen</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:30:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AMA Guide Round-Up: IAB Reviews the AMA Guide Application Issue with Surprising Scrutiny</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AMA-Guide-Round-Up-IAB-Reviews-the-AMA-Guide-Application-Issue-with-Surprising-Scrutiny</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9qQfxpQG39M%3d</guid><description> The decisions from the Delaware Industrial Accident Board are trickling in,  following a previous blog posting (7/2/09) that discussed the   Narbor Santos v. Citisteel   case, the one in which the Board declined to adopt either the 6th Edition or the 5th Edition of the AMA Guide as their &amp;quot</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:14:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>National Return to Work Week - Resource Center</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/National-Return-to-Work-Week---Resource-Center</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">D%2bcrOssrkpE%3d</guid><description>
    
  
  
 National Return to Work Week - Official Website:  See   http://www.nationalreturntoworkweek.org/  .

 
    Return to Work Blogs by Margaret Spence - Featured Blogger on the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center:  
 
     
      Return to Work Programs</description><author>National Return to Work Week</author><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 11:55:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases October Advanced Postings 10/9/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-October-Advanced-Postings-1092009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QAURcIGvm%2bU%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the second batch of advanced postings for the October 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
       
  Deanna J. Rasmussen, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Vijay K. Garg, M.D., Inc., Preferred Employers Insu</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:56:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vermont Workers' Compensation Update July to September 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vermont-Workers-Compensation-Update-July-to-September-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3aPqUeCBxmA%3d</guid><description>WC Rule 27, requiring mediation between the parties prior to a formal hearing went into effect on August 31, 2009. This rule generally follows mandatory mediation rules in existence in liability matters in Vermont and is designed to assist in the resolution of claims prior to their reaching a formal</description><author>Keith J. Kasper</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:04:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Medicare Secondary Payer - Private Cause of Action</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Medicare-Secondary-Payer---Private-Cause-of-Action</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">p13LHLKhsxw%3d</guid><description> I was recently made aware of a  white paper  that discusses the private cause of action under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act. This private cause of action exists for the Medicare beneficiary against a Primary Plan that fails to provide for primary payment (or appropriate reimbursement)  See 42 US</description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:38:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What Risk Managers Need to Know About Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/What-Risk-Managers-Need-to-Know-About-Drug-and-Alcohol-Testing-Programs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uS040azNmoc%3d</guid><description> Drug and Alcohol screening is one of the most common risk management weapons in the arsenal of tools to contain workers comp costs; the goal is to hire employees who are capable of performing the job they are hired to do and to prevent losses where you can. 
 Among the tools used are drug, alcohol</description><author>William Judge &amp; Rebecca Shafer</author><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:59:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Can Snoozing Worker Injured in Company Parking Lot Sue Co-Worker for Negligence?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Can-Snoozing-Worker-Injured-in-Company-Parking-Lot-Sue-Co-Worker-for-Negligence</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DY6x9sZ2ufE%3d</guid><description> Kulik was employed by Sears and began each work shift at 6:00 a.m.  He drove his vehicle to work one day and arrived half an hour before his shift began.  He took a &amp;quot;cat nap&amp;quot; in his car while waiting for the shift to begin.  As Kulik slept and waited, his car was struck fro</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:18:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Premier Medical Management Liens May Live On - What This Means for You</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Premier-Medical-Management-Liens-May-Live-On---What-This-Means-for-You</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2SUtZxo2X7A%3d</guid><description> Despite the September 24, 2009 Order by Judge Mark Khan of the Van Nuys WCAB dismissing lien claims by Premier Medical Management and an extensive list of Premier Medical providers, some providers on the list have challenged the authority of Premier Medical Management to execute a lien dismissal on</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:41:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Brave New World! Delaware Industrial Accident Board Issues First Decision on an Appeal From Utilization Review</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Brave-New-World-Delaware-Industrial-Accident-Board-Issues-First-Decision-on-an-Appeal-From-Utilization-Review</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rMZStNPWZGA%3d</guid><description> The moment practitioners have been waiting for has arrived.  After months of wondering what an IAB adjudication would look like as it relates to an appeal of the new Utilization Review mechanism for challenging the propriety of medical charges for conformity with the newly-enacted Practice Gui</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:57:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 10/2/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-1022009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1M5ZQsqgeSY%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
       
 

   Workers' Comp F</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:07:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Florida Workers' Compensation Legislative &amp; Regulatory Update (9/17/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Florida-Workers-Compensation-Legislative--Regulatory-Update-9172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yRyhFpxnIp8%3d</guid><description> With the Annual Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Educational Conference concluding in  August, the   
  
Florida workers&amp;rsquo; compensation industry (including this newsletter) &amp;ldquo;gets back to business.&amp;rdquo; NCCI has made its annual rate filing for workers&amp;rsquo; compensation rates for the</description><author>McConnaughhay, Duffy, Coonrod, Pope &amp; Weaver, P.A.</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:01:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Closed Formulary</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Closed-Formulary</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">natfMLwxgzs%3d</guid><description> The Texas Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation hosted a stakeholder meeting regarding the closed formulary to discuss two issues: (1) should the &amp;ldquo;initial fill&amp;rdquo; rules be subject to retrospective review; and (2) should the new closed formulary rules apply at a date certain or should th</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:25:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Safety and the Science of Human Behavior</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Safety-and-the-Science-of-Human-Behavior</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oC%2bTlQgyPzE%3d</guid><description>  In an interview with  EHS Today , leadership expert Dr. Aubrey C. Daniels discussed positive reinforcement, realistic safety goals, incentives and how the science of behavior can impact workplace safety.   
 Daniels, the author of several management books, including  Oops! 13 Management Practices</description><author>EHS Today</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:10:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Employer’s Treatment to Worker’s Injured Ankle Did Not Arise Out of Employment; Medical Malpractice Action Can Proceed</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Employers-Treatment-to-Workers-Injured-Ankle-Did-Not-Arise-Out-of-Employment-Medical-Malpractice-Action-Can-Proceed</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">l79mmC6QVaQ%3d</guid><description> Bentt was employed as a fellow in pain management in the Department of Anesthesiology at the
  
  
Georgetown
  
University
  
Hospital.  One evening, while attending a banquet on her own time, she experienced some &amp;quot;difficulty&amp;quot; in her left lower ankle while wearing tight shoes</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:21:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Violence in the Workplace: A Growing Problem in America</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Violence-in-the-Workplace-A-Growing-Problem-in-America</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3ZfGnEFoBYc%3d</guid><description> Special Note: This article was originally published by Jason B. Morris in December, 1999. I have recently updated the article with new statistics and have related it to more current issues! 
  Introduction  
 Workplace violence is a daily occupational risk and hazard for many workers in today&amp;rsq</description><author>Jason Morris</author><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:36:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is the H1N1 Virus Compensable Under Workers’ Compensation?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Is-the-H1N1-Virus-Compensable-Under-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zFy0lPwp4oE%3d</guid><description>Illnesses and diseases must first arise out of and be in the course and scope of employment before being considered &amp;ldquo;occupational.&amp;rdquo; Further, to be compensable, the illness or disease must arise out of or be caused by conditions  peculiar  to the work. 
 
Black lung disease, for ex</description><author>Christopher J. Boggs</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:15:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases October Advanced Postings 9/30/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-October-Advanced-Postings-9302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">euGvsaZTWMM%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the first batch of advanced postings for the October 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
       
  City of  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Pasadena (Police Department), PSI, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Anthony Anderson</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:01:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 9/25/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-9252009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VHpirIb%2bNqs%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.
     
 

    Workers' Comp Fraud B</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:06:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Missouri Reform Shifts Liability in Off-Clock Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Missouri-Reform-Shifts-Liability-in-Off-Clock-Injuries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Tt8ar%2b%2f3e7E%3d</guid><description> Missouri reform in 2005 narrowed the definition of an accident under worker&amp;rsquo;s compensation law. Among other changes, 287.020.2 requires that an accident must be caused by a specific event  during a single work shift . Claimants arriving early and injured prior to work shifts do not have compe</description><author>Martin Klug</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:55:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Update on Texas Division of Workers' Compensation Activities</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Update-on-Texas-Division-of-Workers-Compensation-Activities</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">sEe3SXGkPgc%3d</guid><description>  Access to Information  
 This Fall the Division plans to implement an online program allowing stakeholders access to a variety of statistical information regarding the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation system without having to file open record requests. 
  Sunset Review  
 The Division of Workers&amp;rsq</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:10:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>WCAB Decisions in Almaraz/Guzman II, Ogilvie II</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/WCAB-Decisions-in-Almaraz-Guzman-II-Ogilvie-II</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QTVbujHydPU%3d</guid><description>The WCAB recently handed down a 51-page, 4-to-3 &amp;quot;split decision&amp;quot; in   Almaraz/Guzman II  , with the majority of commissioners essentially validating what they did back in February, but with some notable restraints, limiting modifications and even a couple of outright reversals.  To ma</description><author>Corey Ingber</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:28:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases September Advanced Postings 9/24/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-September-Advanced-Postings-9242009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vbts5G%2fobb4%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the fourth batch of advanced postings for the September 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
       
  California Insurance Guarantee Association, administered by Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., on behalf of Fremo</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:42:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Insurance Agent and Agency Held Liable For Failure to Procure Workers' Compensation Coverage</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Insurance-Agent-and-Agency-Held-Liable-For-Failure-to-Procure-Workers-Compensation-Coverage</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jEkwLBllxQo%3d</guid><description>Plaintiffs opened a new dealership&amp;mdash;Rhino Linings of Santa Fe Springs&amp;mdash;that sold and installed spray-on linings onto the beds of pickup trucks and other vehicles. When plaintiffs inquired about insurance needs, Rhino USA, the company that sold the dealerships, referred them to Robyn T</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:26:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ken Martino on Third-Party Administrators and Workers' Comp Claims (podcast transcript)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ken-Martino-on-Third-Party-Administrators-and-Workers-Comp-Claims-podcast-transcript</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">IJG6i1oXaJs%3d</guid><description>  LexisNexis Podcast   Ken Martino   July 20, 2009 (edited transcript)  
  On this edition, Ken Martino, President and Chief Executive Officer of  Broadspire  on third-party administrators and workers' compensation claims. Ken Martino is President and Chief Executive Officer of Broadspire, joining </description><author>Ken Martino</author><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:50:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Whatever Happened to Uniformity?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Whatever-Happened-to-Uniformity</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">K2E1k%2f9GMQs%3d</guid><description> When the Supreme Court considered the problem of states extending their workers&amp;rsquo; compensation statutes to injuries to maritime workers on navigable waters, its overriding concern was that a uniform system apply to maritime workers throughout the country.  It is hornbook law that &amp;ldquo;C</description><author>Thomas C. Fitzhugh, III</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:19:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 9/18/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-9182009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1%2fLwVpkL1%2fE%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; September 1</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:39:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases September Advanced Postings 9/18/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-September-Advanced-Postings-9182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">w0W5nwmReaU%3d</guid><description> Here's the third batch of advanced postings for the September 2009 issue of Cal. Comp. Cases. 
        
  City of  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Santa Clara (Police Department), PSI, administered by Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Fernando Castro (Dec'</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:52:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Racial Violence and Workers' Compensation: Calif. Assemblymember Mariko Yamada on Her Assembly Bill 1093 - "Taneka's Law"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Racial-Violence-and-Workers-Compensation-Calif-Assemblymember-Mariko-Yamada-on-Her-Assembly-Bill-1093---Tanekas-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">L6Adhe8BrK8%3d</guid><description>  Taneka Talley, a 26-year-old African-American woman, was stabbed to death while at work in a Dollar Tree Store in
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Fairfield,   California, on the morning of March 29, 2006.  She left behind an eight-year-old son, Larry.  The convicted killer, Tommy Joe Thompson, who is white</description><author>Mariko Yamada</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:44:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ABA TIPS Task Force on the AMA Guides</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/ABA-TIPS-Task-Force-on-the-AMA-Guides</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dVQ7oYSSBmk%3d</guid><description> In July 2008 the American Bar Association Tort Trial &amp;amp; Insurance Practice Section's Task Force on the AMA Guides met for the first time in  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Chicago. Since then, it has been actively meeting with representatives from various states, the insurance industry, medical organizations, and</description><author>AMA Guides Resource Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:05:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 9/11/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-9112009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6RZCRNJlS74%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; September 1</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:37:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas 81st Legislative Session Laws Now in Effect</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-81st-Legislative-Session-Laws-Now-in-Effect</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rm5ZW78YKZM%3d</guid><description>The 81st Legislature left Austin after one regular session and one special session. For a number of reasons, the Legislature did not pass the expected number of bills, even bills with bipartisan support. The 81st Legislative Session may well be known for bills that did not pass. A spe</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:53:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pentagon Study Proposes Overhaul of Defense Base Act to Cover Care for Injured Contractors</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Pentagon-Study-Proposes-Overhaul-of-Defense-Base-Act-to-Cover-Care-for-Injured-Contractors</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eBhk7KZ14Jc%3d</guid><description> Congress could save as much as $250 million a year through a sweeping overhaul of the controversial U.S. system to care for civilian contractors injured in war zones, according to a new Pentagon study. 
 In the most extensive review ever of the taxpayer-financed system, the Pentagon suggested that</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:48:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz/Guzman II and Ogilvie II - Synopses and Commentary</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AlmarazGuzman-II-and-Ogilvie-II---Synopses-and-Commentary</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Bst%2fYx%2fadpY%3d</guid><description>  Almaraz v. Environmental Recovery Services; Joyce Guzman v. Milpitas Unified School District, ADJ 1078163/ADJ 3341185 ( Almaraz/Guzman II)( September 3, 2009)  
 In a joint en banc decision, after reconsideration, the WCAB has modified their original 2/3/09 to now hold that (1) the 2005 permanent</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:19:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 9/14/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-9142009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">o3EAEcyH6jo%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES  
  Vol. 74, No. 8  
  August 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compensat</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:47:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does CIGA Have to Pay Medical Providers When They’re “Assigned” to a Collection Company?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Does-CIGA-Have-to-Pay-Medical-Providers-When-Theyre-Assigned-to-a-Collection-Company</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s7bVHT4T78w%3d</guid><description>There has been a great deal of litigation as to when CIGA is responsible for payment of benefits after taking over from an insolvent insurer. Now, with a recent panel decision, a question that has arisen is: When a medical provider assigns its rights and title to a collection account, is CIGA respon</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:27:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Workers Comp Is Important</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Why-Workers-Comp-Is-Important</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bDmQDXJB5a0%3d</guid><description>Texas is the only state that doesn't make workers compensation insurance mandatory for at least some employers. This is a shame, because workers' compensation insurance is beneficial to both employees and employers as Sally Spooner, a school teacher, and the Cody School District, her employer, recen</description><author>John Gibson</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:24:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. WCAB Opens Door to AMA Guides Rebuttal – But Is It Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-WCAB-Opens-Door-to-AMA-Guides-Rebuttal---But-Is-It-Worth-the-Effort-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Qu%2b5L%2fiBdG8%3d</guid><description> The Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Appeals Board on February 3 issued two landmark decisions on rebuttal to the permanent disability rating schedule. These cases,    Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco    and the combined cases of    Almaraz v. Environmental Recovery Services and SCIF  an</description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:15:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Myths and Misses of Mediators</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Myths-and-Misses-of-Mediators</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tKa%2fTHPZ6mg%3d</guid><description>Mediation is all the rage in settling claims and lawsuits. What did we do before there were mediators?
 
There was a time, back when dinosaurs ruled the Earth, when insurance claims adjusters and their appointed counsel actually negotiated settlements with claimants and their counsel. It was </description><author>Insurance Educational Association</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:52:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Congressman Announces Plan to Reform U.S. System to Care for Injured Civilian Contractors</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Congressman-Announces-Plan-to-Reform-US-System-to-Care-for-Injured-Civilian-Contractors</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">juuZttNj%2b9E%3d</guid><description> Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said Wednesday that he will introduce legislation later this year to improve the delivery of medical care to civilian contractors injured while working with the military in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
 Cummings declined to provide details about his proposal but said he hope</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:23:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases September Advanced Postings 9/11/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-September-Advanced-Postings-9112009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">aHW3nx8H53s%3d</guid><description> Here&amp;rsquo;s the second batch of advanced postings for the September 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
  Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., PSI, administered by Sedgwick CMS, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Lal Bendanillo</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:04:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Spotlight: 9/11 - Terrorist Attacks as Positional Risks</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Spotlight-911---Terrorist-Attacks-as-Positional-Risks</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oDj4y%2f%2beiDA%3d</guid><description> There could be no more stark example of a neutral or positional risk than the blind destruction wrought by an indiscriminate bombing or terrorist attack. Visions of the destruction wrought by the September 11, 2001 attacks on the Pentagon and
  
World
  
Trade
  
Center as well as the crash t</description><author>Larson's Spotlight</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:09:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pharmaceutical Utilization and Reimbursement in California Workers’ Comp Up Sharply</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Pharmaceutical-Utilization-and-Reimbursement-in-California-Workers-Comp-Up-Sharply</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">X5p7s%2fLyhec%3d</guid><description> Both the average number of prescriptions and total pharmaceutical payments per claim in California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation are up sharply since 2002, despite medical reforms and the adoption of a pharmacy fee schedule -- increases that coincide with the growing use and soaring cost of &amp;ldquo;br</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:05:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz/Guzman II &amp; Ogilvie II Decisions Issued</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AlmarazGuzman-II--Ogilvie-II-Decisions-Issued</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gr6KJYGY97I%3d</guid><description> The W.C.A.B. has issued its anxiously awaited decisions in the ALMARAZ/GUZMAN and OGILVIE cases today, upholding but significantly altering significant portions of ALMARAZ/GUZMAN and essentially upholding its prior decision in Ogilvie with some additional procedural clarifications: 
  ALMARAZ/GUZM</description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:26:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Impact of Employee Free Choice Act on Workers’ Compensation Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Impact-of-Employee-Free-Choice-Act-on-Workers-Compensation-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">f0ynxOwoPMQ%3d</guid><description> The debate over the Employee Free Choice Act of 2009 ( H.R. 1409 ) has largely overlooked the potentially significant effects of this legislation on the Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation arena.  The enhanced protections against unfair practices and majority signature provisions of the EFCA will inev</description><author>David E. Mastagni &amp; John Holstedt</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:12:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 9/8/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-9-8-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XERkXeYeyS8%3d</guid><description>Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me or post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so before yo</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:35:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 9/4/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-942009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">fLRQksluhXY%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; September 4</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:41:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Kansas High Court Strikes Down Requirement That Injured Workers Make Good-Faith Effort to Find Appropriate Work Following Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Kansas-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Requirement-That-Injured-Workers-Make-Good-Faith-Effort-to-Find-Appropriate-Work-Following-Injuries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u1u7V7KQiE0%3d</guid><description> Bergstrom worked as a production janitor for an employer, a manufacturer of plastic plumbing parts.  She began to experience pain in her back after picking up a heavy garbage can.  She experienced severe pain the following day and was told to see a nurse practitioner, who prescribed pain </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:42:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NYSIF Declares First Year of eCHECK a Success!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/NYSIF-Declares-First-Year-of-eCHECK-a-Success-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Cd70FKF%2f53U%3d</guid><description>The New York State Insurance Fund announced Friday that in its first year of use, more than 17,000 policyholders paid $52.3 million in premium using NYSIF eCHECK &amp;ndash; the free, quick and easy way for policyholders to pay workers' compensation and disability premiums by electronic funds transfer. </description><author>New York State Insurance Fund</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:45:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: Current Issues in Spinal Surgery Second Opinion Procedure</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Current-Issues-in-Spinal-Surgery-Second-Opinion-Procedure-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FopmL1h3nOg%3d</guid><description> 
Has    Sandhagen    eliminated the employer&amp;rsquo;s right to proceed directly with objecting to a treating doctor&amp;rsquo;s request for spinal surgery and obtaining a spinal surgery second opinion evaluation as allowed for under the  Brasher  decision, and must the employer now first submit th</description><author>Stephen T. Gargaro</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:30:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Compensation, Arthritis and Degenerative Disc Disease</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-Arthritis-and-Degenerative-Disc-Disease</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zaT0vsFrVcc%3d</guid><description>When a work injury aggravates, reactivates or accelerates your arthritis or degenerative disc disease, you have a right to file for workers' compensation benefits. There is considerable misunderstanding concerning the right of an employee to obtain these benefits for an aggravation of a preexisting </description><author>Krasno Krasno &amp; Onwudinjo</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:39:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New York Speeds Payments of Guaranteed Awards to Injured Workers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-York-Speeds-Payments-of-Guaranteed-Awards-to-Injured-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rVH%2fm9k4bgs%3d</guid><description> In March 2007 the   Court of Appeals   ruled in    LaCroix v. Syracuse Executive Air Service, Inc   ., 8 N.Y. 3d 348 (2007) that an award for a permanent partial disability under   &amp;sect;&amp;sect;15  (3) (a) through (t) of the Workers' Compensation Law (commonly called a scheduled loss of use award) c</description><author>Ronald Balter</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:58:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Self Insureds’ Average Claim Costs Jump as Medical Losses Increase</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Self-Insureds-Average-Claim-Costs-Jump-as-Medical-Losses-Increase</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EkQdp7OTq5c%3d</guid><description> Calendar year 2008 data issued by the state Office of Self Insurance Plans (OSIP) last week shows average paid and incurred losses on California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation self-insured claim rose sharply last year, led by a big jump in medical payments. 
 The state&amp;rsquo;s initial summary of 2008</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:48:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>EOBs for WC? Let’s Study It</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/EOBs-for-WC-Lets-Study-It</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">18lXK5c0tCU%3d</guid><description>An   article   in the  Los Angeles Times  has bemoaned the death of a bill in California that would have required workers comp insurers to send claimants notices of medical services billed to verify they were actually performed. So-called explanation of benefits (EOBs) are routinely used in health i</description><author>Dennis Jay</author><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:48:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: Current Issues in Spinal Surgery Second Opinion Procedure</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Current-Issues-in-Spinal-Surgery-Second-Opinion-Procedure</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OKebiTK2Hig%3d</guid><description> 
Has    Sandhagen    eliminated the employer&amp;rsquo;s right to proceed directly with objecting to a treating doctor&amp;rsquo;s request for spinal surgery and obtaining a spinal surgery second opinion evaluation as allowed for under the  Brasher  decision, and must the employer now first submit th</description><author>Stephen T. Gargaro</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:07:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California EAMS: Notice of Discrepancy</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-EAMS-Notice-of-Discrepancy</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">63RML31DSRc%3d</guid><description> The &amp;ldquo;Notice of Discrepancy&amp;rdquo; is a new form that has crept into our legal community with the advent of EAMS. Some people are still not familiar with how it works. So let&amp;rsquo;s look at a hypothetical chronology of when the form might be generated. 

  4/1/09     &amp;nb</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:05:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Supreme Court in SORM v. Lawton Decides the 60-Day Waiver Period for Extent of Injury Disputes Does Not Apply</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Supreme-Court-in-SORM-v-Lawton-Decides-the-60-day-Waiver-Period-for-Extent-of-Injury-Disputes-Does-Not-Apply</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MhOCD8UWZ4c%3d</guid><description> In a unanimous decision, the Texas Supreme Court has reversed the Tenth Court of Appeals&amp;rsquo; Decision in   State Office of Risk Management v. Mary Lawton   and pronounced extent of injury disputes are not governed by  &amp;sect;409.021  or controlled by the 60 day deadline which pertains to compensa</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:37:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Offshore Drilling Worker's Tort Claim Against Drilling Company Is Barred by Exclusive Remedy Provisions of the Longshore Act; "Borrowed Servant" Rule Applies</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Offshore-Drilling-Workers-Tort-Claim-Against-Drilling-Company-Is-Barred-by-Exclusive-Remedy</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gnrYlI7DbY4%3d</guid><description>Jackson was hired as a mechanic by Producers Assistance Corporation (&amp;quot;PAC&amp;quot;), a company that supplied workers to businesses, including Total E&amp;amp;P USA, Inc. (&amp;quot;Total&amp;quot;), that were engaged in offshore drilling.   Jackson was immediately assigned to Total and spent seven m</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:01:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 8/28/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-8282009---Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dl6y7vwxqUQ%3d</guid><description> Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; August 28,&amp;</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:21:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 9/1/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-912009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kkiv3dKC4vc%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me or post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so before y</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:05:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases September Advanced Postings 9/2/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-September-Advanced-Postings-922009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vPuYb91hFj4%3d</guid><description> The first batch of advanced postings for the September 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases is now available on lexis.com. 
       
  Doreen Corner v. W.C.A.B., Dorado Youth Services, Everest National Insurance, c/o ACCA  
 74  Cal.  Comp. Cases ***,  2009 Cal. Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 215  
 Pe</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:53:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NYSIF Declares First Year of eCHECK a Success!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/NYSIF-Declares-First-Year-of-eCHECK-a-Success</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DpthfjMgC1U%3d</guid><description>The New York State Insurance Fund announced Friday that in its first year of use, more than 17,000 policyholders paid $52.3 million in premium using NYSIF eCHECK &amp;ndash; the free, quick and easy way for policyholders to pay workers' compensation and disability premiums by electronic funds transfer. </description><author>New York State Insurance Fund</author><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:11:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Weiner vs. Ralphs Company – Voc Rehab Takes Another Blow</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Weiner-vs-Ralphs-Company---Voc-Rehab-Takes-Another-Blow</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vvJrX3Wsqhg%3d</guid><description> As we all are aware,  Labor Code Section 139.5  provided the applicant with rights to vocational rehabilitation.  The repeal of  139.5  was effective on January 1, 2009.  It terminated any rights to vocational rehabilitation benefits if there was no Order from a Judge issued before Januar</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:17:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Resolution of Doubt</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Resolution-of-Doubt</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RrhPwl4T33I%3d</guid><description> The Second Circuit recently restated the rules for applying the  section 20  presumption to occupational disease cases ( 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 920 (a) of LHWCA,  33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901  et seq.).  In  Stanhope v. United States Department of Labor , No. 07-3560-ag, 310 Fed. Appx. 459,  2009 U.S. A</description><author>Stephen C Embry</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:09:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Michigan Supreme Court Opinion on Attorney Fees, Peterson vs. Magna Corp.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Michigan-Supreme-Court-Opinion-on-Attorney-Fees-Peterson-vs-Magna-Corp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fJZ9bV%2f9xkI%3d</guid><description> The Michigan Supreme Court issued a deeply divided opinion in   Petersen  v    Magna Corp   on July 31, 2009 (SC Docket Nos. 136542, 136543). A majority - four of the seven Justices &amp;shy;would rule that only employers and insurance carriers can be assessed plaintiff&amp;rsquo;s counsel&amp;rsquo;s fees on </description><author>Gerald (Jerry) Marcinkoski</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:43:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Performance Based Oversight (PBO) Scores</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Performance-Based-Oversight-PBO-Scores</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0iCZAIk44ME%3d</guid><description> The Division delivered Performance Based Oversight (PBO) scores to the carrier&amp;rsquo;s  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Austin representative boxes and mailed a copy to carrier&amp;rsquo;s home offices.  DWC will publish a complete report on its website revealing PBO results on or about August 31, 2009. 
 The Divis</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:21:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Catastrophic Workplace Accidents: It Could Happen To You</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Catastrophic-Workplace-Accidents-It-Could-Happen-To-You-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">N4fmKrTVPlk%3d</guid><description> While the American workplace is safer than ever, hardly a week goes by without a news report concerning a plant explosion, a chemical release or a fatality arising out of a workplace accident. 
 The most recent government data shows that there were approximately 5,500 workplace fatalities in 2007,</description><author>Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.</author><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:06:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Injured Worker Caught Misbehavin’ Online (or: How an Employer Learned to Stop Worrying and Love MySpace)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Injured-Worker-Caught-Misbehavin-Online-or-How-an-Employer-Learned-to-Stop-Worrying-and-Love-MySpace</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zcNVsgO%2bYGM%3d</guid><description> While employers have legitimate concerns about employees revealing company trade secrets and other confidential work information on MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, etc., employers have also found social media useful for snooping into their employees&amp;rsquo; personal lives. 
 Today  The Virginian-Pilot </description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:22:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases August Advanced Postings 8/26/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-August-Advanced-Postings-8262009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">D9BA4o9wd%2fY%3d</guid><description> Here's the fourth batch of advanced postings for the August 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
       
  City of Sausalito, legally uninsured, administered by Innovative Claims Solutions, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Boa</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:54:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 8/25/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-8252009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SmCEckQcjh8%3d</guid><description> The following are recent panel decisions that we're considering for the LexisNexis database of   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me directly or post a comment to thi</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:26:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tort Claim Fails Under Defense Base Act's Borrowed Servant Rule</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Tort-Claim-Fails-Under-Defense-Base-Acts-Borrowed-Servant-Rule</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6INx1v5w0o0%3d</guid><description> Research Triangle Institute (&amp;quot;RTI&amp;quot;) contracted to rebuild municipal water and sewage facilities in following the 2003 invasion. RTI obtained Ladd's services as a civilian engineer by contract with his direct employer, Chemonics International, Inc. (&amp;quot;Chemonics&amp;quot;). Ladd was serious</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:15:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Immigrant's Tort Claim for Intentional Injury Filed Against New Jersey Cookie Maker Is Barred by Exclusive Remedy Rule</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Immigrants-Tort-Claim-for-Intentional-Injury-Filed-Against-New-Jersey-Cookie-Maker-Is-Barred-by-Exclusive-Remedy-Rule</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Fu3tI5MSpdw%3d</guid><description> A   
  
New Jersey worker, a Vietnamese immigrant who could not speak, read, or understand English, sustained significant injuries when her hand came into contact with a sharp blade inside a biscotti machine at the employer's baking facility. To prevent a hand from entering the area in which the </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 8/21/2009  - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-8212009----Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ci4ViV%2buM%2bo%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions. 
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; August 21</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:17:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bye Bye Brewington</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Bye-Bye-Brewington</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8FMddSeCFHM%3d</guid><description> Thanks to the recent decision by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in   Cannizzaro v. Food Lion  , No. COA08-1381 (N.C. App. filed Aug. 4, 2009), we can say &amp;ldquo;farewell&amp;rdquo; to the misinterpretation of  Brewington v. Rigsbee Auto Parts ,  69 N.C. App. 168 , 316 S.E.2d 336 (1984), by some pr</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:19:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Avoiding The Ninety-Day Rule: Filing Proper Disputes &amp; Challenging Validity of Impairment Ratings in Texas</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Avoiding-The-Ninety-Day-Rule-Filing-Proper-Disputes--Challenging-Validity-of-Impairment-Ratings-in-Texas</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wpy0MC3IzsI%3d</guid><description> Over the last year, the Ninety-Day Rule seems to be rearing its ugly head in a large percentage of impairment rating cases.  It cuts both ways, against both claimants and carriers, and the effects can be costly.  Most of the time, the party that is trying to avoid the Ninety-Day Rule imme</description><author>Matthew B. Lewis</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:08:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Rose By Any Other Name – De Novo Means De Novo</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Rose-By-Any-Other-Name---De-Novo-Means-De-Novo</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">li2WGKQsCyM%3d</guid><description>  IAB Rules That &amp;quot;De Novo&amp;quot; Means Prior Utilization Review Decision Will Be Kept Out In Medical Bill Appeals Under New Statute  
 The IAB's recent ruling in  C. Maude Donovan v. Kent Construction Co.,   IAB Hearing # 1266167  (7/20/09) (ORDER) resolves an issue that has been looming l</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:46:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases August Advanced Postings 8/20/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-August-Advanced-Postings-8202009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">F0d7q0wVG2I%3d</guid><description> The third batch of advanced postings for the August 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases is now available on lexis.com. 
       
  Cordova Chemical (Aerojet), Pacific Employers Insurance Company, adjusted by ESIS, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, David Roark (Dec'd), Joy</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:01:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Compensation Notable People for 2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-Notable-People-for-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">n9vrWbbpNoM%3d</guid><description> The LexisNexis Workers'
  
  
Compensation
  
Law
  
Center is pleased to present its list of  Workers' Compensation Notable People for 2008 . These exceptional people have worked tirelessly on behalf of their clients and others and have made significant contributions to the worker</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:25:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois Worker's Smoking Impedes Recovery, But Doesn't Trigger Disqualification of Benefits</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Workers-Smoking-Impedes-Recovery-But-Doesnt-Trigger-Disqualification-of-Benefits</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Oz9XhHEM41c%3d</guid><description> A worker sustained a work-related injury, remained out of work for a substantial time period, and underwent two rounds of surgery on his back.  There was some expert testimony that claimant&amp;rsquo;s recovery had been hindered by his continued cigarette smoking and at least one physician indicat</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:44:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 8/18/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-8182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">h07l9Gqv7kI%3d</guid><description> The following are recent panel decisions that we're considering for the LexisNexis database of   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me directly or post a comment to thi</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:08:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Uncertainties Created by Medicare Reimbursement Amount Could Lead to Roadblocks to Settlements With Claimants</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Uncertainties-Created-by-Medicare-Reimbursement-Amount-Could-Lead-to-Roadblocks-to-Settlements-With-Claimants</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">AzbhqalhBF0%3d</guid><description> Dear MARC Supporters: I am writing you to share with you a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.  I am concerned that decisions like this will add roadblocks to settlements with Claimants unless we are willing to increase contributions to cover the uncertain</description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:30:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 8/17/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-8172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">r3GkUXlyM8c%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 74, No. 7   July 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compensation Case</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:49:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 8/15/2009  - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-8152009----Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dMha1%2fROT3U%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  
 
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:59:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vermont Workers' Comp Newsletter October to December 2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vermont-Workers-Comp-Newsletter-October-to-December-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OJT3GM8KKwU%3d</guid><description> The Department now has two full-time hearing Officers. Phyllis Phillips, former Director of the Department of Labor and Industry Workers' Compensation Division is now the Senior Hearing Officer at the Department and will be hearing cases and writing decisions. Hearing Officer Jane Dimotsis wil</description><author>Keith J. Kasper</author><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:22:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Aging Workforce: Older Workers Have Fewer Workplace Injuries But Are Often More Costly to Treat</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Aging-Workforce-Older-Workers-Have-Fewer-Workplace-Injuries-But-Are-Often-More-Costly-to-Treat</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2Mbm26frkNE%3d</guid><description> Between 2005 and 2010 the number of workers in the
  
aged 55 to 64 is predicted to increase by 52 percent. With worker maturity comes a new set of risks making it critical for insurance buyers and their representatives to better understand how to help keep these workers safe on the job and, when</description><author>Insurance Council of Texas</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:07:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Beware of Tender: Offer of Fixed Period of Total Disability May Create Ongoing Entitlement</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Beware-of-Tender-Offer-of-Fixed-Period-of-Total-Disability-May-Create-Ongoing-Entitlement</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rCjdpLceRJw%3d</guid><description> Two recent decisions recently released by the Delaware IAB stand equally for the position that the tender to a claimant of an Agreement as to Compensation for a finite period of  total disability (&amp;quot;TTD&amp;quot;) accompanied by a Final Receipt and payment of one or more TTD checks does  not  </description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:20:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are California Providers Entitled to Excess Fees?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Are-California-Providers-Entitled-to-Excess-Fees</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UkCygtzkmTE%3d</guid><description> Can a provider obtain fees in excess of the fee schedule when the fee schedule is unreasonable? 
 By way of background, the legislature in SB 228 (which was approved in 2003 and became effective in 2004) repealed former Labor Code Section 5307.1 and rewrote it without the express language allowing</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:35:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases August Advanced Postings 8/13/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-August-Advanced-Postings-8132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YP9puXddTz0%3d</guid><description> The second batch of advanced postings for the August 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases has now been posted to lexis.com. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases below. 
 Robert Babcock, Dorothy Babcock, Raeann Diamond v. W.C.A.B., Crown Disposal Company, State Compensation Insurance </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:10:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Workplace Worry: 'Textual Harassment'</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Workplace-Worry-Textual-Harassment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xPcND0cYJ08%3d</guid><description> Text messaging in the workplace has become an increasing source of concern for employers. Much like the emergence of e-mail in the 1990s, the popularity of text messaging among employees in all age ranges has grown significantly in the last several years. And any time a new method of communication </description><author>Richard Meneghello</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:34:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Scenes We’d Like to See" From WCRI’s Medical Benchmark Studies</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Scenes-Wed-Like-to-See-From-WCRIs-Medical-Benchmark-Studies</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Tg2BtBh%2fg0k%3d</guid><description> This blog entry isn&amp;rsquo;t going to put a new spin on an old fairy tale, like  Mad Magazine  once did in its &amp;ldquo; Scenes We&amp;rsquo;d Like to See &amp;rdquo; cartoons.  Not because a new spin cannot be spun, of course, but rather because workers&amp;rsquo; comp has very little in common with fairy t</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:39:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>South Dakota Worker's Late Notice of Injury Is Excused</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/South-Dakota-Workers-Late-Notice-of-Injury-Is-Excused</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">it%2br8UBh2NI%3d</guid><description> A worker felt a &amp;quot;pop&amp;quot; in his upper back, between his shoulder blades, as he moved a box of siding from one side of the jobsite to the other. He also felt numbness from his upper-left arm down to his fingers.  Although he described the pain as &amp;quot;intense,&amp;quot; the sensation did no</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:57:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Drug Rehab Program Ruled Not Employer of Injured Rehab Resident</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Drug-Rehab-Program-Ruled-Not-Employer-of-Injured-Rehab-Resident</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lxmlGuUhhco%3d</guid><description> The Iowa Court of Appeals considered a difficult case,  Teen Challenge v. Pauler , where a 44-year-old man who was going through drug treatment was found not to be an employee, while repairing a building to be used by staff members of the program. Teen Challenge is a non-profit organization that re</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:20:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Research Could Expand the Definition of Asbestos</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Research-Could-Expand-the-Definition-of-Asbestos</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s046NlMpFLE%3d</guid><description> Federal lawmakers should do more to reduce exposure to asbestos fibers and other harmful fibers that lead to asbestos-related disease, a New York attorney says. 
 &amp;quot;We know that asbestos causes cancer,&amp;quot; said Joseph W. Belluck, a partner at the New York law firm of Belluck &amp;amp; Fox, LLP, </description><author>Joseph W. Belluck</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:34:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 8/10/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-8102009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TeWPaMF7%2bRs%3d</guid><description> The following are recent panel decisions that we're considering for the LexisNexis database of   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me directly or post a comment to thi</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:10:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Post-Sandhagen Panel Decision Raises New Questions About Utilization Review</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Post-Sandhagen-Panel-Decision-Raises-New-Questions-About-Utilization-Review</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">E0hedVd2LXo%3d</guid><description> On June 24, 2009, in a panel decision dealing with utilization review, the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board in   Vasquez v. Colton Unified School DistrictADJ992523(SBR 0278781), decided that the school board's failure to conduct a timely utilization review &amp;ldquo;renders its argu</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:02:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 8/6/2009  - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-862009----Recent-Arrests-Charges--Convictions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5%2fghadx%2bGvs%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions. 
 

   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; Augu</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:11:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases August Advanced Postings 8/7/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-August-Advanced-Postings-872009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2Oj%2bN2CFH%2fQ%3d</guid><description> Here's the first batch of advanced postings for the August 2009 issue of California Compensation Cases. Lexis.com subscribers with access to Cal. Comp. Cases can link on the cites below to read the full summary of these cases. 
       
  Owens Illinois, PSI, administered by Gallagher Bassett, Pet</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:29:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Chilling Effect of Collateral Estoppel: An Investigative Look Back at the Workers' Compensation File May Put the Plaintiff's Toxic Tort Action on Ice</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Chilling-Effect-of-Collateral-Estoppel-An-Investigative-Look-Back-at-the-Workers-Compensation-File-May-Put-the-Plaintiffs-Toxic-Tort-Action-on-Ice</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">l1qEcm4IuEM%3d</guid><description> In a pending toxic tort action, it is not surprising to learn that the plaintiff in the civil action also pursued a workers&amp;rsquo; compensation claim against his or her employer for the same injuries and condition. The workers&amp;rsquo; compensation file can have a treasure trove of helpful documents,</description><author>Craig T. Liljestrand</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:19:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: Common Certified Workers' Compensation Network Exam Findings</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Common-Certified-Workers-Compensation-Network-Exam-Findings</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eDNdzUmNB8k%3d</guid><description> The Texas Department of Insurance conducts exams of Certified Workers' Compensation Networks (WCNets) as authorized by  TIC &amp;sect;1305.251 . In this article the Health and Workers' Compensation Network (HWCN) wishes to share common errors and omissions discovered in recent exams in order to assist </description><author>TDI HWCN</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:14:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Max and Erma's Gets a Little Confused</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Max-and-Ermas-Gets-a-Little-Confused</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">iZs7lTGHEjg%3d</guid><description> In the recent  Kentucky Court of Appeals  decision of   Max and Erma&amp;rsquo;s v. Lane  , designated to be published, employer  Max and Erma&amp;rsquo;s  received somewhat of a chiding by the Court for &amp;ldquo;misinterpreting&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;confusing&amp;rdquo; the law. 
 The facts were relatively straigh</description><author>Roland Legal PLLC</author><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:00:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Jersey Teacher's Claim for Occupational Asthma Fails Due to Lack of Objective Evidence</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Jersey-Teachers-Claim-for-Occupational-Asthma-Fails-Due-to-Lack-of-Objective-Evidence</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9RHOlebYgWs%3d</guid><description> Thomas was employed by the school system from 1984 until 2000, initially as a substitute teacher and subsequently as a full-time teacher and staff developer. In 1974, at the age of thirty, she developed problems with asthma. From 1974 until 1987, Thomas stated that her asthma &amp;quot;wasn't bad.&amp;nbsp</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:13:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 8/3/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-832009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QS0%2fzYa0RWs%3d</guid><description> The following are recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't r</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:40:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Division of Workers' Compensation No Longer Limits Costs for Physician Reports</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Division-of-Workers-Compensation-No-Longer-Limits-Costs-for-Physician-Reports</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8jYAY6kSqbA%3d</guid><description> In an Appeal Decision filed in late July, 2009,  Caven v. Deere Dubuque Works , the Iowa Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation rules will no longer be interpreted to limit the award of costs for doctor reports to $150.00. That is potentially a major change.  
 Previously, the agency had a rule a</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:40:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California EAMS: Coldiron Has Been Codified</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-EAMS-Coldiron-Has-Been-Codified</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">M8D7bJehPt0%3d</guid><description> Using a paperless adjudication system mandates, more than ever, the need to identify all parties and their clients in any given action. The WCAB issued en banc decisions on this issue back in 2002 named,   Coldiron v. Compuware Corp   (2002)  67 CCC 289  (  Coldiron I  ) and  67 CCC 1466  (  Coldir</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:24:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Plan to Pay Sick Nuclear Workers Unfairly Rejects Many, Doctor Says</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Plan-to-Pay-Sick-Nuclear-Workers-Unfairly-Rejects-Many-Doctor-Says</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MjyMFh0M72s%3d</guid><description> Carla McCabe spent a decade building nuclear bombs at the sprawling Rocky Flats complex near  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Denver. When she developed a brain tumor and asked for help, federal officials told her that none of the toxic substances used at the top-secret bomb factory could have caused her cancer.  
 </description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:34:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 7/30/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-7302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4f2HAnfiTOc%3d</guid><description>
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  

   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; July 30</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:54:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/30/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-7302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mVjnl7v3Zv0%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me or post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so before y</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:26:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 7/23/2009  - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-7232009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">q2zcYd9hVps%3d</guid><description>
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions. 

   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; July 23,</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:52:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 7/16/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-7162009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">k9QR%2fGkiJyg%3d</guid><description>
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions.  

   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; July 16</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:36:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 7/8/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-782009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">T2n3Fxnbc5E%3d</guid><description>
 Each week we'll be surveying what the media, state agencies, insurance companies, and others report in terms of workers' comp fraud. Just like a police blotter, our workers' comp fraud blotter lists recent arrests, charges, and convictions. 
   Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter &amp;ndash; July 8, 20</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:29:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 7/1/2009 - Recent Arrests, Charges &amp; Convictions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Fraud-Blotter-712009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">10uFS0d5onE%3d</guid><description> Employee or employer fraud &amp;ndash; which is the greater problem? Double dippers, false claims, misclassification of workers, and payroll underreporting, are just some of the more common types of fraud we read about in the media and government press releases. 
 But complex insurance fraud schemes, </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Comp Fraud Team</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:30:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases July Advanced Postings 7/29/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-July-Advanced-Postings-7292009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9UN6egq0Z%2bo%3d</guid><description> Here's the fifth batch of advanced postings for the July 2009 issue of Cal. Comp. Cases. Lexis.com subscribers with access to Cal. Comp. Cases can link on the cites below to read the full summary of these cases. 
       
  Dennis L. Joy, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, City of </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:17:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Report Finds Advantages in Gov’t Takeover of Care for Injured Contractors</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Report-Finds-Advantages-in-Govt-Takeover-of-Care-for-Injured-Contractors</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">i7ke6ssLlh4%3d</guid><description> The Congressional Research Service has found that the Defense Department was paying far higher premiums to insure civilians working in war zones than either the State Department or the U.S. Agency for International Development. 
 The insurance is required by the  Defense Base Act  and provides med</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:56:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stress in the Workplace</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stress-in-the-Workplace</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dy1NFF3UqNs%3d</guid><description> Historically studies of occupational stress have emphasized physical rather than mental illness. However, it is generally recognized today that stress in the workplace affects psychological and emotional as well as physical functioning. Occupational stress has been associated with depression, anxie</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:25:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gone to the Dogs – Idiopathic Fall Defense Fails in Case of Veterinarian Who Collapses During Surgery</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Gone-to-the-Dogs---Idiopathic-Fall-Defense-Fails-in-Case-of-Veterinarian-Who-Collapses-During-Surgery</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lcXzR%2fcrv%2bw%3d</guid><description> Cases that review the &amp;quot;idiopathic fall&amp;quot; doctrine pop up in   
  
Delaware on an occasional basis at best and often present interesting facts.  In a recent decision of the Industrial Accident Board,   Laci Nash v. Medical Management International  , IAB Decision, Hearing No. 1320555</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:51:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Firefighter Loses Workers' Comp Claim; Attempts to Sue Appeals Officer in Federal Court.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Firefighter-Loses-Workers-Comp-Claim-Attempts-to-Sue-Appeals-Officer-in-Federal-Court</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SuQ1b3v8um8%3d</guid><description> Wilson, a
  
Clark
  
County (  
  
Nevada ) firefighter, filed a worker's compensation claim with his employer for prostate cancer.  Prior to the filing of  &lt;/city&gt;Wilson's claim, three other
  
  
Clark
  
County firefighters filed similar claims for prostate cancer and received c</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:18:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/27/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-7272009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">q%2fIeMC5a42o%3d</guid><description> The following are recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't r</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:27:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Margaret Spence on What Is the Annual Cost of Not Implementing a Return-to-Work Program?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Margaret-Spence-on-What-Is-the-Annual-Cost-of-Not-Implementing-a-Return-to-Work-Program</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3mjuTZC0S%2fc%3d</guid><description>Recently, I met with a client who wanted to reduce the number of injuries at their job site. Instead of focusing on the number of injuries, I asked him to bring the company&amp;rsquo;s Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA 300 log to the meeting so we could calculate their Return to Work Ra</description><author>Margaret Spence</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:28:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Margaret Spence on What Are the Essential Components of a Successful Return-to-Work Program?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Margaret-Spence-on-What-Are-the-Essential-Components-of-a-Successful-Return-to-Work-Program</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">JGbvOs63Cao%3d</guid><description>A return-to-work program is designed to facilitate the return of injured employees to work as soon as he or she is able to perform meaningful, productive work within the restrictions imposed by the treating physician. Guess what most employers don&amp;rsquo;t know where to start &amp;ndash; here is our blue</description><author>Margaret Spence</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:38:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Margaret Spence on The National Return to Work Week Challenge: Changing Your Perception of Light Duty</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Margaret-Spence-on-The-National-Return-to-Work-Week-Challenge-Changing-Your-Perception-of-Light-Duty</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">o3HTjbRK%2b%2bc%3d</guid><description> Light duty immediately invokes negative feelings for most employers. I have heard countless stories from employers recanting the horrible experiences they have had as they attempted to bring injured employees back to work. I have witnessed the frustration and the surrender that occurs when injured </description><author>Margaret Spence</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 22:19:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Margaret Spence on Return to Work Programs: An Investment in Injured Workers or a Drain on Corporate Resources?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Margaret-Spence-on-Return-to-Work-Programs-An-Investment-in-Injured-Workers-or-a-Drain-on-Corporate-Resources</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">AmNJOWsl7pE%3d</guid><description> Imagine if everyone shared your vision of getting ill or injured employees back to work?  In today&amp;rsquo;s tough economy, it may be difficult to sell your company on the benefits of continuing to offer injured employees viable light duty jobs especially if you are considering a layoff.  
  &amp;n</description><author>Margaret Spence</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 22:02:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Margaret Spence on Physician, Your Return to Work Decision Is Not Clear – Are We on the Same Team?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Margaret-Spence-on-Physician-Your-Return-to-Work-Decision-Is-Not-Clear---Are-We-on-the-Same-Team</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UDfiP1wPBy0%3d</guid><description>Dear Dr. X &amp;ndash; I really don&amp;rsquo;t understand the note I received from your office, can the employee come back to work or not? What do you mean he has a five pound lifting restriction &amp;ndash; he doesn&amp;rsquo;t lift anything all day!
    To listen for free to Margaret Spence's podcast on Na</description><author>Margaret Spence</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:31:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Got Rating?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Got-Rating</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nxbq63unwDc%3d</guid><description> Many states follow the  AMA Guides to Evaluation of Permanent Impairment  to determine what an employer owes an employee injured on the job.
  
  Missouri workers' compensation judges, by contrast, often reject the opinions of experts who rely upon them. 
 There is a difference between impairmen</description><author>Martin Klug</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:52:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Court Awards No Penalty for Failure to Pay While Appeal Is Pending Before the Agency</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Court-Awards-No-Penalty-for-Failure-to-Pay-While-Appeal-Is-Pending-Before-the-Agency</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WMcU8hKH%2b30%3d</guid><description> While limiting its ruling to the specific facts of this case, the   
  
Iowa Court of Appeals ruled in late July, 2009, that an employer could refuse to pay the ordered award to the injured worker while an appeal is pending. 
 In  Millenkamp v. Millenkamp Cattle and Allied Insurance ,  the </description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:31:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases July Advanced Postings 7/22/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-July-Advanced-Postings-7222009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hUJdaUNeHE0%3d</guid><description> Here's the fourth batch of advanced postings for the July 2009 issue of Cal. Comp. Cases. 
        
  Goodwill Industries, PSI, c/o Hazelrigg Risk Management, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Yolanda Delgado, Respondents   
 74 Cal. Comp. Cases ***,  2009 Cal. Wrk. Comp. L</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:34:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What Evidence Based Medicine Can't Tell Us</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/What-Evidence-Based-Medicine-Cant-Tell-Us</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zf3tqkE3UGw%3d</guid><description> Evidence based medicine has been touted as one way to save money in our current health care system. While the concept of evidence based medicine has been around for decades, it has become more known to the public, now that it's part of President Obama's stimulus package.  If one looks at all t</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:46:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Application of the AMA Guidelines in Determining Disability Under the Longshore Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Application-of-the-AMA-Guidelines-in-Determining-Disability-Under-the-Longshore-Act</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mRDf1A3jDIM%3d</guid><description> In evaluating permanent impairment, practitioners using the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act are sometimes confused as to the application of the AMA guides (American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairments (4th ed. 1993)).  That confusion includes a</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:56:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Court of Appeals Finds No Agreement to Settle Claim</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Court-of-Appeals-Finds-No-Agreement-to-Settle-Claim</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5F6ZQAO2JaQ%3d</guid><description> In its opinion in  Eaton Corporation v. Branson , filed June 17, 2009, the Iowa Court of Appeals found that the employer was not entitled to specific enforcement of what they claimed was a legally enforceable agreement to settle a claim for a work injury claim.  
 While the self-insured employer a</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:21:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Application of the 6th Edition of the AMA Guides to Rating Impairment Under the Longshore Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Application-of-the-6th-Edition-of-the-AMA-Guides-to-Rating-Impairment-Under-the-Longshore-Act</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">H39Vmj39Bts%3d</guid><description> The American Medical Association&amp;rsquo;s  Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment  has now been published in six editions, the latest, sixth edition, having been released in 2007.  Those who practice under the LHWCA ( 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901  et seq.) are curious as to what role this l</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:36:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Healthcare Workers, Others, Team Up Behind Safe Patient Handling Bill</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Healthcare-Workers-Others-Team-Up-Behind-Safe-Patient-Handling-Bill</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gNiLE%2fWVK5Q%3d</guid><description> In May, Democratic United States Representative John Conyers, Jr., who represents
  
  Michigan&amp;rsquo;s 14th District, introduced national legislation for the third time that calls for the safe handling of dependent patients and residents throughout the healthcare system. The broad-based Coalitio</description><author>Ergoweb Inc.</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:44:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/21/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-7212009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jco7DfBLMFo%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me or post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so before y</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:42:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Florida Attorney's Fees Statute Denies Injured Workers Procedural Due Process</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Florida-Attorneys-Fees-Statute-Denies-Injured-Workers-Procedural-Due-Process</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qK8qSPtAGlc%3d</guid><description> Florida Statutes  Section 440.34 (3) has been amended, effective July 1, 2009, to provide an employer/carrier paid fee to a claimant's attorney for the successful prosecution of a claim shall be in an amount equal to the amount provided for in subsection (1), which is based on a percentage of benef</description><author>William J. McCabe</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:56:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Supreme Court Finds Permanent Total Disability Award Cannot Be Apportioned</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Supreme-Court-Finds-Permanent-Total-Disability-Award-Cannot-Be-Apportioned</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">D8JTAhvMPeM%3d</guid><description> In the 1990s and up to 2004, the Iowa Supreme Court had held that an employer might be responsible for the impact of a previous work injury, even if it had happened at another employer. That string of decisions had upset employers, and in 2004, the Iowa General Assembly changed the workers&amp;rsquo; c</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:37:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Oregon Workers' Comp Division Provides Details on AMA 6th Edition Project</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Oregon-Workers-Comp-Division-Provides-Details-on-AMA-6th-Edition-Project</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eIc4yNQukN8%3d</guid><description> The Oregon Workers' Compensation Division gave a presentation of the AMA Guides 6th Edition project at the May 15th meeting of the Medical Advisory Committee. A summary of the meeting notes is set forth below: 
 *    *    *    *    * 
 The Di</description><author>AMA Guides Resource Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:40:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/18/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-7182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SIMbTTRnmpM%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent panel decisions issued by the Calif. Workers' Comp. Appeals Board that we're considering for the LexisNexis panel decisions database. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please email me or post a comment to this blog with your request. 
  Berthiaume v. City of </description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:02:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Medical Provider's Lien Claim Under Calif. Fee Schedule Detours Into PPO Contract Dispute</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Medical-Providers-Lien-Claim-Under-Calif-Fee-Schedule-Detours-Into-PPO-Contract-Dispute</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OgL2IlsYDAw%3d</guid><description> The case of  Cynthia Gordon v. State Compensation Insurance Fund  ADJ 745778 (SRO 0132381) appeared to be simple matter and not any different from other cases before the Appeals Board in which the Lien Claimant felt that it was not adequately paid under the Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS), but</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:50:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Hand That Giveth vs. The Hand That Taketh Away: The Hypocrisy of Apportionment in Calif. Workers’ Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Hand-That-Giveth-vs-The-Hand-That-Taketh-Away-The-Hypocrisy-of-Apportionment-in-Calif-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3c7pFhne5ws%3d</guid><description> With the California Supreme Court having recently handed down a major decision regarding the calculation of apportionment in workers&amp;rsquo; compensation ( Brodie vs. WCAB,  (2007)  40 Cal.4th 1313 ) and with Governor Schwarzenegger having recently proclaimed the reforms to the system enacted in 200</description><author>Mark Vickness</author><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:07:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Employer Sues for Specific Performance of Settlement Agreement Allegedly Reached Over Telephone</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Employer-Sues-for-Specific-Performance-of-Settlement-Agreement-Allegedly-Reached-Over-Telephone</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Z0qpUquGQNU%3d</guid><description> Branson, an assembly repair person employed by Eaton for many years, sustained a work-related rupture of the bicep tendon in his right shoulder.  Branson underwent shoulder surgery, was out of work for a few weeks, returned first to light duty and later to regular work.  Branson's physici</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:30:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases July Advanced Postings 7/16/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-July-Advanced-Postings-7162009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">L%2fuNigE%2b5uk%3d</guid><description> Here's the third batch of advanced postings for the July 2009 issue of Cal. Comp. Cases. 
  Recovery Resources, Inc., Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Calistoga Spa, State Compensation Insurance Fund, (Cynthia Gordon), Respondents   
 74 Cal. Comp. Cases ***,  2009 Cal. Wrk. Com</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:21:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Louisiana's New Medical Guidelines</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Louisianas-New-Medical-Guidelines</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s3uI9zzrIYA%3d</guid><description> On the very last day of the 2009 legislative session the medical guidelines bill ( SB 303 ) successfully passed both houses and was signed by the Governor on July 1, 2009 (Act No. 254). The legislation was the product of several months of work by the members of the Workers Compensation Advisory Cou</description><author>Denis Paul Juge</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:18:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa: When Is an Occupational Disease a Work Injury?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-When-Is-an-Occupational-Disease-a-Work-Injury</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zX1%2f9cc3to4%3d</guid><description> For decades, advocates for employers and workers have argued over whether certain conditions were occupational disease or a work injury &amp;ndash; for instance, carpal tunnel syndrome. In a case published in July of 2009, in  Burress v. IBP  the Iowa Supreme Court found brucellosis, which is clearly a</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:46:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Vocational Rehabilitation and the Sweet Hereafter – Struggling to Find Meaning Post-Weiner</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Vocational-Rehabilitation-and-the-Sweet-Hereafter---Struggling-to-Find-Meaning-Post-Weiner</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Ztz7ouCdg2Y%3d</guid><description> Does a workers' compensation system that loses its vocational rehabilitation program lose its meaning? 
 In 1965 the   
  
California legislature introduced the concept of &amp;quot;vocational rehabilitation&amp;quot; by adopting Labor Code &amp;sect; 139.5. In 1974, the legislature amended Labor Code &amp;sect</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:09:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 7/13/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-7132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5PDF7W9Nxqg%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 74, No. 6   June 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compensation Case</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:16:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Compensation and the Economic Meltdown: An Interview of Lex K. Larson</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-and-the-Economic-Meltdown-An-Interview-of-Lex-K-Larson</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rSXwOR%2bQIxs%3d</guid><description> The impact of the economic recession has been felt in all corners of the workers' compensation world, from staff shortages at workers' comp agencies to millions of people losing their jobs, from state legislatures solving budget shortages by attempting to raid workers' comp funds to corporatio</description><author>Larson's Spotlight</author><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:59:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vermont Workers' Comp Newsletter April to June 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vermont-Workers-Comp-Newsletter-April-to-June-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zBI09E0Gnts%3d</guid><description> The annual COLA increase this year effective 7/1/09 will be 1.037 with anew maximum rate of $1,092 and a new minimum rate of $364. 
 As a result of new legislation also taking effect July 1, 2009, within 30 days of being presented with a medical bill, Carriers must notify medical providers, with s</description><author>Keith J. Kasper</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:51:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vermont Workers' Comp Newsletter January to March 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Vermont-Workers-Comp-Newsletter-January-to-March-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">D9Ex15%2bitPM%3d</guid><description>  S. v. C &amp;amp; S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.   Opinion No. 01-09WC  (Jan. 9, 2009).  Treating physician opinion overcomes that of IME doctor due to lack of evidence of unknown pre-existing trauma causing degenerative arthritis instead of repetitive nature of the job. 
  C. v. Pennock Sales &amp;amp; </description><author>Keith J. Kasper</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:35:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2008 Annual Report Illinois Workers Compensation Commission</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/2008-Annual-Report-Illinois-Workers-Compensation-Commission</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">IWjjZq%2bEw2k%3d</guid><description> On June 30, 2009, the Commission released its   Annual Report of Operations for 2008  . Highlights indicate that total claims of 57,515 were up slightly 1.5% from previous year totals of 56,685 including both filed claims and  pro se  settlements. Total claims were down approximately 8% from FY2004</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/9/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-792009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XY1QGQGTNCM%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't regis</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:30:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Commissioner Provides Online Information on Employers’ Work Comp Coverage</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Commissioner-Provides-Online-Information-on-Employers-Work-Comp-Coverage</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6f1Uy%2bCIOYM%3d</guid><description> The Iowa Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Commissioner&amp;rsquo;s Office has provided a new tool for attorneys to find the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation carrier for any employer as of any recent injury date. The information can be reached by going to   http://www.iowaworkforce.org/wc/ncci.htm  . Click on the</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:18:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Significant Developments in Florida Workers' Compensation Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Significant-Developments-in-Florida-Workers-Compensation-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LEGTFurBcDM%3d</guid><description> In the past year there have been significant developments in case law and legislative amendments to the Florida Workers' Compensation Law.
 One of the more significant developments involves the issue of employer/carrier paid attorney fees in a case closely followed by virtually all workers' compen</description><author>Robert J. Grace, Jr. and William J. McCabe</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:57:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Data Show California WC Insured Loss &amp; Expense Payments Exceeded Earned Premium in 2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Data-Show-California-WC-Insured-Loss--Expense-Payments-Exceeded-Earned-Premium-in-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lPa0jSDDRm8%3d</guid><description> California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation earned premium fell by $2.3 billion to less than $11 billion last year, while insurers&amp;rsquo; loss and expense payments totaled nearly $11.2 billion, resulting in a pretax underwriting loss of $84 million according to a CWCI analysis of the Workers&amp;rsquo;</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:15:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Zurich v. Lexington Coal: A Bird in the Hand Is Better Than Two in the Bush – Even in Bankruptcy Court</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Zurich-v-Lexington-Coal-A-Bird-in-the-Hand-Is-Better-Than-Two-in-the-Bush---Even-in-Bankruptcy-Court</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">fU%2byGyD1o4I%3d</guid><description> The recent case of   Zurich v. Lexington Coal  , from a substantive standpoint, involves a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, but it still might prove instructive for underwriters of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation policies. 
 In  Zurich v. Lexington Coal , the insurance company sought priority in Bankruptcy Cour</description><author>Roland Legal PLLC</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:45:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Delaware IAB Again Whittles Down Medical Witness Fee for Live Testimony</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Delaware-IAB-Again-Whittles-Down-Medical-Witness-Fee-for-Live-Testimony</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ecl%2bg7ssu2E%3d</guid><description> For the second time in as many months, the Delaware Industrial Accident Board has disallowed an application for the statutory maximum medical witness fee allowed under the new regulations enacted May, 2008.  Pursuant to a Legal Hearing convened in  Larry Smith v. Sun Belt Holding Inc.,  IAB De</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:08:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases July Advanced Postings 7/8/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-July-Advanced-Postings-782009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qW6qWXs26kU%3d</guid><description> The second batch of advanced postings for the upcoming July 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:36:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Injured Worker Tips: A Quick Primer on Florida Workers' Comp Forms</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Injured-Worker-Tips-A-Quick-Primer-on-Florida-Workers-Comp-Forms</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0qBIpZOMcFo%3d</guid><description>   WORKERS&amp;rsquo; COMPENSATION CLAIM FORM   
 There are many workers&amp;rsquo; compensation claim forms you will encounter if you get injured at work.  While many of the forms may seem confusing, there are four main workers&amp;rsquo; compensation claim forms you should become familiar with.  Th</description><author>Joseph M. Maus</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:18:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Battle of the Guides in Delaware: IAB Rules on the 5th versus the 6th Edition for Permanency and Skirts the Issue</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Battle-of-the-Guides-in-Delaware-IAB-Rules-on-the-5th-versus-the-6th-Edition-for-Permanency-and-Skirts-the-Issue</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YVW0dOUiQJ8%3d</guid><description> In a case under consideration for several months and for which post-trial briefing was requested in October 2008, the Delaware Industrial Accident Board finally ruled that there will be no blanket pronouncement on the  use of the 5th versus the 6th Edition of the AMA Guides for the Evaluation </description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:05:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Farm Worker Injured by Bucking Horse, Benefits Denied</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Farm-Worker-Injured-by-Bucking-Horse-Benefits-Denied</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MO6X2nx7LN8%3d</guid><description> In Baker v. Shields,  2009 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 54 , the Iowa Supreme Court chose to protect a farm operation from a work injury claim, for a reason that can only be characterized as tenuous. Mr. Baker was working for Joshua Shields and his father, Barton Shields, on their farms. His job included riding</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:46:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/2/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-722009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ZRar5B%2bbODg%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't regis</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:58:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California EAMS Bulk Filing</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-EAMS-Bulk-Filing</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bf881ADqRHI%3d</guid><description> First there were OCR forms. Then e-filing came along to expedite things. Now the Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation (DWC) is developing a new way of using the Electronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS) that will exponentially improve the way workers&amp;rsquo; compensation documents are proc</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:34:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Delaware: New Workers' Compensation Rates Effective June 16, 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Delaware-New-Workers-Compensation-Rates-Effective-June-16-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MqlqF%2bIxYzM%3d</guid><description> On June 16 the Delaware Secretary of Labor announced that the average weekly wage in   
  
Delaware for the calendar year 2008 was $916.00.  Based on this figure, the maximum weekly workers' compensation rate will be $610.67.  The minimum workers' compensation rate will be $203.55.&amp;nbsp</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:17:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NYSIF Disability Benefits Policyholders Get Rate Reduction</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/NYSIF-Disability-Benefits-Policyholders-Get-Rate-Reduction</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">16gfTBsLWU4%3d</guid><description> Effective July 1, 2009, the New York State Insurance Fund is reducing the minimum annual premium on disability benefits policies from $100 to $60 for all new and renewing policies. 
 Estimates are that approximately 20,000 NYSIF DB policyholders could see their yearly charge drop the full $40.&amp;nbs</description><author>New York State Insurance Fund</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:36:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bartender Struck by Stray Bullet Awarded Compensation Benefits</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Bartender-Struck-by-Stray-Bullet-Awarded-Compensation-Benefits</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SUK1rX%2bMbqQ%3d</guid><description> Claimant, a bartender at one of her employer's restaurants, sought workers' compensation benefits for injuries she suffered when she was struck in the back by a stray bullet.  The incident occurred near midnight, when claimant was standing at the bar near the front of the employer's premises.&amp;</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:29:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>West Virginia: “Dependents” Who Can Recover Damages Against Employer in Deliberate Intent Action</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/West-Virginia-Dependents-Who-Can-Recover-Damages-Against-Employer-in-Deliberate-Intent-Action</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EG%2b5RkWm1MA%3d</guid><description> The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals expanded the definition of &amp;ldquo;dependents&amp;rdquo; that can recover damages against an employer in a deliberate intent action under  W. Va. Code &amp;sect; 23-4-2 (c).  In  Murphy v. Eastern Amer. Energy, Corp. ,  et al. ,  No. 33811  (W.
  
  Va. June</description><author>H. Dill Battle, III</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:32:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>SSA's Proposal to Replace the Outdated Dictionary of Occupational Titles</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/SSAs-Proposal-to-Replace-the-Outdated-Dictionary-of-Occupational-Titles</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">sKcl4t68eRI%3d</guid><description> The Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced that they're developing a new Occupational Information System (OIS) to replace the information currently obtained from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT), including the Selected Characteristics of Occupations (SCO) and Revised Handbook</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:47:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases July Advanced Postings 7/1/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-July-Advanced-Postings-712009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ivzJ4F6K1AY%3d</guid><description> The first batch of advanced postings for the upcoming July 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full s</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:54:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Defense and Applicants' Attorneys Request Senate Hearing on EAMS Problems, Delays, and Costs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Defense-and-Applicants-Attorneys-Request-Senate-Hearing-on-EAMS-Problems-Delays-and-Costs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mbKY63mte44%3d</guid><description>  Thirty attorneys representing both defendants and injured workers have requested that the Calif. Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee hold a hearing to discuss the problems with the Electronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS). Their letter dated June 22, 2009, is set forth below:  </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:45:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Psychological Impact of Unemployment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Psychological-Impact-of-Unemployment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">AjGhxMLqB0s%3d</guid><description> Unemployment, particularly when unexpected or involuntary, may take its toll on mental health. A large body of scientific evidence demonstrates convincing evidence that unemployed people manifest lower levels of psychological well-being than do their employed peers.  
 Unemployment has been linked</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:06:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Cervical Spine Is Added to the Delaware Practice Guidelines, Effective June 1, 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Cervical-Spine-Is-Added-to-the-Delaware-Practice-Guidelines-Effective-June-1-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vF%2fWCXW7Nxg%3d</guid><description> On June 1 the Health Care Advisory Panel announced that the cervical spine would be added as a Practice Guidelines classification of injury pursuant to 19   
  
Delaware Code Section 2322C.  Health Care Practice Guidelines have been adopted and apply to all treatment rendered after the effec</description><author>Cassandra Roberts</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:20:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 6/30/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-6302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tmVSoM%2f0xt8%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't regis</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:07:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 3/3/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-332009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1qYc9gUAwUI%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:39:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Vocational Rehabilitation and the Weiner Decision: Did Injured Worker Lose His Rights?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Vocational-Rehabilitation-and-the-Weiner-Decision-Did-Injured-Worker-Lose-His-Rights</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Be8B7SWjA6Y%3d</guid><description> One of our community members &amp;ndash; an injured worker &amp;ndash;  recently asked whether, in light of the WCAB's recent en banc decision in  Weiner , he had lost his rights because his vocational rehabilitation appeal was filed in 1994 and not yet been heard. 
 I've asked Otis Byrd, Program Man</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:08:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Attorney's Fees - The Relevant "Community" or Reasonable Rates for Tribunal - Assessed Fees</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Attorneys-Fees---The-Relevant-Community-or-Reasonable-Rates-for-Tribunal---Assessed-Fees</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wVty84zcxEw%3d</guid><description> Pursuant to Section 28 ( 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 928 ) of LHWCA ( 31 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901  et seq.), attorney's fees may be assessed against the employer, the claimant, or not at all.  If fees are assessed, the factors to be considered are first the so&amp;ndash;called &amp;quot;lodestar&amp;quot; (hourly rate </description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:52:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>WCCP Resource Center</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/WCCP-Resource-Center</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">aksLTYQihNw%3d</guid><description> 
   Workers' Compensation Claims Professionals
  
  
Resource
  
Center 
 
       
  Bob O&amp;rsquo;Halloran  demonstrates great talent at multi-tasking. Whether it&amp;rsquo;s successfully handling workers&amp;rsquo; comp claims or being able to simultaneously watch three sports events on telev</description><author>Workers' Compensation Claims Professionals</author><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:22:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Apportionment Under Calif. Labor Code Sec. 4664: Are the "Conclusive Presumptions" Really Conclusive?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Apportionment-Under-Calif-Labor-Code-Sec-4664-Are-the-Conclusive-Presumptions-Really-Conclusive</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4ukRguMMg1I%3d</guid><description> Labor code 4664(a) states that the employer &amp;quot;  shall only be liable for the percentage of permanent disability directly caused by the injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment  &amp;quot;. 
  Section 4664 (b) states that &amp;quot;  if the applicant has received a prior award of</description><author>Stewart R. Reubens</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:55:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Should Going and Coming Rule Apply to In-Home Health Care Provider Traveling From One Patient's Residence to Another?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Should-Going-and-Coming-Rule-Apply-to-In-Home-Health-Care-Provider-Traveling-From-One-Patients-Residence-to-Another</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7Xbiekgwko0%3d</guid><description> A home health care aide was employed by a firm to provide in-home health care services to some of the firm's clients.  She traveled in her personal vehicle to the patients' homes according to a schedule provided by her employer.  She had no office at the employer's facilities, but typical</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:04:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workplace Hazards: The Historical Perspectives Tour – An Interview of Professor Mitchel Rosen</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workplace-Hazards-The-Historical-Perspectives-Tour---An-Interview-of-Professor-Mitchel-Rosen</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">AWZVHbPo1Ys%3d</guid><description>  Professor Rosen is the Director of the Office of Public Health Practice at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (  UMDNJ). He is also the chief organizer of an annual bus tour that explores contemporary and historical hazards faced by workers. The bus tour covered 1,100 miles and</description><author>Mitchel A. Rosen, MS, CHES</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:36:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 6/25/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-6252009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zKfSEJVLuyE%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't regis</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:44:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases June Advanced Postings 6/26/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-June-Advanced-Postings-6262009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uh8AI21FPmY%3d</guid><description> The fourth batch of advanced postings for the upcoming June 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:38:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Increase in State Average Weekly Wage Will Bump Up Calif. Workers' Comp Benefits in 2010</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Increase-in-State-Average-Weekly-Wage-Will-Bump-Up-Calif-Workers-Comp-Benefits-in-2010</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">q9Qhlkz8CAU%3d</guid><description> The U.S. Department of Labor has released new data showing California&amp;rsquo;s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose from $956.20 to $984.83 in the 12 months ending March 31, 2009 &amp;ndash; an increase of just under 3 percent &amp;ndash; which will push up minimum and maximum temporary total disability (T</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:27:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 6/23/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-6232009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5%2bEqSwUz2XM%3d</guid><description> Here are some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with your request, or email me directly. If you haven't regis</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NYSIF Supports National Safety Month</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/NYSIF-Supports-National-Safety-Month</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5yiNd79MErE%3d</guid><description> During National Safety Month, the New York State Insurance Fund reminds employers of the importance of safety in creating a safe workplace. 
 The National Safety Council designates June as National Safety Month each year and promotes tips, strategies and guidelines for maintaining a safe work envi</description><author>New York State Insurance Fund</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:55:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: New Board Rule Requires Considerable Care in Timing Denials of AOE/COE Disputed Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-New-Board-Rule-Requires-Considerable-Care-in-Timing-Denials-of-AOECOE-Disputed-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SNbnFbSR0jE%3d</guid><description> In light of the  new  Board Rule &amp;sect;30 (d)(3)  great care must be taken in timing the date of the defendant&amp;rsquo;s denial of compensability in light of the new regulation&amp;rsquo;s restriction on the defendant&amp;rsquo;s ability to request a QME panel to address a threshold compensability issue. 
 </description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:24:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The AMA Guides Measure What?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-AMA-Guides-Measure-What</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qiL2HIX6xPM%3d</guid><description> Justice is elusive, particularly in workers' compensation law where it is measured by the pound.  Under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act ( 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901  et seq.), as in many workers' compensation acts, awards for partial disability are determined not by the impact of</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:22:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AIG, KBR and CNA Face New Questions About Insurance for Injured Civilian Contractors</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AIG-KBR-and-CNA-Face-New-Questions-About-Insurance-for-Injured-Civilian-Contractors</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vbe%2fth7eIGk%3d</guid><description> Unlike insurance giant  AIG , which promised to cease lobbying after receiving billions in bailout money, Chicago-based carrier  CNA  still works hard to influence lawmakers. The company has spent more than $6 million in lobbying since 2001, including  more than $300,000  in the first quarter of th</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:49:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Court Says Wilkinson Rule Inconsistent With Post-SB 899 Requirement That Apportionment Be Based on Causation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Court-Says-Wilkinson-Rule-Inconsistent-With-Post-SB-899-Requirement-That-Apportionment-Be-Based-on-Causation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EyBy6pU7p%2bY%3d</guid><description> The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, has issued two decisions yesterday, holding that the  Wilkinson  rule is no longer  generally applicable because it is inconsistent with the post-SB 899 requirement that apportionment be based on causation.  
  Vilkitis </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:56:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mississippi Refuses Invitation to Enlarge Intentional Tort Exception to Exclusive Remedy Doctrine</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Mississippi-Refuses-Invitation-to-Enlarge-Intentional-Tort-Exception-to-Exclusive-Remedy-Doctrine</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CNapPMZe8Fo%3d</guid><description> Reflective of the trade offs between business and labor inherent in any workers&amp;rsquo; compensation system, the Mississippi Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Act includes  MISS. CODE ANN. &amp;sect; 71-3-9  (Rev. 2000), which provides as follows: &amp;ldquo;[t]he liability of an employer to pay compensation shal</description><author>Paul B. Howell</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:43:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases June Advanced Postings 6/19/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-June-Advanced-Postings-6192009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6F%2fP4ZY3QZw%3d</guid><description> The third batch of advanced postings for the upcoming June 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full s</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:18:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Safety Services Company: Working With Tools</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Safety-Services-Company-Working-With-Tools</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FDtSomsN1mA%3d</guid><description> Tools come in handy for maintenance work and repairs. They are there for your convenience, but they can be a disadvantage to you too if you do not use them carefully and wisely. In fact, work tools&amp;mdash;whether hand tools or power tools&amp;mdash;can be very hazardous if not used with care and caution</description><author>Safety Services Company</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:51:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Taneka Talley Case – When Does Injury or Death “Arise” Out of Employment?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Taneka-Talley-Case---When-Does-Injury-or-Death-Arise-Out-of-Employment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RKZsgALXH34%3d</guid><description> The phrase &amp;quot;AOE/COE&amp;quot; generally rolls off the tongue quite easily when adjusting   
  
California workers' compensation claims. There are times, however, that deciding whether a claim is compensable is not so easy a task. That was the situation confronting Dollar Tree stores when an empl</description><author>Mark E. Webb</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:00:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 6/18/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-6182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bHb9cX1BPCI%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we plan to post to lexis.com. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon to your web center account and post a comment to this blog with y</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:06:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Spotlight: Texas Refuses to Strike Forum Selection Clause From Employment Contract; Dismisses Retaliatory Discharge Claim</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Spotlight-Texas-Refuses-to-Strike-Forum-Selection-Clause-From-Employment-Contract-Dismisses-Retaliatory-Discharge-Claim</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2frkbOBO6gP0%3d</guid><description> Welch, a   Texas resident, signed an employment contract with Nightingale Nurses, LLC, a   Florida company, to work as an EEG technician at a   
  
Texas hospital.  She suffered a work-related injury and, when the pain became unbearable, sought treatment in the hospital's emergency room.&amp;nbs</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:12:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Safety Services Company: Back and Eye Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Safety-Services-Company-Back-and-Eye-Injuries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gURDHwZeq90%3d</guid><description> Back and eye injuries are the most common complaint of workers in most industries.  In this blog entry, we are going to discuss why these injuries occur and how you can avoid them. 
 Let&amp;rsquo;s start with back injuries.  Back injuries are not just common to blue-collar workers who use t</description><author>Safety Services Company</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:45:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Supreme Court Conference Report 6/17/2009: Review Denied in County of Los Angeles/LeCornu, Fry</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Supreme-Court-Conference-Report-6172009-Review-Denied-in-County-of-Los-AngelesLeCornu-Fry</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CSbO67AIiYg%3d</guid><description> The California Supreme Court has denied review in two cases reported in Cal. Comp. Cases: 
 1. County of Los Angeles v. WCAB (LeCornu) (2009)  74 Cal. Comp. Cases 645  (writ denied), review denied 6/17/2009.
 2. Fry v. WCAB (2009)  74 Cal. Comp. Cases 678  (writ denied), review denied 6/17/2</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:54:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Policy Year 2006 First Reports Show California Workers’ Comp Incurred Claim Costs Up</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Policy-Year-2006-First-Reports-Show-California-Workers-Comp-Incurred-Claim-Costs-Up</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qyw0cfaZQ8k%3d</guid><description> First report data on   
  
California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation insured claims against policies written in 2006 show that despite a continued decline in the number of claims reported within 18 months of policy inception, total incurred loss costs rose by $112 million. That was the first increas</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:00:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. WCAB Issues En Banc Decision on Vocational Rehabilitation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-WCAB-Issues-En-Banc-Decision-on-Vocational-Rehabilitation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7Ws7DbwpLpo%3d</guid><description> The WCAB&amp;rsquo;s 6/10/09 en banc decision in the matter of    Lawrence Wiener v Ralph's Grocery Company    addressed head on the arguments raised by the Applicant&amp;rsquo;s Bar that vocational rehabilitation rights were not fully extinguished by the repeal of   Labor Code Section 139.5   and lived on</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:26:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Safety Services Company: Accident Proofing Your Construction Site</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Safety-Services-Company-Accident-Proofing-Your-Construction-Site</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uSuCLJ1khZc%3d</guid><description> If you&amp;rsquo;ve been working in a construction site for some time, you know that the place doesn&amp;rsquo;t just LOOK dangerous, it IS dangerous.  Flying sawdust, falling debris, scattered nails, high-powered tools and equipment, working at heights &amp;ndash; these are just some hazards common to co</description><author>Safety Services Company</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:55:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Cold War Widows" of Former Nuclear Plant Employees Seek Exception to Statute of Limitations: An Interview of Philip J. Fulton</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cold-War-Widows-of-Former-Nuclear-Plant-Employees-Seek-Exception-to-Statute-of-Limitations-An-Interview-of-Philip-J-Fulton</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">z6j4RZQBOvg%3d</guid><description> Represented by  &lt;/city&gt;Columbus,   Ohio, attorney Philip J. Fulton, author of    Fulton's Ohio Workers' Compensation Law    (LexisNexis), the widows of 38 former employees of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in  &lt;/city&gt;Piketon,   Ohio, are trying to win death benefits from the   
  
Ohio wo</description><author>Phil Fulton</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:16:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Safety Services Company: Ladders and Falls</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Safety-Services-Company-Ladders-and-Falls</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ZkMTHShKdQQ%3d</guid><description> Ladders are helpful tools used to reach areas that are otherwise inaccessible. Whether you&amp;rsquo;re in construction, general industry, or work an 8 to 5 job everyday I&amp;rsquo;m sure you use ladders at some point. But being on a ladder also puts you at the risk of falling. It is important that you us</description><author>Safety Services Company</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:48:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ask the Expert: Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ask-the-Expert-Robert-G-Rassp-Esq</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mDQYf9fmMLk%3d</guid><description>  Ask the Expert          
      
    
     Featured Expert    Robert G. Rassp, Esq.       Topic: AMA Guides &amp;amp; Calif. workers' compensation      
    
    
   If you have a question about the AMA  Guides  and how it interacts with   
  
California workers' compensation law, sim</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:24:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What's New in the 2009 Edition of The Lawyer's Guide to the AMA Guides and Calif. Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Whats-New-in-the-2009-Edition-of-The-Lawyers-Guide-to-the-AMA-Guides-and-Calif-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">PIXx4oVE7zs%3d</guid><description> We are now approaching the fifth year of our use of the AMA  Guides  in our   
  
California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation cases and the learning curve is still quite evident from the reading of medical reports and the deposition testimony of physicians. As we said in the first edition of  The</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:55:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>UPDATE: South Carolina Workers' Compensation Reform: Governator-Style</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/South-Carolina-Workers-Compensation-Reform-Governator-Style</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">fEdscpegqbM%3d</guid><description> Last year I blogged about Governor Sanford's executive orders mandating the use of the AMA Guides in the state's workers' compensation system. 
 On July 17, 2008, the political standoff between the Governor and the state Workers' Compensation Commission appears to have been resolved. A Joint Motio</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:51:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The New Edition of the AMA Guides: Six Times a Charm?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-New-Edition-of-the-AMA-Guides-Six-Times-a-Charm</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">iJOSGe7xNPk%3d</guid><description> According to a recent poll of businesses on compliance issues, workers' compensation ranks as one of the most complicated set of laws, right up there with the tax code. In California this problem wasn't made any easier when the state legislature adopted the American Medical Association's  Guides to</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:53:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sixth Edition Six Feet Under in Kentucky? At Least for Now</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Sixth-Edition-Six-Feet-Under-in-Kentucky-At-Least-for-Now</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">X4aqtG13O3E%3d</guid><description> With the release of the Sixth Edition of the   AMA Guides  , the Kentucky Legislature via   Senate Bill 199  , deemed it prudent to take pause before adopting the sixth edition as &amp;ldquo;the latest edition&amp;rdquo; as the phrase is used in KRS 67A.460, 342.0011, 342.315, 342.316, 342.730, and 34</description><author>Roland Legal PLLC</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:00:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Member Report for the Iowa Task Force Regarding the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Sixth Edition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Member-Report-for-the-Iowa-Task-Force-Regarding-the-AMA-Guides-to-the-Evaluation-of-Permanent-Impairment-Sixth-Edition</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ArVaULUFva0%3d</guid><description>  This position paper was originally published as a part of the Iowa Task Force Report regarding the use of The  Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition  or  The Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Sixth Edition  in the state of
  
  Iowa. The overall report w</description><author>John Kuhnlein, DO, MPH, CIME, FACPM, FACOEM</author><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:07:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Kentucky Workers' Compensation Commissioner Proposes New Practice Changes</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Kentucky-Workers-Compensation-Commissioner-Proposes-New-Practice-Changes</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CKmZRYbAW4s%3d</guid><description> Based upon the presentation of Workers' Compensation Commissinoer   Dwight T. Lovan   at the 17th Biennial Workers Compensation Institute that was held in Lexington, KY on October 16th &amp;amp; 17th, 2008, the following proposals are being considered as potential Practice Regulation Changes: 
  </description><author>Roland Legal PLLC</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:46:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Fibromyalgia Ratable Under the AMA Guides?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Is-Fibromyalgia-Ratable-Under-the-AMA-Guides</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Lbz8wtkTfRQ%3d</guid><description> Is fibromyalgia ratable under the AMA Guides? According to Robert G. Rassp in his book    The Lawyer's Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers' Compensation   , there are two schools of thought in the matter: (1) it is not ratable pursuant to language in Chapter 18 of the AMA Guides (5t</description><author>LexisNexis Occupational Injuries &amp; Illnesses Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:55:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Rejects 6th Edition of AMA Impairment Guides for Work Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Rejects-6th-Edition-of-AMA-Impairment-Guides-for-Work-Injuries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6q5RWZkUako%3d</guid><description>Since its publication, the Sixth Edition of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment has met with stiff criticism. It has been described as a step back in fairly assessing work injuries by many legal and medical experts. Several States have formally rejected use of the Sixth Edition,</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:58:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AMA Guides Sixth Edition Down But Not Out in Kentucky</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AMA-Guides-Sixth-Edition-Down-But-Not-Out-in-Kentucky</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3UpfPq4zf%2bY%3d</guid><description> The publication of the Sixth Edition of the   AMA Guides   and its pronounced divergence from previous editions aroused a controversy of sorts within the Kentucky workers&amp;rsquo; compensation community, not to mention other jurisdictions relying on the publication for determining the occupational di</description><author>Roland Legal PLLC</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:45:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Safety Services Company: What You Need to Know About Workers’ Comp</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Safety-Services-Company-What-You-Need-to-Know-About-Workers-Comp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NWp%2fIkuwoLs%3d</guid><description>  So, what is workers&amp;rsquo; comp? And how does workers&amp;rsquo; comp benefit both the employees and the employers?  
 Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation (or workers&amp;rsquo; comp or work comp) grants benefits and insurance of workers in the event that they get injured or ill while on the job. With the workpl</description><author>Safety Services Company</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:14:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Legislature Takes On "Pill Mills"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Legislature-Takes-On-Pill-Mills</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8K2q1soCV2Q%3d</guid><description> In November 2007, reporter   Stephen Dean at Local 2 Investigates   uncovered the booming business of so-called &amp;quot;pill mills&amp;quot; in  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Houston, where carloads of people and parking lots filled with cars could easily be found. The drugs of choice are typically hydrocodone, Xanax and</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:11:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Surviving Summer – The Tragic Story of an Injured Young Worker</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Surviving-Summer---The-Tragic-Story-of-an-Injured-Young-Worker</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QO5sf6sGT1o%3d</guid><description> He wanted to earn some extra spending money. Instead, he earned himself a trip to the hospital, a body full of scars, and a story that no one should have to tell. 
 Like many other 16 year olds, Eric Olivieri got himself a summer job. Like many other kids his age, he left for work not bothering to</description><author>IAPA</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:01:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CMS' May-Alert Announces MIR Timeline Extensions &amp; Amends the TPOC "Reporting Trigger"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CMS-May-Alert-Announces-MIR-Timeline-Extensions--Amends-the-TPOC-Reporting-Trigger</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">v2uG1UU5ufE%3d</guid><description> On May 14, 2009, the Centers for Medicare &amp;amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a  Supplemental Alert  (dated May 11, 2009; hereinafter referred to as the   May-Alert  ) to the recently released Section 111 NGHP User Guide (Version 1.0) regarding liability insurance (including self-insurance), no-fa</description><author>Mark Popolizio</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:51:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Florida's Cap on Workers' Comp Attorney's Fees: Constitutional Challenge to Statute Could Prove Difficult</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Floridas-Cap-on-Workers-Comp-Attorneys-Fees-Constitutional-Challenge-to-Statute-Could-Prove-Difficult</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">juoicMHLz0M%3d</guid><description> In 2003 the Florida Legislature extensively amended the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation statute with SB-50A. The amendment which received the greatest attention and most controversy was the amendment to   Florida Statute 440.34   that limited attorney fees for benefits secured to a strict contingency f</description><author>Robert J. Grace, Jr.</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:48:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Court Order Approved on General Motors' Bankruptcy</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Court-Order-Approved-on-General-Motors-Bankruptcy</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bdP2tj7OZDI%3d</guid><description> Previously we reported on the so called &amp;ldquo;  first day motion  &amp;rdquo; to the court included a petition to continue wages and benefits to General Motors&amp;rsquo; workforce. As part of this motion, GM&amp;rsquo;s management took the position that payment for all workers&amp;rsquo; compensation benefits, w</description><author>IAIABC</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:56:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Factors in Increasing Medical Costs in Calif. Workers’ Compensation (Part Two) - An Interview of Insurance Executive Mark Webb</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Factors-in-Increasing-Medical-Costs-in-Calif-Workers-Compensation-Part-Two---An-Interview-of-Insurance-Executive-Mark-Webb</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6mYp2lcozYI%3d</guid><description>  Mark Webb is Vice President for Governmental Relations, Employers Direct Insurance Company.  He recently participated in a panel discussion at the Northern California Workers&amp;rsquo; Comp Forum in the  &lt;/city&gt;
  
San Francisco area. This is the second of a two-part interview. In     Par</description><author>Mark E. Webb</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:09:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Supreme Court Conference Report 6/10/2009: Review Denied in Cavaliers Holding/Shelton, Espino, Fan, Grimaldo</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Supreme-Court-Conference-Report-6102009-Review-Denied-in-Cavaliers-HoldingShelton-Espino-Fan-Grimaldo</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CvL38g95LOc%3d</guid><description> The California Supreme Court has issued its Conference List through 6/10/2009.  The following cases were reported in Cal. Comp. Cases: 
 
 1.  Cavaliers Holding Co. v. WCAB (
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Shelton ) (2009) 74 Cal. Comp. Cases 516 (writ denied), review denied 6/10/2009. 
 2.  Espino</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:48:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Occupational Safety and Health in Times of Economic Crisis</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Occupational-Safety-and-Health-in-Times-of-Economic-Crisis</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LcJejG7w%2bwc%3d</guid><description> With credit barely flowing and global demand on a downward slide, enterprises around the world are struggling to cope with the global economic crisis. Meanwhile, the numbers of unemployed and working poor are rising. How is the crisis affecting working conditions? For this year&amp;rsquo;s World Day fo</description><author>International Labour Organization</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:42:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 6/11/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-6112009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bhh1J6dC9M0%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven'</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:15:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 6/10/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-6102009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7M2X77URuY4%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 74, No. 5   May 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Supreme Court Compensation Case  </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:11:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases June Advanced Postings 6/11/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-June-Advanced-Postings-6112009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7bTw%2f1rYjrU%3d</guid><description> The second batch of advanced postings for the upcoming June 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:50:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>To Pay or Not to Pay? Florida Claims Adjuster Ethics - General Principles</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/To-Pay-or-Not-to-Pay-Florida-Claims-Adjuster-Ethics---General-Principles</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QXex7odq7lg%3d</guid><description> Time Constraints and Penalty for Late Payment 
 
Previously, the Florida Workers' Compensation Act required that carriers mail the first payment of compensation within 14 days after they have knowledge of the disability or within 14 days after receipt of a Petition for Benefits. The difficul</description><author>Workers' Compensation Claims Professionals</author><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:31:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) Data on California Workers' Compensation Premium</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/National-Association-of-Insurance-Commissioners-NAIC-Data-on-California-Workers-Compensation-Premium</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">C%2byMShcM8AE%3d</guid><description> The total direct written premium (DWP) of   
  
California workers' compensation insurers in 2008, $7.65 billion, was the lowest since 2000, when it stood at $6.8 billion.  During that 9-year span, rising loss costs drove DWP to $16.1 billion in 2004, then, fueled by declining claim fre</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:37:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AIG Faces Hearing on Denial of Medical Claims by Contractors Injured in Iraq and Afghanistan</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/AIG-Faces-Hearing-on-Denial-of-Medical-Claims-by-Contractors-Injured-in-Iraq-and-Afghanistan</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EQqR0km0sb8%3d</guid><description>  Rep. Dennis Kucinich , D-Ohio,  announced  today that a panel of the  House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform  will hold a hearing on June 18 to examine whether AIG and other major insurance carriers have inappropriately denied medical claims of contractors injured on the job in Iraq an</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:33:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 6/5/2009: Iowa, New York, South Carolina, Georgia, Illinois</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-652009-Iowa-New-York-South-Carolina-Georgia-Illinois</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">13vxqMmw%2b2M%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:54:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Art of Reserves: Claims Adjusters Need Crystal Ball Foresight and High-Level Skills</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Art-of-Reserves-Claims-Adjusters-Need-Crystal-Ball-Foresight-and-High-Level-Skills</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qy7Ca1bouTM%3d</guid><description>Reserves are financial assets, or money, put aside to fund a company&amp;rsquo;s legal obligations. These obligations commonly appear in a company&amp;rsquo;s profit and loss statement, and on its balance sheet.
 
A reserve on an individual claim is an estimate of the total future cost of that c</description><author>Workers' Compensation Claims Professionals</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:16:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Anti-Fraud Legislation Headed to Texas Governor</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Anti-Fraud-Legislation-Headed-to-Texas-Governor</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">b9osQx5KSXo%3d</guid><description> Texas lawmakers took a huge step in curtailing the activities of today&amp;rsquo;s ambulance chasers by passing HB 148.  The bill now on its way to Governor Perry for his signature makes it illegal for lawyers, chiropractors and other health professionals to solicit the victims of auto accidents o</description><author>Insurance Council of Texas</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:46:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Factors in Increasing Medical Costs in Calif. Workers’ Compensation (Part One) - An Interview of Insurance Executive Mark Webb</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Factors-in-Increasing-Medical-Costs-in-Calif-Workers-Compensation-Part-One---An-Interview-of-Insurance-Executive-Mark-Webb</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">v5Ub5jtPsNI%3d</guid><description>  Mark Webb is Vice President for Governmental Relations, Employers Direct Insurance Company.  He recently participated in a panel discussion at the Northern California Workers&amp;rsquo; Comp Forum in the  &lt;/city&gt;
  
San Francisco area.  This is the first of a two-part interview in which Mr</description><author>Mark E. Webb</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:16:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CWCI Study Examines Growth of California Workers’ Comp Medical Costs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CWCI-Study-Examines-Growth-of-California-Workers-Comp-Medical-Costs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LM7OX54JDIs%3d</guid><description> A new CWCI study on post-reform changes in California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation medical payments confirms that since accident year (AY) 2005, insurer payments for treatment, pharmaceuticals and durable medical equipment (DME), med-legal reports, and medical management have grown significantly. De</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:08:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases June Advanced Postings 6/5/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-June-Advanced-Postings-652009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SJE%2b5s3V67E%3d</guid><description> The first batch of advanced postings for the upcoming June 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full s</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:59:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Politics of Insurance: Dinallo Resigns, Crist Hints of Veto and Texas TWIA Bill in Limbo</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Politics-of-Insurance-Dinallo-Resigns-Crist-Hints-of-Veto-and-Texas-TWIA-Bill-in-Limbo-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qZMCylt88zw%3d</guid><description> What happened to the time when a significant insurance coverage decision arrived and everybody in my line of work analyzed that topic for several years? Now, the insurance industry is writing so many new and differently worded forms, it is hard to rely upon case decisions as being of widespread sig</description><author>William F. "Chip" Merlin, Jr.</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:11:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 6/3/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-632009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MxvBW7HePY4%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven'</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:26:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Further Reflections on the Almaraz-Guzman Calif. WCAB En Banc Decision</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Further-Reflections-on-the-Almaraz-Guzman-Calif-WCAB-En-Banc-Decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">i03WtZe%2f88c%3d</guid><description> Many of us have started to reflect on how to respond as an AME/QME/Treater to the Almaraz-Guzman WCAB En Banc Decision. Here are some initial thoughts, some of which are not completely original as I have received input from others. 
 I urge you to read the full Almaraz-Guzman WCAB En Banc Decision</description><author>Steven D. Feinberg, M.D.</author><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:22:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NAIC Report on Insurer Profitability for Calif. Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/NAIC-Report-on-Insurer-Profitability-for-Calif-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bEdXPoiLDW8%3d</guid><description> According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' latest report on insurer profitability,   
  
California workers' compensation insurers have enjoyed healthy returns on net worth each year, starting in 2004.  These returns (12.6% in 2004, 14.2% in 2005, 16.4% in 2006, and 12</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:28:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 5/29/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-5292009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2KxgwHAkHtc%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:35:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Eight Basic Training Principles for New Employees to Get Them Off On the Right Track and Prevent Comp Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Eight-Basic-Training-Principles-for-New-Employees-to-Get-Them-Off-On-the-Right-Track-and-Prevent-Comp-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u9oIq5jwEho%3d</guid><description>   Editor's Note: As part of National Safety Month, we have reposted these tips for a new employee safety program.   
 The ultimate key to the success of the organization's new employee safety indoctrination effort is management's sincere interest in and commitment to the safety and health of </description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:42:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Update From the Benefits Review Board 5/29/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Update-From-the-Benefits-Review-Board-5292009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HqeCoqUT7R0%3d</guid><description> The Board began this fiscal year in October 2008 with 134 pending Longshore appeals.  Historically, appeals are filed in about 10 percent of the Longshore cases decided by OALJ.  During the last fiscal year, which ended September 30, 2008, the Board received 226 appeals in cases under the</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 17:10:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Changes Facing Workers’ Compensation Adjusters – In Florida and Across the Nation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Changes-Facing-Workers-Compensation-Adjusters---In-Florida-and-Across-the-Nation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hOx6ImSTDi4%3d</guid><description>Many factors, including changes in technology, changes in legislation, new rulings by the courts, and the effect of the current economic downturn, are impacting how workers&amp;rsquo; compensation adjusters fulfill their responsibilities.
 
   Bob O'Halloran, who is Vice President of Claims </description><author>Workers' Compensation Claims Professionals</author><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 12:43:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases May Advanced Postings 5/30/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-May-Advanced-Postings-5302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xWMrrfMb56s%3d</guid><description> The fifth batch of advanced postings for the upcoming May 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full su</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:21:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois Temporary Disability Benefits Following Economic "Layoff"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Temporary-Disability-Benefits-Following-Economic-Layoff</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nWxtpBS1%2fs4%3d</guid><description> Will an &amp;ldquo;economic layoff&amp;rdquo; be a solid defense against payment of temporary disability benefits where a carpenter worked for over 2 years following a shoulder injury? The answer is no &amp;ndash; that is, as long as the worker is still under medical care and is still &amp;ldquo;temporarily&amp;rdquo;</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:23:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Almaraz-Guzman and Ogilvie En Banc Decisions - Are They Currently in Force Pending Reconsideration by the Calif. WCAB?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Almaraz-Guzman-and-Ogilvie-En-Banc-Decisions---Are-They-Currently-in-Force-Pending-Reconsideration-by-the-Calif-WCAB</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">W6roTB7Bd3g%3d</guid><description> At a recent educational program, a speaker told the attendees that the WCAB en banc decisions were &amp;ldquo;on hold&amp;rdquo; pending the WCAB&amp;rsquo;s decision after reconsideration.  The defendants in each case had filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the WCAB&amp;rsquo;s en banc decisions and thos</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:02:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>More Than Totally and Permanently Disabled From Work Injury in Illinois</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/More-Than-Totally-and-Permanently-Disabled-From-Work-Injury-in-Illinois</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7r5RJxhw%2bKs%3d</guid><description> Is that possible to receive more than lifetime total disability benefits in   
  
Illinois from a single accident? Answer: Yes -- it is possible, but it won&amp;rsquo;t happen very often. 
 In    Beelman Trucking   , an injured worker received lifetime total disability benefits for the complete para</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:35:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 5/27/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-5272009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">AWvVUsyICes%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 74, No. 4   April 2009  
  A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compensation Cas</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:52:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Summary Judgment Rendered Against a PPO in Louisiana for $261 Million</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Summary-Judgment-Rendered-Against-a-PPO-in-Louisiana-for-261-Million</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OAdlI16ObY4%3d</guid><description> Summary Judgment was rendered by Judge Wyatt in the class action suit (over $261 million) of Clark A. Gunderson, M.D., et al. v. F.A. Richard &amp;amp; Associates, et al. With legal interest the actual award is almost $400 million. 
 There is a special statute that limits the amount of bond neede</description><author>Denis Paul Juge</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:29:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Hope for Cold War-Era Bomb-Makers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Hope-for-Cold-War-Era-Bomb-Makers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">R3ZF7LEXEsg%3d</guid><description> The nuclear bombs Charlie Wolf built helped win the Cold War. But his toughest battles came afterward, when he applied to a troubled federal compensation program intended for those whose top-secret work made them sick. 
 Wolf wound up battling a    bureaucratic morass    for more than six years --</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:26:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Passes Late-Night Changes to Jurisdiction and Penalties for Denying Valid Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Passes-Late-Night-Changes-to-Jurisdiction-and-Penalties-for-Denying-Valid-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">g24xKGim6MI%3d</guid><description> Although it mostly slipped past the press, the Iowa General Assembly passed a light-night bill just before they adjourned for the year. The standings bill is traditionally passed at the very last minute of every session, and includes lots of bills that did not quite make it during regular session. </description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:56:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 5/22/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-5222009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Kyq1cjaUSWw%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:17:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. WCAB Panel Decision: Morgan v. Redwood Credit Union (Post-Almaraz With Dissent)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-WCAB-Panel-Decision-Morgan-v-Redwood-Credit-Union-Post-Almaraz-With-Dissent</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kgcFGm1ScA8%3d</guid><description> In  Morgan v. Redwood Credit Union , a majority of a WCAB panel has granted Applicant's petition for reconsideration and returned the matter to the trial level for further development of the medical record in accordance with the WCAB's recent en banc decision in  Almaraz/Guzman . The majority </description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:51:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FEHA Disability Discrimination Standard – The Interactive Process for Accommodation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FEHA-Disability-Discrimination-Standard---The-Interactive-Process-for-Accommodation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">400qsg%2fc1%2bo%3d</guid><description> The Fourth District Court of Appeals just issued an   employer-favorable decision   with regard to the burdens of evidence imposed on a plaintiff suing under the Fair Employment and Housing Act to avoid summary judgment. This decision gives guidance regarding a split of authority concerning an empl</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:15:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: New Supplemental Income Benefit Rules in Effect</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-New-Supplemental-Income-Benefit-Rules-in-Effect</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Cwezg2XZIPI%3d</guid><description> For qualifying periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009, new supplemental income benefits (SIBs) rules are in effect.  These new SIBs rules offer the first substantial change to the consideration and payment of supplemental income benefits since the new law went into effect in 1991.  Th</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:45:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pentagon’s IG to Examine AIG Insurance Provided to Private Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Pentagons-IG-to-Examine-AIG-Insurance-Provided-to-Private-Contractors-in-Iraq-and-Afghanistan</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bqQM0QLX4L8%3d</guid><description> The   Defense Department's inspector general   is preparing a possible audit to examine allegations that inadequate oversight by federal officials allowed AIG and other major carriers to deny medical benefits due civilian contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
 The examination, undertaken in respon</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:44:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How Return to Work Programs Can Stop the Disability Cycle and Prevent Further Erosion of Our Economy</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-Return-to-Work-Programs-Can-Stop-the-Disability-Cycle-and-Prevent-Further-Erosion-of-Our-Economy-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DeLIJ90Zyh8%3d</guid><description> National Return to Work Week ran from May 10 to 16, 2009, and it will be celebrated annually the second week of May. According to the National Safety Council, employers lose an average of 80 million lost work days every year. The failure to reduce this number causes lost productivity and many hidde</description><author>National Return to Work Week</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:23:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Rebecca Shafer: How to Use a Medical Doctor Proactively to Get Employees Back to Work Sooner</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Rebecca-Shafer-How-to-Use-a-Medical-Doctor-Proactively-to-Get-Employees-Back-to-Work-Sooner</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lEb9w7BFU%2fE%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing on topics that relate to workers' compensation cost containment.  Some will be basic, some advanced.  Please let me know if there's anything in particular you would like me to focus on and I'll do my best to accom</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:54:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Rebecca Shafer: How to Handle "Phantom Accidents"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Rebecca-Shafer-How-to-Handle-Phantom-Accidents</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FxcPpPEZ7hQ%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing on topics that relate to workers' compensation cost containment.  Some will be basic, some advanced.  Please let me know if there's anything in particular you would like me to focus on and I'll do my best to accom</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:17:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Rebecca Shafer: 7 Reasons An Employee May Not Return to Work</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Rebecca-Shafer-7-Reasons-An-Employee-May-Not-Return-to-Work</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bmlw9LOAmZg%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing on topics that relate to workers' compensation cost containment.  Some will be basic, some advanced.  Please let me know if there's anything in particular you would like me to focus on and I'll do my best to accom</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:18:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Rebecca Shafer: 14 Things to Consider When Employees Are Injured Traveling Overseas</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Rebecca-Shafer-14-Things-to-Consider-When-Employees-Are-Injured-Traveling-Overseas</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">quHZGCwv1uY%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing on topics that relate to workers' compensation cost containment.  Some will be basic, some advanced.  Please let me know if there's anything in particular you would like me to focus on and I'll do my best to accom</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:51:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Resolve Difficult (Impossible) Claims: Overcoming Obstacles to Return to Work</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Resolve-Difficult-Impossible-Claims-Overcoming-Obstacles-to-Return-to-Work</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yvQ1AhSA7vk%3d</guid><description>  Ever tried home-based employment?  Claims which have a year or more of lost time  have a very small likelihood of resolving and are likely to hit the statutory limits of indemnity and medical costs.  Some analysts think over half of all workers' comp costs are generated by these 'ye</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:56:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Rebecca Shafer: Working With Unions When Setting Up Return to Work Programs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Rebecca-Shafer-Working-With-Unions-When-Setting-Up-Return-to-Work-Programs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xENq4CrHkG8%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing on topics that relate to workers' compensation cost containment.  Some will be basic, some advanced.  Please let me know if there's anything in particular you would like me to focus on and I'll do my best to accom</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:04:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Record Fines Collected from Uninsured Employers in Ilinois</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Record-Fines-Collected-from-Uninsured-Employers-in-Ilinois</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">PuDvYSbpWnI%3d</guid><description> Fraud is a term which is frequently used by employers as the number one attack on the workers' compensation system. Claimants receiving benefits for injuries that did not occur or injuries that have healed is often a subject that is sensationalized on television.  
 The fraud that never makes it o</description><author>Kim Presbrey</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:55:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger – Rebecca Shafer: How to Handle "Phantom Accidents"</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Rebecca-Shafer-How-to-Handle-Phantom-Accidents-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CtMwJI94jgI%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; , I'll be writing on topics that relate to workers' compensation cost containment.  Some will be basic, some advanced.  Please let me know if there's anything in particular you would like me to focus on and I'll do my best to accommoda</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:26:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Protecting Workers Rights by Stopping Misclassification as Independent Contractors in Maryland</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Protecting-Workers-Rights-by-Stopping-Misclassification-as-Independent-Contractors-in-Maryland-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CaD%2baHHB%2fQY%3d</guid><description> Earlier this month, the  Maryland  legislature joined a number of states in cracking down on worker misclassification by enacting the Maryland Workplace Fraud Act (   S 909    /    H 819    ) which has the    support of Gov. O'Malley    who is expected to sign the bill shortly.  The main focus</description><author>Caroline Fan</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:38:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Detect Workers Compensation Fraud Committed by the Injured Employee</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Detect-Workers-Compensation-Fraud-Committed-by-the-Injured-Employee-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Y2YpHy4NOmQ%3d</guid><description> Fraudulent claims are filed by employees who are seeking workers' compensation benefits for non-existent conditions or for conditions that are not work-related.  These claims are not fraud in the criminal sense in most cases.  Therefore, you must be extremely careful in your claim ha</description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:35:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Detect Workers Compensation Fraud Committed by Healthcare Providers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Detect-Workers-Compensation-Fraud-Committed-by-Healthcare-Providers-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OF37qy6zH%2bM%3d</guid><description> In previous blogs I have discussed how to detect possible employee workers compensation claim fraud and possible inflated workers compensation claims.  This blog will discuss one other area of possible fraud that your organization may encounter - fraud committed by healthcare providers. 
 Thi</description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:34:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Detect Inflated Claims That May Drive Your Workers Compensation Costs Into Orbit</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Detect-Inflated-Claims-That-May-Drive-Your-Workers-Compensation-Costs-Into-Orbit-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5WogNc916qE%3d</guid><description> Inflated claims are different from fraudulent claims in that they begin with an injury or illness that the employee later attempts to manipulate into additional time off with pay or a higher disability award.  An example of this type of claim is when employee, who is nearing retirement and is </description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:32:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>OSHA-gate: The Story Behind the Story</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/OSHA-gate-The-Story-Behind-the-Story-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">t9%2b9%2fL7nowE%3d</guid><description> The news headline in recent days has been the House committee hearing on the underreporting of workplace injuries and illnesses. Click    here   .  
 The    June 27, 2008 episode of Bill Moyers Journal    gave us the story behind the story. Bill Moyers Journal questioned why injury rates have drop</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:51:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Quick Guide to the House Report on Underreporting of Workplace Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Quick-Guide-to-the-House-Report-on-Underreporting-of-Workplace-Injuries-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gfycaGMkLIU%3d</guid><description> In a previous blog, Robin Kobayashi discussed how the  Charlotte Observer  uncovered the underreporting of injuries at poultry plants. Click    here   .  The newspaper's investigation led to a House committee hearing on June 19, 2008 regarding the underreporting of workplace injuries</description><author>Roger Rabb</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:48:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. Court of Appeal Denies Writ of Review in Tapia v. Skill Master Staffing (Appeals Board en banc decision)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-Court-of-Appeal-Denies-Writ-of-Review-in-Tapia-v-Skill-Master-Staffing-Appeals-Board-en-banc-decision</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">A6iw3KXFaK8%3d</guid><description> The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, has denied a petition for writ of review on   May 20, 2009  , in the case of  Tapia v. Skill Master Staffing ,   73 Cal. Comp. Cases 1338   (Appeals Board en banc decision).  
 A Petition for Writ of Review had been filed su</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:52:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Brown v. Cassens Transport: Will Sixth Circuit RICO Ruling Move Workers' Compensation into the Federal System?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Brown-v-Cassens-Transport-Will-Sixth-Circuit-RICO-Ruling-Move-Workers-Compensation-into-the-Federal-System</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">kDCeTa4O2CI%3d</guid><description>  Taking its cue from a Supreme Court directive, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion on October 23, 2008 that effectively allows a   
  
Michigan workers&amp;rsquo; compensation claim to be heard in a federal court. This development poses concerns regarding the potential erosi</description><author>Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:48:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Study Reinforces Links Between Formaldehyde and Cancer</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Study-Reinforces-Links-Between-Formaldehyde-and-Cancer</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">k5cSBoTTLto%3d</guid><description> A study released last week by the National Cancer Institute   strengthens the link   between exposure to formaldehyde and several forms of cancer, including leukemia. The 30-year study, which tracked the health of nearly 25,000 men exposed to the chemical in industrial plants, is likely to imp</description><author>Pro Publica</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:14:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases May Advanced Postings 5/20/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-May-Advanced-Postings-5202009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FQj4Irq2bwk%3d</guid><description> The third and fourth batches of advanced postings for the upcoming May 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  are now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to re</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:33:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 5/15/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-5152009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dnizAsxIuT0%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 02:26:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 5/17/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-5172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oRd%2bKdFzGyI%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:54:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Bad Faith Action: Medical Peer Review Reports of Other Patients Are Privileged</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Bad-Faith-Action-Medical-Peer-Review-Reports-of-Other-Patients-Are-Privileged</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GVTNZ7pp0ZY%3d</guid><description>  In re Netherlands Insurance Company and America First Insurance Company,  Texas Court of Appeals, Fourth District (04-08-00815-CV, April 8, 2009),   2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 2340    
 Plaintiff filed a workers&amp;rsquo; compensation claim.  A doctor assessed plaintiff a 19% impairment rating. </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Attorney Spotlight: William A. Herreras on California Supreme Court's Decision in Smith v. WCAB; Amar v. WCAB</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Attorney-Spotlight-William-A-Herreras-on-California-Supreme-Courts-Decision-in-Smith-v-WCAB-Amar-v-WCAB</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8PYOPv7Hr1g%3d</guid><description>  On May 11, 2009, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in the combined cases of    Smith v. W.C.A.B.; Amar v. W.C.A.B   .  The cases involved
  
  Calif.    Labor Code Section 4607   , which provides:  
 
  &amp;quot;Where a party to a [workers' compensation] proceeding instit</description><author>William A. Herreras</author><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:03:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New York Workers' Compensation Handbook 2009 Edition Continues to Analyze Impact of 2007 Reforms</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-York-Workers-Compensation-Handbook-2009-Edition-Continues-to-Analyze-Impact-of-2007-Reforms</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">JnY3ybwYlR0%3d</guid><description> This year&amp;rsquo;s edition of the  New York Workers' Compensation Handbook  marks a milestone in the history of this Handbook. It is the first since the retirement from worker&amp;rsquo;s compensation practice of its original coauthor Edward I. Pitts. Mr. Pitts recognized long ago the need for a single </description><author>Ronald E. Weiss &amp; Ronald Balter</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:45:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 5/12/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-5122009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">M63Prx1ugr8%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Comp Laws of California - 2009 Supplement Shipping Now to Customers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Comp-Laws-of-California---2009-Supplement-Shipping-Now-to-Customers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lDAGiN4d2cY%3d</guid><description>  
 The 2009 midyear supplement to    Workers' Compensation Laws of   
  
California    is shipping out to customers starting today. This supplement is free of charge to all existing subscribers. It covers regulatory changes from November 2008 through early April 2009. 
 To review a list of regu</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:50:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Spotlight: Racially-Motivated Assaults Within the Workplace</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Spotlight-Racially-Motivated-Assaults-Within-the-Workplace</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DxDD58XVEr0%3d</guid><description> Two  recent cases&amp;mdash;one decided in late October by the Supreme Court of Alabama, the other still pending before the California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Appeals Board&amp;mdash;present a particularly difficult fact pattern within the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation context: the compensability of</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:41:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 5/8/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-582009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">P3YHGKAG%2bvY%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:46:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor Not Subject to State Court Jurisdiction</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Medicare-Secondary-Payer-Recovery-Contractor-Not-Subject-to-State-Court-Jurisdiction</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ZJi5Zo9Y%2bpI%3d</guid><description>As predicted we are seeing increased litigation in an attempt to resolve Medicare Secondary Payer Issues. The   attached opinion   involves the settlement of an Estate in NY State Court. The administratrix sought finality to distribute the Estate proceeds; and the Medicare Secondary Payer </description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:17:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Workers Need the Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Why-Workers-Need-the-Employee-Free-Choice-Act</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wgrDRD9EYiA%3d</guid><description> Unions are good for workers. 
 Today, median weekly pay for union members is $886, compared to $691 for nonunion workers. Moving cargo on the  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Oakland waterfront pays three times what stocking shelves does at Wal-Mart, because longshore workers have had a union contract since 1934. Wa</description><author>David Bacon</author><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:11:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does a Case End When the Injured Worker Passes Away?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Does-a-Case-End-When-the-Injured-Worker-Passes-Away</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zylwVik7MW8%3d</guid><description> I recently received an inquiry from one of our community members. She said that her husband had a long running comp case, having been injured at work.  He recently passed away.  She was told that the case is now closed and she can't do anything about it.  She had taken care of her hu</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:16:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>MMSEA Update, MARC Update, and Recent Litigation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/MMSEA-Update-MARC-Update-and-Recent-Litigation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">BrN0kkIwn7c%3d</guid><description>I have a lot to cover today. To assist I have added headlines, so you may jump around to get to the materials that interest you most. 
 
 RRE REGISTRATION HAS STARTED! 
 
Well MMSEA is finally here. If you as a RRE have production data to report to CMS beginning the first qua</description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:35:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Injured Worker Tips: Wage Benefits Under Florida Workers Compensation Laws</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Injured-Worker-Tips-Wage-Benefits-Under-Florida-Workers-Compensation-Laws</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bBZQRLqqq4o%3d</guid><description> There are four types of  wage benefits  you can receive under the   
  
 Florida   workers compensation  laws.  The four types are: Temporary Total Disability (TTD), Temporary Partial Disability (TPD), Permanent Total Disability (PTD), and Impairment Benefits (IB&amp;rsquo;s).  The easiest </description><author>Joseph M. Maus</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:07:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Spotlight: Exposure to Contagious Disease</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Spotlight-Exposure-to-Contagious-Disease</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2ft0ogtg31II%3d</guid><description> Insurance experts say that the property/casualty insurance sector most likely to see swine flu claims is the workers' compensation line. The following article examines contagious disease in the workplace as well as for traveling employees. 
   
  
 Increased Risk of Exposure to Contagious Diseas</description><author>Larson's Spotlight</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 12:28:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases May Advanced Postings 5/6/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-May-Advanced-Postings-562009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QpSonbOyA5U%3d</guid><description> The second batch of advanced postings for the upcoming May 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full s</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:34:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CMS Releases “NGHP User Guide” &amp; Supplemental “Alerts” Regarding Section 111 Reporting</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CMS-Releases-NGHP-User-Guide--Supplemental-Alerts-Regarding-Section-111-Reporting</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yneDuqcH7Es%3d</guid><description> 
On March 17, 2009, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its long awaited  &amp;ldquo;User Guide, Version 1.0 &amp;ndash; March 16, 2009&amp;rdquo; (hereinafter &amp;ldquo;User Guide&amp;rdquo;)  pertaining to &amp;ldquo;liability insurance (including self-insurance), no-fault insurance and </description><author>Mark Popolizio</author><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:32:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 5/1/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-512009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">b0dL76OpZFg%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:58:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 5/4/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-542009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">J467uE3YW%2fI%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:16:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Senate Committee Rethinks Bill to Limit Time for Filing of Medical Liens</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Senate-Committee-Rethinks-Bill-to-Limit-Time-for-Filing-of-Medical-Liens</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mYG3FS1yqQw%3d</guid><description>   California Senate Bill 403  , which attempted to amend Labor Code &amp;sect; 4903.5 by limiting the time a medical provider has to file a lien to one year from the date of receipt of an EOB and/or EOR, was tabled by the Labor and Industrial Relations Committee on April 29, 2009. According to Gary Lin</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:19:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Florida: The One-Two Punch That Could Roll Back Workers' Compensation Reforms</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Florida-The-One-Two-Punch-That-Could-Roll-Back-Workers-Compensation-Reforms</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vgZcbaQhKP0%3d</guid><description>  This article was originally published in   Florida TaxWatch   and reprinted here with permission.  
 Florida employers have benefited enormously since the sweeping system overhaul provided by the   Workers' Compensation Reform Act of 2003  . They have enjoyed a rate decrease averaging more than 6</description><author>Dennis A. Ross &amp; Christine R. Sensenig</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:02:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recession Adds Stress to the Workplace, Complexity to WC Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recession-Adds-Stress-to-the-Workplace-Complexity-to-WC-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hUfw8amhMII%3d</guid><description> Understanding how business cycles impact human psychology and behavior is key to anticipating the effect of a recession on Workers' Compensation claims, according to International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions Executive Director Dr. Gregory Krohm, who led a recent IAIABC</description><author>David Heitfield</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:47:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The $20 Billion Near-Heist: AIG in NY Revisited</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-20-Billion-Near-Heist-AIG-in-NY-Revisited-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YflIxNVLK2g%3d</guid><description>If AIG goes bankrupt, will state insurance regulators protect the assets of its solvent insurance subsidiaries, ensuring that they will pay policyholders' claims?
 
In the current issue of the insurance law journal    Enforce   , policyholder attorney   David E. Wood   of Anderson Kill Wood &amp;</description><author>David E. Wood</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:17:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Testimony Before the Senate Employment and Workplace Subcommittee “Introducing Meaningful Incentives for Safe Workplaces and Meaningful Roles for Victims and Families”</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Testimony-Before-the-Senate-Employment-and-Workplace-Subcommittee-Introducing-Meaningful-Incentives-for-Safe-Workplaces-and-Meaningful-Roles-for-Victims-and-Families</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">C%2bDneIgzxkY%3d</guid><description> I would like to thank Chair Senator Murray and Ranking Member Senator Isakson for caring enough to hold this hearing and for the honor of being invited to represent the family member victims of workplace tragedies. 
 When a loved one is injured or dies on the job families do not know where to turn</description><author>Tammy Miser</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:00:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases May Advanced Postings 4/30/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-May-Advanced-Postings-4302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vuvpjnLKJiU%3d</guid><description> The first batch of advanced postings for the upcoming May 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full su</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:59:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Protecting Workers Rights by Stopping Misclassification as Independent Contractors in Maryland</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Protecting-Workers-Rights-by-Stopping-Misclassification-as-Independent-Contractors-in-Maryland</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mdC6GJ6CAew%3d</guid><description> Earlier this month, the  Maryland  legislature joined a number of states in cracking down on worker misclassification by enacting the Maryland Workplace Fraud Act (   S 909    /    H 819    ) which has the    support of Gov. O'Malley    who is expected to sign the bill shortly.  The main focus</description><author>Caroline Fan</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:23:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Loyola University Annual Longshore Conference 2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Loyola-University-Annual-Longshore-Conference-2009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9EZXHtj2EQo%3d</guid><description>Loyola University, in co-operation with the United States Department of Labor, put on its annual Longshore Conference on March 19 and 20, 2009, in New Orleans. In spite of the worldwide economic conditions, the conference was well attended. Presentations on aspects of the Longshore and Har</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:15:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Employee Free Choice Act: Free Choice or No Choice for Workers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Employee-Free-Choice-Act-Free-Choice-or-No-Choice-for-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">I8%2b4UPc%2bUPo%3d</guid><description>  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  
 The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 marked a major departure from common law principles, which were modified but not rejected with the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947. Since that time, the legal regime governing labor relations has been relatively stable. Today, </description><author>Richard A. Epstein</author><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:21:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 4/28/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-4282009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rixj402wLtI%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:50:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 4/24/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-4242009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cQf8SxgjlwI%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:17:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pamela D. Pengelley on Fessing up to Facebook: Recent Trends in the Use of Social Network Websites for Insurance Litigation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Pamela-D-Pengelley-on-Fessing-up-to-Facebook-Recent-Trends-in-the-Use-of-Social-Network-Websites-for-Insurance-Litigation-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">QaTpHBoS9jE%3d</guid><description> INTRODUCTION 
 In December 2008, after several failed attempts to serve a couple with court documents by email and text messaging their mobile phones, an Australian lawyer won the right to serve a default judgment by posting the terms of the judgment on the defendants&amp;rsquo; Facebook &amp;ldquo;Wall&amp;r</description><author>Pam Pengelley</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:38:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Woman Falls at Work, Ruled Not Work Injury</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Woman-Falls-at-Work-Ruled-Not-Work-Injury</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vIrp80vfTI4%3d</guid><description>The Iowa Court of Appeals refused to find a woman's back injury was work-related, although she fell at work. In     Ottumwa Regional Health Center v. Mitchell , 752 N.W.2d 35   , filed in April of 2008, the Iowa Court of Appeals decided that since Iowa has not adopted the &amp;quot;positional risk&amp;</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:30:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB - Includes New Post-Almaraz/Guzman Case (Posted 4/24/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-4242009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yww1uIRSCLM%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:29:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: Ultimate Insured Losses &amp; Expenses for 2008 Estimated at 108% of Premium</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Ultimate-Insured-Losses--Expenses-for-2008-Estimated-at-108-of-Premium-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XRlP45N9tzE%3d</guid><description> New estimates from the California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau show ultimate insured losses for accident year (AY) 2008   
  
California work injury claims are expected to total $7.7 billion, or $400 million more than the projected total for AY 2007 claims. This would push </description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:43:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas DWC Adopts New Rule 133.20 Medical Bill Submission by Healthcare Provider</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-DWC-Adopts-New-Rule-13320-Medical-Bill-Submission-by-Healthcare-Provider</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GwxC2nWcXp0%3d</guid><description> Prior to September 1, 2007, medical providers forfeited reimbursement if they failed to submit a medical bill within 95 days. 
 Since September 1, 2007, medical providers could take advantage of one of four exceptions: (1) the provider submitted the timely bill to the group accident, or health ins</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:22:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers’ Compensation, MSP Compliance, and Some Strategy</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-MSP-Compliance-and-Some-Strategy</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cFxmiVjRQ2E%3d</guid><description> If you are like most Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Claimant attorneys, your desk and files are crammed with cases that are left open for medical&amp;hellip;.and the main reason they are left open is the fear on the part of the attorney that something down the road might come back to haunt them.  But</description><author>Karen Shelton</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:52:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Injured Worker Tips: Have a Shot at Receiving Benefits in New York’s Workers’ Comp System</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Injured-Worker-Tips-Have-a-Shot-at-Receiving-Benefits-in-New-Yorks-Workers-Comp-System</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">I%2fwR9iTS%2fgA%3d</guid><description>  5 Deadly Sins That Can Derail Your   
  
New York Workers Compensation Case  is an informative book written for injured workers seeking to learn about what to do if they have been injured on the job.  I wrote this book to provide a clear and easily written overview of the workers' compensat</description><author>Brian M. Mittman</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:49:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Here Is Another Wonderful Example of Better Living Through Nanotechnology. Maybe.</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Here-Is-Another-Wonderful-Example-of-Better-Living-Through-Nanotechnology-Maybe</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ku3c918CCJM%3d</guid><description> It sounds great on the surface as many ideas do. 
 Scientists at Cornell University think they&amp;rsquo;ve solved a widespread public health problem that endangers the health of farm workers and people who live near farms - the drifting of pesticides from the crops where they&amp;rsquo;re applied to the </description><author>Andrew Schneider</author><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:20:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases April Advanced Postings 4/22/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-April-Advanced-Postings-4222009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MSyA%2by1vdmU%3d</guid><description> The fourth batch of advanced postings for the upcoming April 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:23:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How Much Does A Prescription Cost? CMS Pays New Attention to Prescription Valuation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-Much-Does-A-Prescription-Cost-CMS-Pays-New-Attention-to-Prescription-Valuation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UkcY%2fA5NzdM%3d</guid><description> The huge news in workers comp is that last week CMS came out with a new memo that some say will be the end of C&amp;amp;Rs when an MSA is required.  The memo states that  starting 6/1/09  Average Wholesale Price (AWP) will be the only calculation method accepted and no other calculation or discoun</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:51:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 4/17/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-4172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xl6a%2b2WAC5w%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:30:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Maryland Court Says UIM Benefits Are Offset by Employer's Payment of Medical Expenses Whether or Not Workers' Comp Claim Filed</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Maryland-Court-Says-UIM-Benefits-Are-Offset-by-Employers-Payment-of-Medical-Expenses-Whether-or-Not-Workers-Comp-Claim-Filed</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9h3erl6VFMw%3d</guid><description> In    Parry v. Allstate Insurance Co.   , Slip Opinion 04/06/2009, the Court of Appeals has determined that payment of medical expenses are benefits under the workers' compensation law whether or not a formal claim has been filed.  In the case of  Parry v. Allstate Insurance Co. , Slip Opinion</description><author>Lance G. Montour</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:56:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 4/20/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-4202009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cmg%2ff993D9o%3d</guid><description>  IMPORTANT NOTE:  SIGN UP FOR MY   FREE   WEEKLY eNEWSLETTERS COVERING RECENT CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW AS REPORTED ON THE LEXISNEXIS WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW CENTER. SIMPLY EMAIL ME WITH YOUR REQUEST TO BE ADDED TO MY DISTRIBUTION LIST. YOU CAN REACH ME AT  Robin.E.Kobayashi</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:45:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is a National Commission Necessary?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Is-a-National-Commission-Necessary</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bISKPWv8wG8%3d</guid><description> To address the effectiveness of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation systems throughout the U.S., Congressman Joe Baca (D-CA) has introduced legislation (H.R. 635) to establish a &amp;ldquo;National Commission on State Workers' Compensation Laws&amp;rdquo; patterned roughly after the 1972 National Commission establ</description><author>IAIABC</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:02:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 4/17/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-4172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FmBqBDcqnbU%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:51:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Who Should Choose Doctors for Injured Iowa Workers?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Who-Should-Choose-Doctors-for-Injured-Iowa-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2b63t6q7%2bxAY%3d</guid><description> Once again, the Iowa General Assembly is being asked to consider who should choose treating doctors for injured workers. For many years, insurance carriers in   
  
Iowa have been able to tell injured workers what doctors they can see for treatment.   
  
Iowa labor organizations and other</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:33:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California's Permanent Disability Rating Schedule in Light of Almaraz/Guzman: How the Appeals Board Didn’t Get It Right</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Californias-Permanent-Disability-Rating-Schedule-in-Light-of-AlmarazGuzman-How-the-Appeals-Board-Didnt-Get-It-Right</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mEjLD9edWcI%3d</guid><description> Let&amp;rsquo;s start with what the Legislature didn&amp;rsquo;t do. The Courts, including the Board, frequently commence an analysis with the phrase, &amp;ldquo;If the Legislature had intended to do&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; This, of course, is an acceptable part of statutory construction. In reviewing   Almaraz/Guzman </description><author>Mark E. Webb</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:58:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>SPECIAL ALERT! California WCAB Order Allowing Amicus Briefs in Vocational Rehabilitation Jurisdiction Case</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-WCAB-Order-Allowing-Amicus-Briefs-in-Vocational-Rehabilitation-Jurisdiction-Case</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">B0ppa%2b9gyrQ%3d</guid><description> The California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an en banc decision, Order Allowing Amicus Briefs, in in the following case: 
  Weiner v. Ralphs Company and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.  
 (MON 0305426) 
 This decision was filed and served on April 14, 2009. 
 Th</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:10:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Insurance Professional’s Practical Guide to Workers’ Compensation: From History Through Audit</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Insurance-Professionals-Practical-Guide-to-Workers-Compensation-From-History-Through-Audit</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2MysNm%2bAvqk%3d</guid><description>   The Insurance Professional&amp;rsquo;s Practical Guide to Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation: From History through Audit   details how the modern workers&amp;rsquo; compensation system operates in the statutory, contractual and juridical world in which the coverage exists. Legal and contractual concepts are con</description><author>Christopher J. Boggs</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:55:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers' Compensation History: The Great Tradeoff!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-History-The-Great-Tradeoff</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ECVXrt3URUc%3d</guid><description> Eighteenth century pirates and a nineteenth century German &amp;quot;Iron&amp;quot; Chancellor preceded the United States in the creation of a social system for the protection of injured workers.  The modern workers' compensation system owes part of its existence to this unique parentage. 
  Arrrrg, </description><author>Christopher J. Boggs</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:04:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Injured Worker Tips: Calculating Your Florida Impairment Rating</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Injured-Worker-Tips-Calculating-Your-Florida-Impairment-Rating</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hbnWILqfmXc%3d</guid><description> Florida&amp;rsquo;s workers compensation laws are sometimes difficult to understand.   &amp;ldquo;Workers Comp&amp;rdquo; allows a worker injured on the job to treat with doctors until the doctor decides that the injured worker has received all the care they need to return them to the workforce.&amp;nbsp</description><author>Joseph M. Maus</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:23:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases April Advanced Postings 4/16/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-April-Advanced-Postings-4162009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rTpPYHqHJJk%3d</guid><description> The third batch of advanced postings for the upcoming April 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:56:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Guest Column by Iowa Insurance Commissioner Susan E. Voss: Build on State-based Financial Regulation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Guest-Column-by-Iowa-Insurance-Commissioner-Susan-E-Voss-Build-on-State-based-Financial-Regulation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5DTpOM7gQaI%3d</guid><description> Last week, President Obama was in  &lt;/city&gt;
  
London attending the G-20 Summit, where, in the shadow of the global financial crisis, major economic issues were discussed and debated - with banking and regulatory reform issues among them. 
 If the United States has genuine intentions of demonstra</description><author>Susan E. Voss</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:48:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pinnacol Assurance: Is it Private or Public?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Pinnacol-Assurance-Is-it-Private-or-Public</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4bY0QmEfJ4g%3d</guid><description> In the last few days a big dispute arose over a proposal to take what might be considered excess funds from Pinnacol to help the State of   
  
Colorado in the present economic downturn. 
 Pinnacol handles a great many workers comp claims and that means more then any other insurer.  
 In any ev</description><author>Richard E. Falcone</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:46:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 4/13/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-4132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UqOCsFVzQrw%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:49:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 4/10/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-4102009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dSGW9Dmis28%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:13:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Supreme Court's Revised Decision: Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. John Summers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Supreme-Courts-Revised-Decision-Entergy-Gulf-States-Inc-v-John-Summers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">r7aEjIPKjh4%3d</guid><description> The Texas Supreme Court has issued a revised decision in the    Entergy Gulf States Inc. v. John Summers    case.  In a 6-3 decision, the majority confirmed its previous holding.  
 The Supreme Court first issued its decision on   August 31, 2007   holding a premises owner could be a general </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:11:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>U.S. v. Harris - Round II: Government Wins Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff Attorney for CMS Proceeds</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/US-v-Harris---Round-II-Government-Wins-Summary-Judgment-Against-Plaintiff-Attorney-for-CMS-Proceeds</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ElQtvPmuWu4%3d</guid><description> This is an important follow-up to the   U.S. 
  
v. Harris decision that I reported in January 2009  .  As you will recall, the plaintiff attorney in that case ignored letters from CMS to make Medicare whole from settlement proceeds he received in a particular case involving a Medi</description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:36:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>UPDATE: Iowa Court Says Employer Pays for Medical Exam, No Work Injury Required</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/UPDATE-Iowa-Court-Says-Employer-Pays-for-Medical-Exam-No-Work-Injury-Required</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DCl%2fRMZt%2fJc%3d</guid><description> A decision of the Iowa Court of Appeals that was filed in August of 2008 has now been published. While much of the decision is routine, one portion of the decision is interesting. 
 In   Dodd v. Fleetguard  ,   759 N.W.2d 133   (Iowa Ct. App. 2008), the Iowa Court of Appeals held that a claimant d</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:05:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Post Back Surgery Deaths Linked to Opioids</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Post-Back-Surgery-Deaths-Linked-to-Opioids</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NOBmp4aDz44%3d</guid><description> A new study published in the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders finds that pain medications are involved in more than 20 percent of injured worker deaths that occur in the years following spinal fusion surgery for low back pain, underscoring growing concerns about lo</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:54:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Workers' Compensation Certified Network Requirements</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Workers-Compensation-Certified-Network-Requirements</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">O4lAnxqjddU%3d</guid><description> The Texas Department of Insurance, Life, Health, and Licensing Program-General Management sent a letter dated March 30, 2009 to carriers and certified workers' compensation healthcare networks. In the letter, the Department of Insurance misinterprets Section 8.016 in HB-7. The letter is somewhat co</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:24:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>50 Best Blogs on Wellness, Women's Interests, and Work-Life Balance</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/50-Best-Blogs-on-Wellness-Womens-Interests-and-Work-Life-Balance</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EO5%2fxvKFIEc%3d</guid><description> Delaware Employment Law Blog is pleased to add the following 50 blogs to its &amp;quot;Best of&amp;quot; Blogroll.  The common premise among these blogs is the idea that well-rounded employees are happier employees and happier employees perform better for their employer, who, in turn, enjoys more succ</description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:50:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The WorkLife Initiative: Protecting and Promoting Worker Health and Well-Being</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-WorkLife-Initiative-Protecting-and-Promoting-Worker-Health-and-Well-Being</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KPNAabz%2b12o%3d</guid><description> Preserving and improving the health and well-being of people who work is a goal shared by workers, their families, and their employers. Illness and injury, whether resulting from work or off-work activities, reduces income, quality of life, and opportunity for both the affected workers and those de</description><author>NIOSH</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:01:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases April Advanced Postings 4/8/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-April-Advanced-Postings-482009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rW%2fM9FdmG3U%3d</guid><description> The second batch of advanced postings for the upcoming April 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:56:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 4/3/2009 - Texas Supreme Court's Decision in Entergy Gulf States v. Summers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-432009---Texas-Supreme-Courts-Decision-in-Entergy-Gulf-States-v-Summers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lQIDJbcfIvo%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases. 
  Supreme Court of Texas Revisits Its Entergy Decision: Deeply-Divided Court Affirms Its 2007 Determination That Premises Owner Can Also be</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:47:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 4/6/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-462009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ymBHeDrynIA%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:13:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases April Advanced Postings 4/3/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-April-Advanced-Postings-432009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lDMrjlnfz2E%3d</guid><description> The first batch of advanced postings for the upcoming April 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:56:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Social Media Perspectives for the Insurance Industry</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Social-Media-Perspectives-for-the-Insurance-Industry</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">W89RG68Wcbo%3d</guid><description> On Thursday, March 19, 2009 a webinar was held covering social networking aspects for the insurance industry. Listed below is a wealth of information, many websites, contacts for the presenters and where to find their full presentations. 
 The thrust of the webinar focused on social networking bei</description><author>Rebecca A. Shafer</author><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:19:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California State Assembly Proposes Extension of Cancer Presumption</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-State-Assembly-Proposes-Extension-of-Cancer-Presumption</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yorSRlyvp0A%3d</guid><description> California Assemblyman Joe Coto (D-San Jose) has introduced a Bill which would amend Labor Code section 3212.1, commonly known as the firefighter&amp;rsquo;s presumption. Existing law allows a presumption of compensability extending for three months for each full year of service after severance from em</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:25:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Psychiatry More Corrupt Than Other Medical Specialties?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Is-Psychiatry-More-Corrupt-Than-Other-Medical-Specialties</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LOMWeH3%2bMww%3d</guid><description> At a talk I gave Wednesday at
  
  
George
  
Washington
  
University, someone in the audience asked why there seemed to be an inordinate number of psychiatrists on the take to the drug industry. Was it something about the specialty of psychiatry itself or the individuals involved? I have o</description><author>Alison Bass</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:26:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 4/1/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-412009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0Mdxi9xSDVU%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with yo</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:41:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 3/27/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-3272009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GeWC%2bHWTVCQ%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:26:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Lien Claimant Strategies for Notices of Dismissal for Failure to Appear</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Lien-Claimant-Strategies-for-Notices-of-Dismissal-for-Failure-to-Appear</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0niNco59vU8%3d</guid><description> I have been receiving at least three to four requests a week in the last two months from different medical providers (Lien Claimants) who have received a &amp;ldquo;Notice of Intention to Dismiss Lien Claim&amp;rdquo; for failure to appear at various hearings, other then Lien Conferences and or Lien Trials</description><author>Richard J. Boggan, B.S.L., J.D.</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:10:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 3/30/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-3302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dS0gNyh6nvM%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:14:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Millions of Dollars Owed by Insurance Carriers at Stake if Calif. Senate Bill Becomes Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Millions-of-Dollars-Owed-by-Insurance-Carriers-at-Stake-if-Calif-Senate-Bill-Becomes-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zMnOjIZnJKw%3d</guid><description> California Senate Bill 403 proposes to change the statutory filing deadline outlined in Labor Code &amp;sect; 4903.5 and as interpreted by Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decisions. Currently the statute has allowed a &amp;ldquo;tolling&amp;rdquo; of the six months to file a lien after the case between the</description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:35:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases March Advanced Postings 3/26/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-March-Advanced-Postings-3262009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cFe0Ji1AyFE%3d</guid><description> The second batch of advanced postings for the upcoming March 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:45:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>First Joint Effort of ABA’s Two Workers’ Compensation Sections -  A Success in New Orleans</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/First-Joint-Effort-of-ABAs-Two-Workers-Compensation-Sections----A-Success-in-New-Orleans</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Z%2fLS4rqHYCA%3d</guid><description> The two workers&amp;rsquo; compensation committees of the Labor and Employment Law and Tort and Insurance Practice sections joined efforts in the midwinter meeting and pulled off a successful and well-attended program from March 10th through 13th. The leadership of the two sections were so pleased with</description><author>Diana L. Wann and Richard J. Swanson</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:33:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Commissioners Testify Before House Business and Industry Committee</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Commissioners-Testify-Before-House-Business-and-Industry-Committee</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Z9vwIc8Uois%3d</guid><description> On February 3, 2009, the House Business and Industry Committee held its first hearing with invited testimony regarding workers&amp;rsquo; compensation.  Commissioner Bordelon and Commissioner Geeslin addressed their respective state agencies in regards to workers&amp;rsquo; compensation.  Both Co</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:05:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Frances Perkins: The Woman Behind the New Deal</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Frances-Perkins-The-Woman-Behind-the-New-Deal</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ewZq7sWJ8MQ%3d</guid><description>
  This blog originally appeared on     AFL-CIO Now Blog    . Reprinted with permission.  
 When Frances Perkins stepped into her office as labor secretary, the first-ever woman in a presidential Cabinet, her welcoming committee consisted of this: 

 A huge cockroach. 
 It&amp;rsquo;s a fair guess </description><author>AFL-CIO Now Blog</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:57:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 3/26/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-3262009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8Z7jSoMp4ao%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with yo</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:21:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 3/20/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-3202009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fykuhh9VUHo%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:04:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Not Enough"? Unsettled Issues Concerning Fee-Shifting Liability Under Section 28(b) of the Longshore Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Not-Enough-Unsettled-Issues-Concerning-Fee-Shifting-Liability-Under-Section-28b-of-the-Longshore-Act</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Y1nsC3oMuNk%3d</guid><description> In    Success Is Not Enough to Obtain a Fee Under &amp;sect; 28(b)   , 1  Paul B. Howell addresses old and new jurisprudence on the conditions for employer liability for claimants&amp;rsquo; attorneys&amp;rsquo; fees under   &amp;sect; 28  (b) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Act,   33 U.S.C</description><author>Joshua T. Gillelan II</author><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:36:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Web 2.0 for the Insurance Industry (and the Rest of the World)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Web-20-for-the-Insurance-Industry-and-the-Rest-of-the-World-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gCNtaXBpa04%3d</guid><description> Early in my career when I was doing legal work for  &lt;/city&gt;London insurers, we communicated with our clients using  telex , a technology that is to communications what smacking clothes on a rock is to cleaning fabric. It seemed a huge leap when we progressed to faxes, even though the pages rolled o</description><author>Kevin M. LaCroix</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:39:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas SIBs - Appeals Panel Decision 080713</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-SIBs---Appeals-Panel-Decision-080713</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">pxq1ZzaF2rg%3d</guid><description> In a previous hearing, the hearing officer found the claimant was not entitled to supplemental income benefits (SIBs) quarters one through eight. The Appeals Panel affirmed.  
 The claimant sought judicial review and a jury held the claimant was not entitled to quarters one thru three but was enti</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Lawmakers Consider Bill Requiring Non-Subscribers to Submit Additional Information to State Agency</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Lawmakers-Consider-Bill-Requiring-Non-Subscribers-to-Submit-Additional-Information-to-State-Agency</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DB5qF4xOLmE%3d</guid><description> The Business and Industry Committee of the House of Representatives addressed their first workers&amp;rsquo; compensation bill.  Representative Leibowitz presented HB 35 requiring non-subscribing employers to submit additional information to the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers&amp;r</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:04:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: Designated Doctor - AP Decision 080706</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Designated-Doctor---AP-Decision-080706</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7h6CpxHZyJg%3d</guid><description> The hearing officer found in accordance with the first designated doctor who certified maximum medical improvement on the date of the examination on November 4, 2005 with a twenty-six percent (26%) impairment rating. Subsequently, the claimant underwent additional treatment and a Contested Case Hea</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:48:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 3/23/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-3232009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8is3p3%2bSAtM%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:40:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clara Lemlich Public Service Awards 2009 Recipients: Hon. Hillary R. Clinton, Barbara Levine, Hon. Edward Pitts, Troy Rosasco, Randi Weingarten</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Clara-Lemlich-Public-Service-Awards-2009-Recipients-Hon-Hillary-R-Clinton-Barbara-Levine-Hon-Edward-Pitts-Troy-Rosasco-Randi-Weingarten</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bFqrFu%2b94GA%3d</guid><description> The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Memorial has announced the 2009 recipients of the Clara Lemlich Public Service Awards for  their work and efforts in calling attention to and participating in the reform of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation and improvement of occupational safety in New York State</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:11:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - InsureBlog: COBRA Part III: Ohio &amp; COBRA/ARRA -- More Questions Than Answers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---InsureBlog-COBRA-Part-III-Ohio--COBRAARRA----More-Questions-Than-Answers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uoM1ToAADic%3d</guid><description>In looking through the latest missive from the   (Ohio) Department of Insurance  , I was drawn to this innocuous-looking requirement:
 &amp;quot; Employers are required to send a notice to former employees so that former employees can elect to continue their group coverage and receive the subsidy .&amp;quo</description><author>Henry (Hank) Stern</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:19:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 3/18/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-3182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">fQ8SCs0ATCQ%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent   noteworthy panel decisions   issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your re</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:41:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cal. Comp. Cases: March Advanced Postings 3/17/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Cal-Comp-Cases-March-Advanced-Postings-3172009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3kKOdq5s0%2fA%3d</guid><description> The first batch of advanced postings for the upcoming March 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases  is now available on Lexis. These are all WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review (aka &amp;quot;writ denieds&amp;quot;). If you're a lexis.com subscriber, you can link to the cases to read the full </description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:18:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - InsureBlog: COBRA Part II: Spendulus Update</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---InsureBlog-COBRA-Part-II-Spendulus-Update</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">J9ho8MAKbeA%3d</guid><description>   FoIB Bill Montgomery, CIC,   points us to another &amp;quot;deal killer&amp;quot; in this bill [i.e., the COBRA provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act]. According to a memo from United Healthcare, &amp;quot; the subsidy provisions apply to state continuation coverage that is comparable to f</description><author>Henry (Hank) Stern</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:10:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 3/13/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-3132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wxMgJbpf7jc%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:57:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 3/13/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-3132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NIbi22130Cs%3d</guid><description>  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   FEBRUARY 2009  
  CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE  
  Appellate Court Compensation Cases  
  Benson v. W.C.A.B. (1st--A120462)   74
  
  Cal. Comp. Cases 113    Permanent Disability--Apportionment--Wilkinson Rule--Court of Appeal affirmed decision in Benson v. The Perma</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:05:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - InsureBlog: Part I: COBRA Subsidy? Maybe Not . . .</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Part-I-COBRA-Subsidy-Maybe-Not----</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uORwwJmSSSE%3d</guid><description>Washington works in strange ways, if you can say it works at all. One part of the recent legislation, which no one read before voting on, provides subsidies for COBRA.
 
Or does it?
 
We found several resources that have their take on the subsidy. Of course, like anything else having t</description><author>Henry (Hank) Stern</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:06:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in SORM v. Lawton</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Supreme-Court-Hears-Oral-Arguments-in-SORM-v-Lawton</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">76LWFfRUM24%3d</guid><description> On March 11, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in    State Office of Risk Management v. Lawton   .  Thomas Lipovski, Assistant Solicitor General argued on behalf of the Petitioner, State Office of Risk Management (SORM).  Stuart Lewis argued the case for Respondent, </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:41:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mother's Little Helper</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Mothers-Little-Helper</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xoK%2f7dlj0n8%3d</guid><description> &amp;quot;Mother needs something today to calm her down And though she's not really ill There's a little yellow pill She goes running for the shelter of a little mother's helper And it helps her on her way, gets her through her busy day....&amp;quot;  -The Rolling Stones 
 Americans use a lot of pills. 
</description><author>Julius Young</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:04:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CMS Provides Additional Information Regarding Section 111 Compliance at Fifth National "Town Hall" Teleconference</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CMS-Provides-Additional-Information-Regarding-Section-111-Compliance-at-Fifth-National-Town-Hall-Teleconference</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">O9iEQcPTErM%3d</guid><description> On February 25, 2009, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) held its fifth national &amp;ldquo;Town Hall&amp;rdquo; teleconference in conjunction with the agency&amp;rsquo;s continued implementation of its Mandatory Insurer Reporting (MIR) requirements under Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid</description><author>Mark Popolizio</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:43:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 3/6/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-362009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SPSq2b9UYsk%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:41:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Big Business of Nano Litigation: Attorneys Are Hard at Work Protecting Nanotech Makers—What About Consumers?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Big-Business-of-Nano-Litigation-Attorneys-Are-Hard-at-Work-Protecting-Nanotech-Makers-What-About-Consumers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3SMJrk%2bzllk%3d</guid><description>  A recent conference examining the legal protections corporations are taking to defend themselves in the event their products turn toxic highlights regulatory questions.  
 It suddenly struck me while attending a two-day nanotechnology conference in Washington last week: I should have gone to</description><author>Rick Weiss</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:17:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Molly DiBianca: Online Social Networks FAQs by Employers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Molly-DiBianca-Online-Social-Networks-FAQs-by-Employers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">NN8bfuIJ5Hk%3d</guid><description> Employers are using Facebook, MySpace, and other online social networking sites (OSNs), to   monitor employees for a variety of reasons  .  And arguments can be made   in support of and against   this new application of technology.  For those employers who want to use the data posted</description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:14:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Reaffirms Manifestation Rule for Injury Dates, Discovery Rule for Statutes, and Finds That Dates Can Be Different</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Reaffirms-Manifestation-Rule-for-Injury-Dates-Discovery-Rule-for-Statutes-and-Finds-That-Dates-Can-Be-Different</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uvXginc251U%3d</guid><description> In a long opinion, the Iowa Supreme Court reaffirmed their previous rulings on figuring injury dates and on calculating the time a claimant has to file a Petition with the   
  
Iowa workers&amp;rsquo; compensation claim. This case involved a woman who had worked for Larson Manufacturing for man</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:13:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 2/27/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-2272009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YB78l2%2b3M%2bQ%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:36:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Molly DiBianca: Risks for Employers Who Use Facebook to Investigate Employee Fraud</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Molly-DiBianca-Risks-for-Employers-Who-Use-Facebook-to-Investigate-Employee-Fraud</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KF7V%2bwZFu%2fA%3d</guid><description> In light of the recent increase in the number of   employers who use the internet to research potential job candidates  , it is only logical that more and more employers will begin to use the internet to   monitor  current  employees  , as well.  For example, an employer may suspect that </description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:34:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Molly DiBianca: How Employers Are Putting Online Social Networking Sites to Work</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Molly-DiBianca-How-Employers-Are-Putting-Online-Social-Networking-Sites-to-Work</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Uo5UG9DF%2f6M%3d</guid><description> Online social networks (OSNs), such as Facebook and MySpace, are becoming   increasingly common tools in employers&amp;rsquo; arsenals  .  Employers have found a   number of ways to use technology   to their advantage.  The various scenarios span from pre-employment (  recruiting  ), to poten</description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:05:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New FDA Program to Restrict Opioid Prescriptions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-FDA-Program-to-Restrict-Opioid-Prescriptions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">G6XB5HqY9wU%3d</guid><description> Amid growing concern over the overuse and abuse of powerful narcotic painkillers, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to adopt a massive new program to better control the prescribing, dispensing and distribution of extended-release opioids such as oxycontin, fentanyl (in</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:02:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stimulus Bill Moves America Closer to Practicing Evidence-Based Medicine</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Stimulus-Bill-Moves-America-Closer-to-Practicing-Evidence-Based-Medicine</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EjOYVAo12LE%3d</guid><description> As part of the stimulus package passed by Congress last Friday (  H.R. 1: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  ), the U.S. will be ramping up efforts to encourage evidence-based medicine. This is a very good thing. 
 Specifically (from   The New York Times  ): 
 
 The $787 billio</description><author>Nick Anthis</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:03:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 2/20/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-2202009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1iGrO43bGn8%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:17:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Evidence Based Medicine, Round 2</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Evidence-Based-Medicine-Round-2</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Cy1CgRcsqEo%3d</guid><description> Here in   California we have some experience with &amp;quot;evidence based medicine&amp;quot;. 
 After all, that was the premise for adoption of medical treatment standards in the   
  
California workers' comp system. The initial standards adopted were the &amp;quot;ACOEM guidelines&amp;quot;. Those are s</description><author>Julius Young</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:31:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>When Is Positional Risk Not Positional Risk? Iowa Court Gets Do Over</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/When-Is-Positional-Risk-Not-Positional-Risk-Iowa-Court-Gets-Do-Over</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xbhZpytHyWs%3d</guid><description> The Iowa Court of Appeals has once more attempted to address the issue of positional risk, but has come out with an outcome which contradicts their decision from ten months ago, in April of 2008. 
 The &amp;quot;positional risk&amp;quot; doctrine says that an injury at work is covered, even if the in</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:22:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Longshore Concurrent Jurisdiction Update - 50 States &amp; D.C. Survey</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Longshore-Concurrent-Jurisdiction-Update---50-States--DC-Survey</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">44r5B618G%2bQ%3d</guid><description> There have been several important developments in the area of concurrent jurisdiction, particularly in   
  
Illinois,   
  
Ohio and   
  
Pennsylvania.  In addition, several readers, including Larry Postol of Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P. and Tom Langan of Weeks Marine, Inc., have answered the</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:52:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ninth Circuit: Insured's Waiver of Insurer's Credit for Workers' Compensation Does Not Negate Coverage</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ninth-Circuit-Insureds-Waiver-of-Insurers-Credit-for-Workers-Compensation-Does-Not-Negate-Coverage</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VVWdJaSBUn0%3d</guid><description> Does the insured breach the policy by waiving the insurer's right to a credit for workers' compensation? In  Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Conoco Phillips Co. , No. 06-15664, 2008 U.S. App. 21871 (9th Cir. Oct. 20, 2008), the Court held the policy was not breached by the insured's waiver.  
 </description><author>Tred R. Eyerly</author><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:04:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Jonathan Mook: The ADA Amendments Act: Final Thoughts and Compliance Tips</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Jonathan-Mook-The-ADA-Amendments-Act-Final-Thoughts-and-Compliance-Tips</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HvDyo%2f%2feTz8%3d</guid><description> Over the last week, I have discussed a number of the major changes to federal disability law resulting from the enactment of the   ADA Amendments Act of 2008  .  The expansion in the definition of disability under the statute will impact both employers and employees alike as the number of</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:57:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 2/13/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-2132009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Exmf2xpDOZs%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:12:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Illinois Workers Comp Medical Fee Schedule for Outpatient Services</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Illinois-Workers-Comp-Medical-Fee-Schedule-for-Outpatient-Services</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WJywpmHMVTU%3d</guid><description> New Rules and a new   Medical Fee Schedule   apply for maximum fees in hospital outpatient and ambulatory surgical centers under   
  
Illinois workers' compensation effective Feb. 1, 2009. (See: Illinois Workers Compensation   Medical Fee Schedule Instructions and Guidelines   for Treatment</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:04:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 2/11/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-2112009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bBNfQ4CIJZY%3d</guid><description> Here's a roundup of cases to be covered in the upcoming January 2009 issue of  California Compensation Cases . If you're a lexis.com subscriber to  California Compensation Cases , simply click on the links below to access the cases. 
   
  
 CALIFORNIA   COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 74, No. 1   Jan</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:08:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 2/6/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-262009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GjvUbtPOhrE%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:16:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. WCAB Opens Door to AMA Guides Rebuttal – But Is It Worth the Effort?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-WCAB-Opens-Door-to-AMA-Guides-Rebuttal---But-Is-It-Worth-the-Effort</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3ZfxvpOaiqg%3d</guid><description> The Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Appeals Board on February 3 issued two landmark decisions on rebuttal to the permanent disability rating schedule. These cases,    Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco    and the combined cases of    Almaraz v. Environmental Recovery Services and SCIF  an</description><author>Richard M. Jacobsmeyer</author><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:35:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 2/6/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-262009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TK2h1SOwTNs%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:26:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CMS Announces “Query Access” System to Determine Medicare Entitlement for Non-Group Health Plans</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CMS-Announces-Query-Access-System-to-Determine-Medicare-Entitlement-for-Non-Group-Health-Plans</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3mEnvzc%2fLzw%3d</guid><description> On January 22, 2009, CMS held its fourth national &amp;ldquo;Town Hall&amp;rdquo; teleconference in conjunction with the continued implementation of the agency&amp;rsquo;s Mandatory Insurer Reporting (MIR) requirements under Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid &amp;amp; SCHIP Extension (MMSEA). 1   &amp;nb</description><author>Mark Popolizio</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:16:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Trickle Turns Into Torrent of Attorney Fee Denials</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Trickle-Turns-Into-Torrent-of-Attorney-Fee-Denials</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Pm8opfP5XH8%3d</guid><description> It is a rare situation indeed where a trickle of cases favorable to employers under the LHWCA (33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901 et seq.) turns into a torrent of case law that virtually eliminates an avenue of recovery for claimants. [The last may have been the cases which prohibited a claimant from reco</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:09:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Calif. WCAB Issues Two En Banc Decisions Concerning the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Calif-WCAB-Issues-Two-En-Banc-Decisions-Concerning-the-2005-Permanent-Disability-Rating-Schedule</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6mGK3hU6fB8%3d</guid><description> The California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued two en banc decisions today concerning the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule. 
    Wanda Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco, Permissibly Self-Insured  ,  filed and served on February 3, 2009. 
 The Appeals Board held i</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:04:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 1/30/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-1302009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jM9aFlz%2bCmk%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:46:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Jonathan Mook: The ADA Amendments Act: The Product of a Remarkable Bi-Partisan Coalition</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Jonathan-Mook-The-ADA-Amendments-Act-The-Product-of-a-Remarkable-Bi-Partisan-Coalition</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Y%2fo6PJ9q0ew%3d</guid><description> Like the original Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the   ADAAA   was the product of a broad coalition of Republicans, Democrats, disability rights advocates and employer and business groups coming together to enact legislation that they all could support.  Many on both sides of th</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:57:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CWCI Reform Monitoring Research Examines Temporary Disability Claim Experience</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CWCI-Reform-Monitoring-Research-Examines-Temporary-Disability-Claim-Experience</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">57bOaBoCQ2s%3d</guid><description> CWCI's latest report in its research series tracking changes in California workers&amp;rsquo; compensation following the enactment of 2004 reforms ( SB 899 ) shows that although the average amounts of TD paid on lost-time claims at 12 and 24 months are still less than they were before the reforms </description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:46:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Jonathan Mook: The ADA Amendments Act: What Are Major Life Activities and What Is “Substantially” Limiting?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Jonathan-Mook-The-ADA-Amendments-Act-What-Are-Major-Life-Activities-and-What-Is-Substantially-Limiting</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Yys%2blSfgP9c%3d</guid><description> Under the requirement of having an actual disability in both the original ADA and the   ADA Amendments Act  , a physical or mental impairment must substantially limit what is termed a &amp;ldquo;major life activity.&amp;rdquo;  Under the original provisions of the  &lt;/city&gt;ADA, passed in 1990, Con</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:29:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Jonathan Mook: The ADA Amendments Act: Expanding the Definition of Disability</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Jonathan-Mook-The-ADA-Amendments-Act-Expanding-the-Definition-of-Disability</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dP0rWhFe7q4%3d</guid><description> As we have learned, the major purpose of the bipartisan   ADA Amendments Act of 2008   is to liberate the definition of &amp;ldquo;disability&amp;rdquo; from the narrow definition adopted by the courts.  How does the ADAAA do this?  The answer is in several ways. 

     To listen for </description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:46:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Louisiana Supreme Court Gives Lien Claimants in PPO Disputes Their Day in Court</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Louisiana-Supreme-Court-Gives-Lien-Claimants-in-PPO-Disputes-Their-Day-in-Court</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">USUr77O7nPc%3d</guid><description> The Louisiana Supreme Court held in    Broussard Physical Therapy v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.    that the office of workers&amp;rsquo; compensation has the exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over disputes between health care providers and employers/insurers for payment of the health care prov</description><author>Bray Williams</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:40:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Jonathan Mook: The ADA Amendments Act: What It Means for You</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Jonathan-Mook-The-ADA-Amendments-Act-What-It-Means-for-You</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TU5soTsr%2f44%3d</guid><description> On New Year&amp;rsquo;s Day, the most significant piece of civil rights legislation in at least the last fifteen years took effect: The   ADA Amendments Act of 2008  .  The statute does nothing less than specifically reject four Supreme Court decisions, which previously formed the bedrock for</description><author>Jonathan R. Mook</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:48:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Defense Base Act Practice: We're Not in Kansas Anymore</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Defense-Base-Act-Practice-Were-Not-in-Kansas-Anymore</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">dQR9srCMzTM%3d</guid><description> In 1988 or thereabouts, I received a telephone call from a claims manager at an insurance company that was well known to me but for which I had never done any work.  Because they were looking for new counsel due to the death of very able former counsel, he asked me if I would be interested in </description><author>Roger A Levy</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:48:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois Workers' Comp Lien and Employer's Uninsured Motorist Coverage</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Workers-Comp-Lien-and-Employers-Uninsured-Motorist-Coverage</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TY0CjEyM3rQ%3d</guid><description> The Illinois Supreme Court recently decided that a workers&amp;rsquo; comp lien does not apply to a recovery on an employer&amp;rsquo;s uninsured motorist policy under the plain meaning of Illinois workers&amp;rsquo; compensation lien statute since there was no recovery from a 3rd party.   &lt;/city&gt;
  
 T</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:18:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 1/23/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-1232009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MSnIcgVelwE%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:47:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are You LinkedIn? The Benefits of Online Social Media for Lawyers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Are-You-LinkedIn-The-Benefits-of-Online-Social-Media-for-Lawyers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CQJmc6VxJBk%3d</guid><description> Hello Counsel. 
 I understand there is a new LinkedIn sign in module on the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center, and I wanted to take a brief moment to share some information on the benefits of LinkedIn for practicing lawyers. 
 In 2008, there were 13,000,000 registered users and at </description><author>David A. Barrett</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:08:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: 2008 End of the Year Statistical Information</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-2008-End-of-the-Year-Statistical-Information</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ocr0pS4Aap0%3d</guid><description> The end of the year brings new statistical analysis to workers&amp;rsquo; compensation costs affecting the nation as a whole and   
  
Texas specifically. 
 The NCCI recently reported the medical costs per claim jumped 344.1% in the last twenty years.  Medical CPI increased 175.2% during this t</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:47:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Prosecuting Worker Endangerment: The Need for Stronger Criminal Penalties for Violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Prosecuting-Worker-Endangerment-The-Need-for-Stronger-Criminal-Penalties-for-Violations-of-the-Occupational-Safety-and-Health-Act</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wi43rDIOlmo%3d</guid><description> The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy is pleased to distribute an Issue Brief by  David M. Uhlmann , the Jeffrey F. Liss Professor from Practice and the Director of the Environmental Law and Policy Program at the University of Michigan Law School, entitled  Prosecuting Worker En</description><author>David M. Uhlmann</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:23:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Law Review Spotlight: Can't Settle, Can't Sue: How Congress Stole Tort Remedies From Medicare Beneficiaries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Law-Review-Spotlight-Cant-Settle-Cant-Sue-How-Congress-Stole-Tort-Remedies-From-Medicare-Beneficiaries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GWIsewRSMcI%3d</guid><description> The Goldberg Segalla law firm is helping the Medicare Advocacy Recovery Coalition (MARC) identify legal information on the impact of MSP law. There's a lengthy article from the  Akron Law Review  ( &amp;quot;Can't Settle, Can't Sue: How Congress Stole Tort Remedies From Medicare Beneficiaries,&amp;quot;  b</description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:45:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2009 Proposed Revisions to California Qualified Medical Examiner Regulations</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/2009-Proposed-Revisions-to-California-Qualified-Medical-Examiner-Regulations</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YptQKgNwoqg%3d</guid><description>  Senate Bill 228  (Alarc&amp;oacute;n, ch. 639, Stats. 2003) and  Senate Bill 899  (Poochigian, ch. 34, Stats. 2004), among others, changed the workers' compensation laws in California with respect to the roles of treating physicians, Agreed Medical Examiners (AMEs) and Qualified Medical Evaluators (QM</description><author>Calif. Society of Industrial Medicine &amp; Surgery</author><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:15:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: DFEC Expert Report and Testimony Can Be Reimbursable Even If It Is Not Admissible</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-DFEC-Expert-Report-and-Testimony-Can-Be-Reimbursable-Even-If-It-Is-Not-Admissible</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">asAGvC8i2rU%3d</guid><description>  Joey Costa v. Hardy Diagnostic and State Compensation Insurance Fund: Round Three  
 In a notable Opinion and Decision on Reconsideration, a three member panel of the WCAB held that the costs for vocational rehabilitation expert evidence, like medical legal costs, are reimbursable if they were re</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:25:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) Account Administration: When to Call In the Professionals</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Medicare-Set-Aside-MSA-Account-Administration-When-to-Call-In-the-Professionals</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Nyp3B9QarsY%3d</guid><description> Many times, one of the last of many difficult decisions to be made in the settlement process is how to administer the Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) monies.  Unfortunately, this decision is perhaps the least understood of all the MSA issues.  How does each choice protect the interests of M</description><author>Douglas M. Brand, CSSC</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:12:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Teddy Snyder: Do You Speak MSA?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Teddy-Snyder-Do-You-Speak-MSA</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">phGZo0V1CfI%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing about Medicare Set-Asides. If you have any questions for me, please contact me at    TSnyder@ringlerassociates.com    and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.  
     To listen for free to my podcas</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:42:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Conference on the Defense Base Act, Washington, D.C. - Part Two</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Conference-on-the-Defense-Base-Act-Washington-DC---Part-Two</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GjbjQ7TH7js%3d</guid><description>  This is Part Two ot a two-part blog summarizing the events of the recent  A Conference on the Defense Base Act, October 23-24, 2008, Washington, D.C. To read Part One,    click here   .  
 Day Two of the conference allowed for considerably more give-and-take between the presenters and the at</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:48:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Peformance Based Oversight Preliminary Review of Insurance Carriers and Health Care Providers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Peformance-Based-Oversight-Preliminary-Review-of-Insurance-Carriers-and-Health-Care-Providers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yv6I6Z%2bNhPQ%3d</guid><description> AUSTIN, TX - The Texas Division of Workers' Compensation has sent its initial Performance Based Oversight (PBO) results last week.  It is important to review the initial findings for any errors. 
 The Texas Legislature requires the Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation to implemen</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:33:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 1/16/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-1162009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gF7S2oQmenQ%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:36:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Teddy Snyder: What About Those Attorney Fees?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Teddy-Snyder-What-About-Those-Attorney-Fees</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WIA89pWz9Vc%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing about Medicare Set-Asides. If you have any questions for me, please contact me at    TSnyder@ringlerassociates.com    and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.  
     To listen for free to my podcas</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:56:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Teddy Snyder: MSA Account Administration</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Teddy-Snyder-MSA-Account-Administration</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3ndrN4PnZxk%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing about Medicare Set-Asides. If you have any questions for me, please contact me at    TSnyder@ringlerassociates.com    and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.  
     To listen for free to my podcas</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:48:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Teddy Snyder: It Saves Money? It’s Free? Sign Me Up!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Teddy-Snyder-It-Saves-Money-Its-Free-Sign-Me-Up</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">f%2fJlJ3VIvcs%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing about Medicare Set-Asides. If you have any questions for me, please contact me at    TSnyder@ringlerassociates.com    and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.  
     To listen for free to my podcas</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:37:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Featured Blogger - Teddy Snyder: New S-CHIP Law: Medicare Secondary Payer Law May Get Some Respect At Last</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Featured-Blogger---Teddy-Snyder-New-S-CHIP-Law-Medicare-Secondary-Payer-Law-May-Get-Some-Respect-At-Last</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1r92ZqwWQDo%3d</guid><description>  Hello, as the &amp;quot;featured blogger&amp;quot; this week, I'll be writing about Medicare Set-Asides. If you have any questions for me, please contact me at    TSnyder@ringlerassociates.com    and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.    
     To listen for free to&amp;nb</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:29:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 1/9/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-192009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OVuUayZd67w%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>U.S. v. Harris: Government Has Claim Against Plaintiff Attorney for CMS Proceeds</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/US-v-Harris-Government-Has-Claim-Against-Plaintiff-Attorney-for-CMS-Proceeds</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">E7tZBqeF6OQ%3d</guid><description> I am attaching a recent ruling from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia [   U.S. v. Harris   ].  In this case, the Court denied defendant&amp;rsquo;s motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action; and as a consequence of that ruling, the matter is</description><author>Roy A. Franco</author><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:17:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Penalty of $1,000 Per Day Per Claimant—Have We Got Your Attention?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Penalty-of-1000-Per-Day-Per-Claimant-Have-We-Got-Your-Attention</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">54t08aWes0E%3d</guid><description> Have you heard about the new S-CHIP law (P.L. 110-173)?  Sort of hidden in sec. 111(8) are new provisions for reporting to the government when your client&amp;rsquo;s case concludes.  This goes into effect on July 1, 2009.  The new provision is an addition to the Medicare Secondary Payer</description><author>Teddy Snyder</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:04:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Change: The Need to Move the Department of Labor Into the 21st Century</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Change-The-Need-to-Move-the-Department-of-Labor-Into-the-21st-Century</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">15ZViAsjHQc%3d</guid><description> With the presidential election over, Americans look forward to positive change in the years ahead.  Unfortunately, the U.S. Department of Labor seems stuck somewhere in the early 20th century with regard to electronics and communications.  The reluctance of the Department of Labor to move</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:23:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 1/5/2009)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-152009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TMaw54HDC2w%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:43:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 1/8/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-182009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">6HAvLtJKYPg%3d</guid><description> Here's a roundup of cases to be covered in the upcoming December 2008 issue of  California Compensation Cases . 
   
  
 CALIFORNIA   COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 73, No. 12   December   2008  
 Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related In</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:48:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2007 Work Injury and Illness Data: California v. Nationwide</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/2007-Work-Injury-and-Illness-Data-California-v-Nationwide</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hwHMqiAibHc%3d</guid><description> The total number of nonfatal work injury and illnesses reported in California edged up slightly in 2007, and the state accounted for nearly one out of every eight cases reported by private sector employers nationwide according to data from the state Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLS&amp;am</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:27:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas DWC Closes Missouri Field Office</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-DWC-Closes-Missouri-Field-Office</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xLFTqqgknJw%3d</guid><description> It appears the DWC has decided to consolidate the number of field offices in the greater  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Houston area. One of our attorneys was informed earlier this week the  &lt;/city&gt;
  
Missouri City field office is scheduled to close in the next few months. Although a specific closing date was no</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:21:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 1/2/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-122009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">i5S4MT%2b0tUE%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:22:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top 10 2008 Developments in California Workers' Comp</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Top-10-2008-Developments-in-California-Workers-Comp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">p%2b78aY3yXFE%3d</guid><description> As always, the huge   
  
California workers' comp industry continues to be an area of great controversy. In 2008 the 2003 and 2004 reforms continued to settle in, but there were important new developments.  
 There are many possible items for a Top 10 list for   
  
California workers' comp i</description><author>Julius Young</author><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:08:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Year End Wrap Up: Larson’s Top Blogworthy Cases for 6/2008 through 12/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Year-End-Wrap-Up-Larsons-Top-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-for-62008-through-122008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">v1YqD9Nz3lo%3d</guid><description> These are my selections for the top workers' compensation cases during the last six months of 2008. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases. To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:43:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Minnesota WCAC Commissioner Sviggum Proposes to Strip Benefits From Undocumented Workers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Minnesota-WCAC-Commissioner-Sviggum-Proposes-to-Strip-Benefits-From-Undocumented-Workers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MDaIiK4Xg2o%3d</guid><description> The Minnesota Worker's Compensation Advisory Council (   WCAC   ), which advises the commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry about workers&amp;rsquo; compensation matters, recently met to discuss proposed changes to the workers&amp;rsquo; compensation statutes. 
 At the meeting, DOL</description><author>Jerry W. Sisk</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:03:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Supreme Court Overrules Continental Casualty Co. v. Downs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Supreme-Court-Overrules-Continental-Casualty-Co-v-Downs</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gyoIlfsJWAY%3d</guid><description> On December 19, 2008, the Texas Supreme Court rendered its decision in    Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Mitchell    and overruled its prior decision in    Continental Casualty v. Downs , 81 S.W.3d. 803  , (Tex. 2002).  As you recall, the 2001 decision in  Downs  found a carrier waived its</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:08:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Mileage Reimbursement Rate Effective 1/1/2009</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Mileage-Reimbursement-Rate-Effective-112009</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gGdz9X47xoQ%3d</guid><description> Effective January 1, 2009, the mileage reimbursement rate decreases to $ .55 cents. </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:39:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Spotlight: Sexual Harassment Claims and Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Spotlight-Sexual-Harassment-Claims-and-Workers-Compensation-Exclusivity</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LUtWflwyxro%3d</guid><description> Skin burns from contact with hot water or cooking oil, broken bones from falls on slippery floors, soft tissue injuries from lifting or moving heavy objects&amp;mdash;these are the sorts of injuries that are typically associated with work in a busy restaurant.  A restaurant worker should not </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:21:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 12/26/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-12262008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4ZqcxFixbz4%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases. To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:15:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Daily Legal News Podcast: 2008 Year in Review Part I</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/LexisNexis-Mealeys-Daily-Legal-News-Podcast-2008-Year-in-Review-Part-I---------</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xZIjAUegK%2fk%3d</guid><description> The LexisNexis&amp;reg; Mealey's&amp;trade; Daily Legal News Podcast was recently recognized by the  ABA Journal  as being one of the top legal podcasts. Click below to listen to a summary of stories from the legal news desk and reported in the first half of 2008 by LexisNexis&amp;reg; Mealey's&amp;trade; pub</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:17:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>4th International Forum on Disability Management: Breaking Down Barriers Together</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/4th-International-Forum-on-Disability-Management-Breaking-Down-Barriers-Together</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qPLYj%2fxZSs8%3d</guid><description> Dealing with the vocational capacity of employed citizens who are unable to work as a result of an accident or illness is the yardstick by which a &amp;ldquo;healthy&amp;ldquo; society is measured &amp;ndash; especially when older people remain in employment as a result of the demographic development. The rete</description><author>International Forum on Disability Management</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:07:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Physician Networks in California Workers’ Comp Following Reform</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Physician-Networks-in-California-Workers-Comp-Following-Reform</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">REf26MHaQnQ%3d</guid><description> An increasing share of medical care for injured workers in California is being provided by medical networks according to a new Institute study, which shows that in accident year (AY) 2006, network providers accounted for almost two-thirds of all workers' compensation first-year physician-based outp</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:45:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 12/19/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-12192008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">L7oBqb1uq9w%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases. To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:42:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 12/15/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-12152008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wiZpimUGUAA%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:31:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Personal Pleasure and the "Personal Comfort" Defense in Oregon</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Personal-Pleasure-and-the-Personal-Comfort-Defense-in-Oregon</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4IsJwOT1VRQ%3d</guid><description> Under ORS 656.005(7)(b)(B), a compensable injury does not include &amp;ldquo;[i]njury incurred while engaging in or performing, or as the result of engaging in or performing, any recreational or social activities primarily for the worker&amp;rsquo;s personal pleasure.&amp;rdquo;  
 The defense was employ</description><author>Brad Garber</author><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:09:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Postville Immigration Raid: A Manmade Disaster</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Postville-Immigration-Raid-A-Manmade-Disaster</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KHfpGAH0srA%3d</guid><description> Postville at the time of the 2000 census had a population of 2273. At the time of the raid, the Agriprocessors meat-packing plant was far and away Postville&amp;rsquo;s largest employer, with reportedly over 900 employees.  
 On the morning of Monday, May 12, 2008, United States Immigration and Custom</description><author>Paul J. McAndrew, Jr.</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:58:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 12/12/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-12122008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Hr1hzmgBCz8%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases. I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases. To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you </description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:51:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Using E-Verify Doesn't Protect Company From Immigration Raid</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Using-E-Verify-Doesnt-Protect-Company-From-Immigration-Raid</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">zpqDxXumUoY%3d</guid><description> Howard Industries, a manufacturer of electrical products located in   
  
Mississippi , is a recent example of a business targeted for immigration enforcement, despite using an employment verification system run by the federal government. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested 5</description><author>Texas Workforce Commission</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:28:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 12/5/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-1252008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">FB%2f1sY2IffE%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:03:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workplace Bullying: 15 Things That Jerks at Work Usually Do</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workplace-Bullying-15-Things-That-Jerks-at-Work-Usually-Do</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qtqlZYp6ynE%3d</guid><description> Jerks at Work.  Nobody likes them.  Everybody knows them.  Jerks at Work are easy to identify--you know one when you see one.  But for managers who want to eradicate the problem of workplace bullying, it may be difficult to identify just what it is that indicates the employee is</description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:05:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CWCI Study Examines California Workers’ Comp Inpatient Hospitalizations Following Reform</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/CWCI-Study-Examines-California-Workers-Comp-Inpatient-Hospitalizations-Following-Reform</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">pW84g54Acbo%3d</guid><description> A new California Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Institute (CWCI) study shows a sharp reduction in the number of inpatient hospitalizations for California job injuries &amp;ndash; including work-related back injuries -- between 2002 and 2006, coinciding with implementation of workers&amp;rsquo; comp reforms an</description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:53:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Longshore and Defense Base Act Cases (Posted 12/2/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Longshore-and-Defense-Base-Act-Cases-Posted-1222008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uIc0PGY61d0%3d</guid><description> The following is a list of recent noteworthy decisions issued by the Benefits Review Board, the Fifth Circuit, and the Office of Administrative Law Judges that we'll be reporting in Release 699 of the  Benefits Review Board Service Longshore Reporter  (Matthew Bender): 
   BRB DECISIONS </description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:09:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>5 Costs of Coworker Bullying</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/5-Costs-of-Coworker-Bullying</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">k53D1wXNBMg%3d</guid><description>   Workplace bullying   has been a hot topic since the release of the   2007 Zogby survey  , which showed that 49% of American workers report that they've been the target of a bully's bad behavior.  Employers have begun instituting tolerance training and implementing   respectful-workplace poli</description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:26:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>National Underwriter's Virtual Conference on the Future of Insurance, Including Workers’ Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/National-Underwriters-Virtual-Conference-on-the-Future-of-Insurance-Including-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qs6mk14dAFA%3d</guid><description>  National Underwriter  (NU), a leader in property and casualty news, recently held a virtual conference &amp;amp; expo entitled &amp;ldquo;Facing the Future of Insurance.&amp;rdquo; One of the online tradeshow segments highlighted the risk management programs at the three finalists for NU&amp;rsquo;s second a</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:51:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Court Rejects Ahlborn Method for Determining the Enforceable New York Workers' Compensation Lien and Future Payment Amounts</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Court-Rejects-Ahlborn-Method-for-Determining-the-Enforceable-New-York-Workers-Compensation-Lien-and-Future-Payment-Amounts-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">t6FMH%2fUJirY%3d</guid><description>In what appears to be a case of first impression, the Erie County Supreme Court has declined to apply the equitable considerations outlined in the United States Supreme Court Medicaid-lien case    Arkansas Dept. Of Health and Human Servs. v Ahlborn    (547 US 268 [2006]) to set (a) the amount of the</description><author>Roy A. Mura</author><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:53:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 11/28/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-11282008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WebXwMkkCC0%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:14:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California EAMS: Top 10 FAQs re the OCR Forms</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-EAMS-Top-10-FAQs-re-the-OCR-Forms</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5c5DFSZ%2bSo4%3d</guid><description>   1. OCR Forms Mandatory   
  Q: Are the new OCR forms mandatory now that the DWC Regulations are approved?  A: Yes, the OCR forms became mandatory Nov. 17. An   instruction manual   for completing OCR forms can be found on the DWC website &amp;ndash;   www.dir.ca.gov/eams  . There will be a thre</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:47:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 11/26/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-11262008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8%2f3L5yhiYYU%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:44:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Texas Appeals Panel Decisions (November 24, 2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Texas-Appeals-Panel-Decisions-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">J5GruiEUmbk%3d</guid><description> Recent Texas Appeals Panel Decisions (November 24, 2008) 
  Appeals Panel Decision 080805   Issue:  Designated Doctor and Impairment Rating  
 The claimant was examined by the designated doctor who found a thirty-one percent (31%) impairment rating based on a strict interpretation of the Ame</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:49:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 11/25/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-11252008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">URMnj%2f9wZqo%3d</guid><description> Here's a roundup of cases to be covered in the upcoming November 2008 issue of  California Compensation Cases . 
   
  
 CALIFORNIA   COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 73, No. 11   November   2008  
 Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related In</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:30:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 11/21/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-11212008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2flK6jRsuaSU%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:34:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Role Model for Wellness Programs: ING Direct</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Role-Model-for-Wellness-Programs-ING-Direct</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2b7C1glDrIDg%3d</guid><description> Delaware is one of several states that have implemented wellness and prevention programs.  State employee wellness programs are often launched as pilots for broader health initiatives and as examples of best practices that it is hoped the private sector will follow. 
 
  
 &lt;/city&gt;DelaWELL, </description><author>Margaret M. DiBianca</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:13:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How Will Global Financial Meltdown (GFM) Affect Workers Comp - and You?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-Will-Global-Financial-Meltdown-GFM-Affect-Workers-Comp---and-You</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">C5oOxTHL1pQ%3d</guid><description> If you don't recognize the acronym &amp;quot;GFM,&amp;quot; never fear.  I'm not sure it's a common term, but it's one we've been using around our office lately. 
   AcronymFinder.com   says GFM can stand for, among other things, &amp;ldquo;gaming FM (radio)&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;general field marshal,&amp;rdquo; a</description><author>Specific Software Solutions</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:57:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois: Carpenter Fired for Religious Graffiti Not Entitled to Disability Pay</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Carpenter-Fired-for-Religious-Graffiti-Not-Entitled-to-Disability-Pay</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">E0hImIKPzS8%3d</guid><description> An Illinois construction worker was working light duty following a legitimate work injury when he was fired for writing religious graffiti on a store room shelf.  In a case of first impression, the Appellate Court considered the entitlement of a worker to temporary disability pay or temporary </description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:57:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Court of Appeals Reverses Trial Court’s Judgment in Stop Loss Exception Proceeding</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Court-of-Appeals-Reverses-Trial-Courts-Judgment-in-Stop-Loss-Exception-Proceeding-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rMxMoS4nNRk%3d</guid><description> Texas Court of Appeals Third District at Austin reverses the trial court's judgment in the stop loss exception proceeding and establishes that provider (hospital) must demonstrate that audited charges exceed $40,000.00 and that services provided are unusually costly and unusually costly extensive s</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:07:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Practical Approach to Responding to Subpoenas in California</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Practical-Approach-to-Responding-to-Subpoenas-in-California</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DKRUWNnpS54%3d</guid><description> If you are a long-term reader of Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp;amp; Moresi's  The Workers' Compensation Newsletter , you may know that we have periodically provided guidance on the handling of a subpoena received by the claims examiner, typically requesting that a copy of the claim file be produced.  
 D</description><author>Laughlin, Falbo, Levy &amp; Moresi LLP</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:19:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 11/14/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-11142008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YEBuwa63Q3k%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:50:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Employee/Contractor Distinction: Overview</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/EmployeeContractor-Distinction-Overview</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">xmW1oNfady0%3d</guid><description> Last year, Senator Barack Obama introduced legislation entitled the &amp;quot;   Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007    (S. 2044),&amp;quot; designed to address the problem, reported in various studies, of increasing misclassification of employees around the country. 
 As discuss</description><author>Lex Larson</author><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:31:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Potential Impact of the Obama Administration on the Labor and Employment Legal Landscape</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Potential-Impact-of-the-Obama-Administration-on-the-Labor-and-Employment-Legal-Landscape</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">nofLd5t5EMc%3d</guid><description> The 2008 elections are now in the record books.  With the election of Senator Obama to the presidency, and Democrats picking up as many as 20 seats in the House and at least five seats in the Senate, the new balance of power in Washington is likely to bring dramatic change in various areas of </description><author>Robert G. Lian, Jr.</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:26:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2008 Election Results: Coloring the Nation in a Purple Haze</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/2008-Election-Results-Coloring-the-Nation-in-a-Purple-Haze</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">z6gGB%2bUhxAg%3d</guid><description> According to President-elect Obama, we&amp;rsquo;re not Democrats or Republicans anymore, we&amp;rsquo;re Americans. Breathing in the air at Grant Park on election night, one could almost believe that Red states and Blue states were uniting under a new shade of purple.  
 On the state level, any purple ti</description><author>Karen C Yotis</author><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:28:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: $2.40 in Costs to Deliver $1 of Benefits: SDI Subsidizes Comp</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-240-in-Costs-to-Deliver-1-of-Benefits-SDI-Subsidizes-Comp</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yUcBeVaHIfk%3d</guid><description> Is California's State Disability Insurance system subsidizing California workers' comp?  Are California workers partially funding the comp system? 
 Yes, according to an important report unveiled this week by CHSWC (the California Commission on Health, Safety and Workers' Compensation). A lin</description><author>Julius Young</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:38:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama Administration Promises More Efficient Social Security Disability Process</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Obama-Administration-Promises-More-Efficient-Social-Security-Disability-Process</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hh3okFFBDww%3d</guid><description> As a candidate, Senator Barack Obama issued a white paper on the need to redesign the process for Social Security Disability and SSI applications.  The comments are found in a lengthy    Obama Disability Plan Fact Sheet   .  
 At page 7 of that statement, entitled &amp;quot;Streamline the Social </description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:12:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2008 Election Results: Coloring the Nation in a Purple Haze</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/2008-Election-Results-Coloring-the-Nation-in-a-Purple-Haze-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oOWYk2krHps%3d</guid><description> According to President-elect Obama, we&amp;rsquo;re not Democrats or Republicans anymore, we&amp;rsquo;re Americans. Breathing in the air at Grant Park on election night, one could almost believe that Red states and Blue states were uniting under a new shade of purple.  
 On the state level, any purple ti</description><author>Karen C Yotis</author><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:26:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 11/7/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-1172008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vsFN031fsIE%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:33:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 11/6/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-1162008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YZJXZDCfVgw%3d</guid><description> Here's a preview of cases to be covered in the upcoming October 2008 issue of  California Compensation Cases . These cases will be available soon on lexis.com. Lexis.com subscribers are advised to set up email alerts to catch the latest cases.  
   
  
 CALIFORNIA   COMPENSATION CASES   Vol</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:51:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>An Obama Presidency: What Would It Mean for California Workers' Compensation?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/An-Obama-Presidency-What-Would-It-Mean-for-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ODHDuXm0gJo%3d</guid><description> Polls can be wrong. 
 But even as the popular vote appears likely to be tightening, the electoral college math appears to favor an Obama victory in Tuesday's election. (disclosure: I am an Obama contributor; my son, a paralegal at Cotchett, Pitre and McCarthy in Burlingame, is at the moment in Col</description><author>Julius Young</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:41:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers’ Comp Reform Outcomes: Changes in Medical Cost Containment Payments</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Comp-Reform-Outcomes-Changes-in-Medical-Cost-Containment-Payments</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Oe6mZ3q4P6I%3d</guid><description> New data comparing post-reform growth in California workers' compensation medical cost containment (MCC) expenditures to the changes in overall medical payments per claim shows that while MCC costs have continued to rise, total medical benefits have reversed field, and after declining sharply </description><author>California Workers' Compensation Institute</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:23:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois Workers Compensation Medical Fee Geozips</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Workers-Compensation-Medical-Fee-Geozips</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Zzm8pXEy3e4%3d</guid><description> Critics decry the current WC Medical Fee Schedule as not recognizing enough real present medical cost savings but, if they look at historical rates of medical cost inflation, they would see the true value of the present WC Medical Fee Schedule in capping the rate of medical inflation and not in the</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:50:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Conference on the Defense Base Act, Washington, D.C. – Part One</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Conference-on-the-Defense-Base-Act-Washington-DC---Part-One</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2b%2fPXA%2bZj2lw%3d</guid><description>  This is Part One of a two-part blog summarizing the events of the recent A Conference on the Defense Base Act, October 23-24, 2008, Washington, D.C. To read Part Two,    click here   .  
 Loyola Law School (New Orleans) and the United States Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation Pr</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:28:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The New Social Contract, Struggling to Be Born</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-New-Social-Contract-Struggling-to-Be-Born</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fMD3o5QYo34%3d</guid><description> Which will win out: Litigation, regulation, or new kinds of unionism in cobbling together a 21st century social contract between employers and employees?  The old one has been dead for a while.  Given the vacuum, along with so many layoffs, it's no newsflash that the American workforce ai</description><author>Jane Genova</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:43:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 10/31/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-10312008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EpGs2%2fcHj7M%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:05:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 10/29/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-10292008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2fbYudXJq8ys%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:02:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Immigrant Worker Safety and Health</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Immigrant-Worker-Safety-and-Health</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">DyPkFtcRF%2bg%3d</guid><description> In the United States, immigrant workers constitute a significant proportion of the workforce.  In 2006, 15% of workers were foreign-born and at least 6.3 million were undocumented.  Immigrant workers face a disproportionate risk for workplace injury and illness.  This is due to a con</description><author>NIOSH</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:02:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>MRSA Infection Control: Best Practices</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/MRSA-Infection-Control-Best-Practices</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cUM8PWlaPPg%3d</guid><description> Until recently, most people had never heard of staphylococcus aureus. Now methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) seems to be a topic of discussion for most households, workplaces and water coolers. Although there was fear among the general population, healthcare organizations,</description><author>Aruna Vadgama, RN, MPA, CSP, CPHQ, CPE, COHN-S, SR</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:35:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois Workers Compensation Annual Report 2007</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Workers-Compensation-Annual-Report-2007</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">X9izyP17nqQ%3d</guid><description> On October 2, 2008, the Commission released its   Annual Report of Operations for 2007  .  Highlights indicate that total claims were again down from previous year totals with a total of 56,685 new cases filed in FY2007 including both filed claims and  pro se  settlements.  Total claims w</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:05:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois: Mandatory Overtime Included in Average Weekly Wage</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Mandatory-Overtime-Included-in-Average-Weekly-Wage</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">WYjw75BSDz0%3d</guid><description> The 18 year battle over including or excluding overtime in calculation of the average weekly wage continues to rage.  All Illinois benefits are derived from the workers &amp;quot;average weekly wage&amp;quot; in the 52 weeks preceding the accident.  Accordingly, weekly earnings or weekly wages ha</description><author>Brad Bleakney</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:47:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 10/24/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-10242008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">HITqhiu6P%2bc%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:04:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Impact on Human Rights of Private Military and Security Companies’ Activities</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Impact-on-Human-Rights-of-Private-Military-and-Security-Companies-Activities</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">LEU5qTtF%2boA%3d</guid><description> There has been a remarkable expansion, in the last 20 years, of private military and security companies providing services in zones of low-intensity armed conflict and post-conflict situations such as Afghanistan, the Balkans, Colombia, the Congo, Iraq, Somalia or Sudan.  These transnatio</description><author>Jose Gomez del Prado</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:08:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 10/19/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-10192008--</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yUpMR9PX3S8%3d</guid><description>  California A.B. 2181  - Chapter No. 740. Requires an insured employer to file the report with the insurer on a form prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation. Requires a self-insured employer, the state, or the insurer of an insured employer to file the rep</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:29:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Detect Workers Compensation Fraud Committed by Healthcare Providers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Detect-Workers-Compensation-Fraud-Committed-by-Healthcare-Providers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oxlE4ATjIs4%3d</guid><description> In previous blogs I have discussed how to detect possible employee workers compensation claim fraud and possible inflated workers compensation claims.  This blog will discuss one other area of possible fraud that your organization may encounter - fraud committed by healthcare providers. 
 Thi</description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:31:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Appeals Panel Decision on Sub-claimants</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Appeals-Panel-Decision-on-Sub-claimants</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1fhLEsIiPJs%3d</guid><description>  Appeals Panel Decision 080576-s  
  Issue: Sub-claimants  
 The hearing officer found that the subclaimant had legal standing to seek adjudication of this dispute pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 409.0091. Under the facts of this case, Section 409.0091 does not apply because: (1) the claiman</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:01:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 10/17/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-10172008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Uvit%2bJnqSDU%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:07:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>1099 Compliance: Avoid Worker Misclassification and Save Your Company From Financial Disaster</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/1099-Compliance-Avoid-Worker-Misclassification-and-Save-Your-Company-From-Financial-Disaster</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tHDyb7WLiT0%3d</guid><description> For much of our recent business history, the workforce in the United States has been predominantly comprised of full-time employees who receive long-term employment benefits, with many employees remaining employed by the same company for much of their careers.  However, a new trend has em</description><author>Jeff Phelps</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:22:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Foundations of Proof, the Longshore Act Has a Humanitarian Purpose</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Foundations-of-Proof-the-Longshore-Act-Has-a-Humanitarian-Purpose</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wkNanzV67lw%3d</guid><description> Two recent appellate court cases,  Rainey  and  Barscz , serve to demonstrate the depth and breadth of the legal foundations favoring awarding benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act in close cases (33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901 et seq.). 
 In  Rainey v. Director, OWCP and Elect</description><author>Stephen C Embry</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:32:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: Rules, Customs and EAMS</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Rules-Customs-and-EAMS</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hoCT5v%2bmd7I%3d</guid><description> California&amp;rsquo;s Division of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation (DWC) is modernizing its document management and calendaring systems with the implementation of the Electronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS). EAMS will have many consequences. This post concerns one of them; how automation will chan</description><author>Robert K. Norton</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:20:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Detect Inflated Claims That May Drive Your Workers Compensation Costs Into Orbit</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Detect-Inflated-Claims-That-May-Drive-Your-Workers-Compensation-Costs-Into-Orbit</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hsXbRRpH1oM%3d</guid><description> Inflated claims are different from fraudulent claims in that they begin with an injury or illness that the employee later attempts to manipulate into additional time off with pay or a higher disability award.  An example of this type of claim is when employee, who is nearing retirement and is </description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:35:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 10/19/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-10192008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hsjKY%2bAgR7o%3d</guid><description>  California A.B. 2181  - Chapter No. 740. Requires an insured employer to file the report with the insurer on a form prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation. Requires a self-insured employer, the state, or the insurer of an insured employer to file the rep</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:46:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 10/10/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-10102008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YjA0PyMo%2fOs%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:02:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: Outstanding MDR Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Outstanding-MDR-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">BlvMJPfeWks%3d</guid><description> On August 28, 2008, Downs Stanford, P.C. was contacted by the TDI-Division of Workers' Compensation with respect to resolution of outstanding MDR cases that are currently pending as a result of compensability (extent of injury) issues. 
 It appears that the DWC is preparing to review these MDR fil</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:40:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Appeals Panel Decisions on Waiver</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Appeals-Panel-Decisions-on-Waiver</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3KF9TqVRoD8%3d</guid><description>  Appeals Panel Decision 080678   
  Issue: Waiver   
 The claimant alleged one injury. During the recorded statement, the carrier determined that a second injury should also be set up. Only one Notice of Denial of Compensability/Liability and Refusal to Pay Benefits (PLN-1) was filed. In the PLN-</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:31:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 10/10/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-10102008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wYedXTA2BWY%3d</guid><description> This is a preview of some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that we'll be posting to lexis.com in the coming weeks. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions now, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your reques</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:26:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Benefits Review Board Votes to Publish Defense Base Act Case: E.M. v. Dyncorp International</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Benefits-Review-Board-Votes-to-Publish-Defense-Base-Act-Case-EM-v-Dyncorp-International</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2wZ3ysl8Ujk%3d</guid><description> This just in. The Benefits Review Board has voted to publish  E.M. v. Dyncorp International , BRB No. 08-0208, a case arising under the Defense Base Act.  The BRB decision reversed the ALJ's order (2006-LDA-147) that had found the claimant's claim was untimely among other things. The ALJ </description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:39:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Study Supports Early Return to Work for Injured Workers With Nonspecific Low Back Pain</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Study-Supports-Early-Return-to-Work-for-Injured-Workers-With-Nonspecific-Low-Back-Pain-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">MvkbGXcsIfY%3d</guid><description> The  American Family Physician , a peer review journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians, recently published an article entitled &amp;quot;Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Return to Work&amp;quot; authored by Drs. Nguyen and Randolph on November 15, 2007.  This peer reviewed article is designe</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:56:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Longshore Section 8(f) Relief and the Not-So Absolute Defense</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Longshore-Section-8f-Relief-and-the-Not-So-Absolute-Defense</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yIUOM74%2bHts%3d</guid><description> In the course of human events &amp;ndash; mistakes are made.  Many mistakes result from traps laid for the unwary.  One of the biggest traps for employer representatives under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901 et seq. (LHWCA), is the failure to file a </description><author>Paul B. Howell</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:50:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Longshore Attorney's Fees Under Section 28(a): A New Battleground?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Longshore-Attorneys-Fees-Under-Section-28a-A-New-Battleground</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Te6ANdsYa8A%3d</guid><description> An unpublished Benefits Review Board opinion in March 2008 reflected the continuing turmoil in interpreting the attorney's fee provisions of the Longshore Act (33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901 et seq.).  A year ago a divided Board interpreted &amp;sect; 28(b) (33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 928(b)) in  Andrepont v. Mur</description><author>Stephen M. Vaughan</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:12:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CA WCAB Panel Relies on Pre-2005 Medical Records to Apply 1997 Schedule for Permanent Disability</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Appeals-Board-Panel-Relies-on-Pre-2005-Medical-Records-to-Apply-1997-Schedule-for-Permanent-Disability</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7KONeo2H4Iw%3d</guid><description> 
 A Calif. WCAB panel has found that, even though the doctor's report by itself didn't constitute substantial evidence to show existence of PD, pre-2005 medical records indicating the existence of PD were sufficient under the  Cugini  case for application of the 1997 Schedule. 
 

 The cas</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:33:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Illinois Fee Schedules Saving Employers More Than Predicted</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Illinois-Fee-Schedules-Saving-Employers-More-Than-Predicted</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">v6tVYupTS%2bw%3d</guid><description> Employers across the United States have been crying to their state legislatures about the high cost of medical fees for injured workers. Many of the state legislatures have implemented medical fee schedules based upon Medicare.  
 In Illinois the state legislature implemented a fee schedule based </description><author>Kim Presbrey</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:26:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Global Warming and Heat Related Injuries on the Job</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Global-Warming-and-Heat-Related-Injuries-on-the-Job</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">gW9W23N8Hfo%3d</guid><description> As I sit here writing this blog in triple-digit heat, with my A/C going full blast, drinking out of my fifth plastic bottle of water for the day, and contributing to my growing carbon footprint, which is probably the size of the state of California by now, much to my dismay</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:01:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>OSHA-gate: The Story Behind the Story</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/OSHA-gate-The-Story-Behind-the-Story</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4fH7B2TwMkI%3d</guid><description> The news headline in recent days has been the House committee hearing on the underreporting of workplace injuries and illnesses. Click    here   .  
 The    June 27, 2008 episode of Bill Moyers Journal    gave us the story behind the story. Bill Moyers Journal questioned why injury rates have drop</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:42:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 8/15/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-8152008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OjGWRPklpwM%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:38:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Uniform Names" for a Uniform System</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Uniform-Names-for-a-Uniform-System</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">U3Dm9XH0P6Q%3d</guid><description> New EAMS Optical Character Recognition documents will be available for use at &amp;quot;go &amp;ndash; live&amp;quot; on 8.25.08. DWC will encourage use of these documents until mid-October at which time use of the documents will be mandatory.   
   
  One major change in the filing of documents is use </description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:03:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Genetic Discrimination and California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Genetic-Discrimination-and-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bHKhC%2bHrqHg%3d</guid><description> In late May 2008, Congress passed and the President signed into law the landmark    H.R. 493 Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008    (nicknamed &amp;quot;GINA&amp;quot;). This act amends federal law, including the Americans With Disabilities Act, Employment Retirement and Income Security Act o</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:33:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Managing Claims for TTD and TPD Under Florida’s Post-October 2003 Statute</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Managing-Claims-for-TTD-and-TPD-Under-Floridas-Post-October-2003-Statute</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wBLKsjbuw8w%3d</guid><description> Florida's workers' compensation statute provides for an employer to compensate an employee who suffers a compensable accidental injury in the course and scope of his employment during his recovery period, if the compensable condition is severe enough to cause the employee a disability that res</description><author>McConnaughhay, Duffy, Coonrod, Pope &amp; Weaver, P.A.</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:27:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>HR Spotlight: A Top 10 List for Handling Workers' Comp Claims</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/HR-Spotlight-A-Top-10-List-for-Handling-Workers-Comp-Claims</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cPQRqG82M6U%3d</guid><description> &amp;quot;Learn your 'A, B, C's' -  A lways  B e  C losing&amp;quot;--is the workers' compensation mantra of John P. Connolly, an attorney with the Chicago law firm of Brady, Connolly and Masuda.  He argues that time is your enemy in most workers' comp claims. The longer they stay open, the more risk </description><author>HR.BLR.com</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:31:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Schwarzenegger’s Workers Compensation Vetoes: Saving Money at What Cost?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Schwarzeneggers-Workers-Compensation-Vetoes-Saving-Money-at-What-Cost</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">iaNgfVniDcQ%3d</guid><description> On September 30, 2008, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed bills that would have helped remedy some of the problems caused by the reforms he ushered in on  April 19, 2004, when new laws were introduced that have cost many injured workers their homes, possessions and careers, and s</description><author>Clint Feddersen</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:25:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Detect Workers Compensation Fraud Committed by the Injured Employee</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/How-to-Detect-Workers-Compensation-Fraud-Committed-by-the-Injured-Employee</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">rnyfTmjJCLw%3d</guid><description> Fraudulent claims are filed by employees who are seeking workers' compensation benefits for non-existent conditions or for conditions that are not work-related.  These claims are not fraud in the criminal sense in most cases.  Therefore, you must be extremely careful in your claim ha</description><author>CompEraser</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:31:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Supplemental Income Benefits (SIBS) &amp; Dept. of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Supplemental-Income-Benefits-SIBS--Dept-of-Assistive-and-Rehabilitative-Services-DARS</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ppzpvipjMeQ%3d</guid><description>  Review of Appeals Panel Decision No. 080809   
  Issue: Supplemental Income Benefits (SIBs); Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS)   
 The Appeals Panel holds, &amp;ldquo;There is no authority which supports the proposition that a Hearing Officer may substitute his or </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:32:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 10/3/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-1032008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0sH7Njdie5o%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California: EAMS Is Here – Are You Prepared?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-EAMS-Is-Here---Are-You-Prepared</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">m1d5gWaPaoM%3d</guid><description> LexisNexis, publisher of California Compensation Cases, the most cited authority with both the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and the courts, presents LexisNexis Total Practice Advantage TM  for California Workers' Compensation. This new EAMS-compliant solution is organized around the daily wo</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:41:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Subscription v. Non-subscription</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Subscription-v-Non-subscription</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">bJeGIanUISY%3d</guid><description>The Research and Evaluation Group published their non-subscription statistical survey. In 2008, 33% of employers were non-subscribers in Texas. This is a decrease of 4% from 2006. However, more employees work for non-subscribing employers. According to the recent statistics, 25% of Texas employees n</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:05:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 10/2/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-1022008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hhq65hHWYds%3d</guid><description> Here's a roundup of cases to be covered in the upcoming September 2008 issue of  California Compensation Cases . 
   
  
 CALIFORNIA   COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 73, No. 9   September   2008  
 Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related I</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:56:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Conference on the Defense Base Act, October 23-24, 2008, Washington, D.C. - Register now!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Conference-on-the-Defense-Base-Act-October-23-24-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ya66hKWdLz4%3d</guid><description>  LOYOLA   
  
LAW
  
SCHOOL  
     
    and   
  THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,   
    OFFICE OF WORKERS&amp;rsquo; COMPENSATION PROGRAMS   
        

  present   
    A CONFERENCE ON THE DEFENSE BASE ACT   
    October 23-24, 2008 </description><author>Loyola University New Orleans College of Law</author><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:54:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Law Review Spotlight: Undocumented Workers Under Arizona Workers' Compensation Law</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Law-Review-Spotlight-Undocumented-Workers-Under-Arizona-Workers-Compensation-Law</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RoWDQWdZAJ4%3d</guid><description> In  COMMENT: Defining &amp;quot;Employee&amp;quot; Within Arizona's Workers' Compensation Statute: An Argument for Inclusion , 40 Ariz. St. L. J. 691, Walter J. Ashbrook, a 2008 degree candidate of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, discusses whether the Arizona workers' co</description><author>Roger Rabb</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:20:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>More Texas Employees Are Not Covered by Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/More-Texas-Employees-Are-Not-Covered-by-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">V5ggOrazaoY%3d</guid><description> Beginning in 1993, Texas periodically conducts a survey that tracks the percentage of Texas employers who choose workers' compensation insurance. Texas is the only state that does not mandate all employers to carry workers' compensation insurance for the benefit of its workers.  
 According to the</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:38:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Government Rescues AIG: What’s Next?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Government-Rescues-AIG-Whats-Next</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">hcw%2b4lfKzEg%3d</guid><description>  In this blog I've summarized our podcast interview with James M. Davis and Paul R. Walker-Bright of ReedSmith in Chicago about the developments surrounding the AIG bailout . . .    
 AIG comprises one of the larges insurance conglomerates in the world.  It is the largest insurance compa</description><author>Robert M. Lopatin</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:43:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ergonomic Issues Dominate Occupational Health Citation Classics</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Ergonomic-Issues-Dominate-Occupational-Health-Citation-Classics</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">CmVe%2fWDQjZ8%3d</guid><description> A recent survey to identify occupation health citation classics (occupational health articles written since 1949 that have been referred to 100 or more times in research studies) revealed that four of the top 10 most cited scientific investigations involved ergonomic concerns and occupation musculo</description><author>Ergoweb Inc.</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:55:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Workers' Compensation Cases Roundup 8/29/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Workers-Compensation-Cases-Roundup-8292008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Eruh82WwvUo%3d</guid><description> Here's a roundup of cases to be covered in the upcoming August 2008 issue of California Compensation Cases.  
  CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES   Vol. 73, No. 8   August 2008  
 Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Dig</description><author>California Compensation Cases Staff</author><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:41:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 9/26/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-9262008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">eV7CmLLT%2byI%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:37:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Division of Workers' Compensation Proposes Clarifications to eBill Companion Guide</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Division-of-Workers-Compensation-Proposes-Clarifications-to-eBill-Companion-Guide</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ZmcuY0X%2bOcc%3d</guid><description> The Texas Division of Workers' Compensation published a Proposed Clarification to the Texas eBill Companion Guide.  Texas and California are simultaneously creating eBill initiatives requiring carriers to accept medical bills electronically.   
 The proposed payment companion guide </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:49:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: New Maximum and Minimum Weekly Benefits Rates</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-New-Maximum-and-Minimum-Weekly-Benefits-Rates</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Eu7vJbeZ7z0%3d</guid><description> Effective October 1, 2008, the maximum and minimum weekly benefits rates will change.  Such changes are in accordance with the State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) Rate increasing to $749.63.  The new benefit rates are effective through September 30, 2009.  Please note the following maxi</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:28:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Schwarzenegger's Workers' Compensation Reform: Shifting Insurance Companies' Obligations Onto Society</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Schwarzeneggers-Workers-Compensation-Reform-Shifting-Insurance-Companies-Obligations-Onto-Society</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VRc0poMXLvw%3d</guid><description> On April 19, 2004, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger heralded the passage of Senate Bill 899, drastically reducing benefits for California's injured workers, with the following statement: 
 
 &amp;quot;Working together, we have produced a huge win for California. Our bill provides strong refo</description><author>Clint Feddersen</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:02:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas: New Discount and Interest Rates &amp; State Average Weekly Wage</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-New-Discount-and-Interest-Rates--State-Average-Weekly-Wage</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">VscgByp8hyk%3d</guid><description>The state average weekly wage is now $750, an increase from $712. The new $750 state average weekly wage is effective October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. The new interest and discount rate is 5.22% and will become effective October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:15:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top 10 User Errors in EAMS</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Top-10-User-Errors-in-EAMS</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">x14TeyNqHtQ%3d</guid><description> The Top 10 user errors in EAMS are as follows:  
   
  1.  Ignoring the DWC Website   
 The DWC Website has a wealth of information. It should be checked on a regular basis as new information is added daily. The website is located at:    www.dwc.ca.gov/eams      
 Now featured on the </description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:05:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 9/28/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-9282008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s7G0qZfG6UU%3d</guid><description>  Alabama H.B. 18  (new bill) - Prefiled 9/25/2008. Relates to removing some restrictions on workers' compensation payments. 
  California AB 1874  - Signed by Governor 9/26/2008. Expands the State Fund Board of Directors from 5 to 11 voting members. 
  California SB 1145  - Signed by Governor 9/2</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:21:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Benefits Review Board Expands Coverage for Truckers on the Waterfront</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Benefits-Review-Board-Expands-Coverage-for-Truckers-on-the-Waterfront</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">lyWiP6M5Gng%3d</guid><description>  W.B. v. Sea-Logix, L.L.C., and Signal Mutual Indemnity Ass'n,  BRB No. 06-0908, 41 BRBS 89 (Aug. 23, 2007).  
 This decision arises from an appeal of a decision of the ALJ saying that claimant, designated as a truck driver, did not meet status requirements of the Longshore Act (33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect;</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:32:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Informal or Voluntary Networks</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Informal-or-Voluntary-Networks</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">1IOBo4QTMTU%3d</guid><description> The Texas Division of Workers' Compensation has adopted new general rules for medical billing and processing for voluntary and or informal networks including changes to Rule 133.2, 133.4, and 133.5. 
 House Bill 473 required the Division to implement rules regarding voluntary or informal networks.</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:13:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Alternative Dispute Resolution in California Workers’ Compensation: Lessons Learned</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Alternative-Dispute-Resolution-in-California-Workers-Compensation-Lessons-Learned</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KtevcPIhvT4%3d</guid><description> In October of 2004 the Basic Crafts Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Program, the state's only multi-craft collectively-bargained workers&amp;rsquo; compensation alternative dispute resolution program 1 , was negotiated by four management associations 2  in the construction industry and three construct</description><author>Steven Siemers</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:53:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis Top 25 Blogs for Workers' Compensation - 2008 Honorees</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/LexisNexis-Top-25-Blogs-for-Workers-Compensation---2008-Honorees</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7NHcl%2f5XanA%3d</guid><description> The LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center has selected its  2008 honorees for the Top 25 Blogs for Workers' Compensation . Congratulations to all the honorees! 
 These blogsites contain some of the best writing out there on workers' compensation and workplace issues </description><author>Workers' Compensation Top 25 Blogs</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:36:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 9/21/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-9212008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jUQn4J6dAWg%3d</guid><description>  California A.B. 419  &amp;ndash; To Governor 9/17/2008. An act to amend Section 4850 of the Labor Code, relating to workers' compensation. This bill would, for purposes of these provisions, require that these employees be employed on a regular, or full-time basis, but would eliminate the requirement t</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:40:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 9/15/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-9152008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5nGgJfpw7u0%3d</guid><description>  North Dakota Statutory Measure No. 4  &amp;ndash; 9/8/2008; on 11/4/2008 ballot. This initiated measure would add two new sections to title 65 of the North Dakota Century Code providing for the appointment by the Governor of director for the Workforce Safety and Insurance agency, the placement of its </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:38:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 9/19/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-9192008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">jc%2bWIJtkjis%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. 
 &amp;</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:35:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Other Available Work in Georgia Workers' Compensation: Change in Condition for the Better Without a Job Offer</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Other-Available-Work-in-Georgia-Workers-Compensation-Change-in-Condition-for-the-Better-Without-a-Job-Offer</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">u1io%2fcOY7xY%3d</guid><description> In Georgia, once a claim for workers' compensation disability benefits has been accepted, or an all issues determination of compensability and disability has been made, much of the subsequent litigation may involve attempts by the employer/insurer to establish a change in condition for the better, </description><author>James G. Jackson</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:47:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Story of Web 2.0 and the LexisNexis Law Centers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Story-of-Web-20-and-the-LexisNexis-Law-Centers-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">EtMKThZJPd8%3d</guid><description>  Karen C. Yotis, the Site Coordinator for the
  
LexisNexis
  
Insurance
  
Law
  
Center, recently gave the keynote speech at the White and
  
  
Williams
  
Coverage
  
College. Over 400 &amp;ldquo;students&amp;rdquo; from 130 different insurance companies attended the event. The text of h</description><author>Karen C Yotis</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:54:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas eBill Initiative</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-eBill-Initiative</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vl69vdAtZaw%3d</guid><description> The Division is holding stakeholder groups and informational meetings regarding the eBill system that went into effect January 1, 2008.  The Texas legislature requires medical providers to submit their bills electronically to carriers.  Each carrier must have taken the appropriate steps t</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:16:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 9/12/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-9122008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0iL6n90HCdE%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:07:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Workers' Comp Law Now Treats Wrist Injury as Part of the Arm</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Workers-Comp-Law-Now-Treats-Wrist-Injury-as-Part-of-the-Arm</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">acKHaLbJY8k%3d</guid><description> In a ruling that affirmed the Iowa Workers' Compensation Commissioner, the Iowa Supreme Court held that a wrist injury should be treated as an injury to the arm, rather than an injury to the hand. See    Holstein Electric and Integrity Mutual v. Breyflogle   .  
   Under Iowa law, injuries to the </description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:22:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Showing Up for the Showdowns: Appearance Requirements Under EAMS</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Showing-up-for-the-Showdowns-Appearance-Requirements-Under-EAMS</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qf287xSFtTk%3d</guid><description> The automation of   
  
California workers' compensation administrative law proceedings via the Electronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS) has already begun. These reforms include significant changes to the regulations with govern the routine handling of   
  
California workers' com</description><author>Robert K. Norton</author><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:46:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers Compensation Section Newsletter Volume 1 Issue 1 (February 2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-Section-Newsletter-Volume-1-Issue-1-February-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">OhMnQRAfNbA%3d</guid><description>  State Bar of Texas Workers Compensation Section Newsletter  
  February 2008 - Volume 1, Issue 1  
 To read the newsletter, click    here   . 
  Inside this issue:  
 
     Letter from the Chair  
     Officers and Council Members Directory  
     Avoiding the Ninety-Day Rule: Filing Proper</description><author>State Bar of Texas Workers' Compensation Section</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:15:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 9/5/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-952008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9DPzRHOT290%3d</guid><description> The following are some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so befor</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:54:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 9/5/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-952008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tpSOP03Ilo4%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If you</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:47:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>North Carolina's Last Clear Chance Doctrine</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/North-Carolinas-Last-Clear-Chance-Doctrine</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2WBUQNyaF4w%3d</guid><description> In a case of first impression, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in  Outlaw v. APAC-Atlantic, Inc.,  660 S.E. 2d 550 (2008), that a negligent employer still cannot recover its lien when a negligent third party had the last clear chance of avoiding an injury. An examination of the facts and t</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:41:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Supreme Court Finds Petition Filed More Than Two Years After Injury Was Timely</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Supreme-Court-Finds-Petition-Filed-More-Than-Two-Years-After-Injury-Was-Timely</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4ue2WSS62V0%3d</guid><description> The Iowa Supreme Court recently held that a woman who filed a Petition for Arbitration with the Iowa Workers' Compensation Commissioner's Office more than two years after the injury, beyond the statute of limitations, had filed a timely Petition, since she did not learn that the injury was serious </description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:43:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Workers' Compensation Bad Faith in 2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Workers-Compensation-Bad-Faith-in-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">UL0%2bDTjYmHM%3d</guid><description> Plaintiff attorneys are seeking new avenues of income. Many attorneys representing injured workers either no longer accept workers' compensation clients or enhance their current practice with personal injury, social security, and lately bad faith claims. 
   Why Claimant Attorneys Are Diversifying</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:23:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Six Steps to Improve Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Six-Steps-to-Improve-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KjieCRLdjqg%3d</guid><description> Workers' compensation is often neglected in discussions of state health care reform. That is unfortunate, because employers who think they have achieved real savings after a significant change in their group health insurance plan often discover their lower health insurance costs are partially </description><author>Dr. John C. Goodman</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:54:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 9/7/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-972008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">t5MMdASWDd8%3d</guid><description>  California S.B. 1717  - Enrolled 9/2/2008. An act to amend Section 4658 of the Labor Code, relating to workers' compensation. This bill would eliminate those provisions requiring an employer to pay an injured employee a decreased amount of permanent disability benefits if, within 60 days of a disa</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:30:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 8/29/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-8292008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">PmKp4OeppHc%3d</guid><description>
 Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:01:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Workers Compensation Section Newsletter Volume 1 Issue 2 (June 2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Workers-Compensation-Section-Newsletter-Volume-1-Issue-2-June-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7Hzhza5KrKA%3d</guid><description>  State Bar of Texas Workers Compensation Section Newsletter  
  June 2008 - Volume 1, Issue 2  
 To read the newsletter, click    here   . 
  Inside this issue:  
 
     Letter from the Chair  
     Commissioner Resigns  
     Bits and Pieces About DWC  
     Feature Article: Recoupment: It</description><author>State Bar of Texas Workers' Compensation Section</author><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:42:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Report From the 2008 Loyola University Annual Longshore Conference</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Report-From-the-2008-Loyola-University-Annual-Longshore-Conference</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">ypY2sa6pezo%3d</guid><description> For approximately 33 years, Loyola University, in conjunction with the United States Department of Labor, has been putting on its annual Longshore Conference in New Orleans.  In spite of the recent catastrophe a few years ago, the Conference has continued to exist and grow, with its largest at</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:26:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Texas Division of Workers' Compensation Commissioner</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/New-Texas-Division-of-Workers-Compensation-Commissioner</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TJ9QJkw3OJA%3d</guid><description>Media reports confirm rumors that Rod Bordelon will be appointed the new Texas Division of Workers' Compensation Commissioner. Mr. Bordelon currently serves as the Public Counsel at the Office of Public Insurance Counsel. He has experience running a state agency that advocates for consumers. Some be</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:00:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Update From the Benefits Review Board</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Update-From-the-Benefits-Review-Board</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">IUj6KDIJS2U%3d</guid><description> The Board ended its last fiscal year on September 30, 2007, with 152 appeals pending under the Longshore Act and its extensions (LHWCA, 33 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901 et seq.).  During the year, the Board received 241 appeals and issued 282 final dispositions.  All decisions were issued within on</description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:25:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 8/22/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-8222008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">XBuepUk3BvA%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:28:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Entergy Analysis and Debate</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Entergy-Analysis-and-Debate</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Z10outYchGA%3d</guid><description> Another live blog from the State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar:  Tim Stanford and Kay Goggin went after each other's positions regarding the proper analysis and application of the Texas Supreme Court''s  Entergy  decision, which held that a premise owner can also ser</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:13:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 8/25/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-8252008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">GDDr1fUBqjw%3d</guid><description>  California A.B. 419  - Enrolled 8/18/2008. An act to amend Section 4850 of the Labor Code, relating to workers' compensation.    Full version of bill available to lexis.com subscribers   . 
  California A.B. 507  - Enrolled 8/18/2008. An act to add Section 11752.75 to the Insurance Code, relating</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:46:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Missing the Boat - OWCP's Privacy Policy</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Missing-the-Boat-OWCPs-Privacy-Policy</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">S%2fiONf%2fb%2fUY%3d</guid><description> Since August 1, 2006, the Department of Labor has mandated that real names be excised from published decisions for fear of being subject to lawsuits for damaging an individual's right to privacy.  Now employers and carriers are left with an alphabet soup of claimants' initials instead of real </description><author>BRBS Longshore Reporter Staff</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:01:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judicial Review</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Judicial-Review</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">%2bnzuySmvri8%3d</guid><description> Another live blog from the State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar:  Quentin Hagg and Charels Carr provided 10 points for every attorney seeking judical review of the DWC's final decision. (They have two pending trials against one another.) They demonstrated real world depositions</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:19:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judicial Review of Medical Necessity Disputes</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Judicial-Review-of-Medical-Necessity-Disputes-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0tP%2fXt9cxTY%3d</guid><description> In 2003, the Texas legislature amended Texas Labor Code &amp;sect;413.031 allowing the Division to promulgate rules creating an alternative dispute resolution for medical disputes.  As a result, TWCC (now known as Texas Department of Insurance, Department of Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation) adopted Ru</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:17:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2008 State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/2008-State-Bar-of-Texas-Advanced-Workers-Compensation-Seminar</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">9sb0V%2fXaosA%3d</guid><description>I'm blogging from the Advanced Workers' Compensation seminar where the brightest and most experienced attorneys are giving advice and sharing best practices. Brad McClellan provided his yearly case law update and yours truly discussed hot topics. Panel discussions included effective tactics at BRCs </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:54:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>OAG's Brief Suggests Texas Medical Fee Guidelines Are Not a Cap on Medical Reimbursement</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/OAGs-Brief-Suggests-Texas-Medical-Fee-Guidelines-Are-Not-a-Cap-on-Medical-Reimbursement</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">76asFan9jB0%3d</guid><description> Recently, the Office of Attorney General (OAG) filed a Brief on behalf of the Division of Workers' Compensation to the Third Court of Appeals in  &lt;/city&gt;Austin,   Texas, in a case styled  Texas Mutual Ins. Co. v.
  
  
Vista
  
Community
  
Med.
  
Center , et al.  On page thirteen, the br</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:35:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Supreme Court Reaffirms Workers' Compensation Subrogation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Supreme-Court-Reaffirms-Workers-Compensation-Subrogation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yVeLPGfw7KI%3d</guid><description> A unanimous Texas Supreme Court issued a long-anticipated decision in  Texas Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ledbetter.   The Supreme Court upheld the rights of a workers&amp;rsquo; compensation insurance carrier to first monies received in a third party settlement. 
 Mr. Ledbetter was in the course and scope</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:24:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Non-Subscription by Employers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Non-Subscription-by-Employers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2QS5uJ65ujs%3d</guid><description> Another live blog from the State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar:  Mr. Parker once again presents avenues for an attorney suing an employer that chooses or otherwise does not have workers' compensation insurance. He pointed out that employers sometimes mislabel ERISA plans.</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:34:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Waiver and the New Sanders Case</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Waiver-and-the-New-Sanders-Case</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">E95DTh4Uh8U%3d</guid><description> This is another live blog from the 2008 State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar:  Mr. Tipton and Ms. Smith had a &amp;quot;civil&amp;quot; argument regarding waiver and the new  Sanders  case reported this month and some new AP cases.  Sanders  follows the  Lawton  holding that carriers w</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:38:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Changes to Medicare Set Asides</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Changes-to-Medicare-Set-Asides</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">20GpMzWj65U%3d</guid><description> Here's another live blog from the 2008 State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar:   Will Sharpiro faced the unenviable challenge of taking the last topic of the day. He does not believe recent CMS changes to MSAs will affect Texas Workers' Compensation cases. They wil</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:00:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Death Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Death-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">2iT0YpWRl74%3d</guid><description>  Another live blog from the State Bar of Texas Advanced Workers' Compensation Seminar:  Mike Sprain and Roy Leatherberry discussed case law and inconsistencies in death cases. Roy argues that most deaths are by definition an extent of injury. Mike pointed out beneficiaries of volunteer firefig</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:55:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Special Limited Offer! Lexis.com Discount for Section Members Only</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Special-Limited-Offer-Lexiscom-Discount-for-Section-Members-Only</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">96EjOPXR6v8%3d</guid><description>   SPECIAL LIMITED OFFER!   Lexis.com discount for State Bar of Texas Workers' Compensation Section members only. 
 Offer applies to two specific Texas workers' compenation law bundles. 
 Offer expires December 31, 2008.  
 Discounts range from 25% to 30%. 
 Discount depends on which T</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:25:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are Texas Claimants Entitled to More Benefits Than They Are Owed?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Are-Texas-Claimants-Entitled-to-More-Benefits-Than-They-Are-Owed</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">KwC6PzDDU04%3d</guid><description> Claimant attorneys are currently arguing (and prevailing) that the carrier cannot recoup overpaid temporary income benefits from impairment income benefits even if the overpayment is not due to carrier error. The ambiguity comes from a change in Rule 128.1(c) and subsequent Appeals Panel decisions.</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:51:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The SWAG Factor in Workers’ Compensation Cases</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-SWAG-Factor-in-Workers-Compensation-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">7g7vvk9mYrM%3d</guid><description> The acronym &amp;quot;SWAG&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;Scientific Wild-Assed Guess&amp;quot; first appeared in the 2005 Edition of     Workers' Compensation Laws of California     (LexisNexis Matthew Bender) (a.k.a. &amp;quot;The Labor Code Book&amp;quot;) in Table 18 &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Commonly Used in</description><author>James T. Stewart</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:58:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 8/14/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-8142008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">TTEQPraNH2I%3d</guid><description> The following are some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so befor</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:00:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Texas Performance Based Oversight for Healthcare Providers and Carriers</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Performance-Based-Oversight-for-Healthcare-Providers-and-Carriers</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">aDORL6dQsNY%3d</guid><description> The Division held its final PBO Working Group Meeting to discuss the DWC staff paper on the 2009 PBO assessment process. The Legislature required the Division to place selected insurance companies and health care providers in one of three tiers: high performer, average performer, and low performer.</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:45:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Work Comp Index 7th Edition (2008) for California Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Work-Comp-Index-7th-Edition-2008-for-California-Workers-Compensation</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0NBq15GcuBY%3d</guid><description> The new 7th Edition (2008) of the  Work Comp Index  is an alphabetical-by-subject index to workers' compensation in California. It references not only case law, but also codes, rules/regulations and other books by experts on the subject.  
 Have you ever tried to find a code section or case cite, </description><author>James T. Stewart</author><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:03:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Another “Weird-Assed” Medical Condition in the AMA Guides and How to Rate It for Permanent Impairment</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Another-Weird-Assed-Medical-Condition-in-the-AMA-Guides-and-How-to-Rate-It-for-Permanent-Impairment</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">N4iooUFZyHM%3d</guid><description> Throughout the AMA  Guides  there are some medical conditions that are rarely, if ever, seen in industrial injuries or accidents.  When those rarely seen medical conditions emerge within the context of an industrial injury, the question will always arise as to whether the treating or evaluatin</description><author>Robert G. Rassp, Esq.</author><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:43:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 8/17/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-8172008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">t4Ht5z46yH0%3d</guid><description>  Nevada B.D.R. 221  - Filed August 11, 2008. Makes various changes related to workers' compensation. </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:25:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Live DWC Training Session on Filing Documents in EAMS</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Live-DWC-Training-Session-on-Filing-Documents-in-EAMS</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">yiCDoiwfYKA%3d</guid><description> The Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) will conduct two free &amp;quot;train the trainer&amp;quot; sessions for external users on how to file forms and documents in the Electronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS).  
   
 The first session will be held Aug. 14 in
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Los Angeles. T</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:35:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 8/8/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-882008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">imXtEvbqRPM%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:35:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Education Crisis in America and Its Impact on the Future of Workers' Compensation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/The-Education-Crisis-in-America-and-Its-Impact-on-the-Future-of-Workers-Compensation-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">qJUAlG1Dhc0%3d</guid><description>For some time now, people have been talking about a crisis in American education. The crisis certainly does exist. Twenty years ago, the U.S. was ranked #1 in education. Now we're ranked #25 in the world. Veteran teachers &amp;ndash; teachers who have been in the public school system for decades &amp;ndash;</description><author>Christopher Mahon</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:35:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 8/6/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-California-WCAB-Posted-August-6-2008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">fP6XKUUiNqA%3d</guid><description> The following are some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so befor</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:13:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 8/10/08</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-81008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">PoGb98uM4bY%3d</guid><description>  Massachusetts S.B. 2785  - Signed by Governor 8/6/08, Chapter No. 258-2008. An Act providing for the public higher education capital improvement needs of the commonwealth. Section 13A provides: Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, a private entity engaged in a construction, </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:28:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 8/1/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Workers-Compensation-Cases-of-the-Week-812008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">iP52Wc4DHSU%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:17:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa Governor Creates Task Force on Employee Misclassification</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Iowa-Governor-Creates-Task-Force-on-Employee-Misclassification</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Dk6UAJj9zKY%3d</guid><description> This topic sounds boring, but it is an attempt to address real mistreatment and neglect of employees by some unscrupulous Iowa employers that results in thousands of injured workers being stuck without health care or income when injured at work.  
 On July 16, 2008, Governor Chet Culver signed Exe</description><author>H. Edwin Detlie</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:24:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recent Noteworthy Panel Decisions Issued by California WCAB (Posted 7/28/2008)</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Recent-Noteworthy-Panel-Decisions-Issued-by-the-California-Workers-Compensation-Appeals-Board</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">61sRKRASPCw%3d</guid><description> The following are some recent noteworthy panel decisions issued by the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. If you would like a copy of any of these decisions, please logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. If you haven't registered at this site yet, you must do so befor</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:45:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Today's California Earthquake—Compensability of Injuries Sustained by Home-Based Employee</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Todays-California-Earthquake-Compensability-of-Injuries-Sustained-by-Home-Based-Employee</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">b0K6XZV2c58%3d</guid><description> When this afternoon's magnitude 5.8 earthquake hit California (news reports indicate the epicenter was some 29 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, near Chino Hills, in San Bernardino County) a few minutes ago (11:42 a.m. PDT), I was safely ensconced in my home office some 3,000 miles to the ea</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:56:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>State Law Negligence Claim Allowed Against Employer Despite Employee's Waiver Under ERISA Disability Plan</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/State-Law-Negligence-Claim-Allowed-Against-Employer-Despite-Employees-Waiver-Under-ERISA-Disability-Plan</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">RADEE4r1a%2b0%3d</guid><description> On January 15, 2008, the Fifth Circuit in  McAteer v. Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.,  514 F.3d 411 (2008) reversed the District Court&amp;rsquo;s decision dismissing McAteer&amp;rsquo;s claims against Silverleaf Resorts based upon an ERISA plan.   Silverleaf Resorts does not subscribe to the workers&amp;rsquo;</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:03:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 7/25/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-7252008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tzMg8xhCJXs%3d</guid><description> 
 Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. I</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:21:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Coverage for Exemplary Damages Under Employer's Liability Policy for Employer's Gross Negligence</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Coverage-for-Exemplary-Damages-Under-Employers-Liability-Policy-for-Employers-Gross-Negligence</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">oCqxHpcPUEY%3d</guid><description> The Supreme Court issued the decision in the  Fairfield Insurance Company v. Stephens Martin Paving , 246 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. 2008) on February 15, 2008.  The Court heard oral arguments on November 9, 2004.  The Court held public policy does not prohibit coverage for exemplary damages under </description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:51:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 8/3/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-832008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">h5MBHRqX%2bPQ%3d</guid><description>  Massachusetts   SB 2785  &amp;ndash; Sent to Governor 7/31/2008. An act providing for the public higher education capital improvement needs of the Commonwealth. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, a private entity engaged in a construction, development, renovation, remodeling, </description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:24:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Silent PPO Claims Another State</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Silent-PPO-Claims-Another-State</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">188NkeMo3tA%3d</guid><description> It appears that the State of   
  
Oregon is dealing with the nationwide problem of the Silent PPO.    The Oregonian    recently reported that, under pressure from Liberty Northwest insurance company, the second largest insurer in the state of
  
  Oregon, John Shilts, the Administrator of the </description><author>Reid L. Steinfeld</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:29:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>When Do Issues Need to Be Raised to Avoid Waiver in California Workers' Comp Cases?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/When-Do-Issues-Need-to-Be-Raised-to-Avoid-Waiver-in-California-Workers-Comp-Cases</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">SWk28aks90M%3d</guid><description>In California, when are issues finalized for trial in a workers' compensation case?   Does a party to a workers' compensation proceeding waive an issue if it isn't raised at the Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC)?   Or must an issue be raised by the start of trial to avoid wai</description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:21:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>When Does 2 + 2 = 2? The New Math of SB 899 for Temporary Disability</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/When-Does-2--2--2-The-New-Math-of-SB-899-for-Temporary-Disability</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0ZwLfXIPwWM%3d</guid><description> Liability for temporary disability (TD) was severely limited by SB 899. Prior to SB 899, TD was payable until an applicant was either declared permanent and stationary (P&amp;amp;S) or had returned to work if not P&amp;amp;S. It wasn't unusual for an applicant to be found temporarily disabled by a treating</description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:42:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Interpretations of Temporary Disability Limit Four Years After SB 899 in California</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Interpretations-of-Temporary-Disability-Limit-Four-Years-After-SB-899-in-California-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">wDOAMLCsSP0%3d</guid><description> The two-year temporary disability limit under Cal. Lab. Code &amp;sect; 4656(c)(1) is four years post adoption, and some of the major issues relating to it have been addressed in a few published opinions.   1. When does the 104 week TD limit start? It's the date on which temporary disability indem</description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:46:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Interpretations of Temporary Disability Limit Four Years After SB 899 in California</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Interpretations-of-Temporary-Disability-Limit-Four-Years-After-SB-899-in-California</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">YSvkMVHWDZ0%3d</guid><description> The two-year temporary disability limit under Cal. Lab. Code &amp;sect; 4656(c)(1) is four years post adoption, and some of the major issues relating to it have been addressed in a few published opinions.   1. When does the 104 week TD limit start? It's the date on which temporary disability indem</description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:02:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>When Does 2 + 2 = 2? The New Math of SB 899 for Temporary Disability</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/SB-899-Temporary-Disability</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">JEc09ScssX4%3d</guid><description> Liability for temporary disability (TD) was severely limited by SB 899. Prior to SB 899, TD was payable until an applicant was either declared permanent and stationary (P&amp;amp;S) or had returned to work if not P&amp;amp;S. It wasn't unusual for an applicant to be found temporarily disabled by a treating</description><author>Jesse N. Rosen</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:26:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>EAMS Forms and Documents</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/EAMS-Forms-and-Documents</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">BmJi40T%2fcZc%3d</guid><description>   
 After the EAMS regulations become final in October 2008, all parties must use the new EAMS forms for all aspects of their workers&amp;rsquo; compensation practice, including DORs, applications, C&amp;amp;Rs, etc. DWC is encouraging all parties to begin using these new forms when EAMS goes live on 8.25</description><author>Colleen Casey</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:05:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 7/27/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-7272008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">cuTm0i0vRsA%3d</guid><description>  California   A.B. 2091  &amp;ndash; Signed by Governor 7/22/08, Chapter No. 193. An act to amend Section 5307.2 of the Labor Code, relating to workers' compensation. Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compens</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:27:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mickey Mouse to the NRA: Go Ahead—Make My Day!</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Mickey-Mouse-to-the-NRA-Go-Ahead-Make-My-Day</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">e9Nle%2bhA3yg%3d</guid><description> Walt Disney World, the largest employer in central Florida, fired a proverbial broadside at the NRA (and the Florida legislature) when earlier this month it discharged Edwin Sotomayor, a 13-year veteran of Disney World's unarmed security force, for refusing to allow the search of his personal vehic</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:31:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FEHA Sexual Harrassment/Assault/False Imprisonment Case: Baker v. Navfam, Inc. dba Grease Monkey</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/FEHA-Sexual-HarrassmentAssaultFalse-Imprisonment-Case-Baker-v-Navfam-Inc-dba-Grease-Monkey</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">8USlgMu5jTw%3d</guid><description> The law firm of Goldman, Magdalin &amp;amp; Krikes, LLP, recently secured a summary judgment in a FEHA Sexual Harassment/Assault/False Imprisonment case. A summary of the case is set forth below. 
 &amp;copy;  Copyrighted 2008 by Goldman, Magdalin &amp;amp; Krikes, LLP. All rights reserved.  
  Mark Bak</description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:24:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bad Faith Allegations: Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ruttiger</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Texas-Bad-Faith-Allegations-Texas-Mutual-Insurance-Co-v-Ruttiger</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vvPXd3clMTQ%3d</guid><description> The Galveston Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas has published  Texas Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ruttiger , 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 440 (2008).  The unanimous decision affirmed Mr. Ruttiger's bad faith allegations against Texas Mutual Insurance (&amp;ldquo;TMI&amp;rdquo;) (although it reversed find</description><author>Stuart D. Colburn</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:34:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 7/18/08</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-71808</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">uOhfccoft2w%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If y</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:24:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Discrimination Due to Apportionment to Age and Gender-Related Conditions</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Discrimination-Due-to-Apportionment-to-Age-and-Gender-Related-Conditions</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">vxloIZykRzs%3d</guid><description> I've written an expert commentary article that analyzes the unpublished California Court of Appeal decision in   Vaira v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.  (2007) 72   
  
Cal. Comp. Cas. 1586 , which held that any apportionment of a workers&amp;rsquo; compensation award to age or gender,  per se , is a </description><author>Melissa C. Brown</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:04:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Survey of Key Decisions in California Since September 2007</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Survey-of-Key-Decisions-in-California-Since-September-2007</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">51EzDyrpzSg%3d</guid><description> The law firm of Goldman, Magdalin &amp;amp; Krikes, LLP, makes regular news announcements to its clients and the workers' compensation community regarding significant events that are important and notable. Our news alerts appear on an irregular basis as important developments arise. The following </description><author>Goldman, Magdalin &amp; Krikes, LLP</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:41:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pennsylvania Court Says Subrogation Waiver Must Be Explicit</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Pennsylvania-Court-Says-Subrogation-Waiver-Must-Be-Explicit</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Cat39M9Bq34%3d</guid><description> A worker compensation insurer may pursue its statutory right to subrogation against any third party civil action recovery, following a compromise and release settlement.  
 At the time of the C&amp;amp;R settlement hearing in January 2002, a civil action had not been filed. The LIBC 755 Stipulation fo</description><author>Michael D. Sherman</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:26:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 7/20/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Workers-Compensation-Legislative-Roundup-7202008-</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">4mTOklgZ4Zs%3d</guid><description>  Iowa   E.O. 10  &amp;ndash; Introduced 7/16/2008. Executive order to create an independent contractor reform taskforce. Full    text available to lexis.com subscribers   . 
  Michigan   H.B. 5559  &amp;ndash; Signed by Governor 7/17/2008, Public Ac No. 241. An Act to amend 1956 PA 218, including to provi</description><author>LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Center Staff</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:52:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Quick Guide to the House Report on Underreporting of Workplace Injuries</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Quick-Guide-to-the-House-Report-on-Underreporting-of-Workplace-Injuries</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">mLczmCnlsho%3d</guid><description> In a previous blog, Robin Kobayashi discussed how the  Charlotte Observer  uncovered the underreporting of injuries at poultry plants. Click    here   .  The newspaper's investigation led to a House committee hearing on June 19, 2008 regarding the underreporting of workplace injuries</description><author>Roger Rabb</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:41:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Survey of Recent Longshore Act Cases Issued by U.S. District Courts</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Survey-of-Recent-Longshore-Act-Cases-Issued-by-US-District-Courts</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">5T2u9qlZtk4%3d</guid><description> The following list contains selected U.S. District Court cases from the last year that litigate issues raised by practice under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (31 U.S.C.S. &amp;sect; 901 et seq.).   
  Carillo v. Reliance Nat'l Indem. Co. , Civil Action No. 07-4060, 2007 Dist.</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:56:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Misrepresentation in Contract of Employment: Did North Carolina Decision in Freeman v. Rothrock Go Too Far?</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Misrepresentation-in-Contract-of-Employment-Did-North-Carolina-Decision-in-Freeman-v-Rothrock-Go-Too-Far</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">Kelhci2kqp4%3d</guid><description> A majority of the North Carolina Court of Appeals has announced that an employee's misrepresentations in an application for employment rendered the subsequent employment contract&amp;mdash;and also the employer-employee relationship&amp;mdash;void  ab initio , thus providing the employer with an affirmativ</description><author>Vernon R Sumwalt</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:45:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Blogworthy Cases of the Week 7/11/2008</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/Larsons-Blogworthy-Cases-of-the-Week-7112008</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">s5PVMdVrrlY%3d</guid><description> Each week I'll be blogging about recent, interesting workers' compensation cases.  
 I invite everyone to share their thoughts about these cases.  
 To post a comment to this blog, you'll need to register first. If you're already registered, simply logon in order to post a comment. If y</description><author>Thomas A. Robinson</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 03:29:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>An Overview of the XVIII World Congress on Safety and Health at Work</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/An-Overview-of-the-XVIII-World-Congress-on-Safety-and-Health-at-Work-Held-in-Seoul-Korea</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">tSm6tchYhqE%3d</guid><description> The XVIII World Congress on Safety and Health at Work recently convened in
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Seoul, Korea, on June 29-July 2, 2008. The World Congress, which meets every three years, attracts several thousand decision makers, safety and health professionals, employers, workers' representatives, and soci</description><author>Robin E. Kobayashi</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:27:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Supreme Court Issues Key Decision on Medical Treatment Dispute Resolution Process</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/California-Supreme-Court-Issues-Key-Decision-on-Medical-Treatment-Dispute-Resolution-Process</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">3zhFHx47YCQ%3d</guid><description> Detailing the medical treatment dispute resolution process created by Labor Code Sections 4610 and 4062, the California Supreme Court has issued its decision in  SCIF v. WCAB (Sandhagen).   
 In  Sandhagen , Applicant&amp;rsquo;s physician requested an MRI. Defendant denied authorization but failed to</description><author>David Bryan Leonard</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:06:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Report of the National Workers' Compensation Defense Network Seminar in Hartford, CT</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation/A-Report-of-the-National-Workers-Compensation-Defense-Network-Seminar-in-Hartford-CT</link><category>Workers' Compensation</category><guid isPermaLink="false">paRVq8%2b%2fr2U%3d</guid><description> The National Workers&amp;rsquo; Compensation Defense Network recently held a national seminar on June 25-26, 2008, in
  
 &lt;/city&gt;Hartford,   CT. The NWCDN is a nationwide and Canadian network of independent law firms that was created to provide employers and insurers access to the highest quality rep</description><author>Ronald E. Weiss</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:58:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Larson's Legislative Roundup 7/13/2008</title><link>ht