LexisNexis Sites
November 22, 2009
Site Search:
NEW! 11/4/2009 5:24:17 PM EST
Mark Godsey
Posted by Mark Godsey
On April 28, 2009, the United States Supreme Court held in Cone v. Bell , 129 S. Ct. 1769 (U.S. 2009) that a habeas corpus claim for a Tennessee death row inmate is not barred from federal review, creating precedent that could bring hope to inmates...
| Comments (0)

9/23/2009 4:13:16 PM EST
Michele Berry
Posted by Michele Berry
According to the U.S. Supreme Court in Bobby v. Bies , 129 S. Ct. 2145 (U.S. 2009) , if a criminal defendant has been found to be mentally retarded prior to Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304 (U.S. 2002) , the Double Jeopardy Clause...
| Comments (0)

8/26/2009 1:39:05 PM EST
Michele Berry
Posted by Michele Berry
In District Attorneys Office of Alaska v. Osborne , 129 S. Ct. 2308 (U.S. 2009) , the Supreme Court ruled that prisoners do not have a due process right to DNA testing, even if such testing will definitively prove their innocence. The case specifically...
| Comments (0)

7/31/2009 8:07:14 AM EST
Michele Berry
Posted by Michele Berry
In a decision construing the Confrontation Clause in light of Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004) , the U.S. Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts , 129 S. Ct. 2527 (U.S. 2009) , clarifies that criminal defendants...
| Comments (0)

6/4/2009 11:40:10 AM EST
Mark Godsey
Posted by Mark Godsey
On March 3, 2009 in Garner v. Mitchell , 557 F.3d 257 (6th Cir. Ohio 2009) , the Sixth Circuit ruled on when a suspect’s lack of capacity to understand rights guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment and Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S....
| Comments (0)

5/20/2009 1:23:42 PM EST
Jay Shapiro
Posted by Jay Shapiro
In New York v. Belton , 453 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1981) , the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement was extended to vehicle searches. However, in Gant v. Arizona, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 3120 (April 21,...
| Comments (0)

5/6/2009 2:00:10 PM EST
Mark Godsey
Posted by Mark Godsey
In Garner v. Mitchell , 557 F.3d 257 (6th Cir. Ohio 2009) , the petitioner, who had a below average IQ and other mental impairments, argued that his confession, which occurred when he was 19, was inadmissible because he did not have the requisite...
| Comments (0)

5/6/2009 9:48:22 AM EST
Mark Godsey
Posted by Mark Godsey
On February 25, 2009, in State v. Pena-Flores, 198 N.J. 6 (N.J. 2009) , the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed a Fourth Amendment question related to criminal safeguards: Under the New Jersey Constitution, may a police officer with probable...
| Comments (0)

Product Spotlight!

NEW! FREE lexis.com training!! New Legal Research Packages added! All New Look!