Real Estate Law Expert Commentary
5/30/2008 11:20:17 AM EST
The Home Equity Theft Prevention Act
Alfred C. Tartaglia, Principal Law Clerk to Judge in the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Posted by AME3bg
New York has enacted legislation to protect owners of distressed properties from predatory practices by purchasers. In his Expert Commentary, Alfred C. Tartaglia discusses the Home Equity Theft Prevention Act, its effect on title insurance, and its application to overdue mortgage payments. Following are excerpts of the commentary:  
The Home Equity Theft Prevention Act (HETPA), effective as of February 1, 2007, is intended to prevent abusive and fraudulent practices by purchasers of distressed properties who falsely promise to “save” residential properties and to reconvey them to the homeowners at a future date. The Act regulates certain sales of distressed properties by imposing stringent procedural and substantive requirements for sales contracts (“covered contracts”) between homeowners (“equity sellers”) and purchasers (“equity purchasers”). Because the Act is broadly worded, imposes potential civil and criminal penalties for violations on both equity purchasers as well as lending institutions, and creates a right of rescission extending for two years after a sale, lenders and title companies are reluctant to insure or lend funds to transactions falling within the Act. In addition, HETPA adds a new procedural step in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding, i.e., the service of a statutory form of notice, which applies in all residential foreclosures, and which is part of a new wave of procedural requirements required in mortgage foreclosures.
 
Laws added or amended. HETPA amends Banking Law § 595, which sets forth penalties for mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers or banking organizations which fail to comply with HEPTA. HEPTA also adds two new statutes – i.e., Real Property Law § 265-a, which contains the bulk of the new substantive and procedural requirements for sales of distressed properties, and RPAPL § 1303, which requires the service of a statutory form of notice in all foreclosures of owner-occupied one-to-four family dwellings. 
 
Effect on title insurance when the transaction falls within HEPTA. Most title companies will not insure a transaction which falls within the act and constitutes a regulated transaction. It is therefore important in many cases to be prepared to establish to the satisfaction of the title company that the a transaction involving a distressed property is exempt, such as a sale to a purchaser who uses the property as his or her personal residence. Title companies often used form affidavits in these circumstances. See Benders Forms for the Consolidated Laws of New York, RPL § 265-a, FORM 3: Purchaser’s Exemption Affidavit under the Home Equity Theft Prevention Act; FORM 4: Equity Seller and Equity Purchaser Closing Affidavit: Home Equity Theft Prevention Act. 

Rate this article:
LowHigh

Create an account or login to post comments.

Go!
RSS Feed

Should more Law Schools move to a skills-based curriculum??

Yes, this would better prepare students.
No, a traditional legal education is best.
A blend of both should be considered.
Submit

Tell us what content you would like to see on the Lexis Hub


Submit








Most Popular

Featured Career Tips

Featured Communities

Legal Sites

Other LexisNexis® Sites

Practice Area Communities

Your Resources