<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LexisNexis </title><link /><description /><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>A Property Owner Has No Constitutional Right to Stop the Construction of a Neighboring Home that Obstructs Her Water View</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Real-Estate-Law/A-Property-Owner-Has-No-Constitutional-Right-to-Stop-the-Construction-of-a-Neighboring-Home-that-Obstructs-Her-Water-View</link><category /><guid /><description>  If a local zoning code does not protect the water view from your home from obstruction by the construction of a &amp;ldquo;McMansion&amp;rdquo;, can you turn to the federal courts for relief? A federal...</description><author>Ted Zwayer</author><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Right to an Accounting in Disputes among Members or During Dissolution of LLCs</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Corporate-Law/The-Right-to-an-Accounting-in-Disputes-among-Members-or-During-Dissolution-of-LLCs</link><category /><guid /><description>  The right to an accounting by a partner during disputes or at the dissolution of a partnership had long been recognized. The right of a member of a limited liability company (LLC) to an accounting...</description><author>Ted Zwayer</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:33:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Common Ownership of Sister Corporations Does Not Permit Piercing Corporate Veil of One Corporation in Order to Reach Insurance Policy of Second Corporation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Corporate-Law/Common-Ownership-of-Sister-Corporations-Does-Not-Permit-Piercing-Corporate-Veil-of-One-Corporation-in-Order-to-Reach-Insurance-Policy-of-Second-Corporation</link><category /><guid /><description>  In law school we are taught the sanctity of the corporate veil; that one of the purposes of the corporate structure is to protect the owners/shareholders of corporations from personal liability....</description><author>Ted Zwayer</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:53:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Residential Real Estate Closing and Settlement Fees for Non-Existent Services are Prohibited under RESPA – But Excessive Fees are Not</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Real-Estate-Law/Residential-Real-Estate-Closing-and-Settlement-Fees-for-Non-Existent-Services-are-Prohibited-under-RESPA</link><category /><guid /><description>  A federal judge has ruled against an increasingly common practice of real estate brokers in  Vicki Busby v. JRHBW Realty, Inc. , 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41720 (N.D. Ala., Apr. 20, 2009). The...</description><author>Ted Zwayer</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:37:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ask Lambda Legal</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Litigation/Ask-Lambda-Legal</link><category /><guid /><description> When President Obama nominated Judge Sonia Sotomayor to serve as a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, he talked not only about her broad legal experience and distinguished career, but also about the importance of empathy &amp;ndash;...</description><author>Kevin Cathcart</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:25:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California Supreme Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ban– While Former Foes Olson and Boies Team up to Challenge Prop. 8 in Federal Court</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Litigation/California-Supreme-Court-Upholds-Same-Sex-Marriage-Ban</link><category /><guid /><description>  On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court, in  Strauss v. Horton , 2009 Cal. LEXIS 4626 (Cal. May 26, 2009), upheld Proposition 8, which was approved by the voters last fall and banned same-sex...</description><author>Ted Zwayer</author><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:40:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Property Distribution in a Community Property State</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Domestic-Relations/Property-Distribution-in-a-Community-Property-State</link><category /><guid /><description> If you live in one of the nine community property states, property is not necessarily distributed equitably in a divorce action. Instead, marital property must be characterized as either community or separate prior to any distribution.</description><author>Tida Wasch</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:51:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>President Obama Selects Judge Sonia Sotomayor, a Judge with a Common Touch and Extensive Judicial Experience, to Replace Justice Souter on the Supreme Court</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Litigation/President-Obama-Selects-Judge-Sonia-Sotomayor-a-Judge-with-a-Common-Touch-and-Extensive-Judicial-Experience-to-Replace-Justice-Souter-on-the-Supreme-Court</link><category /><guid /><description>  Last Saturday, President Barack Obama said that he wanted a Supreme Court nominee that had a &amp;ldquo;common touch&amp;rdquo; and empathy, who could &amp;ldquo;stand in somebody else's shoes and see through their eyes and get a sense of how the law might work or not work in practical day-to-day living.&amp;quot; </description><author>Ted Zwayer</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:13:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Practical Tips for Closing the Deal</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Commercial-Law/Practical-Tips-for-Closing-the-Deal</link><category /><guid /><description>   &amp;quot;Closing&amp;quot; a transaction is one of the most important duties performed by a junior business attorney. A transaction is considered closed when all requisite documents...</description><author>ABA YLD 101 Series</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:40:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Constitutionality of Anti-Bootlegging Legislation</title><link>http://law.lexisnexis.com/webcenters/newattorney/Fundamentals-of-Intellectual-Property-Law/The-Constitutionality-of-Anti-Bootlegging-Legislation</link><category /><guid /><description>   In an Emerging Issues Analysis, Professor David Nimmer&amp;nbsp;offers a comprehensive&amp;nbsp;examination of constitutional challenges to the anti-bootlegging provisions of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: 17 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 1101, creating civil liability for bootlegging live musical performances, and 18 U.S.C. 2319A, imposing criminal liability for the same activity. The author, who lectures widely in the copyright arena,&amp;nbsp;begins:  &amp;nbsp;</description><author>David Nimmer</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:37:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>